[quote]
Originally posted by arrehman:
The man who Divided India has barely been around for a fortnight ...Today indian muslim are just givvers of the votes ,living in fear because what is happening in pakistan.jinnah's two nation theory has raised barriers of hostility which have not yet been removed.
[/quote]
Well first of all buddy, in Pakistan we always maintain a healthy skepticism of our leaders and dont label them as mahamtama and indulge in stupid mentality and hyppocrisy. It does not mean for a second that anyone here as a single friggin doubt that Jinnah--one of the greatest man that lived in the 20th century-- is not recognized as father of the great nation of Pakistan. His cause was for the muslims in south asia and for the preservance of their heritage and a surity that they would have a shelter on their head. He gave his life for the purpose. there isnt a SHRED of property or wealth accumulated by him. He died in an ambulance on his way to the hospital cuz the engine gave up. He did not remarry after his wife's death and he did not take an iota of Pakistan's national wealth with him. His vision was one of salva tion for the Muslims and he acheived it. Now god dammit I have known many indian muslims full of envy and their sorry ass that they wished they were born in Pakistan. Then on the other hand they sayy that all is well in India with them. If all is well, then there IS NO NEED TO DISCUSS THAT ALL MUSLIMS IN SOUTH ASIA TOGETHER WOULD VE BEEN BENEFICIAL and stuff.
Pakistan at its birth was a very backward area. It was an area of muslims density and British ignored it. There was nothing in Pakistan. Even the plane in which Quad E Azam came wasn't fastend properly. Pakistan has been stabbed too many times by cowardly SOBS and we survived and we will expand and prosper and strive for the destiny that is Pakistan's fate.
Muslims in India are indians now. if they are being suppressed and sidelined, they should take to the streets, lobby, and let the world know what's being done to them. But Pakistan is not responsible for them. Those who remained did so after their own choice.
The Islamic Republic's creation is one of the most beautiful chapter's in the political and Islamic World's history. the people of Pakistan are alhamdolillah full of spirit, energy and zeal. Iran named a whole city after Jinnah. There were shouts of Allaho Akbar and slaughtering of cows and goats in turkey, indonesia... King Faisal called pakistan the fort of Islam (recently the wrods again echoed by the saudi foreign minister, not that I give hoot to those schmucks), Sultan of Oman said if you want to buy a crow buy it from Pakistan (both faisal and the sultan were assasinated).
Yes Jinnah was the instrumental figure in acheiving Muslims a homeland for their salvation! But HELL! if any one thinks that if jinnah hadnt been there, Muslims wouldnt have acheived this security. Jinnah was backed by the best of the best muslim scholars, nationalists, poets, philosophers and lawyers. he enjoyed popularity wherever he went. And this was a guy who was hailed as the ambassador of united India. He was offered WHAT NOT by the british and their slave hindians....but he didnt except anything. Any one who doubts his sincerety is a bigtime f*** up. British were to abandon the subcontinent sooner or later (thank you Hitler), but the creation of Pakistan was JUSTICE done to the people of this land.
India is shi8, its extreme, dense and full of AIDS. Muslims ruled "South asian sub continent' NOT "india". The territory of Pakistan and her people have nothing to do with any continental "Indian" empire. We did not divide anyone country: we carved out a boudary from a vast continent. HECK! if anyone says that middle east is a country or europe is a country.
George Washington (my respects to the general) was single handedly responsible for the creation of the United States of America (now just cuz US has become a shi8hole, doesnt mean its creation was wrong). But goddammit if anyone says that he was single handedly responsible behind the "idea" of US. Hell no, he has nothing to do with the constitution, the bill of rights and the political philosophical evolution of the US: that ws done by hamilton, jefforson, madison, john jay, andrew jackson and so forth) Now how many of us know these names? By comparison washington was shi8.
For sure, Lincoln fought to preserve the Unoin of the United States. But British India was never a Union of willing subjects. Neither its people any one nation, especially the composition of the northwest (Pakistan: the land of best heritage in the world!!) Kashmir is not part of the Indian union, since they never joined it, and India's troops there is illegal and condemnable. East Punjab is part of the indian union since they did choose to join them, and if they try to seperate on account of their greiviences from hindia, then both are justified: Sikhs for seperatism and hindia for sending tin the troops to preserve the union.
Britsh Hindia WAS NEVER A UNION OF WILLING SUBJECTS!
My salute to flag of Sitara O Hillal, the flag of cresent and star . The country which is the epicentre of the Earth. The land of seven rivers. The cross roads of middleast/south/central Asia. to hell withthe rest of smelly hyppocrites and schmucks who piss then run, lie then cover their tracks, opress and then kiss ass. HMPH!
NO ONE GIVES ME ANY CRAP OF DIVIDING A PEOPLE OR COUNTRY FROM NOW ON!
ZINDABAD PAKISTAN!
[This message has been edited by Sultan Toora (edited December 01, 2001).]