Re: Hispanic vermin fleeing crash goes wrong way, kills three
First of all you keep using the word "immigration" to mean both "legal" as well as "illegal" immigration. So a lot of your arguments don't work.
which ones? i use immigration where it doesnt make a difference whether legal or illegal.
[quote]
Anyway, for the sake of simplicity, let me say. I do not support unrestricted open borders. No country in the world does it. There are real, practical draw-backs for allowing unrestricted open borders, when the neighboring countries have very different economic realities and economic problems. May be it will work between Spain and Germany, if both deem themselves similar in economic conditions. But it will not work between Bangladesh and India or Pakistan and Afghanistan, or Mexico and USA. Each country decides what works for them.
Secondly, I only support legal immigration, where a country first decides whether it wants you in or not. Once you are in, then you get various documents to live your life normally (e.g. drivers license etc). I do not support your model, where the person freely moves wherever he or she wants and then it is somehow incumbent upon the host country to provide him with drivers license and other benefits. In real life, this kind of nonsensical utopia does not exist. There is a reason for that. Already given above.
[/QUOTE]
libertarians leave the business of deciding who gets in and who doesnt to the employers. the government doesnt need to get into the business of going into who is and isnt useful or setting quotas. this works when people are moving into the country to work, obviously, and not just in it for the social programs.
an example of the counter-productive impact of all this managed and complicated immigration policies is the H1B visas. Many software companies vie for the limited number of visas available every year. Is there any doubt that the economy would grow if as many visas were granted as were petitioned for? Clearly there is work available for qualified people but is not being allowed. That directly corresponds to a smaller economy than what is possible.
now about your latter argument, where you say nobody is doing that, thats just an argument for the status quo. Not too long ago people would be saying that about democracy :)
obviously libertarian ideas have had limited acceptance in US. However McCain-Kennedy amnesty had the libertarian wing in the republican party content, if nothing else.