The only correct knowledge about this topic is with nekhab, I wonder where these all Molvis of subcontinent taking Muslims. They have ruined the entire concept of Marriage. There is nothing like Halala in Islam and if it then, there should be high evidence preserved during Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam era. Can you people find any? Please provide with proper ref then.
And Queens_24: I am really sorry to say that it’s not nekhab who is unfamiliar with the knowledge. But every single person in Pakistan who believes these Illiterate Barailvi’ / Deobandi Movlis are real Islamic preachers. The problem with subcontinents Muslims is that they don’t attempt to educate themselves. Don’t even try to research and consider whatever they were taught by their elders is correct Islam. I remember one of my relative who was very Katar Barailvi, He once gave 4 for 5 times Talaq to his wife. And considered sin going close to her and consulted a famous Molvi of Lahore before letting her go from the house. He suggested for Halala and directed to him to one of the center in Lahore where this third class ******* Molvi weds his wife and do one night stand and give her Talaq the other the day. WTH. You consider this whole Islam.
I think people should have a courtesy to at least read and go through the material/ link which nekhab has referred. And in return if anyone is against, please provide vindicated material. I am ready to correct my Islam and get Hidayat.
Instead of following opinions and scholars etc. why don't you guys go and read up the holy Quran. The concept is very clear and ironically in contrast to what we traditionally used to know in Pakistan. One divorce is enough to dissolve the marriage if the iddat period is over. during the iddat, the man and woman can reconcile and after the period, a new nikkah is needed. this process is only valid for two times. In case of third time divorce, there is no chance of reconciliation straightaway. There is a big hurdle that our molvis try to cross using trickery known as 'hallala'. This hurdle as mentioned in the Quran is Allah's suggested way to avoid making the institution of marriage a joke.
The proponents of three divorces in a row forget the importance of iddat period after first two divorces where husband and wife have a chance to think over their decision and can get back together since divorce or dissolution of marriage is the most undesirable halal act as per our holy prophet (pbuh)
@Hinamajid and @kchughtai .... Peace .... I thought I explained the matter fully ... Please re-read post number 79 ...
Can you answer the problems that result?
Look, people argue that 3 talaqs in one sitting should be treated as 1 talaq - this is a huge problem, because the basis for saying this is on the idea of the adab that should be followed, not that the divorce is invalid, but that it is wrong and unjust.
It's like saying if the person does zibha of an animal with a knife and reads the name of Allah, compared to a person merely slaughters the animal without the reciting. The animal is still dead - it was just done in the wrong way. To argue that the animal is alive is obviously erroneous.
Look consider that talaq can only be said in accordance with the procedure of the durations given ... if that is the case then saying talaq on day 1 and again on day 2 and again on day 3 will also be treated as 1 talaq ... because the time period is not completed the argument for saying three talaqs together in one sitting will be equal to the argument of saying three talaq on 3 consecutive days.
Ok, let's say that a couple get in to an argument ... On day 1 the man divorces his wife ... After 2 days he wants to get back together with his wife - is he allowed? You will say yes he is allowed perhaps ... Then what if after another 1 day he divorces her again ... but this time after only 6 hours he wants to get back together with his wife ... If he is allowed to divorce and allowed to get back within the time scale then it follows the three talaqs in one sitting are 3 talaqs.
.
By saying that procedure must be followed to be valid then you are also saying that the couple are not allowed to get back together until the iddat is complete. This is not the way this matter is to be understood. If the couple can get back before the iddat then it follows that it is possible for another divorce to happen in quick succession anyway ... So the clear position is that it is wrong adab to divorce three times in a row, but it is not invalid to do it three times in a row ... the punishment is only jaiz on some valid act of reprehensible nature. If the act itself is not valid then the punishment would be an injustice itself.
In Islam we seek out the position of consistency ...