Firstly my own opinion on this proportion is not relevant to what Iqbal meant in his shairy. This is the basic mistake in comprehension you have repeatedly been making. People do not share brains, I have a separate brain, Allama Iqbal had another one.
That being said, if you are asking just out of personal interest (and not because it bears to the interpretation of the misra), then I’d say I dont know of any mullay active in politics, to whom it does not fit, and a good many mullay who are indirectly political.
Finally, you came out behind the bush. You do know there are a lot of mullahs who are doing their job sincerely and not in to politics
directly or indirectly. Now if they are given the chance they would bring sense to any menace created by fake ones.
Here is what I have said repeatdly, instead of b*ng mullahs as evil group or class of individuals one need to think mature way.
that my man, is a classification :D. Im sure you were thinking class…
LOL! What part of my post gave you this silly idea? Try not to add something which was not even said.
why is he talking about school, but no… a class is defined as: A set or category of things having some property or attribute in common and differentiated from others by kind, type, or quality. You have specified what property/attribute Mullas have in common.. some sort of religious degree etc.
LOL. I can say spare me from the definition but as a gentleman I’ll say, thanks for the time exlaining. 
If Iqbal does not specify any particular sort of Mullah, why do I need to put words in his mouth? You repeatedly make the mistake of making an interpretation yourself, and expecting that this is what Iqbal is saying.
Becayse snyne with AS little brain siize as pea would know Iqbal did not mean ALL mulahs, nor he meant thise mullahs who are well educaated.
Isn’t this the reason why I say you are very concrete minded.
1-You think statistics is dolid sceince.
2- You believe National Geographic typical man in the world.
3- You think Iqbal when he wrutes poetry he means bad mullahs as typical mullahs.
5- Next time we have discssion will you tell me Santa is real! …“shudders”
**My advice: Stop reading too much. Get reality check oncee on a while. **
Once again, you’re attributing your own perspective of Mullas on Iqbal.
You are giving way too much credit to me. But thanks.
Now you’re talking.
Now you are getting maybe the right scenario. But thanks again.
Now lets put this shair together with some of his other ones. First, we have my signature:
Din-e-Mullah fee sabeelillah fasad
You have Iqbal’s recommendation for Muslims, when it comes to seeking understanding of their religion:
Aey Musalman! apney dil say pooch, mullah say na pooch
Ho gaya Allah kay bandon say kyon khali Haram
We have his disparaging descriptions of the religion as expounded by clerics
Wo mazhab-e-mardan-e-khud agah-o-Khuda mast
Ye mazhab-e-mullah-o-jamadat-o-nabatat
Alfaaz-o-maani main tafawat nahin lekin
Mullah ki azan aur hai, Mujahid ki azan aur
Parwaaz hai dono ki issi aik fiza main
Girgis ka jahan aur hai, Shaheen ka jahan aur
Then we have the shair you’ve contributed:
Fikr-e-Arab ko dey key farangi takhayyulaat
Islam ko Hijaz-o-Yaman say nikaal dou
Afghanion ki ghairat-e-deen ka hai ye ILaaj
Mullah ko un kay koh-o-daman say nikaal dou
Iqbal exhorted religious nationalism and personal struggle (Khudi). He combined German idealism (in the mould of Kant and Nietzsche) with Sufism (as you mention). To that effect, he promoted a personal relationship with God, with a view to producing Muslim supermen. To that extent he exhorted that Muslims deny Mullay the role they usually like to grab, as leaders of men as the source of Godly authority. He wanted Muslims in general to elevate themselves to an intimate connection with Allah instead of seeking religious outlet with their mullay and peers.
This is not to say he wanted to cleanse the world of Mullay. This is not to say that he did not see (a much more restricted than they have in our country) role for them. The couplet you mention is in the voice of Shaitan, who wishes to remove Islam entirely from the world. The parallel might be drawn with Chinese or Stalnist eradication of religious institutions.
This is the part where he says mullahs are the reason for gharait e deen. And iin his opinion a positive role of mullahs. 
**Glad to see you got the point funally that he did not have any such idea of ‘typical mullahs’. **
Like I said as well, there ARE no typical mullahs.
Bash only those who BY ACTION are bad and in reality fake.
So in summary, while he disparaged the role Mullas play in our society, and wanted Muslim religious development to be personal and a catalyst for action (as opposed to the hidebound orthodoxy of the clerics) he at the same time did not want a cultural invasion where religious institutions and culture were removed with a view to eliminating religion in general.
OK.
You did NOT produce evidence that Iqbal talks about most Mullas being good and only criticies a small minority of ‘fake’ mullay.
**Never meant to when gave example. Merely refuted your assertion that he was somehow thinkng of a typical role by mullas as being fruitles , negative or harmful. And this was a strong evidence. **
All you did was give evidence that Iqbal did not want the elimination of Mullas as a whole, which I wholeheartedly endorse.
Good. But there is also no such thing as typucal class of mullah. No need to shy now saying that too.
Your principal claim is unsubstantiated i.e. that his many many poems on what Mullay do, what their religion is like etc etc refers to a ‘minority of minority’ fake mullay.
Like I said, minority or mahority was never meant to be proved, it was the false notion of typical mullahs which was refuted by me…succesfully.
In what way am I incorrect?
How is this equivalent to a symmetric normal distribution 
.
Bhai rehne do, you really should just stay out of technical fields, if you are still in school and havent chosen a major yet.
Already showed your trial of statistics by using median or typical value was incorrect in defining typical mullahs. Refer to post 51. All you answered was it was in my head () where evil mullahs lie.
Read that again.
"Now that you mentioned about typical then let me add here,
Median (typical) does not get affected by some outlier right?
Mean does get affected.
**I say, bad or fake mullahs are outliers. Not the norm. **
Hence your term of using median (typical) was again incorrect, since you seem to be including good mullahs as your target of your criticism when talk about median or typical.
Ideally you should not even use statistics and just bash the bad outliers, but if you really want to then use mean as your target not median/typical."
I have not made any assumptions in my interpretations. You have morphed your own worldview and claimed it as Iqbals. He doesnt qualify that he is only talking about fake mullas, he doesnt makes that distinction to begin with.
He doesnt educate on properties of good mullas vs bad mullas.
Yes he dies and you hyst admitted above, he did not brand all mullahs same!
This is all your creation, and you rely on nothing but repetition to make your case.
That was strong evidence of not braanding all mullahs same by him and not typical either.
haha. so because he was inclined towards sufi-ism and even socialism we shouldnt take him literally. or were these two sentences disjoint and disconnected… i can never tell.
**Yes, since he was looking at mullahs with different angle at different times. Mullah and durwesh conflict my friend. **
**Also like it is said above, he at the time thought more of personal action by individuals instead of following blindly which I also say time and time again. **
**As a poet exaggerated his thoughts like poets do. **
Poetry and statistics are not related to reality per se.