Re: How to preserve Dignity - For Raheel Sharif
^^^
Sa1eem bhai... don't you even see the amazingly twisted logic in your own posts?
A government full of elected people who fulfill criteria of 62 and 63 is legal government. Today's government is therefore, illegal.
Solution: A government taken by force at gun-point.
And you have the guts to still call the present government 'illegally occupied' as if the pesha-war qatil conquering Pakistan time and again did it legally.
Sad sad sad state of affairs.
Garmi hoti ja rahee hai. Sa1eem bhai, aaj thanda ho jai?
Kakabali bahi aap kuch sonchain, baat samajh aa jayea gee.
First thing you should know is to learn difference between state, government, employees of state and duty of state employees towards state (not government). Governments and state employees are both servants of state (and people). Their duty is to serve the state honestly and in best interest of state (not themselves).
An illegal government is an illegal government, and there should be no two opinions about that. A government that came to power using illegal means is illegal, even if they get elected. It is just like, a medical doctor getting job in hospital as doctor is still not in job if his degree is fake and should be considered as occupying the job illegally.
Armed forces of a country are servants of the state, not servant of government. Armed forces should be always loyal to state and people of state, not government. Their duty is to serve the state, and saveguard the state from all threats and anything illegal … and that anything illegal includes illegal governments.
When armed forces act to save state from illegal or criminal governments, you cannot say that they took the control of government at gun-point, because they only fulfilled their duty towards state and people of state. Actually, to act in circumstances where government is harming state (country or interest of people in country), is duty of army chief.
State functionaries, like police, judiciary, bureaucracy or armed forces, they can only do a thing illegal if they misuse their powers and act to benefit themselves (took bribe, did nepotism, misused power to benefit themselves or someone they know, etc), not if their action is to benefit state or safeguard state from criminals, illegal employees (employees who did not fulfilled the requirement of job), and illegal occupants in governments (something normally do not happen in proper democracy, but in Pakistan it is happening as routine).
If Prime Minister is head of a household, then the army chief is the guard appointed to defend the house. The guard can be hired, fired or replaced at will of the head of household.
If the guard has problems with illegal hiring or firing, he should go to the courts to get justice and not come into the house taking it over at gun point.
Who gave you this ‘BS idea’ that Prime Minister is head of a household and army chief is guard to defend the house?
Prime Minister is just a Servant or temporary employee of ‘State and people of state’ chosen by people of state to look after affairs of state for a limited period of time, usually 5 years (and that also, only if that person qualify for the job … for instance, fulfill all constitutional requirements to apply for job… that is to run in election).
Army Chief on the other hand is permanent employee of state whom state select to do job efficiently, effectively and authoritatively whole their career life. They have much bigger duty ‘towards state and people of state’ to look after the benefit, security, and running of the state than temporary employee (like Prime Minister).
Anyone who thinks that army chief or armed forces are guards of house, they are out of their mind. This is only true in Kingdoms, where King is owner of a country, country is house of King, people are slaves (also called subjects) of King, and state employees are actually personal employees of King with duty to serve King only and obey King's command, as in Kingdoms they are not employee of ‘state and people’ having duty only to state and people.
[Fact is that, it is duty of army chief to act if need be. For instance, chief or armed forces is such a powerful post that even in Kingdoms, where Chief of armed forces is personal servant of King, chief of armed forces act and depose King if he thinks that King is harming the country beyond certain limit].
When a country is not a kingdom, leave army chief, even ordinary policeman can arrest Prime Minister and imprison Prime Minister, if policeman thinks Prime Minister has broken law, doing something illegal, harming state, is threat to state, or got elected using illegal means (was not illegible to contest election, got elected using bribes, cheating, or rigging election).
