General Satti appointed new CGS

Lt. Gen. Salahuddin Satti, ex-DG Rangers and until yesterday the Commander X Corps RWP since 2004, is one of General Musharraf’s closest generals, or so it seems. And rightly so. Ever since General Musharraf became chief Satti has been holding key appointments. But I feel the ‘understanding’ between the chief and his present favourite generals was most probably strengthened after the events of 12 Oct 99; 7 years ago. At that time Satti was a brigadier and commanding the imp 111 Bde; which took control of Isl-RWP on 12 Oct 1999. Another one of the chief’s favourites is Lt. Gen. Tariq Majeed who on 12 Oct 99 was a Div Commander as a Maj Gen in Lahore at the time and took care of the Punjab Governor and Mian Saab’s homes.

Lt. Gen. Tariq Majeed was promoted to 3 stars and appointed CGS and Lt Gen Satti was made Commander X Corps. Yesterday though the chief shufled them both and swapped their appointments; Satti is now CGS and Majeed now Commander X. Both appointments are highly important and there’s no denying that both these officers are probably and hopefully headed to four stars. As the senior breed of Musharraf allied generals has retired since 1999; Usmani, Mehmood, Aziz, Aziz and so on, the juniors now rising who had played key roles then enjoy the General’s attention.

I Just heard about the new appointment a while ago, and thought to mention. The only news report i could find was here;

But the report highlights Gen Majeed, while I feel moving a corp commander to CGS and bringing him to GHQ is far more significant. There are many Corps Commanders; one CGS. Gen Satti is a thorough bred soldier and excellent officer. I’ve always felt he might go places. And I mean no where beyond VCOAS or CJCSC. As Gens Ahsan and Ehsan retire, these two officers seem very eligible.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

You are right about the key roles they played in 1999. But at the same time im sure they are qualified for the assignment they are given. Musharraf expects nuthing but the best from his men, as you may have gathered from his book. Did you read the part about Lt. Gen Ali Kulli Khattak in his book and how his attitude towards Mush changed? I found that quite amusing

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Ali Kuli Khan issues rejoinder to ‘In the Line of Fire’

By our correspondent

ISLAMABAD: Like the two sides of a coin, there is inevitably, more than one to contend with, especially in matters of rivalry.

President General Pervez Musharraf’s recently launched memoir In The Line of Fire has grabbed unprecedented public attention both at home and abroad. The impact could be gauged from reactions to the work, ranging from the highly favourable to unabashed scorn.

While it was predictable there would be a political dimension to the debate over contents in the memoir, some of these relate to individuals and issues that have necessarily triggered reactions for purposes of clarity – the right to one’s opinion, for instance.

The News offers this platform, without fear and favour, to anyone, particularly those who find a mention in the memoir, who wish to present their views, without ascribing to the same. Hereunder, we present a rejoinder issued by General (retired) Ali Kuli Khan Tuesday in response to Musharraf’s references to him In The Line of Fire.

Ali Kuli resigned after he and Lt-General Khalid Nawaz were superseded by Musharraf for the post of chief of army staff. The appointment was made by then-prime minister Nawaz Sharif.

Ali Kuli says:

I have recently read General Musharraf’s book In The Line Of Fire and like many others, I also have discovered its numerous lies, half truths and misleading statements. Lies do good to no-one, least of all a person who claims to be the democratically elected President of Pakistan and quite readily arrogates to himself the leadership of the Ummah. Also disappointing was the discovery of the self serving, motivated and false aspersions against my person. One had hoped that with the passage of time and with exposure to high positions, he would have shed his complexes, but this is obviously not so.

Given below are some details to support my assertions:-

  • On Page 41: It is written “I was one of four candidates short-listed to go to Sandhurst, England, to complete my training …”

Comments: This is patently untrue; the five Cadets selected by the Pakistan Military Academy (PMA) and sent for interview/final selection to GHQ did not include Cadet Pervez Musharraf. The five Cadets selected by PMA for interview at GHQ were Shabbir Sharif, Afzal Malik, Khalid Nawaz, Zahur Afridi and Ali Kuli.

May I (without undue modesty) add that Ali Kuli was finally selected and did exceptionally well and was the first Pakistani Cadet to be made a Senior Under Officer at Sandhurst; an achievement which remains unequalled till date. I was also declared the Best Overseas Cadet and by dint of my performance was placed at the top of 29th PMA Long Course; General Pervez Musharraf was placed 11th in the Order of Merit.

On Page 79: “…Yet instead of me, he selected Lieutenant General Ali Kuli Khan Khattak, who I felt was a mediocre Officer. I must confess I was quite surprised and disappointed.”

Comments: This pertains to my appointment as CGS and is an untruthful remark; Gen Musharraf knows fully well that my career record was far better than his in every respect. I will not labour on this futile point too long, because the professional prowess of both of us is well known. Suffice to say that had my record not been better, given all the connections elaborated upon by General Musharraf in the earlier part of the paragraph under reference, General Karamat would surely have preferred him over me. Actually there is not one single year or facet of our careers in which his record was better than mine.

On Page 85 of the book; General Musharraf gives an account of how he learnt of his elevation to COAS and a mention is made of my conversation with him on this subject. Regrettably even this innocuous encounter is misreported and a proselytising attitude adopted. The true sequence of events were as follows:-

– I learnt of General Musharraf’s appointment on PTV. I immediately rang him in the Armour Mess and I said “PM congratulations and best of luck”; I added further, “I will not be going to GHQ and will be leaving for Peshawar in the morning”. I suspect I was probably one of the earlier people to congratulate him when he reached the Armour Mess and I admit that I was not exactly thrilled at the developments! During this conversation, General Musharraf said nothing more than “OK thanks”; there was also no display of magnanimity nor were there any conciliatory remarks from the newly appointed COAS who had superceded two senior colleagues; two days later, on return from Peshawar and in line with the time honoured tradition of the Army, I resigned. If General Musharraf is disappointed at my not having celebrated his elevation with greater gusto, then so be it, because I am much happier to be known for what I truly am and felt at the time.

– As far as the remarks of “not speaking” or “not attending his dinners” are concerned, I again find them inaccurate. It is also true I did not attend the First Course Reunion after his elevation yet it is conveniently forgotten that I subsequently visited him twice at the Army House. Firstly, when I condoled with him on the passing away of his late father and Secondly when I was invited to the Army House along with Dr Nasim Ashraf’s Human Development Organization. Also conveniently forgotten is the fact that I have attended numerous Annual Course Reunions, including some at The Presidency where Gen Musharraf was a gracious host and I sat on the same table with him! Apart from the above mentioned events we have met briefly at many marriages and social occasions.

Finally, we all know that friendship is a two-way street whose success depends on both individuals. Since this is a season for complaining I am also taking the liberty of making some of my own. Why did General Musharraf not have the courtesy to reply to the Note I sent after the second attempt on his life near Jhanda? The note contained only suggestions to improve his security arrangements and a response of a simple THANK YOU was all that it required.

On Page 79. “…I was third in seniority of Lieutenant Generals, though this happened because of some manipulation by the former Army Chief General Waheed Kakar to give advantage of first position to Ali Kuli …”

Comments: This is another of General Musharraf’s unending conspiracy theories! I wanted to ignore this remark because I know that the common reader is not interested in our career rivalries but I have chosen to respond briefly because General Musharraf has tried to malign a respected soldier who is unlikely to respond.

In his remarks General Musharraf is probably alluding to extensions of service granted to Officers during General Waheed’s tenure as COAS. In order to understand the reasons why these extensions were given, it is necessary to keep in perspective the situation at the time of General Waheed’s appointment. In January 1993, the late General Asif Nawaz died rather suddenly because of cardiac arrest when he had barely completed one out of his three years tenure. This sudden demise of the COAS understandably disturbed the seniority system in Pak Army. In order to reduce the impact of the unexpected death of his predecessor General Waheed was gracious enough to request two of his course mates (whom he had superceded) to continue serving; both of them agreed and served on. Similarly, a couple of other officers, in accordance with a well discussed and declared GHQ policy and approval of the Government, were given extensions of a year or so, so as to ensure that Defence Officers do not retire too young. Finally, during General Waheed’s tenure, two Lieutenant Generals were retired prematurely, which had impacted the promotional structure.

How General Musharraf considers this as a manipulation to deny him the position of being the senior most Lt General at the time of selection of the COAS defies logic. If this allegation were true, then General Waheed from day one would have to know not only that his superceded course mates would agree to serve on but also that he had decided to prematurely retire two other Lieutenant Generals.

These are surely the workings of an obsessive mind. In fact, not only are they baseless and illogical but what is particularly galling is that they have been made against a noble person known for his honesty and integrity.

On pages 82 to 85 in this book there are extensive references to General Ali Kuli with the accusations that, in numerous conferences at GHQ, I was a self-serving hawk who because of my self-promotion wanted to oust Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and continuously pushed for an Army takeover. The evidence for these allegations comes from four conferences in Pindi, in two of which the great Gen Musharraf was not even present, but my misdeeds were dutifully reported to him.

My comments on these allegations are very simple. These conferences were never held to discuss whether the Army should take over or not and as such the question of recommending it never arose. What I did say always was that the Army must maintain a firm and fair posture and I stand by this even today. Geeral Karamat’s aversion (as indeed that of his predecessor) to an Army takeover was well-known and is supported by his actions.

But what is incongruous is the fact that a person who was such a strong supporter of democracy suddenly flipped when his own person was involved. Suddenly democracy became sham and we now have a messiah who will lead us to his version of promised true democracy in accordance with his own oft modified programme. It also suggests the presence of a private intelligence system which reported happenings at GHQ and makes one wonder whether such reporting went even higher?

Kargil: In Chapter 11 of this rather controversial book the author decides to step into the biggest minefield when he brazenly refers to the Kargil Operations as “considered purely, in military terms, the Kargil Operations were a landmark in the history of Pakistan Army”. I am totally amazed at such ostrich-like behaviour when the whole world considers Kargil to be the worst debacle in Pakistan’s history and where countless innocent young lives were lost for nothing. Absolutely nothing!

In this book, a totally futile debate is started by making allegations against the political leadership. Allegations can only be made against others when one’s own work is above par and not when there are gaping holes in it. I regret to say that the conception and planning at the highest level had been poor; in fact so poor that the only word which can adequately describe it is unprofessional. We all know that the main duty of the high command is to ensure that with their meticulous planning they create conditions whereby their junior combatants can fight easy. This was certainly not done at Kargil.

It is also fairly obvious that the Kargil Operations were not conceived in its totality, with the result that apart from bringing ignominy to Pakistan it also caused unnecessary misery to a lot of innocent people. The account of General Musharraf regarding Kargil is inconsistent and has raised more questions than it has answered! We must have a full blown independent inquiry into the Kargil debacle.

In the end, I would like to state that I am not prone to any discourse which casts aspersions on others But, at the same time, I am not one who will present the other cheek! Unfortunately, in this sordid affair a stone was cast by someone and unless I responded, many who do not know us, would have taken it for the truth and hence the need of this rebuttal.

I served for 37 years in the Pakistan Army and retired in October 1998, as the Chief of General Staff (CGS). Interestingly enough, immediately prior to being the CGS, I had been Commander 10 Corps and Director General Military Intelligence and as such was privy to most events which have been discussed. I could say a great deal more on most of these subjects but, since it goes against the spirit of national security, the whole issue needs to be put to rest.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

[quote]
Geeral Karamat's aversion (as indeed that of his predecessor) to an Army takeover was well-known and is supported by his actions.
[/quote]
Point to remember. Something both Ali Kuli and Musharraf agree on.

The army chief's role (in his personal capacity and not as an agent of an institution) in military take-overs must not be played down.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Absolutely 5Abi, both Gens Satti and Majeed are the highest breed of generals, both have all possible courses under their belts and immense experience in command, staff and instructional appointments. I'm not that familiar with Gen Majeed but Gen Satti is particularly much resepected by me, he was also our neighbor when he was DG Rangers. I think Gen Satti is some way related to ACM Mushaf Ali Mir and Flt Lt Younus Hussain Shaheed SJ.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

And yup 5Abi, I did read that portion on Gen Ali Kuli in the book and I think Ali Kuli has damaged his own image through this interview to The News. I had expected better from a well bred and professional general. But it's clear he had had some superiority complex or over confidence issue of his own...the professional rivalry is understandable an natural, but he took it personal and stayed away while he could have used his experince and expertise for Pakistan's benefit atleast in some capacity after 12 Oct 99...And Mush would have welcomed him, he did install Gen Karamat in DC and many other disliked figures here and there just because they can carry out the job well if directed well.
There's no denying Ali Kuli's a brilliant officer but...

Some of the jealous natured points he raises about Musharraf need to be countered & explained for the plain reader unaware of certain things;

'Musharraf passed out at No. 11 at the 29 PMA Long Course. And wasn’t one of the few selected to be scrutinized/interviewed for Sandhurst';
In the book Mush says few weeks before passing out he was aware of passing out at No.4 and was an appointment holder (BJUO) but due to an act of indiscipline during a march a few cadets including him were reprimanded and their rankings reduced, thus Musharraf came down to no. 10 (not 11), and those who had been below him gained advantage. He openly admits he was poor in discipline at that stage. (btw, if anyone had read Shabbir Sharif NH biography by Col Ashfaq Husain it'd be clear how indisciplined ad care free the sword winner of 29 PMA LC was, who btw is today remembered as the army's highest decorated officer with the PMA aptmts, the sword, SJ in 65 and NH in 71)
* About the 4-5 short listed for sandhurst;*
why would he lie? He must have been scrutinized or recommended at some stage, it must still be in some records at the GHQ I guess.
Plus Ali Kuli says he passed out at no.1 from PMA, which is incorrect, he passed out from Sandhurst with honours and appointments and was commissioned in PA. Passing out at no. 1 from PMA was Shabbir Shariff, who won the sword. If Ali Kuli says he was no 1 then Shabbir was no 2 and thus all rankings pushed back…
And I guess this may be a huge issue for those who don’t know, but in PMA the top 15 or so cadets are considered the cream and more or less equally good and they are given an arm of choice as well. which is a huge privilege.

About the appointment as CGS he says he was always a better officer then PM…his own complex speaks for him.;
Somewhere he also said that he was psc (staff college qualified) a year before PM. Who should remind him that by that time PM was a coy commander in the SSG, which is to say that he had long ago completed the elite commando training which is not every officer’s cup of tea. I’m not sure but I wonder how many SSG officers have risen to 4 star…? Because the SSG surely takes away the attn and ability to focus on the higher leadership track which requires CSC/NDC etc. Mush has them all plus the coveted silver bird & dagger on his chest.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Since I have not read the book, I can’t address your other points, but why do you think Ali Kuli has damaged his reputation by answering the allegations in Mush’s book? It was Mush who bought their personal or professional differences to the public with this book. Kuli has a right to reply. Hasn’t Mush further damaged is shaky credibility by airing his dirty laundry in the public? Unlike Mush who disclosed some of our nulcear secrets, Kuli chose not to talk about Kargil even if he knew the real details.

Isn’t it army protocol to retire once you have been superseded? I think it’s more of Mush’s insecurity that made him talk bad about the general who was senior but he superseded. Kuli is right, that you must be magnanimous in victory.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Which nuclear secrets did Mush disclosed?
Anyway.

Ali Kuli wanted General Karamat to take over and enforce martial law but Karamat didnt want to take over the reigns. Ali Kuli was also former class fellow of the then president Farooq Leghari (which is why he was promoted to CGS by Karamat - the next promotion after CGS is usuall army chief). It must have been an utter disappointment for Ali Kul to see Farooq Leghari resign along with the chief justice and then General Karamat being forced to resign by the Waddi Tind, Nawaz Sharif. Nawaz called on Mush to offer the army chief job, not the other way round. Ali Kuli was still the CGS and Mush wanted him to stay but Ali Kuli called on Mush and told him he was going to peshawar the next day to attend a wedding and wont come back.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

That we did not have any nuclear weapon capability in 1999 as reported in the news. Not publicly known before.

So, is it not army protocol to retire once you have been superseded? Should not have Mush showed some magnanimity to Kuli after that happened? What right does Mush have to call someone a mediocre officer in the public? Is that not backbiting of the worst kind? And why are you assuming Ali Kuli's intentions where to take control over the government when he denies it? Just because Leghari was his classmate! What makes Musharraf's words more true then Ali Kulis? He even mentions that Mush was not in two of the meetings where Kuli was accused of being a hawk.

I find no reason to believe Mush over Kuli. For all I know, both of them are liars who tried to play politics like the power-hungry generals they are. One lost and if the situation had been reversed, Ali Kuli would be writing the book, and you might be supporting him, that's all.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Another officer speak out against both Ali Kuli AND Musharraf. He said that Musharraf was incorrect in stating the number of officers who went to Sandhurst and had omitted him, but also says that Ali Kuli is wrong because Musharraf did in fact go.

Saying that he wanted to set the record straight, former Dir Scouts commandant Colonel (retd) Ihsanullah has said that he was one of the six cadets along with President Pervez Musharraf and Lt-Gen Ali Kuli Khan who were shortlisted by the Pakistan Military Academy, Kakul in the early 1960s for selection to undergo training at Sandhurst in England.

In a clarification issued from his hometown, Thana in Malakand Agency, where he is leading a retired life,** he said both President General Pervez Musharraf and Lt-Gen (retd) Ali Kuli Khan Khattak had erred**, while writing about the selection of cadets at PMA Kakul for training at Sandhurst.

He explained: “President Musharraf in his book, In the Line of Fire, wrote that he and three other cadets were shortlisted by PMA Kakul for training at Sandhurst. Lt-Gen (retd) Ali Kuli, on the other hand, in his rejoinder to the book claimed that five cadets were shortlisted and Pervez Musharraf wasn’t among them. But he forgot to mention my name and omitted that of Pervez Musharraf.”

According to Col (retd) Ihsanullah, six cadets were shortlisted by the PMA from the four companies at the academy and sent to the GHQ for interview and selection for training at Sandhurst. “I was shortlisted along with cadets Pervez Musharraf and Khalid Nawaz, who later became Lt-Gen, from the Khalid Company. Cadet Shabbir Sharif, who later became a Major and was awarded Nishan-i-Haider after embracing martyrdom in the 1971 war, was shorlisted from the Salahuddin Company. Cadets Ali Kuli Khan Khattak was shortlisted from the Qasim Company and Zahoorul Islam Afridi, who as lieutenant was martyred in the 1965 war, from the Tariq Company,” he recalled.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Khek, the things is, he mentioned that our nucleur capability was not yet operational by spring 99 but remember we were declared nucleur in haste only a year earlier in May 98.
On page 97-98 Mush says;
"I can also say with authority that in 1999 our nucleur capability was not yet operational. **Merely exploding a bomb does not mean that you are operationally capable of deploying nucleur force in the field and delivering a bomb across the border over a selected target."
*
Now if this is news to people, i'm afraid it's their bad. But anyone with slightest idea of how these warfare strategies have worked over centuries, or anyone with a grip on fast paced global politics and conflicts in the 20th century would know and accept this as an obvious fact. And i'm sure both PMs;indian and pak, both COAS and the int'l leaders would have known this.
As far as the rhetoric that *spilling the beans
would result in everyone having good reason to believe that even in a future hour of stress there would be no guarantee that Pakistan really is capable now, the answer is simple again; both india and pakistan have found globally recognized warhead delivering capabilities since the 90s. Kargil happened merely 12 months after Pakistan said it had the bomb, but didnt say it had the right misiles ready yet. Now 8 yrs later; it's been 8 yrs since we declared the bomb, and we have tremendous capability in terms of missiles; anyone now assuming that Pakistan may be bluffing should get a crash course in how nucleur states develop their delivering systems. It's ok for us commoners to fall into these controversies but those running the affairs always know better.
Besides, nucleur deterence is basically all about speculation, guessing and hence keeping at bay...one can guess the positive or the negative, the result is the same, because it's all about guessing, what one has and what one might do...

[QUOTE]
So, is it not army protocol to retire once you have been superseded? Should not have Mush showed some magnanimity to Kuli after that happened? What right does Mush have to call someone a mediocre officer in the public? Is that not backbiting of the worst kind? And why are you assuming Ali Kuli's intentions where to take control over the government when he denies it? Just because Leghari was his classmate! What makes Musharraf's words more true then Ali Kulis? He even mentions that Mush was not in two of the meetings where Kuli was accused of being a hawk.
[/QUOTE]

It is simply a military tradition and not requirement to retire if superceded. And an officer can only be superceded by a junior officer, not one from his own batch. So Ali Kuli was not technically superceded in the true sense of the concept. That he keeps saying he was superceded and how he has kept claiming he was a better officer, general and candidate for COAS since 1998 shows how he bad mouthed Musharraf and called him lesser capable than himself. That was also backbiting and unprofessional and Musharraf never replied. While Ali Kuli couldnt wait two weeks to reply.
In Ali Kuli's interview above notice in the portion about Gen Waheed Kakar when General Asif Nawaz pased away creating a situation in the heirarchy and he asked his mates to serve on, and they did, because they werent exactly left behind by a *junior. *

[QUOTE]
I find no reason to believe Mush over Kuli. For all I know, both of them are liars who tried to play politics like the power-hungry generals they are. One lost and if the situation had been reversed, Ali Kuli would be writing the book, and you might be supporting him, that's all.
[/QUOTE]

And surely there is NO reason to believe Kuli over Musharraf either.
I like the rest of your paragraph.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Thanks for posting this report Maddy :k:

What a wonderful selection it had been. All of them shone extremely well!
The selection procuders of the armed forces are indeed commendable.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

i think it goes without saying that Musharraf was appointed out of turn because he was considered the least ambitious and not as obviously impressive as the other two. Thats pretty much a repeat of history like with Zia and Ayub whom were both appointed out of turn and both because they were not considered very intelligent or ambitious.(which goes to show you choose competence over loyalty every time)

Still promoting out of turn was also done by Mush in the Air force and Navy chiefs appointments when he was annoyed by their lacklustre support for his "counter coup". (I'm not really sure why he calls it that, which part of his ouster was a coup in the first place?)

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

^^ Exactly...and not to mention the "purges" of bearded ones from the forces , which also go to show that competence was least of the worries...

And the counter coup bit is quintessentially dictatorial verbiage...

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Well he has mentioned in the book why he calls it counter-coup and not coup.
NS had used a minute section of the army to force musharraf out which included the quetta corps commander, the DG ISI and the civil depts of Police and CAA. While the rest of the army supporting musharraf countered the 'coup' while the chief was still in the air on a commercial airbus flight with over a 100 civilains including children from Khi Grammar school on a school trip, and landed with 7 mins of fuel left, the aircraft was also told to go to Bombay or Ahmedabad India if coldnt make it anywhere else. To this Mush replied to the pilot "Over my dead body will you go to India!". And he later explains how it would have looked had a PIA plane carrying the Pak COAS and other pakistanis landed in India. WOuld that not have been treason and coup and backstabbing the nation on NS's part for handing his army chief to the archrival? Think abt it, had it happened that way, what would have the army and the nation done to NS...?
Surely NS never thought abt it and the nation now doesnt try to think abt it...

And about his not being a leading option for COAS; he also explains how he had left it all to Allah and NS told him he made him chief because he was the only one of the 4-5 Lt Gens who hadnt approached him through any means. If we say he wasnt a leading conteder and not as qualified or bright and NS preferred alliance rather than qualification, we can also say that perhaps Gen Karamat and NS had always preferred alliance over competency and hence, NS had made Karamat chief, Karamat made Ali Kuli CGS and Ali Kuli being Leghari's friend was sure he'd get to the top. So maybe even Ali Kuli or Khalid Nawaz were 'leading contenders' because of their alliance and close ties with Leghari, NS, Karamat and not sheer outstanding competency. And it's clear there's no marked diff between their levels of competency as an overview of each one's service record clearly tells.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

The highlighted paragraph would be of interest to those reading or having read the book;

http://www.defencejournal.com//2001/may/mayday.htm

Mayday, Mayday!

IKRAM SEHGAL

Within a week of his appointment as COAS on Oct 7, 1998 Gen Pervez Musharraf made wholesale changes in the senior military hierarchy. The swiftness of the postings of relatively junior Lt Gens into critical slots left no doubt that they were being made with an eye to safeguard his future, and why not, given the unceremonious exit of his predecessor? In “POWER PLAY”, (THE NATION Oct 17, 1998), PM Mian Nawaz Sharif was warned not to mess with the Army again, “he would have reason to remember JK (Jahangir Keramet) with a lot of nostalgia, sooner rather than later”, unquote. The drastic changes, viz (1) Aziz on promotion to Lt Gen posted as Chief of General Staff (CGS), (2) Muzzafar Usmani shifted from Bahawalpur (Comd 31 Corps) to Comd 5 Corps at Karachi and (3) Mahmood Ahmad moving from National Defence College (NDC) to take over as Comd 10 Corps at Rawalpindi, paid off for Musharraf in spades less than a year later on Oct 12, 1999. While Musharraf was hors de combat in the air, the counter coup of “the three musketeers” not only prevented Mian Nawaz Sharif from doing another civilian coup “a la Karamat” but also removed him from power. Musharraf then made one very wise, farsighted move, which must be commended. Between his “musketeers” and himself were about 10 Lt Gens from six PMA Long Courses, not heart and soul behind him as much as his loyalists. Instead of packing off those not in line, he displayed wisdom and supreme self-confidence, keeping the unity of the Army intact by being patient in letting friend and perceived foe retire as per their normal tenure over a period of almost 18 months, “the Last of the Mohicans” being Lt Gen Tahir Ali Qureshi, ex- 33 PMA Long Course, going home on May 16, 2001. Beyond his loyalists (and the present CGS Lt Gen Yousuf) all the Lt Gens are his appointees, and barring one doubtful case, all deserved promotion. On May 17, 2001 the senior-most of the Oct 12 Young Turks, Lt Gen Muzzafar Usmani will become Deputy Chief of Army Staff (DCOAS), though the “langar gup” (kitchen gossip) was that he would become Vice Chief of Army Staff (VCOAS). Usmani has to choose professionalism over religion and solitude, opting for the latter he would probably have been better off retiring and remaining as Governor Sindh, which he has been in all but name anyway, running the Province by proxy through a handful of Brigadiers. The aloofness gives an unfortunate perception of arrogance of rank, it is difficult to reconcile this Usmani to the person one knew a million years ago. Succumbing to the Pharaoh-syndrome is not Pakistan-specific, religious piety notwithstanding.
Talking of “Young Turks”, the Chief Executive has had an extended youth in Turkey, the raison d’être for Ataturk as his preferred role model. Thus the cancellation of Bayinder’s contract for the Islamabad–Peshawar motorway by the National Highway Authority (NHA) during his turn of duty is shocking. Turkish President Suleyman Demirel with a full load of 9 Cabinet Ministers had especially flown to Pakistan for the contract signing ceremony. When Mian Nawaz Sharif restored the contract Ms Benazir had cancelled for political reasons, NHA had to concede far better terms because Pakistan was in a legal bind. Bayinder has proven to be a really bad contractor but NHA also has glaring failings. Why didn’t we ask the Turkish-Government to appoint a Turkish arbitrator of their choice whose decision we would accept as final? That would have put the onus on Turkey. Bayinder has claimed before the Lahore High Court about being pressurized to sub-let the contract to the favourites of some high-ups, such blackmail is not uncommon in Pakistan as one can attest from sorry experience. The present Chairman NHA does not enjoy a very good reputation but the rot seems to reach deep into the upper reaches of the Communications Ministry. The Musharraf regime would do well to conduct accountability expeditiously. Whatever the reason, whatever the shortcomings, the sensitiveness of the Turkish relationship makes it obligatory to supersede all crass commercial factors. No amount of monetary loss is worth alienating Turkey which has always stood behind us like a rock. Iran is already annoyed with us over the Taliban issue and India has exploited this opening by proposing a Indo-Iran nexus. For me personally, it will always be Turkey, right or wrong. The situation must not get out of hand, very much like it seems to be happening between India and Bangladesh.
Snakes and ladders would better describe the border between India and Bangladesh, the heritage of haphazard demarcation pre-1947, carrying through 1971 to the present day. The goodwill of the first years after 1971 notwithstanding, altercation between India and Bangladesh was always on the cards, that it had to wait thirty years to come out in the open is the surprise. 75% of Bangladesh’s borders are with India, only a matter of time before the constant daily friction in innumerable places caused an explosion. Not many people know that the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) and Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), no love lost between them, have been inflicting casualties on each other regularly for the last three decades. With post-1971 officers now coming into command positions in the Bangladesh Army, Bangladeshis are less and less beholden to India for 1971. India claim that 16 BSF soldiers were shot in cold blood, what they were doing in company strength plus at 5:30 in the morning on the Bangladeshi side of the border rousing Bangladeshi villagers from their beds? Moreover, India uses the fiction of mutilation of bodies by muslims as a regular propaganda tool, viz (1) the Talibaan regularly mutilate their opponent’s bodies (2) the Indian pilot shot down over Kargil in 1999 was killed and disfigured on being captured and now (3) the Bangladeshi troops have mutilated the BSF soldier’s bodies. There is an animal known as “wolf” and India has been crying it once too often. Bodies lying in water out in the sun for three days become further decomposed on being dragged several hundred yards. When the BSF men were being shot “at close range in cold blood”, how did they manage to kill two BDR men, one of whom was manning a machine gun in a defiladed position?
Hegemony is an obsession with India, it will never have peace until it can tolerate independent, sovereign countries on its periphery. With major cities of India like Calcutta in the proximity of its borders, Bangladesh is capable of military mayhem, the resultant stampede would kill millions and block all communications. The Bangladesh Army would have certainly learnt the lessons of 1971, moreover Pakistan‘s Eastern Command had to contend with a hostile population, cut off from its logistics base 1000 miles away. While an “Association of Eastern States of South Asia” (AESSA) remains a concept only, one cannot see Bangladesh standing by and seeing millions of its citizens settled (albeit illegally) in the Eastern States of Assam, Tripura, etc (their-version of “Lebensraum”) subjected to pogrom and atrocities by both Indian troops and the indigenous population. The latent animosity between India and Bangladesh has come to the surface at a most inopportune time, pre-General Elections in Bangladesh. India has asked for the DG BDR’s head on a platter, it would be a kiss of death politically for Hasina Wajid to oblige. Bangladeshi nationalist sentiments already consider Hasina Wajid’s Awami League (AL) pro-India, this favours Khalida Zia’s strongly anti-India Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). Kargil propelled the BJP-led coalition back into power (on the strength of blatant nationalist jingoism), Khalida Zia’s vote bank will increase, it being too close to the elections for the Vajpayee Government to do effective damage control. Dhaka stadium during a cricket or hockey match between India and Pakistan is an excellent barometer to really discern who the Bangladeshis favour, the horrors of 1971 notwithstanding.
Which leads us to the Government’s ham-handed handling of ARD’s decision to hold a rally on May Day. For a military regime that has the self-confidence to tolerate a free press, this was sheer lunacy. The ARD would have got a few thousand supporters, the administration’s efforts to prevent the event made it newsworthy, giving fresh life to the ARD campaign, rejuvenating the “deader than the duck” has-been politicians. Someone gave the CE very wrong advice, the military government need not have cracked down, there was no need to “send a message” bureaucracy - style. The politicians must be given a chance to let off steam, as the media-men in Karachi recently told the Federal Interior Minister, “give them a Hyde Park”. Having exercised patience, this uncalled-for crackdown has created doubt about the regime’s long-term abilities to cope with governance into a democratic period. One hopes that the May Day fiasco will not be repeated, otherwise we may well be yelling “Mayday, Mayday” to “save our souls” (SOS) from the mistakes of those in power.

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Lt Gen Ali Kuli’s famous interview to DJ in Dec 2001;

http://www.defencejournal.com//2001/dec/alikuli.htm

Lt Gen (Retd) Ali Kuli Khan
A H AMIN
Please tell us something about your childhood in the Pre 1947 India/NWFP?
My earliest memories relate to the period of the Second World War when my father was away in Burma fighting the Japanese.
He was away for long periods which inevitably brought loneliness to all of us brothers and sisters who had been left behind with our grand parents in Peshawar. One of the more memorable period relates to some months that we stayed together in, Shillong (Assam) where my father’s Battalion had been pulled out from the Burmese Front for the purpose of Rest and Recuperation. Apart from this I do have some vague memories of the carnage that took place during Partition. I do, however, have some very lovely and clear memories of Srinagar, Dal Lake and Gulmarg where our parents took us for a holiday in June 1947
We understand that your grandfather played a major role in recovery of Miss Molly from Ajab Khan. What exactly did he do?
Miss Molly Ellis was the daughter of an officer posted at Kohat. She was kidnapped from Kohat Cantonment in 1923 by Ajab Khan Afridi for the alleged insult to his wife by a British soldier. During this daring operation (which shook the British Empire to its foundations) the mother of Molly Ellis was unfortunately killed but Ajab Khan was successful in taking Molly to Tirah in the heart of the Tribal Area. My grandfather, Al-Haj K.B. Muhammad Kuli Khan, was then the Political Agent of Kurram Agency. He was requested by the then Chief Commissioner to kindly intervene in the matter. He along with a servant travelled to the heart of Tirah, where no Indian or British officer had ever been allowed or had dared to go before and stayed as the personal guest of the great Pir of the Tribals. He successfully negotiated with the Tribals and brought back Miss Ellis with him totally unharmed. For his bravery and humanitarian services the then British Viceroy conferred on him the illustrious medal of QAISER-E-HIND.
Please tell us something about your parents?
My late father Muhammad Habibullah Khan (Bibo to all his friends and relatives) was the second son of KB Muhammad Kuli Khan who was a Provincial Civil Servant officer (PCS) and belonged to the Khattak Tribe. My father’s elder brother is Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak and his younger brother was the late Mohammad Yousuf Khan Khattak, both notable political personages of Pakistan.
My late mother, Mumtaz was the daughter of KB Sikander Khan, who was again a distinguished PCS officer who hailed from Bajaur/Peshawar. My late mother was totally home-educated and spoke and wrote fluent Hindko, Urdu, Pashto, Persian and English.1 Unfortunately, she died rather early in 1965 in a tragic car accident, She was a remarkable person who responded most admirably to the fast changing conditions of her era. She had a perceptible influence on all her children and is fondly remembered by everyone who knew her.
Please tell us about someone who had a decisive influence on your personality in the earliest days?
My parents, in their own way had the greatest influence on my up-bringing; their own personalities admirably complemented each other and as such affected us the most. Additionally, I had the pleasure and privilege of having a doting paternal grandfather who was virtually “all over us” or vice versa till his passing away in 1956! KB Kuli Khan was truly a great man in all respects, self-made, capable, religious and exceedingly loving (in the truly Pathan tradition to his sons and grandsons), he reminds me of nothing but sweetness.
How was school life?
I was very privileged in as much that I was schooled for the first few years at the Presentation Convents of Peshawar and Rawalpindi and then nine years at Aitchison College Lahore. I graduated from Aitchison in December 1959 after completing the Cambridge Higher School Certificate or A levels as they are called today. Nine years as a boarder at Aitchison were an incredible experience because Aitchison was and is a great Pakistani institution. Apart from giving a very wholesome education it did great service for the country as far as integration was concerned; we were groomed as Pakistanis first and foremost. Academically, I generally remained in the top few throughout, was appointed a Prefect and was the proud recipient of the Full School Blazer.
Any contemporaries or friends of school days about whom you would like to say something?
I have always been fortunate to have a large circle of good friends some of whom did very well in life but I cannot even dare to classify them!! Each one of them occupies a special place with me.
Any teacher who had a formative influence on your personality?
Like parents, most teachers influence their students; I am very hard put to mention one particular person in this regard. However, since you press me, I would like to mention the names of Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah, my Principal at Aitchison for five years and Maj G.D Langlands my Housemaster for the same period. Maj Langlands is probably the only person I know (who at an age of Eighty plus) who is continuously working for Pakistan since Partition.
Something about your college life?
I studied at Government College Lahore during the short interregnum of my leaving Aitchison and joining PMA. This is also a great institution but since my period of stay was short there is nothing significant which I would like to mention.
Did you join the army out of pure impulse or was it a deliberate decision?
Ever since my memory starts I was “brainwashed” by my parents to join the Pakistan Army and no distractions on this score were ever entertained!! Ironically, by the time I was commissioned, my father had become an industrialist and people presumed that I was in the Army only for a short stint?! It was only after I became a Lt Col that the people reconciled/believed that I was in “for the works!” It would, however, be appropriate to mention here, that even though my own ardour for an “Army Career” never flagged, it really was my late father’s love for the Pak Army that motivated and propelled me through 35 of the 37 years that I spent in the Pak Army. He fondly “relived” every moment of my army career with me and also provided against any distractions, financial or otherwise, which are usually associated with a career of soldiering. Without any false modesty, let me also state, that I discerned a great deal of pride and satisfaction from him with my progress in the Profession of Arms. This certainly was unusual support from someone who was denied the top slot which was rightfully his and was instead retired at the ripe old age of 46! I am, however, very glad that he did not live to witness my supercession because I fear it might have broken even his stout heart.
How did you view your father’s sudden departure from the army over a matter of principle i.e. the differences with Musa Khan?
My father did not resign from the Army on a matter of principle. The fact is that General Musa and my father were commissioned on the same day in 1932 alongwith the First Batch of the Indian Military Academy (IMA) Dehradun. In the graduating order of merit General Musa (having an advantage of 8-10 years service in the ranks) was placed higher than my father and as such always remained senior to him. In the ensuing 25 years of their commissioned service, the career of General Habibullah so thoroughly outshone and dominated that of General Musa that they were not even in the same league. Having commanded an infantry Battalion for 21/2 years on the Burma front and subsequently held important appointments like Director Staff Duties (DSD), Deputy Chief of General Staff (DCGS), Director General Military Training (DGMT), Chief of General Staff (CGS) and having been appointed as the first Military Head of the Bagdad Pact, General Habibullah was considered as far superior an officer to General Musa. However, in 1958, when the time to appoint a successor to General Ayub Khan, came it was General Musa who was appointed as the Commander-in-Chief and General Habibullah as the Chief of Staff. With these appointments these two officers of infinitely unequal abilities were seen to be working in close proximity of each other and the incongruity of their appointments not only became acceutuated but also became the talk of the town. To remedy the situation, it was considered expedient to retire Lieutenant General Habibullah at the age of 46. Unfortunately, it are “the tall poppies” which get cut but then nations have to pay a price for their incorrect decisions and the effects of this mistake became apparent in the 1965 Indo-Pakistan War, when Pakistan squandered the best opportunity they ever had vis a vis India. Is it not a pity that when Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw, was commanding the Indian Army in 1971, General Habibullah, his IMA coursemate having retired in 1959 was then making a name for himself as an Industrialist in Pakistan?
How was cadet life in PMA?
PMA is a great institution of Pakistan which has produced a large number of excellent officers; life at PMA was tough and traditional but this was well known to me and since I had been educated in a Public School I settled into the PMA quite easily. The ten months that I spent there have remained as pleasant memories for the rest of my life.
Any instructor who impressed you in particular?
The instructors who made an impact included, our Battalion Commander, Lt Col (later Lt Gen) Akbar, Training Major (Later Brig) Abdul Qadir Khan, Platoon Commanders Maj (Later Col) Shahnawaz, Capt (Later Brig) Shakoor Jan, Capt (later Col) Sikander, and Capt (later Brig) NA Soofi. Unfortunately, all of them except Brigadiers Shakoor Jan and NA Soofi (whom I wish long and prosperous lives) have passed away.
Any PMA contemporaries about whom you would like to say something?
The PMA cadets of whom I could like to make a special mention include:-
- Capt Zahur Afridi, SJ (Embraced shahadat in 1965)
- Maj Bilal Rana, SJ, (My Platoon Mate who embraced Shahadat in Dec 71 in East Pakistan. He and I spent the first day of the 1971 War, together in the same trench.)
- Maj Shabbir Sharif, NH, SJ. With whom I had a boxing bout before leaving for Sandhurst.
It will not be out of place to mention that my PMA Course, the 29th Long Course, is probably the most decorated course so far and apart from producing two current service chiefs in General Pervez Musharraf and Admiral Aziz Mirza it also has the distinction of having produced the maximum number of two and three star generals.
Please tell us something about your selection for RMA Sandhurst?
Towards the end of my Second Term at Kakul in September 1962, I was adjudged as the Best Cadet of the Course and selected to go to the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. The top five who featured in this selection included our hero Maj Shabbir Sharif, Capt. Zahur Afridi, SJ (Shaheed), Lt Gen (Retd) Khalid Nawaz Mallik and some others.
How was life at Sandhurs
The basic curriculum and life at Sandhurst was quite similar to that at Kakul. The physical aspects of Kakul were tougher but the approach at Sandhurst was more rational. The academic demands of Sandhurst were somewhat greater because of the better British Education System. I was very happy to discover that there was no “ragging” at Sandhurst but the British Sergeant Majors and Sergeants were something quite different, tough but with a great sense of humour!!
I thoroughly enjoyed my two years at Sandhurst and take great pride in mentioning:-
a. I graduated as a Senior Under Officer (SUO) which makes me the only Pakistani and amongst only a handful of Non-British cadets ever to achieve this distinction. I was also the first SUO of my course to command a Sunday Academy Parade. On this occasion, the entire Academy was on Parade and in deference to me the March of the Baloch Regiment was played during the March Past - great stuff!!
b. I was also awarded the Commandant’s Cane and declared as the ‘Best Overseas Cadet’.
c. I captained the Academy’s Hockey Team and was a Member of the Academy Tennis Team.
Any instructor or contemporary at Sandhurst about whom you think made greatest impact on you?
The people who made the greatest impact on me while I was at Sandhurst include:-
a. The Commandant Sir John Mogg, who rose to be a four star and the Adjutant General of the British Army.
b. My College Commander, Sir John Cowtan, MC who retired as a two star.
c. My Company Commander Maj Paul Pike, MC who was posted out three months prior to my graduation and retired as a colonel.
d. My best friend and platoon mate W. H. (Bill) Backhouse who retired as a Brigadier and with whom I am still in touch.
What made you join the infantry? Please tell us something about your service profile from date of commission till 1965?
I joined my father’s parent Battalion, 12 Baloch in August 64, went through the Collective Training in winter of that year as a platoon commander while the company was effectively commanded by Subedar Mohammad Shafi ‘Choona’ of Khushab. ‘Choona’ was probably amongst the best JCO’s of Pak Army at the time and took me through the initial paces like a father would do with his son; this was hardly surprising because as I later discovered ‘Choona’s’ father Subedar Surkhru Khan had been my father’s Senior JCO in this very Battalion approximately 30 years ago.
In April 65, the Battalion was called out to our operational area around Kasur, it was obviously exciting stuff and I have never supervised the digging of so many trenches in my life ever before or after!! We were ultimately to form a part of the newly raised 11 Division and fought the ‘65 War at Hussainiwala Headworks. We finally returned to the Cantonment in the Summer of ‘66.
Please tell us about your experiences of 1965 War?
As I just mentioned, after digging trenches around Kasur, opposite Bedian and Khem Karan, my Battalion deployed opposite Hussainiwala Headworks. We were primarily in a defensive position along the famous BRB Canal, but I am glad to say that in our Divisional Area nobody was caught napping on 6 September. Our GOC, the late General Hamid, was bright enough to correctly gauge the way events were unfolding in Kashmir and by beginning September had ordered us to prepare and occupy our battle locations. Having done so nothing (apart from the usual artillery shelling and regular straffing by Indian aircraft) significant happened on our front. Two companies of our Battalion participated in forming the Bridgehead in the Army offensive in the Khem Karan Sector but returned back soon unharmed.
Excitement came around 20 September when our Battalion was ordered to launch an attack with a Battalion Minus and a troop of tanks to capture the Hussainiwala Headworks. During this period I was the Battalion Intelligence Officer and the Battalion promptly executed what it had been asked but it was only able to capture a part of its objective. Not surprising, because in 1971 the same objective with more or less the same enemy strength to overcome required an attack with four full battalions. Participating in this Battalion Attack was quite an experience and brought home a fact (often overlooked) that going into an infantry attack is totally different from taking part in war from the safety of a dug-outdefensive position. Accordingly, an attacker requires a different kind of courage and fortitude, which only those understand who have experienced it.
Whereas the ‘65 War for most of the people ended with the ceasefire in end September, we were to see a lot more action right upto April ‘66. It appeared, the Indians were smarting from the territory they had lost and had tried unsuccessfully to restore the situation. In this War our Battalion earned two Sitara-e-Jurats, one Tamgha-e-Jurat and one C-in-C’s Commendation Card.
Personally, even though I came out unscathed, the Baptism of Fire and seeing bullets fired in anger from close quarters was an unforgettable experience!! Amazingly, some personnel who had been problem soldiers during peacetime, turned out to be the bravest during action/war
Please tell us something about the standard of training in the army in the 1960s?
The human material that formed the Pakistan Army before and during 65 was far superior to that which came later on. This was because of the fact that the Army was much smaller in size and had the populations of both East and West Pakistan to draw from. Similarly, because of less distractions in the form of others duties, it was much better trained and because of the American Aid was much better equipped also.
What made you decide to join the Aviation?
Having gone through the War of ‘65 and believing that it was going to be another ten years to reach the rank of Major I thought that it was a suitable time to discover and experience other pastures and hence my joining Army Aviation! I have no regrets for having done so and have enjoyed my stay of five years with them.
In 1968, I qualified as a Fixed Wing Pilot and was awarded ‘The Best Flier Trophy’ of the P-9 Course. I was posted to No.2 Army Aviation Squadron which in 1969 by moving to Lahore, became the first Aviation unit ever to move out from Dhamial. Since our Squadron provided support to the 1 Armoured Division during this period I received my first exposure to our cavalry/armour units and the men who ran them, including a genial Colonel Zia-ul-Haq in whose Regimental Mess we were dining!
After a short stint as a Fixed Wing Pilot I converted to the Rotary Wing in early 69 and in September 69 I was selected to go to the Soviet Union for conversion to MI-8 helicopters. We trained at Kremenchug, a small Ukrainian town on the Dnieper River. Apart from learning about MI-8 helicopters, exposure to the Soviet system of living was in itself a great experience.
Flying MI-8s in Pakistan, during those days when heliborne operations were in its infancy, brought along its own excitement. We were everywhere there was trouble irrespective of whether it was dumping rations in inaccessible sectors of the Northern Areas/Kashmir or if it was supporting operations in the hither to unfrequented areas of the Marri-Bugti Agencies.
Meanwhile the political climate in Pakistan was heating up and I cannot forget the first time that I saw the Bangladeshi flag in late 1970. At that time it felt as if a bullet had hit me in the chest and I remember discussing it with Ikram who is your Managing Editor. Having a better “feel” for the conditions I distinctly remember him writing to me from Dhaka that the situation could be remedied only if an immediate surgical operation was undertaken. Unfortunately, this was not done and by March ’71 the situation had gone out of control.
I went to what was East Pakistan in early April 71. These were sad times for Pakistan but I was certainly happier flying MI-8s as opposed to “hoofing” as an infantryman. Flying was very risky because if we ever came down in an emergency that would probably have been the end. Fortunately, luck smiled on us and despite the intensive and extensive flying we did, there were no mishaps. As you will remember the first job in hand of the Eastern Command in the post 26 March period was to eliminate the pockets of Bangladesh which had been established by the Mukti Bahinis. As such there were numerous heliborne operations like Bhairab Bazar, Pabna, Barisal Kushtia and others in which I participated, but I would like to make a special mention of the Belonia Operation of June 71.1
Belonia was a small finger like protrusion of East Pakistani territory in the general area of Feni near Chittagong. The Mukti Bahinis alongwith elements of an East Bengal Battalion had occupied this area. Pakistani efforts (with a force of two battalions) to evict the rebels had proved unsuccessful. Quite suddenly and totally unprepared two MI-8s were called at sunset to drop two platoon loads of soldiers right in the middle of this rebel Battalion position. I was one of the pilots of the
MI-8s which undertook this suicidal mission. Fortunately, we managed to drop our men in the correct places and resultantly this rebel force which had defied eviction by two infantry battalions melted away during the night. The participating MI-8s had taken bullet hits but we had succeeded in clearing the last rebel enclave in East Pakistan. This was not the only time we received hostile fire but the operation deserves a special mention because of the spectacular results it achieved.
Your experiences as an aviator in East Pakistan in 1971 and the 1971 War?
I have partially answered this question earlier while dilating on my reasons which led to my becoming an aviator, some further details are as given.
Despite the fact that the Pakistani Eastern Command by end June had cleared all rebel enclaves, the situation in general continued to deteriorate because the Indian planning had entered another phase to which we did not respond suitably. In November 1971, an Indian Army Force of approximately three infantry divisions had crossed into Pakistani territory in the Jessore-Khulna Sector and in areas north of Chittagong; this was proper undeclared war and I suspect the Indians wanted us to be provoked into a full scale war. Since we did not oblige immediately, I am sure the Indians must have been somewhat perplexed. Anyway, when Pakistan finally attacked on 3 December 1971, the Indians were able to put through their War Plans which they had painstakingly prepared and mobilized for.
Unfortunately, Pakistan fought the War in East Pakistan with a troop deployment designed for Internal Security operations. Similarly, with the relative strengths loaded in India’s favour and a sympathetic local population, the writing was on the wall from the first day.
It does, however, go in Pakistan’s favour that throughout the war in East Pakistan there was not a place in which the Indians/Muktis broke through the Pakistani defences. Their attempts to break through were thwarted everywhere and they were forced to go around our defences through the many gaps that existed in the thin line of Pakistani deployment. On the other hand, I regret to say that despite all the disadvantages on 16 December ‘71 there still was plenty of fight and materiel left with the Pakistani forces which with a better leadership/high command could have taken advantage of. In other words, there was no compulsion for a surrender on 16 Dec. 71.
One of the most memorable experiences of my life was the first day of the war when 130 Indian air raids came on Dhaka Airport, close to which we were also located. The PAF and Air Defence acquitted themselves excellently on this day and approximately 17-21 Indian Aircraft had been brought down. Unfortunately, we were so outnumbered that by the next night or so the Indians were able to damage the bases Airfield Runways to such an extent that no PAF aircraft could take off from Dhaka.
With the complete dominance of the skies by the Indians, the only way out for the Pakistan Army Aviation was to fly at night which we did with great success. We undertook hazardous night flights to all parts of East Pakistan during which we carried out ammunition supply, casualty evacuation and liaison missions. All this was done with absolutely basic navigation aids and was truly a magnificent achievement. I must mention an Ammunition supply mission with Maj (later Brig) Ali Jawahar to Khulna during which we ran out of fuel and barely managed to reach our own area near Narayanganj and landed in the only graveyard we had encountered in East Pakistan!!
As I have mentioned earlier, the writing on the wall was pretty, obvious from Day One but, even then it came as a great shock when on the evening of 15 December our Commanding Officer was told by Eastern Command to destroy our aircraft in preparation for surrender on 16 December. All of us protested and our Commanding Officer gave a plan for our escape to Burma taking all our aircraft and whatever else we could carry. Eastern Command agreed to this plan and directed us to start preparations and kept the responsibility of choosing passengers to themselves. When at 2 A.M. the crews reached their aircraft parked all over the cantonment they encountered total pandemonium and were barely able to take off with the greatest of difficulty. Our passengers were all women and childrenbut in this chaos and confusion an ambulance load of nurses got left behind; apparently, they had kept sitting timidly in their ambulance hoping to be asked while the others were clambering into the helicopters.
My helicopter was the second to take off but for some reason the first to arrive at Akyab Burma. We had planned to arrive at Akyab by “first light” and once we identified Akyab we flew over the sea to drop our weapons and other belongings by which we could have been identified as military personnel. I was also the first person to encounter the Burmese military guard of Akyab. Quite surprisingly, he spoke Urdu and asked me if I was a Pakistani, and whether I was armed or not? He then asked me if I was a Muslim and upon getting a reply in the affirmative said “Assalam O Alaikum, I am also a Muslim and my name is Mustafa Kamal”
In a short while seven other helicopters also arrived and soon there were approximately 170 Pakistan women and children and Army Aviators milling around the Akyab Terminal which usually received only one aircraft a day! Our Burmese hosts were most understanding and they lodged us in a Burma Oil Company Rest House. The women and children2 were flown out to Rangoon within three days and then to Pakistan within 7-10 days. We, the Aviation crews stayed in Akyab for approximately 10 days and were then asked to fly our helicopters and drop them at Meiktila, whereas we ourselves were flown to Rangoon. After approximately three weeks in Rangoon we were repatriated to Pakistan. After another month a party of Army Aviators were invited and taken back to Meiktila where they found their helicopters painted white with ‘PIA’ prominently emblazoned on them. Our crews flew these helicopters to Bangkok, from where they were shipped to Pakistan. Thus ended the saga of No. 4 Army Aviation Squadron, the only unit of Pakistan’s Eastern Command which had not surrendered. I feel highly honoured to have been a member of this elite squadron and feel greatly indebted to the Burmese authorities for their hospitality.
Please tell us something about your service profile from 1971 till 1977? How did you find the staff college as a student? Anything you would like to say about the standard of instructions which you saw as a student?
On return from East Pakistan in 1972 I served with the Army Aviation for another year and was then selected for the 1973 staff course. This was the first one year course since the 1971 War and was a great learning experience.
Staff College forms a watershed in the careers of most army officers; it was the same with me. I worked exceedingly hard during the entire year and found it to be a very rewarding year. The High Point came in the Third Term when I was given a GOC’s appointment in a Map Exercise which was based on ‘Exercise November Handicap’; this in 1954 had been my father’s Test Exercise for promotion to the rank of Maj. Gen. And for a very long time remained Pakistan Army’s largest Exercise with troops; small world!
At the end of the course joined my Battalion at Maiwand in the Marri Area of Balochistan. In May 74 I moved to Sialkot with my Battalion. In January ‘75, I was posted as the Brigade Major of 102 Brigade in Peshawar. My Brigade commander was Brigadier KK Afridi, a fine soldier and human being and I enjoyed being on his staff. In February ‘77, I was posted as officiating Commanding Officer of my Battalion which was then located at Kel in the Neelam Valley. The Line of Control was totally quiet in those days but it still was an exhilarating experience and one learnt first hand regarding the logistic problems encountered during operations in mountainous area. This was very valuable experience and was to prove very helpful during my subsequent career. In August 78, I was posted as an instructor at Staff College Quetta. Working as an instructor was very hard work, even more than as a student but highly rewarding. After approximately an year and a half, I was appointed as the Defence Attache in Egypt.
Life had really been moving at a hectic pace since 1965 and whereas I had thought I would become a major on my thirteenth year of commission here I was in my fourteenth year in 1980 on my third appointment as a Lt. Col.
You were Defence Attache in Egypt. How was that experience?
Being a Defence Attache in Egypt was a new and novel experience. Cairo with over a hundred embassies was right in the center of the world and as such a great place to follow international developments. Egypt had recently emerged from their socialistic past and it was very interesting to see them grow.
The Egyptian Armed Forces then were at a very similar stage of development as the Pakistan Army. We had also had similar war experiences i.e. 47/48, 65/67 and 71/73 and as such there was great compatibility between us. Previously, Egypt because of Nasser and Nehru had a very strong and long term relationship with India but I was very happy to note that during my stay their interest in Pakistan was growing by leaps and bounds.
As a society, the Egyptians were and are a very tolerant and enlightened but rumblings against Anwar Saadat for his perceived “sell out’ to the Americans/Israelis could be heard loud and clear. This, inevitably, proved to be true and he was assassinated. I missed out on the assassination itself because I was performing Haj at that time!
Despite the fact, that the Egyptians are generally a tolerant society, yet they have a small but highly motivated (far more than in Pakistan) Islamic Extremist Group. Similarly, despite the fact that Egypt had inherited a very strong secret police apparatus from Nasser it had still not been able to come to terms with these extremists and the threat continued.
What do you have to say about the assertion that Zia’s long tenure had a negative effect on the professional efficiency of the Pakistan Army?
What is asserted is perfectly true. Every moment that an Army stays away from its primary task will inevitably affect its own operational efficiency. Similarly, anyone who has trained soldiers will vouch for the fact this is not an easy task and requires total dedication and application, leaving little time if at all for any diversionary activities.
Please tell us something about your service profile from 1977 till 1988?
After return from Egypt in 1983, I once again was appointed as the Commanding Officer of 12 Baloch in Rahim Yar Khan (RYK). In ‘84 I was promoted to Brigadier’s rank and took over the command of the RYK Brigade. In 1985, I was selected for the Armed Forces War Course and on its termination in June ‘86 was posted as the Chief of Staff 10 Corps. After three years as a COS, in 1989, I was posted to command another brigade and in 1990 was promoted to the rank of Maj Gen and appointed as GOC 8 Div.
How was the stint in Sindh as a Brigade Commander in the Anti-Dacoit operations?
In the two years that I was posted in RYK as Battalion and Brigade Commander, I hardly stayed three months at RYK. The rest of the time was spent on internal security and Anti-Dacoit operations in the Left Bank Districts of Sukkur, Khairpur Mirs and Nawabshah. This was a new experience and under the inspiring leadership of Maj Gen (later Gen) Waheed we were able to successfully root out the dacoits. Unfortunately, our endeavours of more than an year were wasted when a jail-break of Sukkur Jail took place and most of the captured dacoits got away. I am also glad to mention that because of our fair dealings we were able to once again establish the credibility of the Pakistan which had been badly tarnished during the Post MRD period. It was during the MRD Movement that the Rural Sindhis (for the first time ever) had come out against the govt; when Gen Zia’s administration clamped down on them with the Army, it inevitably alienated the Rural Sindhi populace. With the Sindhi Rural landlords, sulking, it gave the dacoits (who have been a constant factor in Sindh for hundreds of years) a free hand to exploit the void and they did so till a check was put on them by the Pakistan Army.
One day, while we were in a conference with Gen Waheed, the IG Police brought us some highly reliable information regarding a gathering of the top dacoits at an island in the Indus River known as ‘Adam Ka Binda’. We immediately mobilised and decided to cordon of the area from both sides of the River with a brigade each. I was the over all incharge and starting at sunrise we used the third brigade to search ‘Adam Ka Binda’. The search started as per plan and by midday it was evident from the helicopter that nothing had been found. I tried to call off the operation but could not communicate effectively and as such returned to our Base from where the search had been initiated. I still could not communicate effectively and as such then got into the jeep of SP Police Nawabshah and started to move to a point from where I could debrief and personally call off the operation. While we were travelling in the ‘Kacha’ I saw 8-10 people suddenly rush from a clearing towards the jungle. By the time we stopped the jeep we were hardly 70-80 yards from these people who by now were engaging us with heavy rifle fire. We obviously also took positions and fired back but I soon realized that our Police Escort was totally shell-shocked and unable to fire back. The only effective person with me was the army driver of my jeep which was following us and had also been caught up in this ambush. I also discovered that my wireless operator and been hit in his stomach and unfortunately died. This exchange of fire lasted for approximately 45 minutes during which the dacoits must have fired approximately a thousand rounds at us from close range but quite miraculously we suffered no other casualties. It later transpired that these were the very same dacoits whom we had been looking for but they had probably been tipped off regarding our operation and as such were sitting safely outside our cordon. After firing and making a lot of noise and shouting “naras” they broke contact and disappeared. Fortunately, during the night we were able to kill one of their accomplices but the rest had managed to get away. This was once again a new experience and I later learnt that the dacoits were making noises to scare us because they thought we were the Police. I am told that had they known we were from the Army they would never have fired on us.
How was the GOC 8 division?
I commanded 8 Division for one year and a half during which we went through a fairly tense period of confrontation with the Indians. The whole Division was out in its battle locations for months on end and even though it was not very comfortable in the humid summer, it had welded us as a formation and we were able to refine our Battle Plans and defences.
How was the stint as Commandant Staff College Quetta? Any major changes that you brought as Commandant Staff College?
In early ‘92, I had the honour to be picked as the Commandant of Staff College Quetta, where earlier on, I had been both a student and an instructor. Being in the Staff College is always an invigorating experience because one is dealing with the cream of Pakistan Army. It was the same this time also and I enjoyed every moment of my stay. I tried to lay emphasis on building the confidence and integrity of the students and tried to assure them that genuine mistakes will not prove detrimental to their careers. I also modified their curriculum and training activities so as to take advantage of computers and the emerging information technology. Unfortunately, my stay as a Commandant was somewhat shortened when in the wake of General Asif Nawaz’s death I was posted out as the Director General Military Intelligence.
Do you think that the present one year term of Staff College should be longer?
This debate has gone on for a long time but for reasons of expediency, career planning and our typical career patterns, Pakistan Army has stuck to a one year course. Presently, even though there is a one year course, its ramifications including preparation, with much more work to be done before the Course including the Science Term makes its influence felt for a much longer period.
How fair is the system of assessment in the Staff College?
The Assessment is as fair as is humanly possible, and is constantly reviewed. However, I regret to say that we have, so far, failed to build enough student confidence in the system so as to eliminate the use of previous/old solutions.
How was the stint as DG MI?
I came to the post of DGMI quite untrained and inexperienced in the field of intelligence which some people counted as an advantage! It is only when I took over did I realize the MI Directorate’s spread and importance. During my tenure as DGMI, I considered myself very lucky in two respects, firstly, I enjoyed the total confidence of my boss the COAS and secondly, the MI Directorate, while I was the DGMI, was used only for strictly professional intelligence pursuits.
My greatest moment us a DGMI came when the Assessment and Recommendations of the MI Directorate regarding the Indian Buildup in 1994, proved correct and were applauded for its greater objectivity and superior analysis when compared to those of other intelligence agencies.
What do you have to say about the Murtaza case which occurred during your tenure as DG MI?
I have no knowledge of the Murtaza Case other then what has appeared in the Print Media. Unbelievable, as it may appear, it was not of primary importance to the MI Directorate.
Please tell us about the alleged Zaheer ul Islam Abbasi Conspiracy affair?
In the Zaheer ul Islam Abbasi case, another intelligence agency had intercepted the purchase of illegal arms and its transportation in a military vehicle by an officer of the Pakistan Army. This was reported to the Army High Command and was of course investigated. As it turned out, it was an elaborate Plan with dangerous consequences which amongst other issues also strongly implicated Zaheer ul Islam Abbasi. They were proceeded against in accordance with the law.
How far in your opinion is the allegation that 1988, 1990, 1993 and 1997 elections were rigged selectively or in any other manner?
I was the DGMI during the 1993 elections and the CGS during the 1997 elections. I mention my appointments just to emphasize that had there been any conspiracy to fix the elections, it would have been very difficult to keep me ignorant of developments. No matter what others say, I believe that both those elections were fair.
What do you have to say about the allegation that the MI Directorate indulged in making and breaking governments in the period 1988-96?
During the period that I was the DGMI i.e. 1993-95, I am certain the MI Directorate did not indulge in making or breaking governments.
How was the stint as Corps Commander and CGS?
I was appointed as Commander 10 Corps in October 95 and consider it as one of the most enjoyable periods of my career, having been the Chief of Staff 10 Corps for three years not too long ago, I knew the terrain and issues very intimately and thus took to the job of commander as duck would take to water! During my command a few major events took place which I would like to mention in a little more detail.
a. Neelam Valley Closure. As soon as I took over in October 95, I was told that because of Indian Firing only half the winter dumping of rations had been completed for Upper Neelam Valley. This was serious trouble and hence the first place I visited was the place where they were interdicting our movement. I personally moved on the road at night, was fired upon by the Indians but it gave me a fair idea of the problem. We took remedial actions by arranging effective return of fire and am very happy to say that within a week our traffic flowed up and down Neelam Valley without any interference. We were lucky that the snows came late that year and we were comfortably able to complete our dumping.
b. Construction of Bypass. In order to thwart any further interference, we immediately began the construction of a Bypass from Kaghan and completed it in record time, from within with the corps resources.
c. Counter - Interdiction in the Northern Area. In the Kargil Area, the enemy road is visible to some of our posts. In case the enemy ever again resorted to firing on the Neelam Valley Road we planned for interdicting the movement of Indian vehicles on this road. Accordingly, with great difficulty and innovation we were able to move special weapon systems into these very high altitude posts from where they could with direct firing weapons effectively interdict Indian vehicular movement. I am also very glad to say this was also done and in later days these weapon systems played a very effective role, Allah be praised!
d. Helicopter War. All Theatres of War usually have their own rules likewise in the War in Siachen also there was an unwritten law between the adversaries, that unless very seriously provoked they would not fire unnecessarily on each others helicopters. One fine day the Indians broke this convention by firing and downing our helicopter with a missile while it was landing at a very high and dangerous post. Fortunately, our pilots in this helicopter were safe but it certainly incensed us all and we began to retaliate in the same coin. I am again glad to report that without any further loss to us, within a period of one year, we were able to down around 6-7 Indian helicopters including an MI-17. Apart from damage to the helicopters, this caused great consternation and acrimony between the Indian Army and their Air Force operating in the Siachen Region, where they depend a great deal on helicopter support.
In April ‘97, I was posted as the Chief of General Staff and for the first time I sat in the same chair in which my late father had sat over forty years ago. I consider it a great privilege and was very happy to enjoy the wide span of this appointment and the fact that the CGS virtually runs the Army for the COAS, I also became fully alive to the acute shortage of resources/finances from which the Pakistan Army suffers. There were many exciting events during my tenure as CGS but probably the most interesting period was the time when Pakistan had to work out our response to the Indian Nuclear tests of ’1998!!
You are remembered as the man who reformed Burn Hall?
As Commander 10 Corps 1 was the Chairman of the Governing Body of the Army Burn Hall Schools. One fine morning I was informed that the night before the boarders had ransacked the entire School and the Police and the Army had to be called to control the situation. I immediately went there and confirmed what was reported. It was a terrible scene of total wanton destruction by the senior boarder students themselves. After consultations, we decided to immediately close the School, because with the extensive damage the School could not continue anyway. Similarly, after consultations and in order to set an example we decided to expel the entire lot of boarders and confiscate their security deposits in order to repair the damages. Expelling 308 students in one go was a tough but fair decision and despite great pressure, we made no exceptions and expelled the whole lot. Great care was taken in the subsequent admissions and I am told that happily today, Burn Hall, is amongst the most disciplined schools of the country.
What do you have to say about the fact that the system of selection of Army Chief is highly politicized? Any measure which can counter this negative state of affairs?
The answer to your question is very simple, in that, whenever anyone tampers politically with a system, they should also be ready for a political response. Simply put, without very cogent professional reasons, no one should fiddle with the principle of seniority cum ability on which the armed forces work.
Should the ISI be under the Army Chief or under the civilian head of state?
The Inter Services Intelligence as the name suggests, should be de-politicized and working under the Joint Staff Headquarters. Having said that, I would also like to emphasize that our entire intelligence apparatus needs to be rationalized.
What are your post retirement activities?
I am working in our family business and am trying hard to revive some units, which for various reasons are not in a healthy state. This activity, keeps me shuttling between Rawalpindi and Karachi. I enjoy hunting and playing Golf whenever possible. I must add here that I have been very lucky with respect to my married life. Neelofar, my wife, has not only been a full partner but a source of great strength to me particularly during adverse conditions. She has been a true soldier’s wife looking after the family during my absences. I have similarly been blessed with three, fine children, Ayesha, Hussain and Khalid. For me the company of my children and grandchildren are a matter of supreme satisfaction and contentment.
What do you have to say about the assertion that army’s increased involvement in civilian administration has negatively affected its qualitative efficiency?
I have said earlier, that anything which takes away/distracts the Army from its main task of soldiering will inevitably cast a shadow on its professional efficiency. This should be true of all professions!
What is the solution to Pakistan’s political problems?
This requires a very elaborate answer, however, stating it in two words, I will say “More Democracy”.
What do you have to say about the assertion that many a times the army took over because it was a matter of ambition/ego rather than principle?
What you state is true to an extent … but it is also too elaborate an answer to attempt at the moment.
Any thing else that you would like to say as a message to DJ readers?
I would like to wish the Management of DJ and its readers all the very best in the future. Their efforts are a great service to the profession of Arms which despite whatever else anyone may say, is a noble profession.
END NOTES
1 Belonia is the same area in which the late Colonel Sehgal undertook the ‘Asalong Mauza Operations’ as was published in the ‘Defence Journal’ of October 2001.
2 One of my pleasurable moments in life comes every 16 December, when a young Major Ahad has the decency since the last many years to reach me out wherever I am and thank me for evacuating him in my helicopter. He must have been a small child on 16 December ‘71 and I was merely doing my duty but all the same it is heartening to know that there still are such good persons in this world!!

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

His father Gen Habibullah had once been my grandfather's GOC. Gen Habibullah belonged to the first batch of Indian cadets selected for the Kings Commission from Sandhurst, but b the time they were to proceed to Sandhurst the British Army decided to establish a military academy for Indian cadets in India, and hence came into beign the IMA Dehradun. The first batch inclided some famous officers like Brig Mirza Hamid Husain of the Royal family of bhopal (ex-dir KMC if i recall right in the 60s), FM Sam Manekshaw COAS India and few others including a Sikh officer who later won a VC during WWII, and according to some sources, even Gen Musa, who had been selected for commission from the ranks. So again I think when Gen Habibullah said he deserved being given the COAS chair by FM Ayub Khan, we couldnt exactly be sure how and why? Because both of them had been at the same course in the IMA in 1930s. It was the 1st or 2nd IMA course. If anything, gen Musa must have had better, more practical and longer service record keeping his 'jawan' days in view.

Like Ive always said, Ali Kuli's having met the same controversial end to a good career has always made me a bit sad, he was a brillaint officer, but that says nothing about him being better than Musharraf and his making lowly conuter-claims, the professional excellence of both officers has been equally exemplary as is evident to those with an overview of both officers' careers. If anything, Musharraf's SSG gives him a raw edge with nerves making him 'cut out for the job' he today has.

Ali Kuli hasnt been able to get over being overlooked for top post, look how much Musharraf faces each day, gets over and start a new day with!
Ali Kuli should have atleast some sportsman spirit, 'may the best man win' is the philosophy, and God knows who the best man 'for that particular job or vistory' is, in thois case, it's proven over and over, Musharraf is the best man!

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

I’ve broken down your comments into points Haris so I can answer

  1. To my knowledge (and I maybe wrong) NS himself never made that specific order? The interesting bit which I am not sure if the book mentions is Musharrafs ambiguity on the whole storming the supreme court. It seems Mush opposed army intervention at all stages except when his own job was threatened. Similarly how he “rewarded” those generals who saved his neck is common knowledge.

  2. Stretching that rule.. that would mean Musharraf was appointed out of alliance as well? Karamat was appointed on seniority as is done the same in the cases of judges. I wasn’t aware of Khalid Nawaz having any close ties to Leghari. To my knowledge the “sifarish” if any that both could use were other Muslim League leaders and not leghari.

3)In fact Ali Kuli may well have been in the bad books of leghari and co simply because in the 1990’s the PPPliyas would not tolerate someone with so many Muslim league relations. All we have is Musharrafs word on it..which I don’t give much weight too considering how rarely he keeps it..

  1. Again I’ll agree to disagree, indpendent people who knew him in his pre COAS days will say a few things about him ..firstly ..he is a poor strategist but a good tactician (I heard this pre Kargil and post..and it sounds even more accurate post 9/11). Secondly they’ll make some unverifiable comments about his stint in the middle east which again reflect poorly on Musharraf.

The interview with Ali Kuli was quite interesting..I wasn’t aware he had given any interviews prior to this one..

Re: General Satti appointed new CGS

Haris, we know that Mush was selected for a one year course at the prestigous Royal College Of Defence Studies in 1990. Was Ali Kuli selected ever fro this course?

Also, one more thing, in 1999 when his plane from Columbo was being refused to land at any airport in Pakistan, why didnt they contact any PAF base? How bout the Faisal Air Base in Karachi. Surely, no civilian authority had control over PAF bases?