How did rape become a weapon of war?

An interesting article though i wonder how come BBC correspondent forgot to add kashmir in this list…

How did rape become a weapon of war?
By Laura Smith-Spark
BBC News

Displaced Sudanese woman at Mornay camp, western Darfur
The UN has accused the Janjaweed militia in Sudan of using mass rape
Women’s bodies have become part of the terrain of conflict, according to a new report by Amnesty International.

Rape and sexual abuse are not just a by-product of war but are used as a deliberate military strategy, it says.

The opportunistic rape and pillage of previous centuries has been replaced in modern conflict by rape used as an orchestrated combat tool.

And while Amnesty cites ongoing conflicts in Colombia, Iraq, Sudan, Chechnya, Nepal and Afghanistan, the use of rape as a weapon of war goes back much further.

Spoils of war?

From the systematic rape of women in Bosnia, to an estimated 200,000 women raped during the battle for Bangladeshi independence in 1971, to Japanese rapes during the 1937 occupation of Nanking - the past century offers too many examples.

So what motivates armed forces, whether state-backed troops or irregular militia, to attack civilian women and children?

Gita Sahgal, of Amnesty International, told the BBC News website it was a mistake to think such assaults were primarily about the age-old “spoils of war”, or sexual gratification.

Rape is often used in ethnic conflicts as a way for attackers to perpetuate their social control and redraw ethnic boundaries, she said.

“Women are seen as the reproducers and carers of the community,” she said.

Women were raped so they could give birth to a Serbian baby
Medecins Sans Frontieres report

“Therefore if one group wants to control another they often do it by impregnating women of the other community because they see it as a way of destroying the opposing community.”

A report by Medecins Sans Frontieres says it first came across rape as a weapon in the 1990s.

“In Bosnia systematic rape was used as part of the strategy of ethnic cleansing,” it said.

“Women were raped so they could give birth to a Serbian baby.”

The same tactic was used in a “very strategic attack” by state-backed Pakistani troops during the fight for Bangladesh’s independence in 1971, Ms Sahgal said.

South Korean former
Ex-“comfort women” in Korea hold a weekly rally demanding reparations

“They were saying ‘we will make you breed Punjabi children’,” she said, with the aim of weakening the integrity of the opposing ethnic group.

Amnesty this year accused the pro-government Janjaweed militias in Sudan’s Darfur region of using mass rape in order to punish, humiliate and control the non-Arab groups to which they belong.

Such attacks cause women and children to flee their homes, lead to fragmentation of communities and bring the risk of infection with HIV/Aids.

Sexual violence is also used to destabilise communities and sow terror, Amnesty says in its Lives Blown Apart report.

In Colombia, rival groups rape, mutilate and kill women and girls in order to impose “punitive codes of conduct on entire towns and villages”, so strengthening their control.

Act with impunity

The strategic use of rape in war is not a new phenomenon but only recently has it begun to be documented, chiefly in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia and Sudan, said Ms Sahgal.

And even after conflicts are resolved, few countries seem willing to tackle what is often seen as a crime against individual women rather than a strategy of war.

In many nations the collapse of the rule of law leaves them unable to deal with allegations of rape, while in others women feel too exposed to stigma to accuse their attackers.

International courts have tackled some cases in Bosnia, where Muslim women were forced into sexual slavery in the town of Foca in the 1990s, and in Rwanda, but the vast majority of perpetrators act with impunity.

Women’s lives and their bodies have been the unacknowledged casualties of war for too long
Amnesty’s Lives Blown Apart report

Representatives of the 200,000 “comfort women” forcibly drafted into military sexual slavery by Japan from 1928 until the end of World War II are still fighting for restitution.

Far from colluding, women from Korea, China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Malaysia and East Timor were “severely coerced” into prostitution, says Ms Sahgal.

And whether a woman is raped at gunpoint or trafficked into sexual slavery by an occupying force, the sexual abuse will shape not just her own but her community’s future for years to come.

“Survivors face emotional torment, psychological damage, physical injuries, disease, social ostracism and many other consequences that can devastate their lives,” says Amnesty.

“Women’s lives and their bodies have been the unacknowledged casualties of war for too long.”

E-mail this to a friend

I wonder why no one has replied so far....
It's so sad :(
I'll bet you there will be people here who say that it's the US's fault, that this could never happen in Islam, blah blah blah

Rape is not just an instrument of war.

How many times have you heard a man who is angry with another man say "I will f**k his mother and his sister". For variety, you get the occasioal wife thrown in.

It is casually thrown out as an instrument of revenge and victory over someone.

It is the mentality of anyone who thinks of a woman as property as that negates her value as a living, breathing, feeling person.

What I don't get is how a man can look at a woman who is crying and pleading and still do this.

Let’s face it, no one gives a rat’s bund about poor people of Sudan. We all like to shove our heads up Ummah’s ass in Iraq. I wonder why all Ummah is quiet, there’s no outrage in the Islamic world about what’s going on in Sudan. I am ashamed to be Muslim.

:jhanda:

madhanee, did you say anything at all on this thread aside from bashing anti-US posters?

you dont care about this crisis aside from milking petty debating points? for shame.

Ravage, unlike you, I don’t consider this a ‘debate’. It’s the worst humanitarian crises that is faced today. The reason all Ummah is quiet over this is because the culprit is Muslim. We love to blame Jews and America for even when our camels have cold, but god forbid we criticize our fellow muslims. And I don’t come here to score points in a debate.

:jhanda:

not that i deny that our people are too complacent when the aggression comes from within. this does NOT invalidate the merited criticism of aggression from without.

but realistically, what do you think Muslims can do as far as Sudan is concerned. bear in mind that you would be distracting our focus if you mention Iraq/Palestine/Kashmir in your reply.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

200,000 women raped by Pakistanis during the 1971 war? This number is severly exaggerated and spread through propoganda by Bengalis and Indians posing as Bengalis to gain international support. I can accept that atrocities were committed against the Bengali women but this figure is unbelieveable. An estimated 20,000 Pakistani soldiers and officers in Bangladesh were murdered and their wives were forced to serve the perpetrator in the nude. I don't think the Bengalis will admit to that.

There is no parallel between the rape of Nanking, Chechnya, Bosnia etc and Bangladesh.

I missed the news where 150 000 US troops invaded Sudan and occupied for freedom.

I’m ashamed you call yourself a muslim too.

[quote]

The same tactic was used in a "very strategic attack" by ** state-backed Pakistani troops ** during the fight for Bangladesh's independence in 1971, Ms Sahgal said.

"They were saying 'we will make you breed Punjabi children'," she said, with the aim of weakening the integrity of the opposing ethnic group.

[/quote]

WHAT!

^^ "WHAT!" is quite right. Creation of Bangladesh was a sad day in Muslim history.

That’s right Gamma…that’s how our brave sons acted in 1971. It is the darkest chapter in the life of our country. I don’t know why we are so gung ho about Kashmir.

Coming back to situation is Sudan, if all the Muslims countries condemned and threatened to isolate Sudan, you can be sure that situation will improve there in a day. When it comes to helping fellow Muslims, the Ummah is impotent. Molvis shout out of their ass when Muslims are victimized by non-Muslims, but god forbid they speak up against atrocities committed by Muslims against Muslims.

:jhanda:

I think it is pretty obvious that the topic of this thread is not Drafur Sudan. If we have to analyze Sudan only (for some unknown reason), it should be discussed in reference to the topic of this thread instead of spending our energies in " blame displacement".

Lets get back to the topic please.

madhnee i dont think condemnation brings anything. arabs dont trade much with one and another, they're more than willing to risk causing further misery to their own people thru not yielding 'heroically' to sanctions, and Muslim governments have lost star power. nobody cares a hoot what their stances are.

im pretty sure every relevant country has atleast expressed concern on this issue. not sure to what extent. but their aint much happening from that.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Sara516: *
I wonder why no one has replied so far....
It's so sad :(
I'll bet you there will be people here who say that it's the US's fault, that this could never happen in Islam, blah blah blah
[/QUOTE]

Your comment is kind of silly don't you think?

Does islam say you can rape a woman?

Yeah Madhanee you are right !
We Pakistanis also rejected the UN resolution demanding sanctions against Sudan !
We are truly great Mousallmans :jhanda:
And how many times do you see Sudan mentioned in PTV , as compared to Kashmir,Palestine or I-raq. See such great defenders of faith we are !! :jhanda:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ak47: *

Your comment is kind of silly don't you think?

Does islam say you can rape a woman?
[/QUOTE]

I think you misunderstood ak47. I don't think she was insinuating that Islam gives permission to rape a woman but rather she was pointing a finger at those people whose arrogance and close mindedness doesn't allow the comprehension of that Muslim men are capable of raping women. Another point she could have been making is that this is just another proganda scheme to deface the muslims.

Ghori , Ghaznavi , Abdali etc killed lots of evil Hindooo Kaafirs and raped their wives.Women were than converted to Islam and the invaders married them ( 4 wife limit fully utilized !!)Everything is kosher if you are spreading the great religion :jhanda:

BTW how much deeds of these gentleman are appreciated by us patriotic Pakistanis can be seen by the fact that all our Missiles are named after them.:jhanda:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fallenpieta: *

I think you misunderstood ak47. I don't think she was insinuating that Islam gives permission to rape a woman but rather she was pointing a finger at those people whose arrogance and close mindedness doesn't allow the comprehension of that Muslim men are capable of raping women. Another point she could have been making is that this is just another proganda scheme to deface the muslims.
[/QUOTE]

Fallenpieta fair point

Just it is better to be clear otherwise you will get comments like our friend above who thinks you have right to rape 4 women and more rubbish propoganda if you see my point!

^^ Except that she didn't say it. Not even close.