Hate of Islam, EVERYWHERE!

Everywhere we look, there is HATE for Islam. go to Yahoo! and search for Islam. I have seen too many Hindu sponsered hate sites. It makes me sick. Its like everywhere on TV as well. Here in the religion section as well. Many people are just taking whip of anything islamic. I ask all u ppl here. Please find me one islamic site that propogates HATE for anoyone. I would love to see what they say.

It seems like the whole world is united in this task. But what do we have on our side, Allah.

May Allah enlighten all those who are ignorant of His signs and may Allah bring them to the right path.

Here is what Islam preaches about Races and Hate. This is too beautifuil..Suhan’Allah:
http://www.islam.about.com/religion/islam/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://members.tripod.com/etori/racism.html

Racism & Islam

The Facts about Racism & Islam

by Hisham Zoubeir
Racist against other religions?

"Say: We believe
In God, and in what
Has been revealed to us
And what was revealed
To Abraham, Isma’il(Ishmael);
Isaac, Jacob, and the tribes,
And in (the Books)
Given to Moses, Jesus,
And the Prophets,

From their Lord:
We make no distinction
Between one and another
Among them and to God do we
Bow our will( in Islam)."
Holy Quran 3:84

“Let there be no compulsion in matters of Religion”
Holy Quran 2:256

“Verily, those who believe (in the Quran)
And those who follow the Jewish( scriptures)
And the Christians and the Sabians,
Any who believe in God
And the Last Day,
And work righteousness
Shall have their reward
With their Lord; on them
Shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.”
Holy Quran 2:62

Racism towards other races?

“(The Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca) was an exhilarating experience to see
people belonging to different colours, races and nationalities, kings,
heads of states and ordinary men from very poor countries all clad in two
simple white sheets praying to God without any sense of either pride or
inferiority. It was a practical manifestation of the concept of equally in
Islam.”
Cassius Clay, now Muhammed Ali.

“The Europeans in South Africa dread the advent of Islam, as they( Muslims)
claim equality with the white races. They may well dread it. If brotherhood
is a sin, if it is equality of the coloured races that they dread, then
their dread is well-founded.”
Mohandas K. Ghandi

“I have been struck over again by this indivisible unity of Islam that
makes a man instinctively a brother. When you meet an Egyptian, an
Algerian, an Indian and a Turk in London, what matters is that Egypt is the
motherland of one and India is the motherland of another.”
Sarojini Naidu

“Never have I witnessed such sincere hospitality and the overwhelming
spirit of true brotherhood as is practised by people of all colours and
races here in this ancient Holy Land, the home of Abraham, Muhammed, and
all the other prophets of the Holy Scriptures. For the past week, I have
been utterly speechless and spellbound by the graciousness I see displayed
all around me by people of all colours.”
Malcolm X

“Allah is to be praised and thanked for ridding us of the vices and pride
of the days of ignorance. O People! Note that all men( the noun includes
women as well) are divided in two categories only: the pious and
God-fearing who are esteemable in Allah’s reckoning, and the transgressors
and hard-hearted, who are lowly and contemptible in the eye of Allah.”
Prophet Muhammed, peace be upon him.

"O Mankind!
Most certainly, it is
We( God almighty) who have
Created you all

From a single (pair)
Of a male and a female,
And it is we who
Have made you into
Nations and tribes,
That ye may recognise each other
(Not that ye may despise each other).
Verily, the noblest of you
In the sight of Allah
Is (he who is) the most
Righteous of you."
Holy Quran 49:13

“And mankind is naught but a single nation.”
Holy Quran 2:213

“And among His Signs
Is the creation of the heavens
And the earth, and the variations
In your languages
And your colours; verily
In that are Signs
For those who know.”
Holy Quran 30:22

“All men(includes women) are equal in Islam, the Arab has no superiority
over the non-Arab, nor does the non-Arab have superiority over the Arab,
save in the fear of God.”
Prophet Muhammed, peace be upon him.

“The extinction of race consciousness as between Muslims is one of the
outstanding achievements of Islam, and in the contemporary world there is,
as it happens, a crying need for the propagation of this Islamic virtue.”
Professor A.J. Toynbee in New York 1948

“I hope the time is not far off when I shall be able to unite all the wise
and educated men of all the countries and establish a uniform regime based
on the principles of the Quran which alone are true and which alone can
lead men to happiness.”
Napoleon Bonaparte

Islam is not a racist religion, nor does it preach racism. The peoples of
other faiths have always enjoyed religious toleration under Islam; when the
Jews were being persecuted in the rest of Europe, they found freedom and
sanctity in Muslim Spain. Their historians regard that as one of their
Golden Eras. In the Muslim countries today, Christians are permitted to
practise their faith as freely as any country; the Churches in my home town
of Abu Dhabi are large in number, and one of my closest family friends, an
Anglican priest. Inter-cultural marriages are common in Islam; I am the
composite of five different cultures.

Peace be upon you.

[This message has been edited by Topee Wala (edited February 25, 2001).]

This is what we Kaffirs see:

WE WANT TO KEEP OUR FINGERTIPS AND HEADS INTACT. THANK YOU.

009.005
YUSUFALI: But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

SHAKIR: So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

009.029
YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
PICKTHAL: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.
SHAKIR: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.


009.123
YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! fight the unbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you: and know that Allah is with those who fear Him.
PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him).

SHAKIR: O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness; and know that Allah is with those who guard (against evil).

Here are some of the verses, which are very very disturbing to a human being who's only crime is that he does not believe in Islam or Mohammed. But even if one is an atheist, should he be killed for not believing in GOD?I find the 008:012 most distastefull and disturbing.

Bismillahir rahman ir rahim.

ok... 9:05
Now, u are reading it out of context. Here are the transltions of the verses before and after:
**
9:04
(But the treaties are) not dissolved with those pagans with whom Ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught nor aided anyone against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term: for Allah loveth the righteous.

9:05
But when the forbidden months are past then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them and seize them beleaguer them and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving Most Merciful.

9:06
If one amongst the pagans ask thee for asylum grant it to him so that he may hear the word of Allah and then escort him to where he can be secure: that is because they are men without knowledge.
The Quran
**

The 5th ayat refers to a time where the treaty has been broken and you are at WAR. Now in the 6th ayat, if a kafir asks for assylum, it is obligatory to give assylm. Now as you can see this is only in a state of war, and we are only allowed EVEN IN WAR to kill those who fight against you.

Now for the second verse u gave. It is regarding jiziya. It is tax. Any person living in the community HAS to pay tax. The authorities have to subdued them. I.e. make them pay. Here are is commentry on this verse by Yousaf Ali:

**
Jizya: the root meaning is compensation. The derived meaning, which became the technical meaning, was a poll-tax levied from those who did not accept Islam, but were willing to live under the protection of Islam, and were thus tacitly willing to submit to its ideals being enforced in the Muslim State. There was no amount permanently fixed for it. It was in acknowledgment that those whose religion was tolerated would in their turn not interfere with the preaching and progress of Islam. Imam Shafi'i suggests one dinar per year, which would be the Arabian gold dinar of the Muslim States. The tax varied in amount, and there were exemptions for the poor, for females and children (according to Abu Hanifa), for slaves, and for monks and hermits. Being a tax on able-bodied males of military age, it was in a sense a commutation for military service. But see the next note. (9.29)

1282 'An Yadin (literally, from the hand) has been variously interpreted. The hand being the symbol of power and authority. I accept the interpretation "in token of willing submission." The Jizya was thus partly symbolic and partly a commutation for military service, but as the amount was insignificant and the exemptions numerous, its symbolic character predominated. See the last note. (9.29) Commentry by Yusuf Ali

**

Now for your last quote: 9:123
Here is the commentry on this ayat. It is ALSO regarding a time in which conflict becomes inevitable:
**
When conflict becomes inevitable, the first thing is to clear our surroundings of all evil, for it is only evil that we can rightly fight. To evil we must put up a stout and stiff resistance. Mealy-mouthed compromises are not right for soldiers of truth and righteousness. They are often a compound of cowardice, weariness, greed, and corruptibility. (9.123), commentyr by Yousef Ali **

Now here is another thing "fight the unbelievers". About 'fighting' we are ONLY allowed to fight those who are fighting against us the Islamic state. For exaple, if we had a Kashmir type situation we would have to prevent that. At a point where conflict starts, you have to fight the enemy. Its the only obvious thing.

One thing you have to realise, looking at one ayat alone is not islam. It is a part of a set of instruction. One following the other. They can not be looked at abstractly and out of context. I hope you will read the commentry and reduce some of the hate. I will post here the ayat 9:6, the one after 9:5 and then tell me what you think:
**
9:06
If one amongst the pagans ask thee for asylum grant it to him so that he may hear the word of Allah and then escort him to where he can be secure: that is because they are men without knowledge.
The Quran
**

May Allah decrease the hatred u have for Islam and may He guide you to the right path, Insha'Allah.

[This message has been edited by Topee Wala (edited February 25, 2001).]

I forgot to talk about 8:12. Again read teh next few verses and you will understant that it is about a War situation. A miuslim can not go around choping off heads and fingers. Here are veses 11 to 19 with commentry:

**
11 Remember He covered you with a sort of drowsiness to give you calm as from Himself and He caused rain to descend on you from heaven to clean you therewith to remove from you the stain of satan to strengthen your hearts and to plant your feet firmly therewith. 1186 1187 1188
12 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." 1189
13 This because they contended against Allah and His apostle: if any contend against Allah and His apostle Allah is strict in punishment.
14 Thus (will it be said): "Taste ye then of the (punishment): for those who resist Allah is the penalty of the fire."
15 O ye who believe! when ye meet the unbelievers in hostile array never turn your backs to them. 1190
16 If any do turn his back to them on such a day unless it be in a stratagem of war or to retreat to a troop (of his own) He draws on himself the wrath of Allah and his abode is Hell and evil refuge (indeed)!
17 It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah: when thou threwest (a handful of dust) it was not thy act but Allah's: in order that He might test the believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He who heareth and knoweth (all things). 1191 1192
18 That and also because Allah is He who makes feeble the plans and stratagems of the unbelievers.
19 (O unbelievers!) if ye prayed for victory and judgment now hath the judgment come to you: if ye desist (from wrong) it will be best for you: if ye return (to the attack) so shall We. Not the least good will your forces be to you even if they were multiplied: for verily Allah is with those who believe. 1193

The Quran.

1186 Cf. iii. 154 for Uhud. Calm (presence of mind) is essential in battle and in 'ill posts of danger. If the mind is too much in a state of excitement, it cannot carry out a well-considered or well-concerted plan. This spirit of calm confidence on the part of the Muslims won against the blustering violence of the Quraish. (8.11)
1187 The rain was welcome for many reasons. (1) Water was scarce both for drinking and ablutions; (2) the muslim band, without baggage or equipment or comforts, found that their thirst aggravated their fatigue; (3) the sand was loose, and the rain consolidated it and enabled them "to plant their feet firmly." (8.11)
1188 "Stain of Satan". Dirt is physically a symbol of evil, and the Muslims were particular about ablutions before prayer. But the rain also refreshed their spirits and removed any lurking doubts in their minds (suggestions of the Evil) that victory might be impossible in such adverse circumstances. (8.11)
1189 The vulnerable parts of an armed man are above the neck. A blow on the neck, face or head, finishes him off. If he has armour it is difficult to get at his heart. But if his hands are put out of action, he is unable to wield his sword or lance or other weapon, and easily becomes a prisoner. (8.12)
1190 The laws of Jihad are exactly similar to those enforced by military virtue and discipline. Meet your enemy fairly and squarely, not rashly, but after due preparation. Zahfan in the text (meeting in hostile array) implies a slow and well-planned proceeding towards a hostile army. When once in combat, carry it through: there is no room for second thoughts. Death or victory should be the motto of every soldier: it may be death for himself individually, but if he has faith, there is triumph in either case for his cause. Two exceptions are recognised: (1) reculer pour mieux sauter, to go back in order to jump forward; or to deceive the enemy by a feint; (2) if an individual or body is, by the chances of battle, isolated from his own force, he can fall back on his force in order to fight the battle. There is no virtue in mere single-handedness. Each individual must use his life and his resources to the best advantage for the common cause. (8.15)
1191 When the battle began, the Holy Prophet prayed, and threw a handful of dust or sand at the enemy, which, as described in traditions, struck the eyes of the enemy. This had a great psychological effect, (8.17)
1192 Numerically the odds against the Muslims were three to one. In other ways they were at a disadvantage: of arms and equipment they had but little, while the enemy were well-found: they were inexperienced, while the Quraish had brought their foremost warriors. In all this there was a test, but the test was accompanied by gracious favours of countless value: their Commander was one in whom they had perfect faith, and for whom they were ready to lay down their lives; the rain refreshed them; their spirit was unshaken; and they were fighting in Allah's cause. Thus the trial or test became itself a blessing. (8.17)
1193 Fath = victory, decision, judgment. The Quraish in Makkah had prayed for victory: they were confident that their superior numbers, equipment, and experience would be decisive. With a play on the word, they are told that the decision had come, and the victory-but not in the sense they had hoped for! (8.19)
**

Oh as well. Since you have to see all this in its context u have to see under which conditions these verses were revealed. Here is the surah information about surah 8 and 9 my maududi:

Suran 8
Name
The Surah takes its name AL-ANFAL (The Bounties) from the first verse.
The Period of Revelation
It was revealed in 2 A.H. after the Battle of Badr, the first battle between Islam and kufr. As it contains a detailed and comprehensive review of the Battle, it appears that most probably it was revealed at one and the same time. But it is also possible that some of the verses concerning the problems arising as a result of this Battle might have been revealed later and incorporated at the proper places to make it a continuous whole. At any rate, in the whole Surah there is nothing that might show that it is a collection of a couple of discourses, that have been patched up together.
Historical Background
Before reviewing the Surah, it is worthwhile to consider the events that led to the Battle of Badr. During the first decade or so of the Prophethood at Makkah, the Message had proved its firmness, and stability. This was the result of two things. F'irst, the Messenger, who possessed the highest qualities of character, was performing his Mission with wisdom, foresight and magnanimity. He had shown by his conduct that he had made up his mind to carry the movement to a successful end and, therefore, was ready to face all sorts of dangers and obstacles in the way. Secondly, the Message was so charming that it attracted the minds and hearts of the people irresistibly towards itself. So much so that all obstacles of ignorance, superstition and petty prejudices failed to check its advance. That is why the Arab upholders of the ways of "ignorance," who looked down upon it in its initial stages, had begun to reckon it as a serious menace during the last period of the stay of the Holy Prophet at Makkah, and were bent on crushing it with all the force at their command. But in spite of the above-mentioned strength, the movement still lacked certain things to lead it to victory
First, it had not yet been fully proved that it had gathered round it a sufficient number of such followers who not only believed in its truth, but also had such an intense devotion to its principles that they were ready to expend all their energies and all that they possessed in the struggle for its success and establishment. So much so that they were ready to sacrifice their lives in the fight against the whole world itself even though they should be their own nearest relative. It is true that the followers of Islam had endured the severest persecutions at the hands of the Quraish of Makkah and had given a good proof of the firmness of their faith and their strong relation with Islam, yet further trials were required to show that Islam had succeeded in acquiring such a band of followers which considered nothing dearer than its ideal and was ready to sacrifice life for it.
Secondly, though the voice of Islam had reached every part of the country, its effects were yet scattered and its acquired strength was spread here and there: it had not yet gathered sufficient force essential for a decisive conflict with the old established order of "ignorance".
Thirdly, Islam had yet no home of its own and had not established itself firmly anywhere in the land where it could consolidate its power and make it a base for further action. For the Muslims were scattered all over the country and were living among the unbelievers as aliens whom their bloodthirsty enemies wanted to uproot from their own homes.
Fourthly, the Muslims had not yet had an opportunity to demonstrate practically the blessings of the system of life based on Islam. There was neither any Islamic culture, nor any social, economic or political system; nor were there any established principles of war and peace for their guidance. Therefore the Muslims had no opportunity for demonstrating those moral principles on which they intended to build their entire system of life; nor had it been proved on the touchstone of trial that the Muslims as a community were sincere in the proclamation of the Message. Allah created opportunities for making up these deficiencies. During the last four years or so of the Prophet's stay at Makkah, the voice of Islam had been proving effective at Yathrab and the people for various reasons had been accepting the messagc more readily than other clans of Arabia. So much so that in the twelfth year of Prophethood on the occasion of Hajj a deputation of 75 people met the Holy Prophet in the darkness of night. These people not only accepted Islam, but also offered to give him and his followers a home. As this was a most epoch making opportunity provided by Allah, the Holy Prophet took advantage of it. The significance of this offer was quite clear to the people of Yathrab, and they fully realized that this was not an invitation to a mere fugitive, but to the Messenger of Allah so that he should become their leader and ruler. Likewise they knew that they were not inviting the Muslim refugees to give them shelter from persecution but to assemble them from all over the country for their integration with themselves to form an organized community. Thus the offer of the people of Yathrab was to make Yathrab the "City of Islam." Accordingly the Holy Propliet accepted their invitation and made it the first "City of Islam" in Arabia. And the people of Yathrab were fully aware of the implications of this offer. It was indeed a declaration of war against the whole of Arabia, and an invitation to their own social and economic boycott as well. And when the Ansar from Yathrab declared their allegiance to the Holy Prophet at Aqabah, they knew fully well its consequences. During the course of the formal declaration of allegiance, Asad-bin- Zurarah, the youngest of all the delegates from Yathrab, stood up and said, "O people of Yathrab! Just listen to me and consider the matter carefully in all its aspects. Though we have come to him, regarding him only as a Messenger of Allah, we should know that we shall be inviting the enmity of the whole of Arabia. For when we take him away to Yathrab, we shall be attacked and our children may be put to the sword. Therefore if you have the courage in your hearts to face it, then and then only, you should declare your allegiance to him and Allah will give you its reward. But if you love your lives more than him and his Message, then leave this matter and frankly excuse yourselves, for at this time Allah may accept your excuses."
Abbas bin Ubadah bin Naalah, another member of the delegation, reiterated the same thing, saying, Do you understand the implication of the declaration of your allegiance to this person?" (Voices, "Yes, we know it.") "You are challenging the whole world to war by your declaration of allegiance to him. There is every likelihood of a serious menace to your lives and properties. Therefore consider it well. If you have any idea lurking in your minds that you will then hand him over to his enemies, it is much better to leave him alone now, because that conduct shall bring shame and disgrace to you in this world and the next. On the other hand, if you have sincerely resolved that you will endure all kinds of consequences that will follow as a result of this invitation, then it would be the best thing to take the oath of allegiance to him because, by God, this will surely bring good to you in this world as well as in the next world." At this all the members of the delegation cried with one voice, "We are ready and prepared to risk all our wealth and our noble kith and kin for his sake." It was then that the famous oath of allegiance, which is known as the "Second Oath of Allegiance at Aqabah" was taken.
On the other side, the people of Makkah also understood fully well the implications of this matter from their own point of view. They realised that Muhammad (Allah's peace be upon him), who, they knew well, had a great personality and possessed extraordinary abilities, was going to gain a strong footing, by this allegiance. For this would help integrate his followers, whose constancy, determination, and unwavering fidelity to the Messenger had been tried, into a disciplined community under his wise leadership and guidance. And they knew that this would spell death for their old ways of life. They also realised the strategic importance of Al-Madinah to their trade, which was their chief means of livelihood. Its geographical position was such that the Muslims could strike with advantage at the caravans travelling on the trade route between Yaman and Syria, and thus strike at the root of their economy and that of other pagan clans very effectively. The value of the trade done by the people of Makkah alone on this route, not to count that of raif and other places, amounted to about two hundred thousand dinars annually. As the Quraish were fully aware of the implications of the oath of allegiance at Aqabah, they were greatly perturbed when they got wind of it the same night. At first they tried to win over the people of Al-Madinah to their side. But when they saw that the Muslims were migrating to Al- Madinah in small groups, they realised that the Holy Prophet was also going to emigrate soon from there. Then they decided to adopt an extreme measure to prevent this danger. A few days before his migration, the Quraish held a council to consider the matter. After a good deal of argument; they decided that one person should be taken from each of the families of Quraish other than that of Banu Hashim to put an end to the life of the Holy Prophet. This was to make it difficult for the family of the Holy Prophet to fight alone with all the other families of the Quraish and thus to force them to accept blood-money for his murder instead of taking revenge from them, but by the grace of Allah their plot against the life of the Holy Prophet failed because of his admirable foresight and full trust in Allah, and he reached Al-Madinah safe and sound. When they could not prevent his emigration, it occurred to them to exploit Abdullah bin Ub who had begun to cherish a grievance against the Holy Prophet since his arrival at Al-Madinah. He was an influential chief of Al-Madinah and the people had agreed to make him their king. But when the majority of Aus and Khazraj clan became Muslims and acknowledged the Holy Prophet as their leader, guide and ruler, all his hopes of becoming a king came to an end. Therefore the Quraish wrote to him, "As you have given shelter to our enemy, we tell you plainly that you should either fight with him yourself or exile him from your city otherwise we swear by God that we will invade your city, kill your males and make your females our slave girls." This letter added fuel to the flames of his jealousy and he was inclined to do some mischief, but the Holy Prophet took timely precautions and defeated his evil designs. The Quraish got another opportunity to hold out a threat. When Sa'ad bin Mu'az, another chief of Al-Madinah, went to Makkah to perform Umrah, Abu Jahl interrupted him at the very door of the Kabah, saying, "Do you think we will let you perform Umrah in peace wlien you give shelter and help to renegades from us? Had you not been a guest of Ummayyah bin Khalf, you would not have gone alive from here." Sa'ad replied, "By Allah, if you prevent me from this, I will retaliate in a worse manner and block your route near Al-Madinah." This incident virtually led to a declaration from the people of Makkah that they would prevent the Muslims from a pilgrimage to the Kabah, and from the people of Al-Madinah that as a retaliation they would block their trade route to Syria against the opponents of Islam. As a matter of fact there was no other alternative for the Muslims than to keep a strong hold on this route so as to force the Quraish, and the other clans, whose interests were vitally bound with this route, to reconsider their inimical and antagonistic attitude towards them. That is why the Holy Prophet attached the greatest importance to this problem. As soon as he was free from making the preliminary arrangements for organizing the newly formed Muslim Community and settling peace terms with the neighbouring Jewish habitations, he adopted two measures in this connection
First, he entered into negotiations with those clans who lived between the Red Sea and this route so as to make alliances with them or at east to persuade them to make treaties of neutrality with the Muslims. He was successful in this, and he entered into a treaty of non-alignment with Juhainah, which was a very important clan of the hilly tract near the sea coast. Then, at the end of the first year of Hijrah, he made a treaty of defensive alliance with Bani Damrah, who lived near Yanb'u and Zawal Ushairah. In 2 A. H. Bani Mudlij also joined the alliance, as they were the neighbours and allies of Bani Damrah. Then it so happened that quite a large number of these people were converted to Islam as a result of the missionary work done by the Muslims.
Secondly, he successively sent small bands of his men on this route to serve as a warning to the Quraish, and himself accompanied some of them. In the first year of Hijrah, four expeditions were sent there, that is, the expedition under Hamzah, the expedition under Ubaidah bin Harith, the expedition under Sa'ad bin Abi Waqqas and the Al-Abwa' expedition under the Holy Prophet himself. In the first month of the second year two more incursions were made on the same route. These are known as Buwat Expedition and Zawal Ushairah Expedition. Two things about all these expeditions are noteworthy. First, no blood was shed and no caravans were plundered in any of these expeditions. This proves that the real object of these expeditions was to show to the Quraish which way the wind was blowing. Secondly, not a single man from the people of Al-Madinah was sent by the Holy Prophet on any of these incursions. All the bands consisted purely of the immigrants from Makkah so that the conflict should remain between the people of the Quraish themselves and should not further spread by the involvement of other clans. On the other side, the Quraish of Makkah tried to involve others also in the conflict. When they sent bands towards Al-Madinah, they did not hesitate to plunder the people. For instance, an expedition under the leadership of Kurz bin Jabir al-Fihrl plundered the cattle of the people of Al-Madinah from the very vicinity of the city to show what their real intentions were.
This was the state of affairs when, in Sha'aban, 2 A.H. (February or March, 623 A.D.) a big trade caravan of the Quraish, carrying goods worth $50,000 or so, with only a guard of thirty to forty men, on its way back from Syria to Makkah, reached the territory from where it could be easily attacked from Al-Madinah. As the caravan was carrying trade goods worth thousands of pounds, and was scantily guarded, naturally Abu Sufyan, who was in charge of it, from his past experience feared an attach from the Muslims. Accordingly, as soon as he entered the dangerous territory, he despatched a camel rider to Makkah with a frantic appeal for help. When the rider reached Makkah, he, following an old custom of Arabia, tore open the ears of his camel, cut open his nose and overturned the saddle. Then rending his shirt from front and behind, he began to cry aloud at the top of his voice, "O people of Quraish despatch help to protect your caravan from Syria under the charge of Abu Sufyan, for Muhammad with his followers is in pursuit of it; otherwise I don't think you will ever get your goods. Run, run for help." This caused great excitement and anger in the whole of Makkah and all the big chiefs of the Quraish got ready for war. An army, consisting of 600 armoured soldiers and cavalry of 100 riders with great pomp and show marched out for a fight. They intended not only to rescue the caravan but also to put to an end, once for all, the new menace from the Muslims who had consolidated themselves at Al-Madinah. They wanted to crush that rising power and overawe the clans surrounding the route so as to make it absolutely secure for future trade. Now the Holy Prophet, who always kept himself well informed of the state of affairs, felt that the decisive hour has come and that was the right time when he must take a bold step; otherwise the Islamic Movement would become lifeless for ever and no chance would be left for it to rise again. For if the Quraish invaded Al-Madinah, the odds would be against the Muslims. The condition of the Muslim Community was still very shaky because the immigrants Muhajirin had not been able to stabilise their economy during the short period (less than two years) of their stay at Al-Madinah; their helpers, the Ansar had not yet been tried; and the neighbouring Jewish clans were antagonistic. Then there was a strong group of hypocrites and mushriks in Al-Madinah itself; above all, the surrounding clans lived in awe of the Quraish and had all their religious sympathies with them. The Holy Prophet, therefore, felt that the consequences of this possible invasion would not be favourable to the Muslims. The second possibility was that they would not invade Al-Madinah but try only to escort their caravan safely and securely by a mere show of force. In that case, too, if the Muslims remained inactive, it would affect their reputation adversely. Obviously, this weak stand in the conflict would embolden the other Arabs also and make the position of the Muslims very insecure in the country and the surrounding clans would, at the instance of the Quraish, start hostilities against them, and the Jews, the hypocrites and the mushriks of Al- Madinah would openly rise against them and not only endanger their security of life, property and honour but make it difficult for them even to live there. The Muslims would not be able to inspire the enemy with awe so as to keep safe from them their life, property and honour. A careful study of the situation led the Holy Prophet to make up his mind to take a decisive step and go into the battle with whatever little strength he could muster, for thus and thus only could he show whether the Muslim Community had the right to survive or was doomed to perish.
When he arrived at this momentous decision, he called the Muhajirin and the Ansar together and placed the whole position before them, without any reservation. He said, "Allah has promised that you will confront one of the two, the trade caravan coming from the north or the army of the Quraish marching from the south. Now tell me which of the two you want to attack!" A large majority of the people replied that they wanted to attack the caravan. But the Holy Prophet who had something else before him, repeated the same question. At this Miqdad bin 'Amr, a Muhajir, stood up and said, "O Messenger of Allah! Please march to the side to which your Lord commands you; we will accompany you wherever you go. We will not say like the Israelites, 'Go and let you and your Lord fight we will wait'. In contrast to them we say, 'Let you and your Lord fight; we will fight by your side to our last breath'." Even then he did not announce any decision but waited for a reply from the Ansar who had not yet taken any part in any battle of Islam. As this was the first opportunity for them to prove that they were ready to fulfil their promise of fighting for the cause of Islam, he repeated the question without directly addressing them. At this, Sa'ad bin Mu'az, an Ansar, stood up and said, "Sir, it appears that you are putting the question to us." When the Holy Prophet said, "Yes", the Ansar replied, "We have believed in you and confirmed that what you have brought is the Truth, and have made a solemn pledge with you that we will listen to you and obey you. Therefore, O Messenger of Allah, do whatever you intend to do. We swear by Allah Who has sent you with the Truth that we are ready to accompany you to the sea shore and if you enter it, we will plunge into it. We assure you that not a single one of us will remain behind or forsake you, for we will not hesitate at all to go to fight, even if you should lead us to the battlefield tomorrow. We will remain steadfast in the battle and sacrifice our lives in the fight. We do hope that by the grace of Allah our behaviour will gladden your heart. So, trusting in Allah's blessing, take us to the battlefield." After these speeches it was decided that they should march towards the army of the Quraish and not towards the trade caravan. But it should be noted that the decision was of an ordinary nature. For the number of people, who came forward to go to the battlefield, was only a little more than three hundred (86 Muhajirs, 62 from Aus and 170 from Khazraj). Then the little army was ill-armed and hardly equipped for battle. Only a couple of them had horses to ride and the others had to take their turn in threes and fours on the back of a camel, out of the 70 they had in all. Above all, they had not got enough weapons for the battle; only 60 of them had armours. It is, therefore, no wonder that with the exception of those who were prepared to sacrifice their lives for the cause of Islam, the majority of those who had joined the expedition, were so filled with fear that they felt as if they were knowingly going into the jaws of death. Then there were people who always looked at things from a selfish point of view. Though they had embraced Islam, they did not realize that their faith would demand the sacrifice of their lives and properties from them; they were of the opinion that it was a mad expedition prompted by irrational enthusiasm for religion. But the Holy Prophet and the true Believers had realized the urgency of that critical hour which required the risk of life: therefore they marched straight to the south-west, wherefrom the army of the Quraish was coming. This is a clear proof of the fact that from the very beginning they had gone out to fight with the army and not to plunder the caravan. For if they had aimed at plundering the caravan they would have taken the north-westerly direction and not the south-westerly one.
The two parties met in combat at Badr on the seventeenth of Ramadan. When the two armies confronted each other and the Holy Prophet noticed that the Quraish army outnumbered the Muslims by three to one and was much better equipped, he raised his hands up in supplication and made this earnest prayer with great humility: "O Allah! Here are the Quraish proud of their war material: they have come to prove that Thy Messenger is false. O Allah! now send that succour that Thou hast promised to give me. O Allah! If this little army of Thy servants is destroyed, then there will be left none in the land to worship Thee." In this combat the emigrants from Makkah were put to the hardest test for they had to fight against their own near and dear relatives and put to the sword their fathers, their sons, their paternal and maternal uncles and their brothers. It is obvious that only such people could have come out successful in this hardest of tests as had accepted the Truth sincerely and cut off all relations with falsehood. And in another way the test to which the Ansar were put was not less hard. So far they had only alienated the powerful Quraish and their allies by giving shelter to the Muslims against their wishes but now, for the first time, they were going to give fight to them and to sow the seeds of a long and bitter war with them. This was indeed a very hard test for it meant that a small town with a population of a few thousand inhabitants was going to wage a war with the whole of Arabia. It is obvious that only such people could take this bold step who believed in the Truth of Islam so firmly that they were ready to sacrifice every personal interest for its sake. So Allah accepted the self-sacrifices of the Muhajirin and the Ansar because of their true faith, and rewarded them with His succour. The proud, well-armed Quraish were routed by these ill-equipped devotees of Islam. Seventy men of their army were killed and seventy captured as prisoners and their arms and equipment came into the hands of the Muslims as spoils of war. All their big chiefs, who were their best soldiers and who had led the opposition to Islam, were killed in this Battle. No wonder that this decisive victory made Islam a power to be reckoned with. A Western research scholar says that before the Battle of Badr, Islam was merely a religion and a state but after the Battle it became the state religion, nay, the state itself.
Topics of Discussion
It is this great Battle that has been reviewed in this Surah. But let it be noted that in some respects this review is quite different from the reviews that are usually made by the worldly commanders after a great victory. Instead of gloating over the victory, the moral weaknesses that had come to the surface in that expedition have been pointed out so that the Muslims should try their best to reform themselves.
It has been impressed upon them that the victory was due to the succour of Allah rather than to their own valour and bravery so that the Muslims should learn to rely on Him and obey Allah and His Messenger alone. The moral lesson of the conflict between the Truth and falsehood has been enunciated and the qualities which lead to success in a conflict have been explained. Then the Surah addresses the mushriks, the hypocrites, the Jews and the prisoners of this war in a very impressive manner that should teach them a good lesson. It also gives instructions in regard to the spoils of war. The Muslims have bean told not to regard these as their right but as a bounty from Allah. Therefore they should accept with gratitude the share that is granted to them out of it and willingly accede to the share which Allah sets apart for His cause and for the help of the needy.
Then it also gives normal instructions concerning the laws of peace and war for these were urgently needed to be explained at the stage which the Islamic Movement had entered. It enjoined that the Muslims should refrain from ways of "ignorance" in peace and war and thus should establish their moral superiority in the world. It also meant, to demonstrate to the world in actual practical life the morality which it had been preaching to the world from the very beginning of Islam and had been enjoining that practical life should be based on the same. It also states some articles of the Islamic Constitution which help differentiate the status of the Muslims living within the limits of Dar-ul-Islam (the Abode of Islam) from that of the Muslims living beyond its limits.


Surah 9:

Name
This Surah is known by two names AT-TAUBAH and AL-BARA'AT. It is called AT-TAUBAH because it enunciates the nature of taubah (repentance) and mentions the conditions of its acceptance.(vv. 102. 118). The second name BARA' AT (Release) is taken from the first word of the Surah.
Why Omission of Bismillah
This is the only Surah of the Quran to which Bismillah is not prefixed. Though the commentators have given different reasons for this, the correct one that which has been given by Imam Razi: namely, this is because the Holy Prophet himself did not dictate it at the beginning of the Surah. Therefore the Companions did not prefix it and their successors followed them. This is a further proof of the fact that utmost care has been taken to keep the Quran intact so that it should remain in its complete and original form.
Discourses and Periods of Revelation
This Surah comprises three discourses. The first discourse (vv. 1-37), was revealed in Zil-Qa'adah A.H. 9 or thereabout. As the importance of the subject of the discourse required its declaration on the occasion of Hajj the Holy Prophet despatched Hadrat Ali to follow Hadrat Abu Bakr, who had already left for Makkah as leader of the Pilgrims to the Ka'abah. He instructed Hadrat Ali to deliver the discourse before the representatives of the different clans of Arabia so as to inform them of the new policy towards the mushriks.
The second discourse (vv., 38-72) was sent down in Rajab A.H. 9 or a little before this, when the Holy Prophet was engaged in making preparations for the Campaign of Tabuk. In this discourse, the Believers were urged to take active part in jihad, and the shirkers were severely rebuked for holding back their wealth and for hesitation to sacrifice their lives in the way of Allah because of their hypocrisy, weak faith or negligence.
The third discourse (vv. 73-I 29) was revealed on his return from the Campaign of Tabuk. There are some pieces in this discourse that were sent down on different occasions during the same period and were afterwards consolidated by the Holy Prophet into the Surah in accordance with inspiration from Allah. But this caused no interruption in its continuity because they dealt with the same subject and formed part of the same series of events. This discourse warns the hypocrites of their evil deeds and rebukes those Believers who had stayed behind in the Campaign of Tabuk. Then after taking them to task, Allah pardons those true Believers who had not taken part in the Jihad in the Way of Allah for one reason or the other. Chronologically, the first discourse should have come last; but being the most important of the three in regard to its subject-matter, it was placed first in the order of compilation.
Historical Background
Now let us consider the historical background of the Surah. The series of events that have been discussed in this Surah took place after the Peace Treaty of Hudaibiyah. By that time, one-third of Arabia had come under the sway of Islam which had established itself as a powerful, well organized and civilized Islamic State. This Treaty afforded further opportunities to Islam to spread its influence in the comparatively peaceful atmosphere created by it. After this Treaty, two events took place, which led to very important results:
Conquest of Arabia
The first was the Conquest of Arabia. The Holy Prophet was able to send missions among different clans for the propagation of Islam. The result was that during the short period of two years, it became such a great power that it made the old order of ignorance feel helpless before it. So much so that the zealous elements from among the Quraish were so exasperated that they broke the Treaty in order to encounter Islam in a decisive combat. But the Holy Prophet took prompt action after the breach so as not to allow them any opportunity to gather enough force for this. He made a sudden invasion on Makkah in the month of Ramadan in A H. 8 and conquered it. Though this conquest broke the backbone of the order of ignorance, it made still another attack on Islam in the battlefield of Hunain, which proved to be its death-knell. The clans of Hawazin Thaqif, Naur, Jushm and others gathered their entire forces in the battlefield in order to crush the reformative Revolution, but they utterly failed in their evil designs. The defeat of 'ignorance' at Hunain paved the way for making the whole of Arabia the 'Abode of Islam' (Dar-ul-Islam). The result was that hardly a year had passed after the Battle of Hunain, when the major portion of Arabia came within the fold of Islam and only a few upholders of the old order remained scattered over some corners of the country.
The second event that contributed towards making Islam a formidable power was the Campaign of Tabuk, which was necessitated by the provocative activities of the Christians living within or near the boundaries of the Roman Empire to the north of Arabia. Accordingly, the Holy Prophet, with an army of thirty thousand marched boldly towards the Roman Empire but the Romans evaded the encounter. The result was that the power of the Holy Prophet and Islam increased manifold and deputations from all corners of Arabia began to wait upon him on his return from Tabuk in order to offer their allegiance to Islam and obedience to him. The Holy Quran has described this triumph in Surah An-Nisa: "When the succour of Allah came and victory was attained and you saw people entering the fold of Islam in large numbers...
Campaign to Tabuk
The Campaign to Tabuk was the result of conflict with the Roman Empire, that had started even before the conquest of Makkah. One of the missions sent after the Treaty of Hudaibiyah to different parts of Arabia visited the clans which lived in the northern areas adjacent to Syria. The majority of these people were Christians, who were under the influence of the Roman Empire. Contrary to all the principles of the commonly accepted international law, they killed fifteen members of the delegation near a place known as Zat-u-Talah (or Zat-i-Itlah). Only Ka'ab bin Umair Ghifari, the head of the delegation, succeeded in escaping and reporting the sad incident. Besides this, Shurahbil bin Amr, the Christian governor of Busra, who was directly under the Roman Caesar, had also put to death Haritli bin Umair, the ambassador of the Holy Prophet, who had been sent to him on a similar minion.
These events convinced the Holy Prophet that a strong action should be taken in order to make the territory adjacent to the Roman Empire safe and secure for the Muslims. Accordingly, in the month of Jamadi-ul-Ula A.H. 8, he sent an army of three thousand towards the Syrian border. When this army reached near Ma'an, the Muslims learnt that Shurahbil was marching with an army of one hundred thousand to fight with them and that the Caesar, who himself was at Hims, had sent another army consisting of one hundred thousand soldiers under his brother Theodore. But in spite of such fearful news, the brave small band of the Muslims marched on fearlessly and encountered the big army of Shurahbil at M'utah. And the result of the encounter in which the Muslirns were fighting against fearful odds (the ratio of the two armies was 1:33), was very favourable, for the enemy utterly failed to defeat them. This proved very helpful for the propagation of Islam. As a result, those Arabs who were living in a state of semi-independence in Syria and near Syria and the clans of Najd near Iraq, who were under the influence of the Iranian Empire, turned towards Islam and embraced it in thousands. For example, the people of Bani Sulaim (whose chief was Abbas bin Mirdas Sulaimi), Ashja'a, Ghatafan, Zubyan, Fazarah, etc., came into the fold of Islam at the same time. Above all, Farvah bin 'Amral Juzami, who was the commander of the Arab armies of the Roman Empire, embraced Islam during that time, and underwent the trial of his Faith in a way that filled the whole territory with wonder. When the Caesar came to know that Farvah had embraced Islam, he ordered that he should be arrested and brought to his court. Then the Caesar said to him, "You will have to choose one of the two things. Either give up your Islam and win your liberty and your former rank, or remain a Muslim and face death." He calmly chose Islam and sacrificed his life in the way of the Truth.
No wonder that such events as these made the Caesar realize the nature of the danger that was threatening his Empire from Arabia. Accordingly, in 9 A.H. he began to make military preparations to avenge the insult he had suffered at M'utah. The Ghassanid and other Arab chiefs also began to muster armies under him. When the Holy Prophet, who always kept himself well-informed even of the minutest things that could affect the Islamic Movement favourably or adversely, came to know of these preparations, he at once understood their meaning. Therefore, without the least hesitation he decided to fight against the great power of the Caesar. He knew that the show of the slightest weakness would result in the utter failure of the Movement which was facing three great dangers at that time. First the dying power of 'ignorance' that had almost been crushed in the battlefield of Hunain might revive again. Secondly, the Hypocrites of Al-Madinah, who were always on the look-out for such an opportunity, might make full use of this to do the greatest possible harm to it. For they had already made preparations for this and had, through a monk called Abu Amir, sent secret messages of their evil designs to the Christian king of Ghassan and the Caesar himself. Besides this, they had also built a mosque near Al-Madinah for holding secret meetings for this purpose. The third danger was of an attack by the Caesar himself, who had already defeated Iran, the other great power of that period, and filled with awe the adjacent territories. It is obvious that if all these three elements had been given an opportunity of taking a concerted action against the Muslims, Islam would have lost the fight it had almost won. That is why in this case the Holy Prophet made an open declaration for making preparations for the Campaign against the Roman Empire, which was one of the two greatest empires of the world of that period. The declaration was made though all the apparent circumstances were against such a decision: for there was famine in the country and the long awaited crops were about to ripen: the burning heat of the scorching summer season of Arabia was at its height and there was not enough money for preparations in general, and for equipment and conveyance in particular. But in spite of these handicaps, when the Messenger of Allah realized the urgency of the occasion, he took this step which was to decide whether the Mission of the Truth was going to survive or perish. The very fact that he made an open declaration for making preparations for such a campaign to Syria against the Roman Empire showed how important it was, for this was contrary to his previous practice. Usually he took every precaution not to reveal beforehand the direction to which he was going nor the name of the enemy whom he was going to attack; nay, he did not move out of Al-Madinah even in the direction of the campaign.
All the parties in Arabia fully realized the grave consequences of this critical decision. The remnants of the lovers of the old order of 'ignorance' were anxiously waiting for the result of the Campaign, for they had pinned all their hopes on the defeat of Islam by the Romans. The 'hypocrites' also considered it to be their last chance of crushing the power of Islam by internal rebellion, if the Muslims suffered a defeat in Syria. They had, therefore, made full use of the Mosque built by them for hatching plots and had employed all their devices to render the Campaign a failure. On the other side, the true Believers also realized fully that the fate of the Movement for which they had been exerting their utmost for the last 22 years was now hanging in the balance. If they showed courage on that critical occasion, the doors of the whole outer world would be thrown open for the Movement to spread. But if they showed weakness or cowardice, then all the work they had done in Arabia would end in smoke. That is why these lovers of Islam began to make enthusiastic preparations for the Campaign. Everyone of them tried to surpass the other in making contributions for the provision of equipment for it. Hadrat Uthman and Hadrat Abdur Rehman bin Auf presented large sums of money for this purpose. Hadrat Umar contributed half of the earnings of his life and Hadrat Abu Bakr the entire earnings of his life. The indigent Companions did not lag behind and presented whatever they could earn by the sweat of their labour and the women parted with their ornaments. Thousands of volunteers, who were filled with the desire of sacrificing their lives for Islam, came to the Holy Prophet and requested that arrangements for weapons and conveyance be made for them so that they should join the expedition. Those who could not be provided with these shed tears of sorrow; the scene was so pathetic that it made the Holy Prophet sad because of his inability to arm them. In short, the occasion became the touchstone for discriminating a true believer from a hypocrite. For, to lag behind in the Campaign meant that the very relationship of a person to Islam was doubtful. Accordingly, whenever a person lagged behind during the journey to Tabuk, the Holy Prophet, on being informed, would spontaneously say, "Leave him alone. If there be any good in him, Allah will again join him with you, and if there be no good in him, then thank Allah that He relieved you of his evil company".
In short, the Holy Prophet marched out towards Syria in Rajab A.H. 9, with thirty thousand fighters for the cause of Islam. The conditions in which the expedition was undertaken may be judged from the fact that the number of camels with them was so small that many of them were obliged to walk on foot and to wait for their turns for several had to ride at a time on each camel. To add to this, there was the burning heat of the desert and the acute shortage of water. But they were richly rewarded for their firm resolve and sincere adherence to the cause and for their perseverance in the face of those great difficulties and obstacles.
When they arrived at Tabuk, they learnt that the Caesar and his allies had withdrawn their troops from the frontier and there was no enemy to fight with. Thus they won a moral victory that increased their prestige manifold and, that too, without shedding a drop of blood. In this connection, it is pertinent to point out that the general impression given by the historians of the campaigns of the Holy Prophet about the Campaign of Tabuk is not correct. They relate the event in a way as if the news of the mustering of the Roman armies near the Arabian frontier was itself false. The fact is that the Caesar had begun to muster his armies, but the Holy Prophet forestalled him and arrived on the scene before he could make full preparations for the invasion. Therefore, believing that "discretion is the better part of valour," he withdrew his armies from the frontier. For he had not forgotten that the three thousand fighters for the cause of Islam had rendered helpless his army one hundred thousand strong at M'utah. He could not, therefore, even with an army of two hundred thousand, dare to fight against an army of thirty thousand, and that, too, under the leadership of the Holy Prophet himself. When the Holy Prophet found that the Caesar had withdrawn his forces from the frontier, he considered the question whether it would be worthwhile to march into the Syrian territory or to halt at Tabuk and turn his moral victory to political and strategic advantage. He decided on the latter course and made a halt for twenty days at Tabuk. During this time, he brought pressure on the small states that lay between the Roman Empire and the Islamic State and were at that time under the influence of the Romans, and subdued and made them the tributaries of the Islamic State. For instance, some Christian chiefs Ukaidir bin Abdul Malik Kindi of Dumatul Jaiidal, Yuhanna bin D'obah of Ailah, and the chiefs of Maqna, Jarba' and Azruh also submitted and agreed to pay Jizyah to the Islamic State of Al-Madinah. As a result of this, the boundaries of the Islamic State were extended right up to the Roman Empire, and the majority of the Arab clans, who were being used by the Caesar against Arabia, became the allies of the Muslims against the Romans. Above all, this moral victory of Tabuk afforded a golden opportunity to the Muslims to strengthen their hold on Arabia before entering into a long conflict with the Rormans. For it broke the back of those who had still been expecting that the old order of 'ignorance' might revive in the near future, whether they were the open upholders of shirk or the hypocrites who were hiding their shirk under the garb of Islam. The majority of such people were compelled by the force of circumstances to enter into the fold of Islam and, at least, make it possible for their descendants to become true Muslims. After this a mere impotent minority of the upholders of the old order was left in the field, but it could not stand in the way of the Islamic Revolution for the perfection of which Allah had sent His Messenger.
Problems of the Period
If we keep in view the preceding background, we can easily find out the problems that were confronting the Community at that time. They were: (1)to make the whole of Arabia a perfect Dar-ul-Islam, (2)to extend the influence of Islam to the adjoining
countries,
(3)to crush the mischiefs of the hypocrites, and (4)to prepare the Muslims for Jihad against the non-Muslim world.
Now that the administration of the whole of Arabia had come in the hands of the Believers, and all the opposing powers had become helpless, it was necessary to make a clear declaration of that policy which was to be adopted to make her a perfect Dar-ul-Islam Therefore the following measures were adopted.
A clear declaration was made that all the treaties with the mushriks were abolished and the Muslims would be released from the treaty obligations with them after a respite of four months.(vv. 1-3). This declaration was necessary for uprooting completely the system of life based on shirk and to make Arabia exclusively the centre of Islam so that it should not in any way interfere with the spirit of Islam nor become an internal danger for it.
A decree was issued that the guardianship of the Kaabah, which held central position in all tlie affairs of Arabia, should be wrested from the mushriks and placed per- manently in the hands of the Believers, (vv. 12-18) that all the customs and practices of the shirk of the era of 'ignorance' should be forcibly abolished: that the mushriks should not be allowed even to come near the "House" (v. 28). This was to eradicate every trace of shirk from the "House" that was dedicated exclusively to the worship of Allah. The evil practice of Nasi, by which they used to tamper with the sacred months in the days of 'ignorance', was forbidden as an act of kufr (v. 37). This was also to serve as an example to the Muslims for eradicating every vestige of the customs of ignorance from the life of Arabia (and afterwards from the lives of the Muslims everywhere). In order to enable the Muslims to extend the influence of Islam outside Arabia, they were enjoined to crush with sword the non-Muslim powers and to force them to accept the sovereignty of the Islamic State. As the great Roman and Iranian Empires were the biggest hindrances in the way, a conflict with them was inevitable. The object of Jihad was not to coerce them to accept Islam-they were free to accept or not to accept it-but to prevent them from thrusting forcibly their deviations upon others and the coming generations. The Muslims were enjoined to tolerate their misguidance only to the extent that they might have the freedom to remain misguided, if they chose to be so, provided that they paid Jizyah (v. 29) as a sign of their subjugation to the Islamic State.
The third important problem was to crush the mischiefs of the hypocrites, who had hitherto been tolerated in spite of their flagrant crimes. Now that there was practically no pressure upon them from outside, the Muslims were enjoined to treat them openly as disbelievers (v. 73). Accordingly, the Holy Prophet set on fire the house of Swailim, where the hypocrites used to gather for consultations in order to dissuade the people from joining the expedition to Tabuk. Likewise on his return from Tabuk, he ordered to pull down and burn the 'Mosque' that had been built to serve as a cover for the hypocrites for hatching plots against the true Believers.
In order to prepare the Muslims for Jihad against the whole non-Muslim world, it was necessary to cure them even of that slight weakness of faith from which they were still suffering. For there could be no greater internal danger to the Islamic Community than the weakness of faith, especially where it was going to engage itself single-handed in a conflict with the whole non-Muslim world. That is why those people who had lagged behind in the Campaign to Tabuk or had shown the least negligence were severely taken to task, and were considered as hypocrites if they had no plausible excuse for not fulfilling that obligation. Moreover, a clear declaration was made that in future the sole criterion of a Muslim's faith shall be the exertions he makes for the uplift of the Word of Allah and the role he plays in the conflict between Islam and kufr. Therefore, if anyone will show any hesitation in sacrificing his life, money, time and energies, his faith shall not be regarded as genuine. (vv. 81-96). If the above-mentioned important points are kept in view during the study of this Surah, it will facilitate the understanding of its contents.


Please read these then pass your judgement.

Thanks for the verbose explanations but I have a simple question, does any other religion asks it people to kill people of other faiths or prescribes the method of killing?

To the best of my knowledge, Islam is the only religion that proposes killing others. Islam not only promises a palce in heaven for ones who have killed Kaffirs but also promises other incentives such as the services of several virgins - I believe they are called Hoors - to the myrters.

[This message has been edited by schopenhauer (edited February 25, 2001).]

.

[This message has been edited by kumarakn (edited February 25, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by Topee Wala:
*Everywhere we look, there is HATE for Islam. *
[/quote]

You get what you give. It's simply, really. It's not the Muslims here bend over backwards to defend everyone else.

Expect it, move on with your life, and find out what works for you.

It is not only islam, but judaism and chirstianity as well prescribe methods. The reason why this is there that under war like situations that people know what do and dont do wrong things like raping. These are guidelines. What is wrong with guidelines. Otherwise what will happen is people will start fighting and so wrong things. Its a lot better then nuking a whole population then making them pay jiza (which is just tax on adult non-muslim males)

Ok get this fact straight. The killing bit is ONLY in war. Yes, we are commanded that if we are attacked, or our people being killed, we have the right to defend ourselves and Islam orders us to attack the opressor. It is only under this situation that we are allowed to kill kafirs, and only those who are fighting against us. Its only sane to do so. Islam gives us the guidelines under these situations. Those verses you quoted are those guidelines. Its as simple as that. Islam has never allowed killing of civilins and doing so is unislamic.

But whatever i say, non-muslims are scared. Islam is growing too fast and that is a threat to everyone else.

What about the following that teaches Muslims to kill Kaffirs in peace time.
Let's first start with everyone-is-scared-of-the-muslims bit. No one is scared. In fact, most people do not know how barberic Islam is. Only if more people knew , the 4.8 billin Kaffirs would unite. For being scared, if Israel could take on enemies 100 times its size and defeat them twice, thus capturing Golan and the West Bank, and the US could vertually destroy Iraq in two weeks, you can imagin what would happen if the NATO, Russia, and China joined forces .

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING

Sahih Muslim, Book 001, Number 0176:
It is narrated on the authority of Usama b. Zaid that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent us in a raiding party. We raided Huraqat of Juhaina in the morning.

I caught hold of a man and he said: There is no god but Allah, I attacked him with a spear.

It once occurred to me and I talked about it to the Apostle (may peace be upon him). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said:
Did he profess" There is no god but Allah," and even then you killed him?

I said: Messenger of Allah, he made a profession of it out of the fear of the weapon.

He (the Holy Prophet) observed:
Did you tear his heart in order to find out whether it had professed or not?
And he went on repeating it to me till I wished I had embraced Islam that day.

[This message has been edited by schopenhauer (edited February 25, 2001).]

I am sorry but u are not quoting this correctily. This is the real hadith. U are missing one word. I will explain. What u have posted here is wrong. Here is the real hadith:
Hadith 5.568: Bukhari
Narrated by Usama bin Zaid:
Allah’s Apostle sent us towards Al-Huruqa, and in the morning we attacked them and defeated them. I and an Ansari man followed a man from among them and when we took him over, he said, “La ilaha illal-Lah.” On hearing that, the Ansari man stopped, but I killed him by stabbing him with my spear. When we returned, the Prophet came to know about that and he said, "O Usama! Did you kill him after he had said “La ilaha ilal-Lah?” I said, “But he said so only to save himself.” The Prophet kept on repeating that so often that I wished I had NOT embraced Islam before that day.

The letter in the bold is what u missed. By omitting one word u changed the whole meaning.

The same hadith in volume 9 hadith 11:
Narrated Usama bin Zaid bin Haritha

Allah’s Apostle sent us (to fight) against Al-Huraqa (one of the sub-tribes) of Juhaina. We reached those people in the morning and defeated them. A man from the Ansar and I chased one of their men and when we attacked him, he said, “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.” The Ansari refrained from killing him but I stabbed him with my spear till I killed him. When we reached (Medina), this news reached the Prophet. He said to me, “O Usama! You killed him after he had said, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah?”’ I said, “OAllah’s Apostle! He said so in order to save himself.” The Prophet said, “You killed him after he had said, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.” The Prophet kept on repeating that statement till I wished I had not been a Muslim before that day.

I really want to get offensive but i will not. By missing the NOT u changed the meaning. The real meaning is as stated that he regretted being a muslim because of what a terrible act that he had commited. The Prophet emphasized that he killed some one who had said Lailahillah. Ohh, dont do this again. Changing Hadith. I dont konw how many times u have done this before BUT u have been caught this time. **Shame on you for trying to play such a trick! **

** U are changing the hadith for insulting Islam and changing the meaning of the Hadith. Be careful. This is NOT GOOD. Refrain from misquoting again.
**

This is a VERY offensive action that u just did. I hope that u misquoted this by mistake.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/mad3.gif

[This message has been edited by Topee Wala (edited February 25, 2001).]

These two appear to be narration of the same story with conflicting meanings. I do not know which is correct because I am not a scholar of Islam, I simply read that somewhere.

Going back to some original issues:
1) No other religion preches killing of the followers of other religions. In fact, criticizing other religions is prohibited in Budhism because Budha said,"... other's religion is as precious to them as your's is to you. Therfore, by criticizing another's religion you offend his feelings, which is the worst offense in the eyes of God." Compare this to Islam which provides Hoors to Muslims for killing Kaffirs.

2) If there is such a pervasive hatred for Muslims, then why did NATO, made up almost entirely of Christians (Tirkey excepted), went to the defense of Muslims in Kosovo. By the way, where were all those Muslim-britherhood-preaching countries during the Kosovo war? Where was Milosavic's son attempting to immigrate - China.

3) Why are Siahs (spelling?) and Sunnis killing each other in Karachi?

4) Why are Ahmadis killed in Pakistan for calling their place of preyer Mosque?

I suggest that you Muslims think long and hard how you want to fit in ths world. If your aim is killing or subjugation of the rest, you will find opposition. We Kaffirs like our fingertips and heads and we would like to keep them intact. Hope that you people do the same.

Oh my god. ok, now
1. We are not allowed to call anyones religion 'bad'. Because if we slander their religion, they slander ours.
2. The serbs really hated the Muslims and started ethnic-cleansing. I am talking about the media. The media portrays as evil all the time. The muslims were send military help to Kosovo and Pakistan sent its troops (under the UN).
3. The killing of shias and sunnis is islamicly wrong. The ones who kill either do so not based on Islam but some other motives. The take the name of Islam but are not good ppl.
4. I keep telling you. Islam does not allow killing other then in time of war and only against those who are fighting you.
5. We do not get hoors for killing kafirs. They are for shaheeds, those who give their own lifes for Allah. Those killing indiscriminantly will are guilty of murder and they will be accountable for this.

Lastly all u hear about islam on the media is mostly untrue. The parts that are true are taken out of context and therefore look strange as u posted those three verses.

Just belive me on this one. Our religion does not propogate hate. But people will always hate each other. When the prohpet (saw) was chased and stoned while he ran from a town of kafirs, when he was leaving he prayed that Allah guides them to the right path. He did not hate. He did not kill them... When mecca was taken over only 3 execution took place. This was in a time when armies took over they destroyed whole populations. So please think with an open mind. U have come to a decicion based on distorted information. Reconsider your approch and maybe u will find something new.

May Allah guide you to the right path. Ameen

[This message has been edited by Topee Wala (edited February 26, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by Topee Wala:
*Reconsider your approach and maybe you will find something new.
*

[/quote]

You can make this argument for pretty much any belief system.

[quote]
Originally posted by schopenhauer:
**
1) No other religion preches killing of the followers of other religions. In fact, criticizing other religions is prohibited in Budhism because Budha said,"... other's religion is as precious to them as your's is to you. Therfore, by criticizing another's religion you offend his feelings, which is the worst offense in the eyes of God." Compare this to Islam which provides Hoors to Muslims for killing Kaffirs.
**
[/quote]

As far as the contention that Islam advocates the killing of others is concerned, I really do not think that it deserves any attention unless an academic basis is provided to support it.

Buddha was correct. I really do not think that any reasonable person can ascribe to such a belief. Islam strictly forbids taking life of another human being, except in given cases. Any one who ascribes to and then promotes the belief that killing a member of another religion or sect is not only allowed but is a great virtue in Islam must support his belief from the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh). In the absence of such support from the sources of Islam, promotion of such thought should be construed as spreading anarchy and mutual hatred among Muslims and non-Muslims and, therefore, should be severely punishable in an Islamic (as well as any other) state.

I must emphasize that Islam does not allow taking life of another human being except in case of murder or spreading unrest or anarchy in the land (Al-Maaidah 5: 32). Only the state has the authority to carry out such an injunction. Killing other people, including non-muslims, is beyond the jurisdiction of the common muslim.

[quote]
Originally posted by schopenhauer:
**
2) If there is such a pervasive hatred for Muslims, then why did NATO, made up almost entirely of Christians (Tirkey excepted), went to the defense of Muslims in Kosovo. By the way, where were all those Muslim-britherhood-preaching countries during the Kosovo war? Where was Milosavic's son attempting to immigrate - China.
**
[/quote]

I'm afraid I am not an expert in this field. Maybe someone else would kindly offer to enlighten us both on this particular issue.

[quote]
Originally posted by schopenhauer:
**
3) Why are Siahs (spelling?) and Sunnis killing each other in Karachi?
**
[/quote]

I really think that the fire of hatred that is being aired between the followers of the two sects (especially in Pakistan), is completely out of place and should not have happened. But this does not mean that I view the differences in the two sects as trivial. Although I believe that although there are major differences in the two sects, it should be sought to resolve these differences, through propagation of what is right, rather than through calling each other "Kafir" or taking each other's lives. As far as Islam is concerned, it does not promote such behaviour. The previous reply should clarify this.

[quote]
Originally posted by schopenhauer:
**
4) Why are Ahmadis killed in Pakistan for calling their place of preyer Mosque?
**
[/quote]

As has been pointed out above, there is no basis in the Qur'an and the Sunnah for such acts. In fact, such behaviour goes directly against the injuctions of Islam and has always done so.

[quote]
Originally posted by schopenhauer:
**
I suggest that you Muslims think long and hard how you want to fit in ths world. If your aim is killing or subjugation of the rest, you will find opposition.
**
[/quote]

This opposition would include those who have studied Islam correctly, instead of using it as a cloak for their own political ideals.

[quote]
Originally posted by schopenhauer:
**
We Kaffirs like our fingertips and heads and we would like to keep them intact. Hope that you people do the same.**
[/quote]

Schopenhauer sir, I would just like to point out one concern of mine regarding the use of the word "Kafir" in situations where it is simply not relevant. As I have said elsewhere, the word "Kafir" can be in no way synonymous with the words "non-muslim" or "non-believer".

A “non-Muslim”, obviously, is a person who is not included in the group that we label as “Muslims”. While a “Kafir” is a “rejecter of the truth”. Thus, “Kafir” actually is one who, knowingly, rejects the truth. Rejecting the truth due to lack of knowledge, correct understanding or because of a mistake, does not make a person a "Kafir". On the contrary, “Kafir” is a person who knowingly turns his back on the truth.

Only God, in his absolute knowledge, has the authority to declare someone as "Kafir". I would therefore kindly request you, in all humbleness, to refrain from using the word "Kafir" out of context, as the need for it does not even arise here.

I hope you have not taken any offence at my remarks. Rest assured, my intention was not so.


They shoot partypoopers, don't they?

[This message has been edited by Mr Partypooper (edited February 27, 2001).]

Mr Partypooper, if there were marks alloted for being polite and oh-so-politically correct then you will get 11 out of 10!

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

I enjoy everytime you come in to explain the correct meaning of the word ‘kafir’, whereas most ppl use it as a slang for ‘non-muslim’. I am truly impressed!

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

Ah! Finally some one on this forum who sounds civilized and logical. It's a pleasure to read your response.

I only wrote what I observed. I did not make anything up. In fact, I did not even know the word kafir up until a few years ago when I watched jihadis souting "death to kafirs" on CNN.

So far as Muslims hating everyone, just read the post on this forum. They claim self-defense. But if you keep poking everyone in eye, they fight back. Then Muslims claim self-defense.

Take for example Kashmir. Pakistan is now saying that they are fighting against opression of Muslims in Kashmir. But, Pakistan invaded Kashmir in 1947, within a few months after partition. There was no opression then because India was a new-born country that did not even have its police in places.

Thake for example Israel. Muslim countries, except Egypt, do not even recognize its right to exist.

On the other hand, when Muslims were persecuted in Kosovo, we immidiately went to their defense and my tax dollars paid for it.

I have said befor and I am saying it again, if Muslims keep poking us in the eye we will start forming an alliance to fight back. I had predicted more than a year ago the tough stance UK would take against terrorism. US, China, Russia, Japan, Australia, and other countries are beginning to form anti-terrorist alliances that will keep getting stronger unless the frequent call of jihad against us stops emanating from within the boarders of countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan and hard-line Muslims stop following the call. I can assure you that if there are 10 more USS Coles in the next year, Afghanistan and Pakistan would be turned into sheets of glass and the lives of expatriates from those countries would be hell.

If yopu believe that people are misusing Islam for their own political purposes, then I recommend that you speak out against them. They will head advice coming from a fellow Muslim more than the ones coming from us heathens, or kafirs, or what ever they call us.

Have i been offensive in my response? I dont think so, it was u that misquoted the Islamic text. U took verses out of context and drew conclusions. U justify the hate. Hate for the unborn muslim children. Hate so great then when the children in Iraq die everyday no one cares and they continue the sanctions. American dogs are cared for more then those children. Why, because in the media we are evil. U expect us not to retaliate??!! What are we? We are not going to let our children die so the US can maintain its oil supply.

All I have found that these discussions are not usefull because, we already konw what u guys want. The only reason i started this thread was to be able to show that Islam is not what u think it is. I was trying to decrease the hatered. Hate is a bad thing, so bad that for us it is sinful for us to hate. We do not advertise hate. Hate is a by-product of the sufferings the muslims are undergoing. But it seems like that u want to maintain the hate. This is the same Islam that Ghandi, nepolean talked about. This is the same Islam that Mohammed Ali, Karim Abdul Jabbar, Malcom X, Cat Stevens became part of. The same Islam where the heads of states and the poorest people do Hajj in the same place, all wearing the same clothes, under the same sun, saying the same thing. The same Islam in which all different types of people bow their head at the same time.

But i guess i was trying to achive something almost immpossible. Trying to make some muslim haters believe that we are humans. I dont think that I will try this adventure again because it is people like u who hate us that some people respond the way they do.

The largest increasing minority in the US is mulims. Soo many people are converting! If they can see the 'light', try to wonder why they are doing this. They are not stupid.

I end of this discussion with a quote from the quran describing the situation here:

Or do they say, "He is possessed"? Nay, he has brought them the Truth, but most of them hate the Truth. The Quran 23:70

May Allah decrease the hate that you so effectivly justify to others and May Allah guide all of us who have gone astray.

Whatever you do, you are human, and how much ever u hate us, I will not hate you for you are Allah's creation, even though u might disagree. u have a heart and in that heart there is a light and a conscience that just might one day lead you to the right path, insha'Allah.

Kosova and Bosnia didn't get 'help' until they had organised themselves into fighting pretty efficiently themselves and in fact the tide of the battle was turning.

[quote]
No other religion preches killing of the followers of other religions.
[/quote]

First, Islam does NOT prescribe killing people of other faiths as others have proved here for your satisfaction. Your misconception about Islam is based solely on watching some reports on CNN of all places!

As for other religions preaching the killing of peoples of other faiths. I suggest you consult a few history books and you will see quite the contrary.

 Read up on the Crusades. You will discover that during that time all the major Christian Churches of Europe in alliance with all the kingly rulers of the European states (England, France, Germany, Italy etc) formed large armies to invade the holy land and set up their own Christian states. They overthrew the so-called “infidel” rulers of the region i.e. Muslims and Jews.

 These (Christian) Crusader States which ruled for close to 300 years before being liberated by the Great Saladin, treated the native “infidels” to the harshest rule possible. The crimes of the Christian Crusaders are on par with the genocide’s of the last century or even worse. All the killings of Muslims and Jews were sanctioned by the highest authorities of Christendom (the Pope), using biblical justification and to assert Christian Supremacy.

 Once you have read up on the Christian Crusades, you should read up on the Spanish Inquisition – one more clear-cut example of the killing of Muslims and Jews on a genocidal scale. And, again justified by the highest authorities of the Catholic Christian Church using biblical quotes in order to wipe out all non-Christian faiths.

 For more recent examples of Christian Churches preaching the killing of other faiths read up on the history of African Slavery, and the European Colonialism of the 19th/20th centuries.

Slavery, which led to the deaths of some 15 million Africans, was justified on biblical grounds by the leading lights of the Christian Churches of the day. Africans were seen as “inferior” beings who had to be controlled and forced to accept the “civilising” beliefs of European Christians.

 European Colonialism in Africa, Asia and the America’s was justified by the missionary zeal of the Catholic and Protestant Churches. Colonialism was seen as the “white man’s burden” i.e. the Natives had to be educated on the “Superior” beliefs of western Christianity. Peoples of all other non-Christian faiths were killed in the defence of their faiths by Christian-sanctioned repression.

[quote]
If there is such a pervasive hatred for Muslims, then why did NATO, made up almost entirely of Christians (Tirkey excepted), went to the defense of Muslims in Kosovo
[/quote]

Is that what you seriously believe? What do you actually know about the history and the politics of the region?

Firstly I would like to know what you know about the Muslim lands of the former Yugoslavia, namely Bosnia, Kosovo, the Sandzak and Kosovo? Go back and read the history of these lands from the early 1980’s onwards and you will see how mistaken you are. If you still hold to the view that the NATO helped Muslims in Kosovo then I will surely be back very soon to prove you completely wrong and misinformed (probably by watching CNN).