Re: Goa - why?
bangladesh is now our close ally
ISI has established bases and are training Assam freedom fighters and they are winning....
say bye bye to your assam provinces
once they are taken we move to tamil and khalistan and then kashmir
are pahele balochistan sambhal ..... :OMG:
he is such a joker ....
Re: Goa - why?
i really dont know what kind of propoganda that the indian media is feeind you...
balochistan is nothing more than a little annoyance.....
but assam is no longer in indian control, khalistan movement is getting stronger by the day, ISI has spread its deadly tentacles in every nook and cranny of india....
If i were you, I would be more concered about assam, orissa, kashmir, khalistan, tamil-nadu, regions....
Re: Goa - why?
tamil nadu, orissa, khalistan? yaar you bakistanis really are nuts. there isnt one ak-47 firing in tamil nadu in 50 yrs. 500 rounds of AK-47s are fired every night in balochistan. minor nuisance indeed. 
Re: Goa - why?
then why is pakistan the one supplying weapons to sri lanka and not their masters india?
could it be that the indian government and its incompetent army have been throughlly defeated in tamil nadu and anything done against the tamils will have severe reprecussions..
some army
so thats what you do all night?
go to baluchistan and sit there all night and count the number of bullets being fired…
no wonder your posts are so dilusional, you are sleeping during the day:D
Re: Goa - why?
Who else will buy made in pakistan weapons ? Any future plans for sale to Nato ?
Re: Goa - why?
HAHAHAHAHAH!
dude, you have no idea what tamil nadu is and what sri lanka is. you are one ignoramus, passing great judgements with ZERO knowledge. indian army defeated in tamil nadu HAHAHAHAH! when was indian army even in a conflict in tamil nadu, o great great political pundit, pray tell.
whats with all these morons out to bash india with not a clue in hell?
Re: Goa - why?
This entire thread abt GOA is so stupidly absurd i am from this region ask me what you talking is nothing but bull**** the person who has written this post should come down to GOA and understand its history to end in nutshell GOA was attached by Portugues in 1500 which was resisted by the local Gomantak people so the attack was carried out by India BTW there was hardly any fight.
People in GOA still enjoy dual nationality thanks to portugues govt so govan people have two passports
Come to enjoy beer, fish, sun, babes, music, praties, water sports its Holidays 365 days a year
Re: Goa - why?
dude, you have no idea what tamil nadu is and what sri lanka is. you are one ignoramus, passing great judgements with ZERO knowledge. indian army defeated in tamil nadu HAHAHAHAH! when was indian army even in a conflict in tamil nadu, o great great political pundit, pray tell.
whats with all these morons out to bash india with not a clue in hell?
tell that your prime minister who was blown away by tamils
Re: Goa - why?
They already said 'sorry' for that unfortunate act. Lets move forward. Sonia also pardoned some of the accused.
Re: Goa - why?
Pakistani army is fighting them with fighter jets, helicopter gunships, rockets and everything similar to US troops fighting Iraqis.
Actually, I dont think its a mere annoyance but a mini-war.
Same can be said about FATA, Waziristan and to some extent Northern Areas.
[quote]
but assam is no longer in indian control
[/quote]
Actually, Assam is well under Indian control and India's tea-exporter. Indian army doesnt go with fighter jets and helicopters to fight the minor irritants there.
In the state elections that were held there recently, many militants fought and won some seats. They are now in power along with the Congress party.
[quote]
khalistan movement is getting stronger by the day
[/quote]
It is strong only in UK nightpubs.
[quote]
If i were you, I would be more concered about assam, orissa, kashmir, khalistan, tamil-nadu, regions....
[/quote]
Well I guess those the latest headlines from Jihadi news or something.
tell that your prime minister who was blown away by tamils
The LTTE are not from Tamil-Nadu, but from Sri Lanka, just as Pashtuns also live in NWFP in Pakistan although they are mostly from Afghanistan.
Re: Goa - why?
Colin Powell said that to defeat the maximum number of force must be used to subdue the enemy.
what about it?
we are conducting operations and rooting foreign terrorist from our sacred land
Prove it.
thats because you fear that a bunch of rag tag militants can shoot down your expensive russian imports
so a bunch of people who took up arms against the state are now running the place. in pakistan such activity is considered traitarous but i guess india is just too scared to prosecute them
and vancouver...
havent you heard about the maoist insurgency?
still they got support from tamils in india and india doesnt send arms to sri lanka because it fears the tamils in india
Re: Goa - why?
Well even after using so much force, Pakistan has not yet been able to quell the Balochistan, FATA, Waziristan fighting. It means they are also very strong.
[QUOTE]
Prove it.
[/QUOTE]
Well you made the charge, you prove otherwise.
[QUOTE]
thats because you fear that a bunch of rag tag militants can shoot down your expensive russian imports
[/QUOTE]
When they do not have anything more sophisticated then country-made rifles and an odd AK-47 sometimes then such action is not neccessary.
[QUOTE]
so a bunch of people who took up arms against the state are now running the place.
[/QUOTE]
The Congress is the leading party only 3 seats given to the former millitant candidates. The millitants won a total of 11 seats as compared to 52 of the Congress.
[QUOTE]
in pakistan such activity is considered traitarous but i guess india is just too scared to prosecute them
[/QUOTE]
Well I guess thats coz Pakistan is a military dictatorship and not a democracy. Those 11 millitants came into power by the will of the people, which is supreme.
[QUOTE]
havent you heard about the maoist insurgency?
[/QUOTE]
Maoist insurgency afflicts more than a 150 districts in India. But it is confined to tribal and jungle areas only.
[quote]
still they got support from tamils in india and india doesnt send arms to sri lanka because it fears the tamils in india
[/quote]
The LTTE were trained by the RAW, and the Indian Army threw them out of Jaffna in 2 weeks, which the Sri-Lankan army could not manage to do in more than 2 years.
India sells army radars and non-lethal arms to Sri-Lanka. Anyways, I have never heard Pakistan selling any arms to Sri-Lanka.
Re: Goa - why?
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I think if ther is a war with Pakistan , the sikh regiment and the madras regiment would be the first to kick some pakistani ass.:).
Keep dreaming sweetu.
Re: Goa - why?
Guys, the topic was goa, if you can go back to topic then fine, otherwise I'll close the thread.
Re: Goa - why?
I knew a Portugese girl many years back. I enjoyed a warm relationship with her. She told me Portugal was totally wrong in staying in India. Now you know.
Re: Goa - why?
I don't doubt that portugal's presence in Goa was obsolete. I supported the handover of Hong Kong to China, Britain had no place there.
But why did India have to resort to hostility, force of arms, to secure Goa? Why could India not have patiently negotiated for decades with Portugal, like China did in order to get Macao from Portugal?
Is it because India is inherently belligerent and aggresive in nature? Why could India not take the slow, peaceful path, rather than sending in soldiers all the time?
Re: Goa - why?
But why did India have to resort to hostility, force of arms, to secure Goa? Why could India not have patiently negotiated for decades with Portugal, like China did in order to get Macao from Portugal?
Is it because India is inherently belligerent and aggresive in nature? Why could India not take the slow, peaceful path, rather than sending in soldiers all the time?
are supporting or opposing that operation ......
Re: Goa - why?
But why did India have to resort to hostility, force of arms, to secure Goa? Why could India not have patiently negotiated for decades with Portugal, like China did in order to get Macao from Portugal?
Is it because India is inherently belligerent and aggresive in nature? Why could India not take the slow, peaceful path, rather than sending in soldiers all the time?
because the portugese were killing goans and not allowing any form of dissent in their territory. Even in portugal it was the same. They were ruled by a dictator then fully supported as always by US. I forgot his name.
Re: Goa - why?
Why is China always threatening Taiwan with invasion. Why does China not be patient.
Worst still why is Pakistan supporting China - why not let Taiwan remain independent. Kashmiri's are Muslims they want to save, and yet all the Muslim Pakistani's stuck in Bangladesh are left to rot.
You call China your friend - but they are Kaffirs, worst still they are communists - or Godless people.
Double standards !!
Re: Goa - why?
no standards ...standards is a redundant term .....