History of Pashtuns series

[Mir_Baloch]

Re: History of Pashtuns series

@marwati

Balochs have never any kingdom or independent state in their history, throwing mud at others and creating false history wont make you shiny. Sikhs had an empire but they lost their state in 1849 to british, while Afghans still have their own state. Balochs on the other hand, were always subservient to persian, turkic, afghan, mughal and british rulers. It was not an agricultural and rich land so foriegn rulers instead allowed local rulers who had to pay annual tribute. Even the semi-independent tributary vassal state of kalat was not founded by a baloch, but by a brahui. Clever Dravidian bruhais ruled over balochs and are nowadays are claiming baloch identity to legitimize and justify their centuries long rule over balochs. @Mir Baloch believe in martial race of british but in their case non-martial dravidian race of bruhis became lords and masters of baloch. Not just brahuis, a very small tribe of pashtuns, barozai of sibi who are sub-tribe of panni, established their rule over sibi, mastung and bolan. On one occassion khan of kalat assembled large army of balochs and tried to capture bolan pass, but their entire army was slaughtered by a lashkar of tareens. On another occasion, barozais defeated kalat and laid waste to the area. The same barozais, in alliance with kalhoras, subjugated marris and bugtis and extracted tribute from them. In another tribal war, lunis and jafars, slaughtered half of marri tribe.

at that time marri and bugti were not in sibi stupid marri bugti came later in sibi only rind and domki were there who also supported barozai afghans against khan of kalat thats why barozai were able to resist khan of kalat cause barozai had baloch backing but still at the end barozai afghans were kicked out from bolan by khan of kalat and khan of kalat noori naseer khan subdued them completely in sibi too and they used to pay us tribute ever since they have been ruled by the great baloochs