Re: Hadith and thier Authenticity [Split]
Yup. People just take pleasure in labeling Hadith-rejectors without understanding what a persons stance is and whether he is actually rejecting something or questioning about how other people reached to a conclusion. To me it has been like this; to defend someones conclusion you should be able to understand how that conclusion was derived.
Re: Hadith and thier Authenticity [Split]
[Quote]
healthymind, stop relying on internet....
[/Quote]
My dear Mr ARMUGHAL, he cant very well throw the actual book at you through this forum can he? The only way to refer to a third source while debating on the net is through sources on the net. If he scanned a page of the book u would say his copy is flawed or worse, he forged it and would stick to you claim that YOUR copy is correct. Either accept his source, or put forward proof that his sources are incorrect (such as link to your own source).
Otherwise what you are saying is that ALL the sources of Sahih Bukhari on the net are flawed? As incredible as that sounds that would only mean that sunnis are extroardinarly incompetent. And while I am no sunni, even I wouldnt insult them so. (No insult intended, just trying to get my point across)
So again, please, for the sake of people who have to actually read your arguments, put some more thought into them.
Re: Hadith and thier Authenticity [Split]
From where will he bring the thoughts?
Re: Hadith and thier Authenticity [Split]
i have noticed that you people instead of learning the classification and science of ahadees , keep on objecting them
so what i can do , i have done to bring the article of classification of ahadees to the gupshup
so that you should take a look at that
and tell us how much is your knowledge
go and check out