Re: Imran Khan sees people’s revolution looming
No…not good for him…good for us. He has done what we all should have banded together to do long ago…good for the nation…good for the needy…good for millions of people that would otherwise have received no treatment.
I’m sure that Imran will benefit from his own good deeds…but likely not until after the day of judgement.
yes…I do believe that it was the right time for him to be seeking membership…absolutely…he was killing three birds with one stone…raising funds for flood victims, raising funds for SKMH and campaigning. I would have been disgusted if he spent money travelling the world ONLY to collect funds.
and exactly what political nonsense are you referring to? be specific…
I am not here discussing who is the better person rather I am questioning who is the better leader for the nation.
typical…when there is no reply then let’s resort to splitting hairs shall we?
let’s put aside the nomenclature and deal with what the world understands…for all intents and purposes Zardari is the head of state.
Are you suggesting that Imran’s party was unrepresented in relief efforts?
And others have answered you well with respect to who holds more responsibility in the org structure so I’m not going to repeat the same material.
Imran’s social work has taken him to a level above and beyond those that Zardari or NS can ever hope to achieve so let’s not even open the giant pandora’s box of rising above.
As far as “petty political gains” is concerned, you may consider them to be petty but those that look for transparency, honesty and justice don’t agree. And since we touched on “petty” what do you think of Zardari’s move to change his son’s last name to Bhutto? Perhaps that can be discussed in another thread.
Please make up your mind…either you like him to avoid questions or you don’t. Per your own ideology you can’t blast the man for doing one thing and then blast him again if he decides to do the other. This method doesn’t make for a very credible impression.
I for one believe that a leader who will address the questions is to be trusted more than one that will shut down channels to protect his image.
Btw…you sure do use a lot of words to say the same stuff. There really is no need.