Honestly if the correct facts are gauranteed to reach you then it would be easier to choose a side. However muslims being in India have to abide by the Laws of India and if they do against them knowingly then there is not much to side with. I think however the mass public opinion of Pakistan would be against the Indian action knowing how our people think.
India's Gujrat riots = mostly innocent civilians killed, very few extremist retards killed = SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED
Pakistan's Lal Masjid = mostly extremist retards killed, very few innocent civilians killed = SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED
How can you compare them?
Anyway, Back to the topic... if sumthing like this happened in India... the reaction would be totally different.. even if there was enough proof most pakistanis would think its a conspiracy... and mullahs would use it to spread anti-india hatred
No I wouldn't... I think you have forgotten that I'm not really a regular Hindu..or an Indian.... I dont have any bias.. I assess the situation from a neutral point always... I'm kind of forced to do that...with my background..
Fanatics are fanatics.. hindu muslim sikh christian or jews.. if they take over any religious place of worship and do crap like the lal masjid retards did... they should be invaded and killed..
India's Gujrat riots = mostly innocent civilians killed, very few extremist retards killed = SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED
Pakistan's Lal Masjid = mostly extremist retards killed, very few innocent civilians killed = SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED
How can you compare them?
Anyway, Back to the topic... if sumthing like this happened in India... the reaction would be totally different.. even if there was enough proof most pakistanis would think its a conspiracy... and mullahs would use it to spread anti-india hatred
I am not comparing innocent muslims with fanatics, the point being when a fanatic hindu govt. can kill so many innocent muslims and get away with it you think fanatics killing fanatics will make any difference.
^^ ??? bro ur not making any sense... you compared the lal masjid raid to gujrat riots... and im saying thats stupid to do...
Gujarat cannot be compared with anything let alone Lal Masjid, the story of Gujarat is all over Human Rights web site.. The point still stands IF so many innocent muslims are burned alive and nothing happened do you think killing fanatics would make any difference?
kakay, forget india, wanna bet in two months time majority of pakistanis will be blaming the pak govt for the lal masjid "massacre of 1000s of innocent believers".
Gujarat cannot be compared with anything let alone Lal Masjid, the story of Gujarat is all over Human Rights web site.. The point still stands IF so many innocent muslims are burned alive and nothing happened do you think killing fanatics would make any difference?
There you go.. you said it urself that it cannot be compared with lal masjid... where on your previous post you clearly said "india alreayd had such an incident (similar to lal masjid).. gujrat riots"
*"IF so many innocent muslims are burned alive and nothing happened do you think killing fanatics would make any difference?"
*I still don't understand your point. How does burning of innocent muslims in India relate to deaths of fanatics in Pakistan?
There you go.. you said it urself that it cannot be compared with lal masjid... where on your previous post you clearly said "india alreayd had such an incident (similar to lal masjid).. gujrat riots"
*"IF so many innocent muslims are burned alive and nothing happened do you think killing fanatics would make any difference?"
*I still don't understand your point. How does burning of innocent muslims in India relate to deaths of fanatics in Pakistan?
Seems like you are having comprehension problems or you are like going in circles.
Here it is one more time hope it will sink...
If a fanatic hindu govt. can kill so many innocent muslims and get away with it do you think it will make any difference if the same hindu fanatics would kill muslim fanatics? ... makes sense or still difficult.
Seeing how Abdail's mind works, it's obvious that if a lal masjid situation had happened in India and the Indian army was sent to handle the Muslim militants, the Indian army would've been called the "terrorists" and the muslim militants would've been called "freedom fighters". "struggling to fight off the Indian rule" such words would've been used for the militant terrorists by people like Abdail.
^ Ah it hurts ain’t it, especially the truth when Indian terrorist in uniform kill or rapes they are not terrorist, or if fanatic hindus burn muslims alive they are not fanatics… EH!!! Now is that a double standard or is that a double standard.