Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Everybody looks good and pure before they are in the seat. Although he is much better than Nawaz and Ghaddari.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Everybody looks good and pure before they are in the seat. Although he is much better than Nawaz and Ghaddari.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Well, in my opinion he is worse than both due to the affinity of his views with Taliban.
But I will surely like him to be more popular. Because his vote bank will come at the expense of PMLN.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
^ Unlike PML[N] he wont form alliances with the terrorist Altaf Bhai and his extermist MQM party, so watch what you say, 'bhai'
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Given Imran Khan's track record of transparent financial management and acumen in foreign and local affairs, and now education TOO, there should be no doubt in anyone's mind that he's capable of much bigger things, so he's definitely done EVERYTHING to be given a chance at leadership.
His party's poor election performance is entirely the people's fault. I'm very certain that Pakistanis shed crocodile tears for corruption, lack of governance and social infrastructure -- they are actually* very* happy with the current system, given their voting record. That or they're just too redneck to see the obvious choice in front of them.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
^ I am sure the MQM supporters know hes sincere, fair and honest, but then again, these are the qualities they fear the most.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Again you can call MQM an extremist party etc but it doesn't change the fact that Imran Khan sympathizes with terrorists. Just cuz someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they like MQM. Bringing MQM in this discussion only show your hatred for specific type of people. Keep your racist views to yourself next time.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
^^ Imran travels EXTENSIVELY to the US to raise funds for his party and for his hospital. If he supported the terrorists, surely he'd be denied entry in the nation that is fighting a war directly with them, USA.
You guys need to make up your mind. Depending on the situation, he's alleged to be part of the jewish lobby and at other points he's accused of siding with the terrorists. It's getting nauseating now -- it just shows the racist mindset of the people who don't like him.
And there is a surprising correlation between hatred for Imran and support for MQM. I wonder why?
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
not ignoring you......just busy.
will be back soon.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Again you can call MQM an extremist party etc but it doesn't change the fact that Imran Khan sympathizes with terrorists. Just cuz someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they like MQM. Bringing MQM in this discussion only show your hatred for specific type of people. Keep your racist views to yourself next time idiot.
How does anti-MQM mean 'hatred for specific type of people'? I think you need some help.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
for example, he said something about Zardari deserving the joota he got. now, it might be satisfying for all the people who hate Zardari. but if tomorrow an MQM supporter throws a joota at Imran, will he also accept that since the MQM supporter is only expressing how he feels about Imran?
either we can raise the level of political discourse or we can wallow in the gutter. and if we stay there Imran better not complain when he is on the receiving end.
the guy who can't even lead his own party is going to lead the nation?
this is a guy who can't even attract and keep any reasonable intellectual/political stalwart in his party. his leadership of his party is so shambolic that every decent person who joins his party leaves it eventually. I can think of two off the top of my head - Naseem Zehra (probably the finest journalist in Pak today) and Miraj M. Khan (one of the principled, finer politicians) both of who left PTI because of Imran. Miraj Khan's interview is on youtube. feel free to see what he has to say about Imran the leader.
how is that related to this? if we're going to criticize people for this kind of stuff, there is plenty in Imran's past that is far worse than Zardari renaming his son.
I'm not sure what you're talking about. you said that Imran can't escape politics because people drag him into it.
my point is that 1) Imran when he decides he does not want to answer a question, he does NOT. that is his track record. so, why couldn't he avoid the political statements this time if the only reason why he made them because of the people present who forced him to? 2) Imran is supposed to be THE leader here, right? if people ask an inappropriate question or make a stupid comment in the context of today's situation, it is HIS job to put an end to it and diffuse the situation in a reasonable manner.
fair enough. I just can't resist posting a response to things like Imran saying that all liberal Pakistanis want to bomb anyone who disagrees with them and that suicide bombers in Pakistan are taking rightful revenge, etc. that is a preposterous statement. similarly, I can't help but point out the hypocrisy of Imran conducting a political campaign while abroad at the time of the flood and criticizing Zardari for also being out of the country at the time of the flood.
while we're offering each other helpful and constructive suggestions, I must say that I find it pretty amusing that someone who by her admission doesn't have much knowledge of Pakistani politics is so sure that Imran is the best thing since sliced political bread and Zardari's the devil's spawn. shouldn't you be educating yourself before giving such definitive opinions that I should accept as the gospel? I get it you attended a fundraiser, talked to him, etc. I've attended protests organized by PTI.. a friend is the organizer of one PTI chapter. I considered officially joining it once upon a time until Imran's conspiracy theories and verbal diarrhea regarding the taliban ensured that I would never support him as a politician.
I suggest you read up on Imran's views on terrorism and taliban. and I'm not talking about his recent statements. go back a few years and read all of them. you might not like them all that much and you'll like Imran even less. and you might realize why Imran's party fares so poorly in the polls and why Imran is considered a rightwing nutjob, closet taliban supporter and ardent terrorist apologist.
Let me be short and simple......
I am not in the habit of justifying one man's transgressions by comparing them to those of anothers'; that which is wrong for one is wrong for the other. Having said that, what you want to refer to as Imran's tarnished past had little to no direct impact on the Pakistani poitical scene while Zardari's move to change his son's surname is nothing more than politically motivated maneovering. What I am focused on here is the intent behind the act.
If my nation is in turmoil I will not go looking for the leader of the opposition or worse yet, the leader of a small party that is not even in opposition, for relief, guidance etc. I will look to my head of state. This is reason enough to criticize Zardari's absence from the country.
I don't mind that you find it amusing.....so I'll say it again.....I don't have much knowledge of Pakistani politics, but I can see when someone is robbing and stealing from an already desolate nation. I may have a lot to learn but one could be blind and still see the corruption that exists in the PPP, PML and MQM regimes alike. Again.....I am in the process of educating myself. I can't help it if you don't agree with the conclusions that are obvious.
I will definitely take your advice and read up. But why are you asking me to ignore his recent comments and go back a few years? Is a man not entitled to grow and learn? I would be weary of a person that refuses to learn from mistakes.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
I'm not asking you to ignore his recent comments. what I'm saying is go back a few years and read his comments on terrorism/taliban, etc and continue until the present. and you will see that apart from idiotic moulvis like Fazlurrehman, Qazi, etc, Imran is the biggest apologist for terrorists, suicide bombers and taliban. that has been his consistent position for a number of years now.
I will never support a politician who supports, sympathizes with or justifies terrorism, suicide bombings, taliban, etc. and Imran is one of those politicians.
[quote]
Is a man not entitled to grow and learn? I would be weary of a person that refuses to learn from mistakes.
[/QUOTE]
that is also the tragedy/irony of Imran - that he hasn't grown and hasn't learned a thing.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
I'm not asking you to ignore his recent comments. what I'm saying is go back a few years and read his comments on terrorism/taliban, etc and continue until the present. and you will see that apart from idiotic moulvis like Fazlurrehman, Qazi, etc, Imran is the biggest apologist for terrorists, suicide bombers and taliban. that has been his consistent position for a number of years now.
I will never support a politician who supports, sympathizes with or justifies terrorism, suicide bombings, taliban, etc. and Imran is one of those politicians.
that is also the tragedy/irony of Imran - that he hasn't grown and hasn't learned a thing.
I will take your advice and read. I need to do that anyway to formulate an educated opinion.
What I heard directly from Imran on the matter of the Taliban summarizes to this: you cannot wage war (i.e. seek a "military" resolution) against these people. They will not relent (i.e. you kill one and they will continue to wage war against you for generations). You must seek a "political" resolution (i.e. enter into talks with them). Funny comment from hiim on the matter: "Allah nay duniya main do makhlooq bana'een hain.....aik insaan or aik pathan."
I don't see this as the position of an apologist. I see this as the stance of someone that has studied and undertands the "enemy". I see this as a position that may save many lives......... but then again, what do I know, right?
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
All I will say is that if every Tom,Dick and Harry (or Amr,Bakr and Zaid for that matter) are with him in their entirety as far as cricket is concerned that means the guy must have a sound mind. Therefore, if such is the case then why don't we give him benefit of the doubt at the very least.
Re: Imran Khan sees people’s revolution looming
that is the one thing I don’t get about Imran. the man lives in Pakistan. heads a political party. how can he be so bloody clueless living there?
there are factual errors that he makes in the assumptions he bases his views on which make his views nonsense. instead of writing out a long post, here is a great response to his views I found. should address some of the things I raised. I’m not the only one who sees Imran as an apologist for taliban:
What’s Wrong With Imran Khan?
http://www.chowk.com/articles/whats-wrong-with-imran-khan-hasan-shakoor.htm
Hasan Shakoor April 27, 2009
Dear Mr. Khan,
I was rather disappointed to read your latest article entitled “How to clear the mess.” In Pakistan’s political wasteland, many still remain optimistic that someone of your background, education and high standing in society will maybe provide a viable option worth supporting, or
at least say the right things at the right times. You have, time and time again, failed to do either.
Pakistan faces a crisis of colossal proportions. More than ever before, Pakistanis need to hear voices of reason…strong and firm voices telling them that they are not alone in their fear and loathing of the Taliban threat. I for one am tired of people like you making excuses for these barbarians. Your arguments are simplistic, if one is to be polite. Why can’t someone like you just say what has to be said. These people are savages and don’t represent the Islam we grew up practicing.
Shatter the myth that lurks in the Pakistani subconscience. There is nothing remotely muslim in the taliban’s preachings. They are a band of semi-literate neanderthals who know nothing about Islam and the shariat. The only way forward for Pakistan is to call them out for the hypocrisy and anti-Islamic practices they engage in.
What Pakistani in his right mind would claim that the militancy is not a threat to Pakistan. “How does it concern us?” you ask rather naively. For one, Al-Qaida and the Taliban were given refuge by the Pakstani state, so we weren’t exactly the silent observer you would make us out to be. The army and ISI were aiding and abetting the taliban’s spring incursions into Afghanistan. Most sensible observers are willing to admit that, Mr. Khan. So, unfortunately, this was always our problem.
What’s more, it amazes me to think that human life is still considered such an expendible commodity in out unfortunate country. You seem to ignore the fact that about 900 Pakistanis died last year alone as a result of suicide attacks. I fail to see how this does not make it our war.
You call the Lal Masjid incident “a slaughter”. Pray what would you have the government do? These people were directly challenging the writ of the federal government, engaging in kidnapping, vandalism and seizure of public property. They had amassed a huge stash of guns and ammunition and had fired upon and killed several security personnel. Yet there are those in the media and individuals such as you who insist that innocent blood was shed. I am sure you must have offered your “Shukrana” prayers this week when the government decided to release Abdul Aziz on bail. A great day for justice, indeed! The Musharraf government did botch up the Lal Masjid episode. They should have acted earlier with brute and unambiguous force to reassert its control over the federal capital. This would have sent the clear signal that no one can impose their version of law or morality over any area of the land, unless it be the rightful government of the time. Abdul Aziz should be tried to endangering the lives of the madrassa students in his seminary and for terrorism against the state itself. Neither of these charges can possibly be challenged in a court of law.
Musharraf’s actions were egregious on many fronts, but allowing the US to “replace a pro-Pakistan Afghan government with a pro-Indian one�? was not one of them. First of all, the Taliban are as anti-pushtoon as could be possible. The Pakistani establishment has been using religious fundamentalism as a buffer against pukhtoon nationalism almost since independence. The puritanical form of Islam the Taliban imposed on Afghanistan was alien to pushtoon culture. The Pakistani state has allowed this rabid wahabi/deobandi form of our religion to be exported from the deserts of Arabia to both Afghanistan and to their own country. We are now reaping the rewards of this insanely short-sighted policy. The military establishment continues to propagate the jihadi policy in hopes that it will one day finds its way back into the corridors of power in Afghanistan once the west washes it’s hands of the region. In the meantime, Pakistan will burn to the ground.
Almost as ludicrous is your claim that the Taliban brought about “law and order” to Afghanistan. I have heard this argument in many an air-conditioned Pakistani drawing room. The Taliban’s form of justice is obviously something armchair fundos like yourself would rather admire from afar than experience first-hand.
Public floggings of criminals and stoning to death of those who engage in sexual misconduct in the middle of a soccer pitch certainly taught the common criminal (and sexually frustrated couples) a lesson! Let’s try to forget the fact that heroin production actually went up several fold in Afghanistan, with the Taliban actually claiming that since it is mainly an export to the west, it should not be outlawed. Women were treated like livestock and education was ignored completely. Ethnic minorities like the Hazaras were brutally massacred and towns like Mazar-e-Shaif and Bamiyan were destroyed. How on earth does this marauding group of savages represent “law and order�? to you ?
The notion that the Afghan Taliban were a spontaneous movement for justice and order is actually dangerously untrue. It was a regime foisted upon the people by the Pakistani state to further its own interests in Afghanistan. What we are experiencing in Pakistan now is blowback. The chickens, sir, are coming home to roost. We have no one but ourselves to blame for this. Pakistanis need to stop trying to differentiate between the Taliban movement in Afghanistan, the TTP, the LeJ, the LeT, the Jaish-e-Muhammed and all other such organizations. The amount of cross-pollination and cooperation between all of them should be enough to convince us that the state should employ the same policy towards them all.
Most of all we as Pakistanis need to realize that the overwhelming threat to our existence as a sovereign nation comes from within our borders. It is foolhardy and naive to expect our enemies to sit back and not take advantage of our plight. I am sure the BLA and even the TTP is getting help from the Indians and maybe even the present Afghan establishment. Any third grade student could tell you that the long term solution is increased investment in development and education. That is only stating the obvious.
I am sure the Swatis don’t appreciate the media continuously implying that they have pined for the speedy justice that the so-called shariat promises them. The Pakistani state has failed its citizenry miserably and has failed to provide law, order and justice to every region, not only in the Swat valley. To suggest that this form of warped, uninformed justice is the only viable solution is a slap in the face of all the judicial system in Pakistan has recently been through.
You seem to be enamored by the jirga-panchayat system that is still prevalent in large parts of Pakistan. It seems quite a paradox that you on one hand try to pass yourself off as a champion for the movement for a free judiciary and on the other hand keep calling for the validation of jirga justice. I am wondering what form of “village jury” you would like to see flourish in Pakistan? The kind that sanctioned the gang rape of Mukhtar Mai? The kind that allows honor killing across Pakistani villages? And how is this jirga or panchayat possibly going to be anything but subservient to feudal interests? In which parts of the country are the senior members of the “village-jury” not the most prominent and therefore economically well off members of the community?
Your naivety boggles the mind! A system that submits itself to the whim of the mob is hardly what Pakistan needs at this point. A natural follow-up to helping restore the higher judiciary of the land is to ensure that this form of constitutional justice permeates to the lower levels of our society.
Unfortunately, your argument against myth number 4 (“That the next terrorist attack on the US will come from the tribal areas”) falls flat on its face. Almost every terrorist attack since 9/11 can in some way be traced back to Pakistan. There is no shortage of proverbial ostriches in our country, unfortunately. Most of the world views us as the fountainhead of Islamic terrorism. People like you can go hoarse blaming the US for its tilted policies towards Israel and India, but the problem remains a Pakistani one. The ISI and the military have been playing a double game ever since the so called war on terror was declared. Musharraf’s problem was that he carried out ill planned attacks in the tribal areas and aided and abetted the taliban and other jihadis at the same time. Misguided commentators like yourself, Ahmed Qureshi, Shireen Mazari and others are doing a fine job perpetuating the myth that India remains our biggest threat. The three headed Hindu-American-Zionist monster lies licking its chops at our borders, ready to slice up the Pakistani state and devour the remains. The monster, however, need not gets its hands dirty, it seems. We are doing a fine job doing the slicing ourselves.
The threat from India is miniscule compared to the threat we harbor within our borders. Unless the military establishment realizes that a clear U-turn in our priorities is needed, the battle is lost. They must realize that the jihadis they still harbor and encourage within Pakistan will devour the country. So what if India is able to extend its influence into Afghanistan? At least Pakistan will still have a chance of surviving the challenge posed at both its major borders. Our quest for “strategic depth�? into the Afghan territory needs to be dropped for the betterment of the country. If they can’t have Afghanistan, the fanatics will have Pakistan. Our state has failed us in every imaginable way, but the real roots of this failure need to be understood and pronounced with no ambiguity.
The ground realities are far from what reactionaries such as you claim they are. We are our own worst enemies. We ourselves have managed to radicalize the state to such an extent that there is an almost complete lack of outrage at the current events in our North West. The tragedy of Pakistan today is that no one has the guts to speak out against the hypocrites who kill our own citizens in the name of Islam. The only people speaking out are apologists and appeasers such as yourself. “ The taliban act because of a lack of justice and order, they act against the elite and economically advantaged in our society�? is what you seem to be suggesting. Strangely enough, I can think of few who would be better poster boys for the Pakistani elite than yourself. I wonder how the taliban and those you would have sit on this so-called village jury you so vehemently praise would view your former life before you so fortunately found the path to eternal salvation.
Like most of my depressed generation that watches these events unfold and our country hemorrhage to death in front our eyes, I have admired you for your services to cricket and the pride it gave us to be Pakistani. I for one wish you would go back to busying yourself with the task of reviving cricket in Pakistan.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
thanks samb.
I will read this and other material and get back to you.
btw.....did you see a response from Imran on this? It would be wise to present both sides.....
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Some people buy into the hype so easily. Because MQM and Pakistans Pathetic Party can't find any corruption case, any loan theft, any case where Imran Khan is diverting the flood to save his illegal zameen..... they resort to calling him a supporter of terrorist.
I have never once heard Imran Khan say that he supports suicide bombings. And if MQM and PPP hate extremism and supporters of Taliban why are they both in coalition of Fazoool Rehman, he openly supported Baitullah.
The MQM party has killed many more innocent people then Imran Khan has. Same with ANP.
Imran Khan has always argued that he would like to negotiate with people who lay down arms, he is against drones, he is against Amrikas war because it serves Pakistan no purpose. Whats wrong with negotiating? U.S. has bent over backwards to see Mullah Omar at the negotiating table. India has been quietly negotiating with the Tajiks, Uzbeks to get them on their side....
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
The entire Pakistan political system needs a complete sweep from top to bottom. It over 50 years and the state not progressing, so if something not working you fix it, if not possible to fix and same problem keep happening then you need replace with new model so yes pakistan needs complete revolution.
Re: Imran Khan sees people's revolution looming
Some people buy into the hype so easily. Because MQM and Pakistans Pathetic Party can't find any corruption case, any loan theft, any case where Imran Khan is diverting the flood to save his illegal zameen..... they resort to calling him a supporter of terrorist.
I have never once heard Imran Khan say that he supports suicide bombings. And if MQM and PPP hate extremism and supporters of Taliban why are they both in coalition of Fazoool Rehman, he openly supported Baitullah.
The MQM party has killed many more innocent people then Imran Khan has. Same with ANP.
Imran Khan has always argued that he would like to negotiate with people who lay down arms, he is against drones, he is against Amrikas war because it serves Pakistan no purpose. Whats wrong with negotiating? U.S. has bent over backwards to see Mullah Omar at the negotiating table. India has been quietly negotiating with the Tajiks, Uzbeks to get them on their side....
Word!!