Don’t know what to make of this. I came across this website by default. A lot of it is unsavoury and quite unnecessary.
While there maybe some truth in some of the (personal) allegations levelled against Imran Khan but delving into someone’s private life is the lowest form of self-defence IMO. Atleast Imran Khan is not involved in murder or extortion cases.
http://www.imrankhanexposed.com/IMRANKHANEXPOSED/index.html](http://www.imrankhanexposed.com/IMRANKHANEXPOSED/index.html)
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
someone is feeling very insecure now, just one reference filed and MQM is running nude already?
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
Nonsense, hate site.
IK is a star.
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
IN this day and age photos are meaningless due to manipulation. But some of the allegations in the publications linked by that site do make you sit back and think.
I'm increasingly sceptical that he is any different from the breed of politicians that our country has suffered under for so very long.
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
^ it is true, but he seems to be the 'andhon mai kana raja', he doesn't look like a person greedy for money money money.
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
Only a terrorist organisation can defame a national cricket hero and philanthropist like Imran Khan.
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
IK is almost a God. MQM just want to discredit this Lion.
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
IK could be giving hand jobs to monkeys for all I care... As long as he makes a good leader and helps to resolve the countries many REAL problems.
His personl life is his own bussiness, although im sure none of the other politicans are clean either.
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
no body is a star all are same
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
Whats any Update on Imran VS Altaf case???
I tried to comment on of these MQM people who are just going around *COMMENTING ON EVERY *every video that is uploaded with Pakistan tag(regardless of nature) on cricket videos, Pakistani drama clips, just randowm video of Pakistani people....and it turns out that one of those guys blocked me from commenting on their videos and profile. That tells u, how brave they are in accpeting someone who wants to argue with them!
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
Going around videos?
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
couldn’t agree more…
MQM is berzerk over the fact the Imran wants to take Altaf down…and they can’t find anything but mudslinging as a counter tactic…
There US palat experts are telling them to use dirtly mudslinging…
Plus TI already posted a lot of stuff on MQM and had decided to take them HEAD on…
so this backlash was inevitable…
http://www.mqmwatch.org/
^ although the above is a much more professional and sophisticated assault on MQM, vs the cheap porn style mudsling site that MQM or its supporters have put up in defence…
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
I am not saying that Imran Khan is an angel but the following article very conveniently fails to appreciate two things:
A- That progress is not in accepting an alien culture in it's entirety but in taking it's good points and learning from them. It's about balancing the postives (emphasis on education and health, independent judiciary and press, human rights etc.) against the negatives of the western society. If one enjoys or likes certain things about the West or lives in the West, it does not mean one must ape everything. &
B- That a muslim, as long as he's abiding by the laws of the land, does not become a hypocrite if he selectively adopts another culture
Look in the mirror Imran Khan
IMRAN KHAN HATES AMERICA BUT LOVES AMERICAN DOLLARS
Imran Khan, Islamist politician by day, London playboy by night.
by James Forsyth and Jai Singh
KHAN EMBODIES THE HYPOCRISY of Muslim elites who inveigh against the West by day and enjoy its pleasures by night. His fame in Pakistan comes from cricket not politics: the best cricketer Pakistan ever produced. In London many remember him as an even greater playboy.
Throughout 1980s Khan was linked to a string of beautiful women. In 1988 he told Australia's Sunday Mail, "Pakistan society encourages marriage. There, I lead a very steady, comfortable life.
Here, it is more exciting. The pace is faster. Because of the nightclubs and parties, it is a very good place to be single."
As his cricket career wound down he began to develop political ambitions, he became more reticent about his lifestyle. In 1992 a London Evening Standard reporter asked him if he found his conquests fulfilling he turned bashful: "Er, by answering that question I put myself in a difficult position because this will get quoted in Pakistan. And, in Pakistan, the mere fact that you admit you're having affairs upsets a lot of people's sensitivities. I respect my culture. a lot of young people look up to me.
It's a big responsibility for me not to make these admissions in public. Everyone knows I'm single and a normal man. But there's no need to stick it down their throats." His ex-girlfriends were less discreet, though. One observed to the Times, that Imran "juggled his girlfriends extremely elegantly".
A man who once captained the Oxford University cricket team and was a feature at London's trendiest places, now turned against the culture he had previously enjoyed.
In 1995 he denounced the West with its "fat women in miniskirts" (presumably the skinny ones in miniskirts Khan had dated were okay) and proclaimed that the "West is falling because of their addiction to sex and obscenity." He also chastised Pakistanis who looked to the West for ideas, saying "I hate it when our leaders or elite feel that by licking the soles of the feet of foreign countries we will somehow be given aid and we will progress."
So it came as something of a surprise that year when he married an English society beauty, Jemima Goldsmith, who was half his age and far worse--for the Islamists he was courting politically--half-Jewish. The reaction to the marriage in Pakistan was hostile and put a rapid stop to Khan's political momentum. In a Pakistani newspaper column defending his marriage Khan mused that, "I suppose if my marriage proves one point, it is that I am not a politician."
Khan initially won liberal and Western hearts by building a cancer hospital and fashioning himself as a reformer, but he has turned increasingly to hard-line Islamist politics. After Khan cast a vote in favor of the Islamist candidate for prime minister in 2002, a leader in his party told a Pakistani monthly, "Khan has more than a soft corner for the ousted Afghan Taliban. He thinks that the orthodox religious militia did a great service to Afghanistan and Islam before they became a target of the Americans." However, Khan could never become the standard-bearer of Pakistan's Islamists while married to a Western girl--even if she had converted to Islam. Unsurprisingly, in 2004 he and Goldsmith divorced, each citing cultural differences.
Khan is the only member of his party in parliament, and enjoys little popular support. His strategy for getting to the top is to climb on the anti-Musharraf bandwagon. "By the time we have the next general elections," said Khan recently, "we would see two broad-based political alliances in the country, pro-Musharraf and anti-Musharraf." The easiest way to attack Musharraf, of course, is to attack his American protectors. Unfortunately, Musharraf has decided he will stay in power beyond 2007.
NOT THAT KHAN scorns America entirely: He likes its money. On May 15, Khan was in Washington, D.C. raising $175,000 for his cancer hospital, as well as he went to Denver, Los Angeles, and New York. But don't expect him to mention back in Lahore that American generosity is keeping his hospital going.
Even his political allies find Khan's duplicity hard to take. In 2002 one of his party leaders remarked: "Even we are finding it difficult to figure out the real Imran. He dons the shalwar-kameez and preaches desi and religious values while in Pakistan, but transforms himself completely while rubbing shoulders with the elite in Britain and elsewhere in the West." Khan claims that his marriage proved he wasn't a politician but his divorce and his recent demagoguery show that he now is one, albeit one of the worst sort.
James Forsyth is an assistant editor and Jai Singh is research editor at Foreign Policy.
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
This site shows how "ghutya" ppl behave and express themselves...
extremely ghutya...
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
The man is entitled to change between 1988 and 2007!
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
^ Absolultely....
and change with humility...
rather than some who persist in their ways with audacity....
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
Desperate low life people take desperate action. They should remember "People living in glass houses ....."
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
NOT THAT KHAN scorns America entirely: He likes its money. On May 15, Khan was in Washington, D.C. raising $175,000 for his cancer hospital, as well as he went to Denver, Los Angeles, and New York. But don't expect him to mention back in Lahore that American generosity is keeping his hospital going.
Even his political allies find Khan's duplicity hard to take. In 2002 one of his party leaders remarked: "Even we are finding it difficult to figure out the real Imran. He dons the shalwar-kameez and preaches desi and religious values while in Pakistan, but transforms himself completely while rubbing shoulders with the elite in Britain and elsewhere in the West." Khan claims that his marriage proved he wasn't a politician but his divorce and his recent demagoguery show that he now is one, albeit one of the worst sort.
James Forsyth is an assistant editor and Jai Singh is research editor at Foreign Policy.
[/quote]
This is nothing but BS
Imran gets all the donations from the overseas pakistanis and not from the foreign governments and he deserves every penny of it. These so called journalist should concentrate on their own politicians instead of probing into our affairs
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
This is nothing but BS Imran gets all the donations from the overseas pakistanis and not from the foreign governments and he deserves every penny of it. These so called journalist should concentrate on their own politicians instead of probing into our affairs
Well said and I believe that's true
Re: Imran Khan exposed?
True.
esp. this article accusing Imran Khan and his longstanding friend since his Aitchison days Yousuf Salahuddin (Allama Iqbal’s grandson) of all sorts of filth jaise Yousuf ka ghar na ho balke koi fahaashi ka udda. While Imran and Yousuf may not exactly be saints I don’t believe for a moment that they are this immoral.
http://www.imrankhanexposed.com/IMRANKHANEXPOSED/Pdf/Part1.pdf](http://www.imrankhanexposed.com/IMRANKHANEXPOSED/Pdf/Part1.pdf)