Hudood Ordinance Amended!!! (Merged)

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

I have to disagree, a dude could be taken advantage of without his consent if someone slips something in his drinks for example, or threatens him with something..the law needs to change that part as well.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

Yeah! I agree however then if you cannot prove anything on anyones part then there is no hudood for either. Again the point is if you cannot prove a crime, you cannot punish for it. So if a guy is raped then, the harm is still mostly on part of the woman. So how do you solve this ambiguity then?

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

DNA can come from variety of sources, like skin of assailant under the nails of victim, hair etc. Similarly other forensic evidence like fabric etc can be analyzed.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

what d u mean by the harm is still mostly on the part of the woman? if a guy was taken advantage of he would have the same type of emotional distress as a girl who was taken advantage of. we can not discount it by saying that ther eis little harm to him.

and then who is to say that the aggressor must be a woman, knowing pakistan and all the baccha baazi that pathans do, it could very well be a khan sahab.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

Can someone post here the full version of Hudood ordinance or give a link.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

Ooh , gimme a break

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

The Offence of Zina (Enforcement Of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979.

Ordinance No. VII of 1979

February 9th, 1979

An Ordinance to bring in conformity with the injunctions of Islam the law relating to the Offence of Zina.
WHEREAS it is necessary to modify the existing law relating to zina so as to bring it in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam as set out in the Holy Quran and Sunnah;
AND WHEREAS the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary to take immediate action;
Now, THEREFORE, in pursuance of the Proclamation of the fifth day of July 1977, read with the Laws (Continuance in Force), Order, 1977 (C.M.L.A. Order No. l of 1977), and in exercise of all powers enabling him in that behalf, the President is pleased to make and promulgate the following Ordinance:-
Chapter I

PRELIMINARY

**1.**Short title, extent and commencement
(1)This Ordinance may be called the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. (2)It extends to the whole of Pakistan. (3)It shall come into force on the twelfth day of Rabi-ul-Awwal, 1399 Hijri, that is, the tenth day of February, 1979. **2.**Definitions
In this Ordinance, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject of context: (a)“adult” means a person who has attained, being a male, the age of eighteen years or, being a female, the age of sixteen years, or has attained puberty;(b)“hadd” means punishment ordained by the Holy Quran or Sunnah;(c)“marriage” means marriage which is not void according to the personal law or the parties, and “married” shall be construed accordingly;(d)“Muhsan” means (i)a Muslim adult man who is not insane and has had sexual intercourse with a Muslim adult woman who, at the time he had sexual intercourse with her, was married to him and was not insane; or(ii) a Muslim adult woman who is not insane and has had sexual intercourse with a Muslim adult man who, at the time she had sexual intercourse with him, was married to her and was not insane; and(e)“tazir” means any punishment other than “hadd”, and all other terms and expressions not defined in this Ordinance shall have the same meaning as the Pakistan Penal Code, or the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. **3.**Oridnance to override other Laws.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall have effect nothwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force. **4.**Zina
A man and a woman are said to commit ‘Zina’ if they wilfully have sexual intercourse without being validly married to each other. **Explanation: **Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual intercourse necessary to the offence of Zina. **5.**Zina liable to hadd.
(1)Zina is zina liable to hadd if- (a)it is committed by a man who is an adult and is not insane with a woman to whom he is not, and does not suspect himself to be married; or(b)it is committed by a woman who is an adult and is not insane with a man to whom she is not, and does not suspect herself to be, married. (2)Whoever is guilty of Zina liable to hadd shall, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance, - (a)if he or she is a muhsan, be stoned to death at a public place; or(b)if he or she is not muhsan, be punished, at a public place; with whipping numbering one hundred stripes. (3)No punishment under sub-section (2) shall be executed until it has been confirmed by the Court to which an appeal from the order of conviction lies; and if the punishment be of whipping; until it is confirmed and executed, the convict shall be dealt with in the same manner as if sentenced to simple imprisonment. **6.**Zina bil Jabr
(1)A person is said to commit zina-bil-jabrif he or she has sexual inter-course with a woman or man, as the case may be, to whom he or she is not validly married, in any of the following circumstances, namely:- (a)against the will of the victim;(b)without the consent of the victim;(c)with the consent of the victim, when the consent has been obtained by putting the victim in fear of death or of hurt; or(d)with the consent of the victim , when the offender knows that the offender is not validly married to the victim and that the consent is given because the victim believes that the offender is another person to who the victim is or believes herself or himself to be validly married.**Explanation: **Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual inter-course necessary to the offence of zina-bil-jabr. (2)Zina-bil-jabr is zina-bil-jabr liable to hadd if it is committed in the committed in the circumstances specified in sub-section (1) of section 5. (3)Whoever is guilty of zina-bil-jabr liable to hadd shall subject to the provisions of this Ordinance, - (a)if he or she is a muhsan, be stoned to death at a public place; or(b)if he or she is not muhsan, be punished with whipping numbering one hundred stripes, at a public place, and with such other punishment, including the sentence of death, as the Court may deem fit having regard to the circumstances of the case. (4)No punishment under sub-section (3) shall be executed until it has been confirmed by the Court to which an appeal from the order of conviction lies; and if the punishment be of whipping until it is comfirmed and executed, the convict shal be dealt with in the same manner as if sentenced to simple imprisonment. **7.**Punishment for Zina or zina-bil-jabr where convit is not an adult.
A person guilty of zina or zina-bil-jabr shall, if he is not an adult, be punished wiht imprisonment of either description for a term whic may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both, and may also be awarded the punishment of whipping not exceeding thirty stripes: Provided that, in the case of zina-bil-jabr, if the offender is not under the age of fifteen years, the punishment of whipping shall be awarded with or without any other punishment. **8.**Proof of zina or zina-bil-jabr liable to hadd.
Proof of zina-bil-jabr liable to hadd shall be in one of the following forms, namely:- (a)the accused makes before a Court of competent jurisdiction a confession of the commission of the offence; or(b)at least four Muslim adult male witnesses, about whom the Court is satisfied, having regard to the requirements of tazkiyah al-shuhood, that they are truthful persons and abstain from major sins (kabair), give evidence as eye-widnesses of the act of penetration necessary to the offence: Provided that, if the accused is a non-Muslim, the eye-witnesses may be non-Muslims. **9.**Case in which hadd shall not be enforced
(1)In a case in which the offence of zina or zina-bil-jabr is proved only by the confession of the convict, hadd, or such part of it as is yet to be enforced, shall not be enforced if the convict retracts his confession before the hadd or such part is enforced. (2)In a case in which the offence of zina or zina-bil-jabr is proved only by testimony, hadd or such part of it as is yet to be enforced, shall not be enforced if any witness resiles from his testimony before hadd or such part is enforced, so as to reduce the number of eye-witnesses to less than four. (3)In the case mentioned in sub-section (1), the Court may order retrial. (4)In the case mentioned in sub-section (2), the Court may award tazir on the basis of the evidence on record. **10.**Zina or zina-bil-jabr liable to tazir.
(1)Subject to the provisions of section 7, whoever commits zina or zina-bil-jabr which is not liable to hadd, or for which proof in either of the forms mentioned in section 8 is not available and the punishment of qazf liable to hadd has not been awarded to the complainant, or for which hadd may not be enforced under this Ordinance, shall be liable to tazir. (2)Whoever commits zina liable to tazir shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which [Click here for amendment]](Criminal Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 1980)may extend to ten years and with whipping numbering thirty stripes, and shall also be liable to fine. (3)Whoever commits zina-bil-jabr liable to tazir shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which [Click here for amendment]](Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) (Amdendment) Act, 1997.)shall not be less than four years nor more than twenty-five years and shall also be awarded the punishment of whipping numbering thirty stripes. (4)When zina-bil-jabr liable to tazir is committed by two or more persons in furtherance of common intention of all each of such persons shall be punished with death. **11.****Kidnapping, abducitng or inducing women to compel for marriage etc. **
Whoever kidnaps or abducts any woman with intent that she may be compelled, or knowing it to be likely that she will be compelled, to marry any person against her will, or in order that she may be forced or seduced to illicit inter-course, or knowing it to be likely that she will be forced or seduced to illicit inter-course, shall be punished with imprisonment for life and with whipping not exceeding thirty stripes, and shall also be liable to fine; and whoever by means of criminal intimidation as defined in the Pakistan Penal Code, or of abuse of authority or any other method of compulsion, induces any woman to go from any place with intent that she may be, or knowing that it is likely that she will be, forced or seduced to illicit inter-course with another person shall also be punishable as aforesaid. **12.**Kidnapping or abducting in order to subject person to unnatural lust.
Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be subjected, or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being subjected, to the unnatural list of any person, or knowing it to be likely that such person will be so subjected or disposed of, shall be punished with death or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty-five years, and shall also be liable to fine, and, if the punishment be one of imprisonment, shal also be awarded the punishment of whipping not exceeding thirty stripes. **13.**Selling person for purposes of prostitution, etc.
Whoever sells, lets to hire, or otherwise disposes of any person with intent that such person shall at any time by employed or used for the purpose of prostitution or illicit intercourse with any person or for any unlawful and immoral purpose, or knowing it to be likely that such person will at any time be employed or used for any such purpose, shall be punished with imprisonment for life and with whipping not exceeding thirty stripes, and shall also be liable to fine. Explanations: (a)When a female is sold, let for hire, or otherwise disposed of to a prostitute or to any person who keeps or manages a brothel, the person so disposing of such female shall, until the contrary is proved, be presumed to have disposed of her with the intent that she shall be used for the purpose of prostitution.(b)For the purposes of this section and section 14 “illicit intercourse” means sexual inter-course between persons not united by marriage. **14.**Buying a person for purposes of prostitution, etc.
Whoever buys, hires or otherwise obtains possession of any person with intent that such person shall at any time be employed or used for the purpose of prostitution or illicit intercourse with any person or for any unlawful and immoral purpose, or knowing it to be likely that such person will at any time be employed or used for any such purpose, shall be punished with imprisonment for life and with whipping not exceeding thirty stripes, and shall also be liable to fine. **Explanation: **Any prostitute or any person keeping or managing a brothel, who buys, hires or otherwise obtains posession of a female shall, until the contrary is proved, be presumed to have obtained possession of such female with the intent that she shall be used for the purpose of prostitution. **15.**Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage
Every man who by deceit causes any woman who is not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit with him in that belief, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty-five years and with whipping not exceeding thirty stripes, and shall also be liable to fine. **16.**Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a woman
Whoever takes or entices away any woman with intent that she may have illicit inter-course with any person, or conceals or detains with intent any woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years and with whipping not exceeding thirty stripes, and shall also be liable to fine. **17.**Mode of execution of punishment of stoning to death
The punishment of stoning to death awarded under section 5 or section 6 shall be executed in the following manner, namely :- Such of the witnesses who deposed against the convict as may be available shall start stoning him and, while stoning is being carried on, he may be shot dead, whereupon stoning and shooting shall be stopped. **18.**Punishment for attempting to commit an offence
Whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable under this Ordinance with imprisonment or whipping, or to cause such an offence to be committed, and in such atttempt does any act towards the commission of the offence, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one-half of the longest term provided for that offence, or with whipping not exceeding thirty stripes, or with such fine as is provided for the offence, or with any two of, or all, the punishments. **19.**Application of certain provisions of Pakistan Penal Code, and amendment.
(1)Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Ordinance, the provisions of sections 34 to 38 of Chapter II, sections 63 to 72 of Chapter III and Chapters V and VA or the Pakistan Penal Code shall apply, mutatis mutandis, in respect of offences under this Ordinance. (2)Whoever is guilty of the abetment of an offence liable to hadd under this Ordinance shall be liable to the punishment provided for such offence as tazir. (3)In the Pakistan Penal Code, - (a)section 366, section 372, section 373, section 375 and section 376 of Chapter XVI and section 493, section 497 of Chapter XX shall stand repealed; and(b)in section 367, the words and comma “or to the unnatural lust of any person,” shall be omitted. **20.**Application of Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 and amendment
(1)The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, hereafter in this section referred to as the Code, shall apply, mutatis mutandis in respect of cases under this Ordinance: Provided that, if it appears in evidence that the offender has committed a different offence under any other law, he may, if the Court is competent to try that offence and award punishment therefor, be convicted and punished for that offence[Click here for amendment]](Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) (Amendment) Ordinance, 1980). : Provided further that an offence punishable under this Ordinance shall be triable by a Court of Session and not by a Magistrate authorised under section 30 of the said Code and an appeal from an order the Court of Session shall lie to the Federal Shariat Court: Provided further that a trial by a Court of Session under this Ordinance shall ordinarily be held at the headquarters of the Tehsil in which the offence is alleged to have been committed. (2)The provision of the Code relating to the confirmation of the sentence of death shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to confirmation of sentences under this Ordinance. (3)The provisions of section 198, section 199, section 199A or section 199B of the Code shall not apply to the cognizance of an offence punishable under section 15 or section 16 of this Ordinance. (4)The provision of sub-section (3) of section 391 or section 393 of the Code shall not apploy in respece of the punishment of whipping awarded under this Ordinance. (5)The provisions of Chapter XXIX of the Code shall not apply in respect of punishments awarded under section 5 or section 6 of this Ordinance. (6)In the Code, section 561 shall stand repealed. **21.**Presiding Officer of Court to be Muslim.
The Presiding Officer of the Court by which a case is tried, or an appeal is heard, under this Ordinance shall be a Muslim: Provided that, if the accused is a non-Muslim, the Presiding Officer may be a non-Muslim. **22.**Saving
Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to apply to the cases pending before any Court immediately before the commencement of this Ordinance, or to offences committed before such commencement.Source:: Manual of Hudood Laws in Pakistan, Kausar Brothers, Law Publishers, Lahore

This is the law that i could find on net. Discuss.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

Well I agree with that I was wrong.

You may refer to this :

Now according to the bold part, you may infer that that is forensic evidence for proving rape, when it clearly is not. I have deleted the offensive portions, but they are in far from being called a forensic analysis and can be done by the local hakim.
Needless to say, they DO NOT prove that the crime occured.

There is also another injustice. Hudood doesn’t clearly differentiate between rape and adultery. So the victim suddenly finds herself under *defence *against adultery, and it is here that Tazir convictions against her proceed.

http://www.wluml.org/english/pubsfulltxt.shtml?cmd[87]=i-87-2675#_ftn7

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

I think you missed my point. The hud is only when you break certain limits, hence called Hud. Intercourse resulting from penetration is the condition for applying its Hud. If a guy fondled a woman without engaging in intercourse you cannot apply the Hud for rape then.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

regarding what?
that a man who has been raped has less rights than a woman who has been? or that the impact on him is less than the impact on the aggresoor? I would give u a break, I am trying to understand what you are trying to say.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

I know, this is something new guys getting raped. Did not happen in the time of Prophet SAW. You know a guy being taken advantage of is quite different from a girl being taken advantage of. A guy getting raped rarely becomes a big deal.

Yeah I forgot Khan sahab and londay baazi. This really falls under homosexuality not ightisaab though don't you think.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

I may have missed it, if a woman lodging a complaint of Zina bil Jabr (ightisaab or rape) fails to present 4 eye witnesses testifying to the incident automatically gets convicted under adultery (zina) charges. I believe this is the issue. What I don't see is that Zina is an act committed by male and female consent so how can there be a one-sided zina case.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

According to the Hudood Ordinance, all extra-marital sex is criminal act. Even when the woman claims that she was raped not adultery, she must have four pious male witnesses to prove the claim and only Muslim men can testify.

The law needs to be repealed, right in this day and age it is very hard to implement it. First the authorities have to be the pious Muslims, which is not possible. Moreover, forensic evidence is mostly for the books, hardly get implemented. We need to desperatly reform the rape law and give more rights to women. Most of the rape victims in jail continue to get harrassed and sexually abused by police. You can not just make it equal in Pakistan. Women need extra protection when it comes to harrasment and rape issues in Pakistan. Ground relaties just dictate this fact.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

first of all ..:alhamd:
Don’t know the new / changed version except that the regular courts will handle the cases …
then as far as the old law…it was baised against women..presuming them to be at guilt before a trial so needing 4 witnesses to prove their case…
The Shariah does not require a woman claiming to be raped to produce 4 eye witnesses for her being raped. It requires that the ones being accused provide proof of their innocence. If they are guilty they are punished under Islamic “hadd”.[This is inline with Islam raising the status of women compared to before Islam where they were treated as property of men. ]
If the accused provide witnesses / proof (modern day forensics come in here - DNA etc) then the woman is considered slanderous and islamic “hadd” is on her rather than who she accused.

May Allah SWT provide justice to all those women raped and tortured and in jails right now. Afsos kay humaray yahan izzat kee hifazat karnay walay hee lootaray hain!

My sister in law (salee) used to work with Zia Awan in big K and she did a report and interviewed women in jails…the stories cannot be retold. She could not sleep for years and I think it changed her forever. She won’t even get into a taxi alone in Big K.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

which of course isnt true. If you'd read the posts in this thread, you'd see a woman does not need 4 pious witnesses to prove a rape..she can use any sort of evidence, known as Tazir. Or could have.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

Abhiman,
ANY evidence, including DNA was valid in Tazir cases, not just tears or whatever. There might have been a problem in some cases with lack of technology when examining the persons involved though..this is the lack of resources though. Hudood did not differentiate between rape and adultery, that part of what you say is true..but you know the reason? If a woman says she had sex with that man, and she can’t prove a rape..what else is left? the saying as any law student knows, is if it’s not rape, it must be adultery, so the trial for adultery proceeds..This has now changed, and it’s better that it has.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

Please read my post , the original Hudood Ordinance says teh followinh about rape:

10.Zina or zina-bil-jabr liable to tazir.
(1)Subject to the provisions of section 7, whoever commits zina or zina-bil-jabr which is not liable to hadd, or for which proof in either of the forms mentioned in section 8 is not available and the punishment of qazf liable to hadd has not been awarded to the complainant, or for which hadd may not be enforced under this Ordinance, shall be liable to tazir. **
(2)Whoever commits zina liable to tazir shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years and with whipping numbering thirty stripes, and shall also be liable to fine.
(3)Whoever *commits *zina-bil-jabr liable to tazir
shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than four years nor more than twenty-five years and shall also be awarded the punishment of whipping numbering thirty stripes.
(4)When zina-bil-jabr liable to tazir is committed by two or more persons in furtherance of common intention of all each of such persons shall be punished with death.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

I believe there is misunderstanding about Hudud ordinance and Tazir (PPC) cases, and some are trying to exploit that and misguide others. What I understand, this is how system use to work and what present changes would bring.

Case one:
An ordinary person, XYZ, rapes a girl from rich and influential family. Girl family goes to police station, register FIR, and tell the police that the case should go to criminal court (not Shariat court). Pakistan criminal court uses PPC ‘Pakistan penel code - non-Shariah court laws’ that is Tazir. The rapist arrested as accused. Criminal court deals with girl case, according to laws in Tazir-rat-e-Pakistan. There are chances that if proven, the rapist would get punishment in this case. Girl stays free throughout.

Case two:
A rich and influential person, XYZ, rapes a girl from ordinary or poor family. Girl family goes to police station, registers FIR. Regardless of whatever girl family wants, police register the case under hudud ordinance. Police contact rapist family who give them money and rapist goes free. In the end, case goes to shariet court that throws away the case on lack of witnesses. Further, under the influence of rapist or because of money, Police arrests the girl on adultery charges making her confessions as basis. She languishes in jail and gets exploited by police until her family is willing to pay.

**Thus, rich girls while find some justice (not always), poor girls stays in prison once raped. Rich girl could also suffer but police has choice to put her case under hudud ordinance or tazeerat-e-Pakistan (where other evidence is also valid). Since this normally happens on the whim of police who are not doing anything illegal, as that is their right, thus hudud ordinance of Zia became a licence for rich and influential to rape.* *

Similarly, adultery case were used to punish women by their husband or parents (against willing marry). People use to go to police and register the case against a woman and she get arrested straightaway under the crime. She stays languishing in prison until case comes to shariet court, where judge throw away her case due to lack of witnesses. Sometime, just to get her case heard, it takes long time and once she is free (after many years in prison), she goes home but nothing happens to the accusers.

** What little I understood:** Present law took away this right from police, and made it law that all rape cases should be registered with criminal court, using tazeer. Present law also took away the right of police to register adultery or rape cases, or arrest the girl/women on this basis. Now only court itself can order arrest in such cases.

Thus, present amendment has taken away rape cases out of hudud ordinance, and made it a crime only under tazeer.

In adultery case, government wanted automatic punishment for Qazaf (wrongful accusation of adultery) but I believe MMA managed to water that down.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

there is something called, the day of judgement - then there is no respite for the criminals.
so haddood ordinance as a made-up sketch of some ruling is at best, a safety net for the powers that be.

nothing more.

women need to protect themselves and that is the best hadood.

Re: Hadood ordinance Amended!!

it should be though, I mean its very simple for scholars to rule that zina bal jabr rules applies to both genders.

but there can be a difference between gay pana in consenting gays, and some khan sahab forcing himself on some other guys, or worse some on some kid.