I have a question

[Nikki.M]

Re: I have a question

@Anil Khan

My initial post which reffered the hindus and sikhs to another forum was not because of their religon. It was due to their dialect (bombay street language) that they were imposing on the pakistanis on this forum. Clearly that sort of language was irksome to me and others here and hence I made a suggestion.

Yes, there are sikhs, hindus, and christians in Pakistan but clearly they are a minority. Further, it is highly unlikely that they indulge in such an uneducated dialect.

Allah Nigheban

Are you studying languages and their dialects? I love learning them, so would love to hear more from you. Cheers.

[Amorphous]

Re: I have a question

don’t even start comparing the population of Pakistan with that of North India…you’ll find the same blood in many more Indians than Pakistanis. And I wonder if you would still be on about the same once u check this link:

I checked the link, and read a number of articles there. A few things are really disturbing. We don’t seem to have the same blood.

While Indian Muslims in the United States, whose numbers are in any case relatively small, have not been similarly vocal in stating their views on the insurrection now taking place in Kashmir, the same can scarcely be said for those Hindus who continue to give their unstinting support to Hindu militancy in India. They rejoiced in the destruction on 6 December 1992 by Hindu militants of a sixteenth-century mosque, and have poured much money into the construction of a grand new Hindu temple in Ayodhya; and they contribute generously to the activities of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), a world-wide organization set up to promote Hindu culture. It is significant that no Indian party has ever had such support among Indians in the United States as the Bharatiya Janata Party, which mainly serves Hindu interests and now governs India. That the ossified Hinduism of some Hindus in the United States, who are far removed from the complexities of the faith and its rich engagement with the multiple strands of Indian civilization, has unsavory political ramifications is nowhere better illustrated than in the activities of the Los Angeles-based Federation of Hindu Association (FHA). Instituting a “Hindu of the Year” award in 1994, the FHA at once conferred it upon Bal Thackeray, a Hindu politician in Mumbai and avid admirer of Hitler who has been responsible for instituting pogroms against Muslims, and Sadhvi Ritambara, who has openly declared that Muslims in India cannot expect to live there except on terms dictated by the Hindu community.

http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/Diaspora/roots.html

[Scratch]

Re: I have a question

@Aashna

Last I checked there were hindus, sikhs and christians in pakistan aswell, where do you suggest they go?

Sigh…the day ppl learn to be more tolerant and less ignorant is when all the BS in the world will subside.

Allah Hafiz.

Aashna, tummein Pakistaniyun se leRne ka boht shauq hei :–p What we haven’t told you yet is if the hindus, sikhs and christians dont leave Pakistan, we will have them converted to Islam … aur sab se pehle queer ko musalmaan kerna zaroori hei.

[Aashna]

Re: I have a question

@Scratch

Aashna, tummein Pakistaniyun se leRne ka boht shauq hei :–p What we haven’t told you yet is if the hindus, sikhs and christians dont leave Pakistan, we will have them converted to Islam … aur sab se pehle queer ko musalmaan kerna zaroori hei.

lol.

Thats not true, maine tumse kabhi laRayee nahin ki!
As far as queer is concerned, he’s already half dabbling in something or the other…poora musalman bhi kardo to koi farq nahin parega

[Rukhsarbibi]

Re: I have a question

Chloe yeh tum ne kya kiya

[Faruk_Khan]

Re: I have a question

@Nikki.M

it was all india back then

Girl you are sooo naïve.

Ok so Pakistan didn’t exist back then and I admit Pakistan is younger than India but India did not exist back then neither, it was not "all India" like you assume, yes you heard me India didn’t exist back then it was only united into an empire called India/Hind by foreign Muslim invaders. Indians seem to think India existed since time immemorial well let me tell you that is not the case, now it’s time you threw away the demontale textbooks your greasy Shiv/Pashupati-Sena/VHP/RSS, Pandit Ji gave you and open your head a bit.

I admit to a large extent Pakistan does have a common heritage with India, and ok I admit the dominant cultures in South Asian countries (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives) are all closely related, my point was Sanskrit is our heritage as much as it is India’s, we left Hindu cults behind and don’t want anything to do with them because we have a new and better ideology and spiritual path but we chose to retain the non-religious parts of our culture such as language and dress because our religion doesn’t have a problem with that, if faggot/queer thinks Pakistanis are ashmed of their culture then he is mistaken, Pakistanis still follow the same culture and Sanskrit/Hindi names and words in Pakistan are very common, the only thing we have changed is adopted a better spitirual path and superior ideology, we were enlightened because we're not bigoted and closeminded, that doesn't mean we want to be Arab, I've never met a Pakistani who wants to be Arab except maybe those that live and work in the Middle East.

Having said that cultures change and there is nothing wrong change and adopting things into our culture from other cultures if they are for the better, all languages and cultures evolve on interacting with others, Pakistani culture and language is essentially Indic/South Asian but it has took from other cultures such as Urdu having Arabic, English and Persian words and Pakistanis wearing Shalwar Kameez which was imported but these things have now come to be associated with this region. Change with time is good provided it is for positive reasons.

[quote]
It says that the Indus Valley people (Mohenjadaro and Harrapa) were most likely Dravidians, who were pushed downwards by the Aryans when the migrated to the sub-continent. So that way, you actually got no right on these civilzations, nor do I, cos none of us is South Indian. Lol, ain't that funny. So why dun we just agree that, sod it-- it was part of our heritage no matter what, feel good about it and just leave it at that?
[/quote]

I don't really care for race or caste (caste too is a result of racism based on skin color), people are defined by how they live their life not by where or what their ancestors came from.

Just for clarification Pakistanis and North Indians do have Dravidian blood mixed into them, that's not a permanenet tan they have, none of us are pure Aryan, even the Brahmins mixed with the local Dravidians, a lot were driven down south but sometimes their women were captured and took as forced wives or concubines by the VEDIC Aryans.

I'd like to see the caste sytem and racism obliterated from India as much as from Pakistan, both nations are racially very diverse from region to region and people need to ignore racial background and follow the national culture if they want their nations and region to be strong.

[Nikki.M]

Re: I have a question

@Faruk Khan

my point was Sanskrit is our heritage as much as it is India’s,

That's my point as well. I think you were the one who said something like "you 100% Dravidian pedigree dun have no right...etc." Dravidians are Indians as well, so they do have a right over the language, you just said it yourself. So now what are you on about? Neway, why do you even need to think about all that so much. C'mon I dun have nething against Sanskrit being a part of Pakistani heritage, so why should it bother you?

[Faruk_Khan]

Re: I have a question

I've no beef with you, you seem like a decent person.

What irritated me was the queer guy assuming that just because Pakistanis are proud Muslims they are less Desi which is not the case.

I've nothing against Indians, the only thing which irritates me is when they act like the "big brother" in everything.

[queer]

Re: I have a question

@Anil Khan

My initial post which reffered the hindus and sikhs to another forum was not because of their religon. It was due to their dialect (bombay street language) that they were imposing on the pakistanis on this forum.

shreeman Anil kumar baniya jee,

firstly, how is tapori suddenly a hindu or sikh language? let me educate poor peela sakool hindus like you:

aila! = hai Allah!

secondly, how does posting in tapori become an “imposition on pakistanis”? why so sensitive?

so, remember my hindu friend, each time you call tapori inferior, that is precisely how the zabaan-e-khaas farsi using courtiers of dilli darbaar refered to urdu before it grabbed them by their balls.

[Anil_Khan]

Re: I have a question

@queer

shreeman Anil kumar baniya jee,

firstly, how is tapori suddenly a hindu or sikh language? let me educate poor peela sakool hindus like you:

aila! = hai Allah!

secondly, how does posting in tapori become an "imposition on pakistanis"? why so sensitive?

so, remember my hindu friend, each time you call tapori inferior, that is precisely how the zabaan-e-khaas farsi using courtiers of dilli darbaar refered to urdu before it grabbed them by their balls.

Lol! This is getting comical. Buddy, as much as you want me to be part of the hindu cult, I have to give you a reality check and say its not gonna happen! Judging by your name (queer) I think you may have a guilty fetish for guys and as such you continue to respond to my posts. I'm gonna disappoint you again and tell you that I don't turn that way. Secondly, just because my first name may have a hindu origin does not mean that I'm hindu. There are many hindus with muslim names but that does not mean that they're muslim (eg. Shahid Kapoor). Ofcourse, I would't expect you to know that since I doubt you even have a high school diploma.

Now, I suggest that if you really want to "quench your thirst", you may want to take a trip to San Francisco where you can find people like you.