Re: How does one know?
Peace Seminole
Muhammad (SAW) according to our beliefs was sinless, innocent, but was in a position where mistakes had been made now here is the wisdom in such things.
1) By making mistakes Muhammad (SAW) sought forgiveness, that showed us how to seek for forgiveness, if we did not have that example how can it be perfect?
2) By making mistakes Muhammd (SAW) was humble and knew that all Power belongs to Allah (SWT), now if Muhammad (SAW) was faultless then that Attribute would conflict with the Unique qualities of God, thus it would undermine the message of Tawhid.
Also we have been told within hadith who the best people were and who had the best understandings. That led to the development of classification of hadith and tafsir of Qur'an and hadith.
Coming back to the perfect example ... Logically a perfect example for mankind is something that is practical for mankind not idealistic for mankind. Mankind is itself full of faults, so how can someone be a perfect example for a faulty people if that someone is himself a different class of being? He will need to be part of us to be an example for us.
Thank you for the reply.
While "Muhammad was not perfect" does make sense in that he was a* practical* example for mankind, it doesn't make sense if people are to follow everything he did (or reported that he did since hadith are far from being 100% accurate) as the perfect example. Muslims believe the Quran to be perfect, so there are no gray areas. But if you combine that with following the imperfect example of what an imperfect man did, you are no longer following a perfect religion. Particluarly when the Quran's recitation, recording and promise was perfect and hadith was not.
My thought has always been, and why of all the major religions I find Jesus' teachings in the Bible to be my best example to follow as he represented the perfect man. Not that any of us will ever get there, but it is something to strive for. I just can't believe that God's last message to mankind is going to include war, slavery and discrimination built into it (as examples.) Surely God's plan is for us to evolve more than that. I'd like to think it possible. I don't see God laying down the final message when we were soooo far from it in the time and context in which it was revealed.
I don't think it will have a geographical and cultural bias and I don't think it will require scholars to figure it out for us. I don't think it will require us to be so concerned with the history of one group of people from one point in history. I'm not sure if the final message has been delivered, but if it has I don't think any organized religion has interpreted correctly as of yet.
I digress, I apologize, since my question here was how and who determined the parts of Muhammad's life that became an integral, necessary part of the religion. For instance - the 5/prayers a day outlined in Islamic doctrine when the Quran only mentions 3. That is an example of how I see sunnah subjugating the Quran.