Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

[Shamraz_Khan]

So, Mushrraf is not alone is his quest quest to conquer the judiciary. These people need to realize that independent judiciary is in interest of everybody. You never know when you might need it, yet all of them have been trying to undermine the judicial system.

http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=9317

Nawaz wanted to arrest Sajjad Ali Shah, says book

By Umar Cheema

ISLAMABAD: President General Pervez Musharraf bears at least one similarity with his benefactor-turned-rival Nawaz Sharif as far as their approach towards the judiciary is concerned.

Former PM Nawaz Sharif was instead a step ahead of Musharraf as he badly wanted to arrest then Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah and put him in jail for a night, if not for a longer period, one of his senior cabinet members revealed in his memoirs.

Not only this, Nawaz also wanted to summon the CJ before the National Assembly’s privilege committee in complete absence of any provisions in the rules but luckily he had a good advisor who warned him against doing that. However, his lust for unbridled power had later forced him to show the door to the CJ through his own clan, the judges of the apex court.

Apparently taking cue from Nawaz, Musharraf also tried to carry out this adventure but was checkmated by the superior judiciary, legal fraternity and vibrant media that turned out to be very aggressive against this unholy move.

“Gohar Sahib, show me a way to arrest the chief justice and keep him in jail for a night,” Gohar Ayub, a senior politician who has seen the history of Pakistan making before his eyes, disclosed about Nawaz’ plan in his book – Glimpses into the Corridors of Power – to be launched on Tuesday.

Son of the country’s first military ruler, Gohar, was foreign minister in Nawaz’ 2nd term when his boss was planning this misadventure and sought advice on the issue from him (Gohar) who had served as National Assembly speaker in his previous regime.

Giving details about the Nawaz plan, Gohar writes that he was first asked to provide guidance as to how Sajjad Shah could be summoned before the privilege committee and later for sending him to jail.

“The tussle between the PM and chief justice was reaching its peak. I got a call from the PM on November 5, 1997 asking me to come and see him in his chamber in the National Assembly,” Gohar writes in his memoirs.

When I arrived, he writes, I found members of the privilege committee (Nawabzada Iqbal Mehdi and others) present in the cabinet room. The PM asked the chairman of the privilege committee to explain the situation to me. The chairman said that they wanted to summon the chief justice before the committee and all those present (including the PM) concurred, he further writes.

“I told them that the rules did not provide for such a drastic step. I have prepared the rules as speaker. No, you cannot summon him and if you make the mistake of doing so, he will disregard your summons. The committee and the PM will be insulted,” Gohar writes.

With that, the discussion came to an end. The PM asked me to accompany him to the PM House. In the car, the PM put his hands on my knee, and said: “Gohar Sahib, show me a way to arrest the chief justice and keep him in jail for a night.” “For heaven’s sake, do not even consider doing anything of the sort. The whole system will collapse,” I told him. He said nothing more, Gohar writes in his book.

[shriek11]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

What was the case all about? Was it nawaz's abuse of power? It is sad that the punjabis on the bench played the ethnic game. No wonder we are what we are: a failed banana republic which has replaced its british masters for the american ones..

[Flame_of_Life]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

Gohar has some interesting stories to tell. I ma get this book when it’s launched (tomorrow)

[Shamraz_Khan]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

@shriek11

What was the case all about? Was it nawaz’s abuse of power? It is sad that the punjabis on the bench played the ethnic game. No wonder we are what we are: a failed banana republic which has replaced its british masters for the american ones..

Well, CJ SAS was a stubborn judge, but a good judge. He was ousted by NS by engineering a coup d’eta from within the SC.

http://www.emagine-group.com/behindthechairmansdoor/2007/07/21/a-defining-moment-for-the-judiciary-sajjad-ali-shah/

I HAVE been following with great interest the proceedings of the case of the Chief Justice of Pakistan. The judiciary is an institution with two sides like that of a coin. One is external which is visible to the people and the other is internal which is not visible and is not discussed in public.

What happens inside the judiciary and to the judges as they interact with the executive is not divulged to the outside world. The Chief Justice knows better because he controls the administration and deals with the executive in that connection.

So there are wheels within wheels. The executive always tries to win over the judiciary by following a carrot and stick policy. The CJP administers the oath of office to the president and vice versa, and there are important functions in the presidency and PM House with the participation of foreign dignitaries which are attended by the CJP.

Both civil and military governments want a friendly judiciary and they don’t like decisions against the government or its policies. Even otherwise, Islamabad is a small town with a limited social life. On the administrative side, the CJP can accommodate the federal government but without transgressing the Constitution and law.

During my tenure as CJP, a request was made to me by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for the appointment of a particular lawyer as attorney-general of Pakistan. I consulted the CJ of the high court of the province concerned and in spite of some difficulties, we were able to make the appointment as wished by the prime minister acceptable to all relevant quarters.
In February 1997, Mian Nawaz Sharif won the elections and took oath on February 17. One or two days before taking oath, he came to my residence in Rawalpindi for a courtesy call accompanied by Messrs Wasim Sajjad, Sartaj Aziz, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan and Ishaq Dar.

We had a friendly meeting of 45 minutes during which he talked about his heavy mandate and expressed his interest in dispensing cheap and quick justice at the doorstep of needy people and sought the cooperation of the courts. I assured him that the same was possible under the existing judicial system if more judges and funds were provided. Our working relationship started on a happy note until a misunderstanding was created between us. His ears were poisoned by hawks in his cabinet and supporters.

Differences started with the setting up of speedy courts, which was a parallel judicial system manned by retired judges or lawyers appointed at will for limited tenures, and then over the appointment of five judges in the Supreme Court.

Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif was not willing to let go of the CJ of the Lahore High Court and two other judges to join the Supreme Court and refused to give reasons as directed in the judgment of the Judges’ case. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif cut the number of the judges of the Supreme Court from 17 to 12 to block the appointments.

Of course, the 13th and 14th Amendments were made in the Constitution without a debate by relaxing the rules of procedure. Cases were taken in hand for hearing against the prime minister on the grounds of corruption, abuse of authority and contempt of court.

He, his supporters and party workers resented this very much and there were camps of hawks and doves. Many well-wishers gave correct advice and were in favor of an amicable settlement but the hawks remained adamant.

President Farooq Leghari and then COAS General Jehangir Karamat intervened to defuse the situation and to avoid a conflict between the executive and the judiciary, but to no avail. General Nasim Rana, DG, ISI, was also playing an important role and they are very important witnesses.

On the other hand, the government was trying to find a legislative way to get rid of the CJP. The National Assembly and Senate were in constant session. They were debating the taking away of the administrative powers of the CJP by making a roster and assigning cases to be exercised by a board of senior judges.

Damage is always done to the institution from within. The prime minister was advised to work on the judges and isolate the Chief Justice. He had a meeting with me at his Model Town residence and in the presence of Mr Majid Nizami and Mr Shahbaz Sharif offered me a better position after my retirement as CJP if I cooperated.

In return, he wanted me not to hear cases against him. I did not agree and insisted that I would decide cases according to the law, that I had no animus against him and that he should not be fearful if allegations were false.

I also offered that if he was interested in speedy trials, then within the same judicial system, I was prepared to make the high court a trial court and the Supreme Court an appellate court to decide cases in the shortest possible time, provided he gave more funds for increasing the number of judges. He agreed first but then backed out.

I was also hearing the case of the political wing of the ISI as to under what law it was functional and the scope of authority under that law. It was under such circumstances that the government of Nawaz Sharif finally decided to work on the judges of the Supreme Court to go against me. It was also decided that first a judicial order would be obtained in any proceedings, suspending the notification of my appointment as CJP and then to dislodge me by force, including an attack on the Supreme Court.

I was not afraid of the two murder attempts on me and numerous letters threatening to kill me and my family members. I sent the copies to the president and the DG, ISI. The threats were that if anything happened to the prime minister, I would not be spared.

I was presiding over the bench hearing a contempt case against the prime minister. On his request, the bench granted one week’s adjournment during which petitions were filed in the registries of the Supreme Court alleging my appointment to be unconstitutional for the reason that I was not the senior-most judge when I was appointed CJP. I was fourth on the list. The judges who were superseded did not resign or step down as is done in the armed forces.

When General Musharraf was appointed COAS out of turn, he was number three on the list. Two aggrieved generals resigned. On November 27, 1997, the Quetta bench of the Supreme Court composed of two judges, Irshad Hassan Khan and Khalilur Rahman, passed an interim order in the incidental proceedings of a rent case that the Supreme Court was incomplete as the CJP was appointed out of turn.

The third judge, Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid, reached Quetta in the evening and he also appended his signature. Incidentally, all three judges in Quetta were inducted in the Supreme Court on my recommendation and had been administered their oath by me. Justice Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui passed a similar order in the Peshawar bench. Justice Mukhtar Junejo was also a member of the bench but refused to sit on the bench in that case. Justice Siddiqui took over powers of Chief Justice and issued his own roster and directed that the matter be heard by a full court except the CJP who was restrained and Justice Ajmal Mian who was the intended beneficiary and was conveniently present in Islamabad on one week’s leave as he wanted to defuse the tension and resolve differences among the judges supporting the CJP and those supporting the prime minister.

Orders passed by the Quetta and Peshawar benches were given coverage on TV because they were in favor of the government. On November 29, 1997, the Supreme Court was stormed by a mob. I had advance information that preparations were afoot to send a large crowd of persons from Lahore by Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif in buses. I informed the DG, ISI, who later told me that the government was not involved.

One evening before the passing of the order by the Quetta bench, Justice (r) Senator Mohammad Rafiq Tarar flew in a private plane of the chief minister along with others and had a meeting with two judges of the Supreme Court from Lahore. He did a faithful job of winning over the judges of the Supreme Court in favor of the prime minister. He was rewarded with the post of the president.

It is surprising that the Supreme Court judges did not raise any objection for nearly three and a half years while I was Chief Justice and suddenly realised that my appointment was unconstitutional because I was appointed out of turn.

It turned out that out of 17 judges, 10 supported the prime minister and six were with me. Out of the 10, eight were appointed on my recommendation and were sworn in by me. All of them have retired from the Supreme Court and some got assignments after retirement. My only fault was that I was appointed out of turn, which was declared unconstitutional by 10 judges of the Supreme Court, who supported the prime minister and voted against their own CJP.

Rule of seniority was laid down in the appointment of judges when the process of consultation was involved. In the appointment of the CJP, there is no consultation as the president can appoint any one of the judges as Chief Justice or appoint a lawyer who has practised for 15 years as an advocate of a high court directly to the post of CJP.

The Constitution can be amended. In fact, that is the only way to remove ambiguity in the language. Nobody talks about the attack on the Supreme Court in November 1997 and how it happened and what was the conspiracy between certain judges and the government. The judges followed the directions of Justice Saeeduzzaman because the government gave its nod. These are the circumstances to be considered while evaluating the judgment in Malik Asad’s case. None of these 10 judges regretted the attack on the Supreme Court.

The whole offensive was filmed by hidden cameras fixed on the premises of the Supreme Court and was seen by the president, the prime minister and the COAS. Photographs were published in newspapers showing federal ministers leading the mob. I sent a reference to the president against Justice Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui on grounds of misconduct but the prime minister refused to act.

President Musharraf in his book ‘In the line of fire’ has stated that the prime minister convinced certain judges to take his side and they passed a resolution against their own Chief Justice and then the prime minister got his party goons to storm the Supreme Court building while the court was in session.

On page 84 of the book it is stated that this matter was discussed at the meeting of the corps commanders and the author (who was himself a corps commander) supported the idea that the president and the Chief Justice be sacrificed and the prime minister be saved. Against such a background with the backing of the prime minister, the federal government and the army, the judgment in Malik Asad’s case is to be considered. It is not fair to say that it is a matter between the judges of the Supreme Court, forgetting and ignoring the conspiracy and the attack on the Supreme Court.

The 13 judges of the Supreme Court, who heard the case of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, can also consider the doctrine of necessity and relevant case law on the subject and bury the hatchet for ever. They can let ambiguities in the Constitution be rectified by parliament so that all the institutions mentioned in the Constitution can perform their duties within the parameters laid down by the Constitution to enable the nation to enjoy the fruits of real democracy after 60 years of political waywardness and constitutional confusion.

If they want the senior-most judge to be Chief Justice and the Chief Justice to be appointed and removed by the remaining judges of the Supreme Court or high court, let it be said specifically in the Constitution so that the workload of interpretation by the courts is decreased and time is given to litigation for the common man.

[Flame_of_Life]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

Sharmaz, thanx for the great article mate.

[shriek11]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

In that case, Musharraf is an angel since whatever decision he made he chose to abide by the ruling of the court [not get it attacked]. I wonder why people forget the depressed nineties and will probably "elect" benazir / nawaz if they were to come back?

[Shamraz_Khan]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

In that case, Musharraf is an angel since whatever decision he made he chose to abide by the ruling of the court [not get it attacked]. I wonder why people forget the depressed nineties and will probably "elect" benazir / nawaz if they were to come back?

FOL, no problem.

Shriek11, I agree, but Mushrraf has way too many problems...so probably that the reason. NS had super-majority in the Parliament so he thought he was indispensable. As French President Charles De Gaulle once said "graveyards are full of indispensable men."

[hanibal]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

@Flame_of_Life

Gohar has some interesting stories to tell. I ma get this book when it’s launched (tomorrow)

I agree, gohar’s is a story teller… actually now it is govt’s turn to point fingers to others and say they also did it… :halo: or they were going to do so..etc etc

[hanibal]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

In that case, Musharraf is an angel since whatever decision he made he chose to abide by the ruling of the court [not get it attacked]. I wonder why people forget the depressed nineties and will probably "elect" benazir / nawaz if they were to come back?

I got a news for u my friend,

look at current govt and ruling party apart from few, all are from nineties... From Shujaat to Faisal Salah Hayaat and Aftab Sher'pao...they were looters then they are looters now..so tell me what is the difference between mush's govt and NS/BB's govts of 90s...

[Reza_Pahlavi]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

What was the case all about? Was it nawaz's abuse of power? It is sad that the punjabis on the bench played the ethnic game. No wonder we are what we are: a failed banana republic which has replaced its british masters for the american ones..

Punjabi judges? Care to explain. Is the present CJ Ifti not a Punjabi as well?

[Haris]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

In that case, Musharraf is an angel since whatever decision he made he chose to abide by the ruling of the court [not get it attacked]. I wonder why people forget the depressed nineties and will probably "elect" benazir / nawaz if they were to come back?

Exactly shriek..

[Haris]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

@Flame_of_Life

Gohar has some interesting stories to tell. I ma get this book when it’s launched (tomorrow)

Yeah man, I’d love to get it asap too! Yesterday there was an ad in the paper and I found out its published by Sang-e-meel Pub in urdu? Though I was under the impression and eagerly waiting for the English title which was announced 2-3 months ago “glimpses into the corridors…” by OUP?
Any clues whats up?

[shriek11]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

Punjabi judges? Care to explain. Is the present CJ Ifti not a Punjabi as well?

What is this supposed to mean?

How did this ifti sahab ended up in sajjad ali shah thread?

[Zakk]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

Is this his personal memoirs? Whoever gets it do tell what it says about the 1964 karachi riots.

The difference between Nawaz and Mush is Nawaz wanted to arrest the CJ and Mushy did..

[shriek11]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

When did musharraf arrested the CJ and put him in Jail?

[Flame_of_Life]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

@Haris Zuberi

Yeah man, I’d love to get it asap too! Yesterday there was an ad in the paper and I found out its published by Sang-e-meel Pub in urdu? Though I was under the impression and eagerly waiting for the English title which was announced 2-3 months ago “glimpses into the corridors…” by OUP?
Any clues whats up?

yup..I think it’s out already. I went to the Oxford bookshop here but I was a little late and they had just closed but I saw a poster on the main door. So it’s out definitely. Not sure about the Urdu version.

On a related topic, has anyone read “Encounters with Destiny”](http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/Pakistan/?view=usa&ci=9780195471427) By Javed Iqbal?

This book translates the autobiography of Pakistani writer, philosopher, and jurist Javid Iqbal. Including a candid look at relations with his father, the world renowned poet and visionary, who conceived the idea of Pakistan as an independent homeland for Indian Muslims, the book spans his personal experience over eighty years. It provides an insight into the political turmoil that led to the creation of Pakistan as well as the subsequent politial, judicial, and cultural developments in his native land.

[Ajju]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

@Flame_of_Life

yup..I think it’s out already. I went to the Oxford bookshop here but I was a little late and they had just closed but I saw a poster on the main door. So it’s out definitely. Not sure about the Urdu version.

On a related topic, has anyone read “Encounters with Destiny”](http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/Pakistan/?view=usa&ci=9780195471427) By Javed Iqbal?

I would like to read it. Since Khanb**** had spewed much venom against Javed Iqbal calling him different names and part of conspiracy against islam, Javed Iqbal’s got to be a reasonable guy.

[Shamraz_Khan]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

@Ajju

I would like to read it. Since Khanb**** had spewed much venom against Javed Iqbal calling him different names and part of conspiracy against islam, Javed Iqbal's got to be a reasonable guy.

Excuse my ignorance, but who is Javed Iqbal?

[Captain1]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

^ Allama Iqbal ka beta (ya pota/nawasa) may be

[Zakk]

Re: Gohar Ayoub: Nawaz wanted to arrest CJ Sajjad Ali Shah

I wonder why people forget the depressed nineties and will probably "elect" benazir / nawaz if they were to come back?

I am guessing the same reason people are willing to forget the armys role in the loss of east Pakistan or zias kalashinkov culture.