Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Bani Gala kay nashai babay ko jab media main bayan jari karna hota hia. to aesi hi oot patang bahki bahki batain karta hia…
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Another news on travel ban
State Department Suspends President Trump’s Travel Ban
President Donald Trump’s travel ban has been temporarily blocked by a U.S. judge just a week after it caused panic and chaos among predominately Muslim countries.
CNN](http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/03/politics/federal-judge-temporarily-halts-trump-travel-ban-nationwide-ag-says/index.html?adkey=bn) reports the state department and The Department of Homeland Security suspended plans to execute Trump’s order on Saturday (Feb. 4) per the approval of U.S. District Judge James Robart. Lawsuits brought against Trump by attorney generals Bob Ferguson (Washington state) and Lori Swanson (Minnesota) about Trump’s order helped influence Robart’s ruling. Trump issued the executive order last week, preventing visa holders from seven predominately Muslin countries (Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen) from entering the U.S. In a move everyone saw coming, Trump took to Twitter to denounce the move and promised to overturn the government’s decision.
In a move everyone saw coming, Trump took to Twitter to criticize the move and pledged to reverse the government’s decision.
Robert explained the states “met their burden of demonstrating that they face immediate and irreparable injury as a result of the signing and implementation of the Executive Order. ” He also said the order grossly hinders the “education, employment, education and freedom to travel.” The US Customs and Border Protection alerted airlines to reinstate visas and to admit of refugees who have U.S. visas as well. Lawyers are still offering services to those affected by the ban at several airports across the country.
With this being the first legal pushback against the Trump administration, the case could make its way to the Supreme Court. Like Trump previously mentioned, the White House can issue an appeal against the temporary block. A preliminary judgment meeting will also follow in a matter of weeks for the temporary restraining order.
During the press conference on the issue, Ferguson assured that justice would be served to the people. “It’s our president’s duty to honor this ruling and I’ll make sure he does,” Ferguson said. “No one is above the law, not even the president.”
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Whats going in there, these kind of things happens in 3rd world countries where both the leader and officials are selected on the basis of their stupidity…
Since you are in sane region whats your take on it?
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
The matters are left to ISPR perhaps
مسلم ممالک پر امریکی پابندیاں:‘دفتر خارجہ کا بیان ناکافی قرار‘](مسلم ممالک پر امریکی پابندیاں:‘دفتر خارجہ کا بیان ناکافی قرار‘ - Pakistan - Dawn News Urdu)
حکومت واشنگٹن پرزور دےکہ مسلم ممالک پر ویزا پابندیاں دہشت گردی کے خلاف جنگ میں نقصان دہ ثابت ہوں گی،پیپلز پارٹی
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Ban story continued
https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/safe_image.php?d=AQDnXIwkwy2jgnhe&w=450&h=236&url=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dawn.com%2Fmedium%2F2017%2F02%2F5897013c137a6.jpg&cfs=1&upscale=1&sx=0&sy=38&sw=500&sh=262&_nc_hash=AQAb6tD7eY9Jm2NIUS court rejects bid to reinstate Trump travel ban
Travel ban suspension remains in place.
DAWN
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Like US govt is waiting for an input from Pakistan
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
This is how the courts should work in Pakistan. Supreme Court judges still sitting on their fat corrupt ugly butts on stealing case of PM. Shame on Pakistani courts. Talk about your corrupt courts and corrupt government.
yeh corruption ke nuskhe apnay paas rakho aor apnay government aor corrupt judicial system ko do.
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
You hate Punjabies to that extent that yoy even fail to get sarcasm from them…your maybe you are so slow to get one to start with…
2ndly, i asked your opinion on US not on Pak but seems like you fail to write a sentence where you do not spray venom against Pak…
Either you are in teaching profession or you are that particular student who will write an essay on MY BEST FRIEND no matter what the subjecy is…only you write essay on the “PEOPLE I HATE MOST”.
But Haters going to hate and Pakistan shall prosper…where Talpors, Jatoois, Bhuttos and Shahs and other Waderas from Sindh and other Parts are finally going to pay…
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Bani gala kay nashi babay ko koi samjhay… Insaf ki shafafiat US aur Europe main kahian ziydah achi hia..
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
I don’t. How the hack I know whether your remarks are sarcastic or serious. I just wanted to say if judges can decide boldly in Pakistan like here. This does not show any hate with my country of origin but opposite. I don’t know what you have enmity with talpurs, jatois, shahs etc. They are mirror image of choudhries, malik, tiwanas, dogar, mian etc etc of your Punjab. They have not paid as yet because of corrupt and incompetent system of judiciary. Look at your PM’s case. What is the problem that theses judges are not deciding?
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
.
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Chalo ji, its all good for Pakistanis right now. Except they dont know Trump doesnt need any “plan” for changing things..
No plan for travel ban on Pakistanis: US - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
WASHINGTON: The Trump administration has no plan to ban Pakistani citizens from travelling to the United States because Pakistan is providing the data they need to vet a visitor, US officials say.
In recent briefings to various media outlets, White House officials also said the administration had no plan to add other countries to the list of seven Muslim countries whose citizens were barred from travelling or migrating to the US.
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer explained that Afghanistan, Pakistan and Lebanon were among the countries which were providing the information needed to scrutinise travellers. But he warned that if this cooperation changed, these or other countries could also be added to the list.
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
^^That is definitely very encouraging. I hope genuine and deserving people from Pakistan will not be denied entry into USA. Immigrants have made this country one of the best in the world to live in.
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
so if trump ban pakistanis …thats they only way IK will do something usefull?
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
IK said that because he was insulted at Toronto airport before entering USA. He wanted same treatment for every Pakistani 
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Yet another blow to IK’s wish. Had Pakistan such courts and judges Pakistan would have thrived better than India.
Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump travel ban
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal appeals court refused Thursday to reinstate President Donald Trump’s ban on travelers from seven predominantly Muslim nations, unanimously rejecting the administration’s claim of presidential authority, questioning its motives and concluding that the order was unlikely to survive legal challenges.
The three judges of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the argument that the ban targets Muslims raised “serious allegations” and presented “significant constitutional questions,” and they agreed that courts could consider statements by Trump and his advisers about wishing to enact such a ban.
Moments after the ruling, Trump tweeted, “SEE YOU IN COURT,” adding that “THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!”
In response, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat who leads one of the states that challenged the ban, said: “Mr. President, we just saw you in court, and we beat you.”
The panel declined to block a lower-court ruling that suspended the ban and allowed previously barred travelers to enter the U.S. But it did not shy away from the larger constitutional questions raised by the order.
The judges sided with the states on every issue except for one technical matter. They rejected the administration’s argument that courts did not have the authority to review the president’s immigration and national security decisions. They said the administration failed to show that the order met constitutional requirements to provide notice or a hearing before restricting travel. And they said the administration presented no evidence that any foreigner from the seven countries was responsible for a terrorist attack in the U.S.
“Despite the district court’s and our own repeated invitations to explain the urgent need for the Executive Order to be placed immediately into effect, the Government submitted no evidence to rebut the States’ argument that the district court’s order merely returned the nation temporarily to the position it has occupied for many previous years,” the panel wrote.
The court battle is far from over. An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court seems likely. That could put the decision in the hands of a divided court that has a vacancy. Trump’s nominee, Neil Gorsuch, is unlikely to be confirmed in time to take part in any consideration of the ban, which was set to expire in 90 days unless it is changed.
The appellate judges noted compelling public interests on both sides.
“On the one hand, the public has a powerful interest in national security and in the ability of an elected president to enact policies. And on the other, the public also has an interest in free flow of travel, in avoiding separation of families, and in freedom from discrimination.”
The Justice Department said it was “reviewing the decision and considering its options.” It’s the first day on the job for new Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who was sworn in at the White House earlier Thursday by Vice President Mike Pence.
Last week, U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order halting the ban after Washington state and Minnesota sued. The ban temporarily suspended the nation’s refugee program and immigration from countries that have raised terrorism concerns.
Justice Department lawyers appealed to the 9th Circuit, arguing that the president has the constitutional power to restrict entry to the United States and that the courts cannot second-guess his determination that such a step was needed to prevent terrorism.
The states said Trump’s travel ban harmed individuals, businesses and universities. Citing Trump’s campaign promise to stop Muslims from entering the U.S., they said the ban unconstitutionally blocked entry to people based on religion.
The appeals court sided with the administration on just one issue. The states had argued that 9th Circuit precedent prohibits review of temporary restraining orders. The panel said that due to the intense public interest at stake and the uncertainty of how long it would take to obtain a further ruling from the lower court, it was appropriate to consider the federal government’s appeal.
Josh Blackman, a professor at South Texas College of Law in Houston, said the “million-dollar question” is whether the Trump administration would appeal to the Supreme Court.
That could run the risk of having only eight justices to hear the case, which could produce a tie and leave the lower-court ruling in place.
“There’s a distinct risk in moving this too quickly,” Blackman said. “But we’re not in a normal time, and Donald Trump is very rash. He may trump, pardon the figure of speech, the normal rule.”
Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School, said the ruling was thoughtful and supported by a great deal of legal precedent. More important, it was unanimous despite the fact that the panel included judges appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents.
“It’s a very important message that judges are not just politicians in robes and not just political hacks,” Levinson said. “The role of the judge is to transcend politics. That’s why they’re appointed for life, so they don’t worry about what’s popular. They worry about what’s legally correct.”
After the ban was put on hold, the State Department quickly said people from the seven countries — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — with valid visas could travel to the U.S. The decision led to tearful reunions at airports around the country.
Associated Press writers Brian Melley in Los Angeles, Gene Johnson and Martha Bellisle in Seattle, Rachel La Corte in Olympia, Washington, and Eric Tucker in Washington, D.C., contributed to this repo
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Remind me again why are we wasting so much bits and bytes on this clean shave talban’s one of countless brain fart?
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
Its surprising that in response to a comment IK made in passing, gupshup warriors have created a multipage thread. Amazing indeed are the priorities of PPP and PMLN..shamless and petty to say the least.
Re: I hope Trump bans Pakistani visas: Imran Khan
^ Yes. All the haramkhor parties are under one umbrella against whoever challenges the status quo.