His name is Khan, and he is not a terrorist

[Muzna]

Re: His name is Khan, and he is not a terrorist

@kaka_in_usa

For those who still dont grasp the concept, let me clear it for you.

His dollars are dependent on America’s ashirwad. He knows it very well that americans can cut that lifeline anytime they want. America lets him collect money from their country, thats how they control different people in the world. Bribery (extreme word for this case) doesnt have to be direct. And also, who knows who is giving him money.

It seems that you’re the one that is not clear.
Are you suggesting that “America” could in any way restrict his fund-raising efforts?
Do explain how. Maybe I will better understand where you are coming from with this argument…

@kaka_in_usa

Plus, i will say this again, why would he go to america for chanda.

Because there is an abundance of private funds available there.
Because he can.
Simply because. Why shouldn’t he?

@kaka_in_usa

why cant he collect from pakistani citizens who he thinks he is fighting for.

1. He is collecting from Pakistani citizens. I hold dual citizenship, Pakistani and Canadian. I believe he is fighting for me.
2. He does collect from Pakistani citizens living in Pakistan. They contribute a significant amount.

@kaka_in_usa

You call them biggest terrorist and call them your enemy and still you want their money.

He doesn’t want “conditional governmental aid” from the US.
What part of that do you not get?

@kaka_in_usa

This kind of thing would never fly in India.

How does India factor into any of this?
Why are we comparing to India? Did I miss some part of the conversation in which we all agreed that India is a benchmark?