Re: Free Speech in Egypt under Morsi vs Sisi - a picture speaks a thousand words
Assalama alaykum respected Sister, your information is outdated.
Yes, In first Afghan war against USSR in late 1970s and 1980s America and Saudi with other Gulf countries were funding Muslim Brotherhood along with other Jihadis.
In the second Afghan war and two Iraq wars Muslim Brotherhood was not in the American camp so Saudi stopped funding Muslim Brotherhood from that time on.
Hamas is branch of Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine. Saudi never funded them – In fact it was Iran who funded Hamas.
True, Qatar did fund Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.
Whenever two entities, be they countries, societies or any organisations, have same goal and agendas surely they will support each other.
We all know that America and the West are funding secularists and NGOs in Muslim countries to impose their way of life in those countries.
Iran is actively funding Shia organisations in all the Muslims countries to have influence in those countries.
Respected Sister, you cannot lump Taliban and Muslim Brotherhood together. They are both Sunnis but their agenda and methodology is completely different.
Muslim Brotherhood was run by highly educated professionals. Muslim Brotherhood is the most organised from all Islamic organisations. They run and manage free schools, hospitals, orphanages and pharmacies.
Just to let you know that I am not member of Muslim Brotherhood
Saudi was hand in glove with America and Sissy (Egyptian Army) in ousting Morsi from power and were actively funding Morsi’s opponents and Sissy.
Respected Sister, the letter is fake! I don’t know on what grounds you are giving it possibility of being true.
It was sent from Egyptian Embassy in Israel which was in control of the Egyptian backed administration!
Yes, on internet one can find anything to support one’s views. Authentic views are backed up by solid evidences from reliable sources. Not from those sources who are bent on telling lies. It is our duty not to spread such doubtful material which is lies and goes against any Muslim. This way we unwittingly become agents of the liars.
Also we should not turn a blind eye to games being by: 1) America 2) UK 3) France 4) Turkey 5) Iran 6) Qatar 7) UAE 8) Shia government in Iraq 9) and of course not forgetting Israel
Organisations like Hezbollah, Mahdi Army, Shia Militias armed and trained by Iran, All sunni groups are also in the game!
And you will be surprised that Sufis in Army of the Men of the Naqshbandiyah Order are in the game too and are co-operating with ISIS!
If you don’t believe me, check it here:
ISIS: Not alone in their conquest of Iraq
ISIS: Not alone in their conquest of Iraq - The Washington Post
This is logic and strategy of war, first one has to subdue the lesser or weaker opponents and then go for the strongest one! As there will be no one to back stab when is fighting a strongest force.
**Respected sister **May Allah Almighty bless you with long and healthy life so that you will see a lot of fighting within Muslim groups and states each vying for supremacy.
There will come a time when the Muslims forces will be unified under one command.
This (all) has been foretold by the most Blessed Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
If you read the history of Sultan Ṣalaḥ ud-Dīn Yusuf ibn Ayyub (May Allah Almighty reward him immensely and forgive his shortcomings), for first 16 years he fought against his Muslim opponents likes of: Fatimids of Egypt, rulers of Damascus, rulers of Homs. rulers of Hama and Assassins. Once he had unified the Muslims into a formidable and powerful fighting force, he gave the crusaders a trashing!
Read the following:
*During his term as vizier Saladin began to undermine the Fatimid establishment, and following al-Adid’s death in 1171 he took over the government and realigned the country’s allegiance with the Baghdad-based Abbasid Caliphate. In the following years, he led forays against the Crusaders in Palestine, ordered the successful conquest of Yemen and staved off pro-Fatimid rebellions in Upper Egypt.
Not long after the death of Nur ad-Din in 1174, Saladin personally led the conquest of Syria, peacefully entering Damascus at the request of its ruler. By mid-1175, Saladin had conquered Hama and Homs, inviting the animosity of his former Zengid lords, who had been the official rulers of Syria. Soon after, he defeated the Zengid army in battle and was thereafter proclaimed the “Sultan of Egypt and Syria” by the Abbasid caliph al-Mustadi. He made further conquests in northern Syria and Jazira, escaping two attempts on his life by the Assassins, before returning to Egypt in 1177 to address issues there. By 1182, Saladin completed the conquest of Syria after capturing Aleppo, but ultimately failed to take over the Zengid stronghold of Mosul.
Under Saladin’s personal leadership, the Ayyubid army defeated the Crusaders at the decisive Battle of Hattin in 1187, leading the way to the Muslims’ re-capture of Palestine from the Crusaders who had conquered it 88 years earlier.
Morsi was ousted because he was trying to move Egypt away from American bondage, rather too fast.
He held absolute no power that’s why the Egyptian Army ruthlessly crushed Muslim Brotherhood.
I concur with you that Muslims on the whole don’t want a strict religious leader to rule over them. Most will settle for very diluted Shariyyah, nothing like what was implemented in the time of the most Blessed Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and his blessed Companions (may Allah be pleased with them all).
I wonder how the Muslims will react when Imam Mahdi (ra) and Hz. Isa ibn Maryum (as) try to implement Shariyyah Muhammdiyah upon them in its full spirit!
As we are moving away from the topic at hand - so my last post here.