Where did I say I do not understand your view and subject matter?
i said you do not know what you are trying to say and how.
This topic is very good no doubt. I have no intention to drag my take on your first post. However you said two things here:
1- This is the norm. You cannot avoid it. hence you agreed with those who present themsleves with mixed and opposite views just to have fun! Not serious with the conviction themselves.
2- The example of reporter does not apply to those who would write in favor of hijab/chaadar but show video of woman without hijaab/ chaadar to make a point. Hence my example of those who would write against porn.
The reporter did not torture people ‘himself’. Reporter merely presented it to public. And by presenting it to public it did not proliferate torture, but presenting porn to public would make people enjoy more porn.
I guess you will not admit there was no reason to place a link to video to make a point for chaadar or ghoongat. You did the same thing as the video maker did, to make fun of the ‘essence’ of chaadar/ghoongat but trying to promote ghoongat!
No need to go overbaard there to lose the real meaning of chaadar/ghoongat!
Anyhow I agree with your point that religion does not bind anyone to use a certain kind of article of clothings to achieve the same goal.