1-What is the official reply of Mirza masroor after this interview of Jang Reporter in which he claimed qadiyanis as ones behind the blashphemous cartoons?
2-Are the figures of alfazl true?
how do you calculate who have entered in your religion and why claiming that such many people have entered in your religion where as the OFFICAL stance of mirzais is that they are part of muslims.
This was the first response by Mirza masroor on 3rd march
[quote]
Huzuraba delivered his Friday Sermon in response to a baseless and fabricated news item published in the London edition of the Urdu daily ‘Jang’ yesterday.
Huzuraba said in the current climate when the sentiments of the Muslim world are aroused in light of the offensive caricatures published across Europe, the printing of a ‘news item’ as this on a Thursday is pre-emptive mischief to solely incite and agitate the un-informed against the Ahmadiyya Community, particularly from among those who have scheduled a protest today (Friday).
The ‘news item’ refers to a Danish secret service member as saying that the decision to publish the caricatures was only taken by after assurance given to Danish officials from the Ahmadiyya Community during their September 2005 annual convention in Copenhagen that the followers of the Holy Prophetsaw were only limited to the country of Saudi Arabia and that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had changed the Islamic commandments and had maintained that God forbid the teaching and the era of the Holy Prophetsaw had ended. It also mentioned that at the convention the Ahmadiyya Community maintained that it was the standard bearer of Islamic teachings and that their prophet had abolished the practice of Jihad.
Huzuraba said to begin with no annual convention (Jalsa) was held in Denmark in 2005 due to his trip to the Scandinavian countries and a joint convention was held in Sweden. However, a reception was held in Denmark during Huzuraba’s visit there which was attended by dignitaries and the press and where Huzuraba had delivered a speech on the peaceable teachings of Islam with reference to the Holy Qur’an, Ahadith and writings of the Promised Messiahas which was covered by the media. Huzuraba advised that if MTA had not broadcast the speech it could do so now. *This was promptly followed the Friday Sermon[(http://www.ahmedi.org/uart/BreakingNews2006?page=3)
EDIT:
1-Also if the allegation is false what action ahmediya/qadiyani jammaat will take against the reporter.
As far as I know Mr. Kanwal and Jang were challenged in court. There has been complete silence from Kanwal or Jang on this matter. Why don't you ask around and see if they still persist with their news story.
My information is correct about the court case against Jang group of publications. I don't know how far the case has gone but Jang has kept complete silence about the whole afair. Alislam will update you on the outcome once the court has reached a decision. Javed Kanwal allegedly wrote for ahmedi.org which is an anti ahmadiyya site during and some time after the whole cartoon controversy to defend his view point. He has not written anything on this matter for a long time now. This is a strange behaviour from someone who has irrefutable evidence about the Ahmadiyya role in the whole issue. Even Jang has not published anything on this afterwards. Why is that?
1-What is the official reply of Mirza masroor after this interview of Jang Reporter in which he claimed qadiyanis as ones behind the blashphemous cartoons?
2-Are the figures of alfazl true?
how do you calculate who have entered in your religion and why claiming that such many people have entered in your religion where as the OFFICAL stance of mirzais is that they are part of muslims.
Dont you have anything better to do? why can't you just let them be. (Islam never gave persmission to demeen other people's beliefs) and on the day of judgement you are going to be questioned about your faith and not theirs! So worry about that! And listen your signature is just disgusting!
It is our duty to STOP any one promoting thier FALSE aqeedah in the name of islam, and yes i will be questioned about what i did when kuffar was presented in the name of islam .
In this thread i have asked two valid questions from ahmedis and am still waiting for thier reply.
Your are more then welcome to contribute in a construtive way.
If you have any further queries about this group you/any one can PM me and inshallah i will try to get them suitable answers