Forced Conversions to Islam (in Kerala)

[NameInUse]

Re: Forced Conversions to Islam (in Kerala)

@Sadiyah

Err... yes, they were protected from theives and not just the government. I'm sure they don't get killed on spot because they don't have the money to pay. Since you're so sure that they met bad treatment, please provide some evidence for it.

Interesting. By your own standards, the non believers had to be protected from their own governments. That is exactly what the mafia does, pay up or pay in blood. Of course "failure to protect" is the same as committing the crime. Worse yet, paying extortion to be second class.

@Sadiyah

How are they treated? They are bombed, killed, raped, and sodomized everyday! I guess it is all justified because Muslims happen to be the victims. Under the Islamic caliphate things weren't even half as bad as they are now. I don't see how snatching the land from Palestinians after WWII, limiting them to a certain piece of land that gets bombarded all the time anyway, and by holding back the funds to run their country is any indication of goodness from their neighbours.

Hmm, the Israelis are sodomozing the Palestinians! What next, are you going to site the the Saudi newspaper and say that Jews like to bake with the blood of Arab children?
Again, to my thesis of Islam being militaristic, anywhere Muslims are not dominating, they are victims and the non-believers are invaders. Forget that religiously Jews have as much or more rights as the Muslims do to the "unholy" lands.
By the way, where are the suicide bombers to liberate the black Muslims of Sudan? What would do the Caliph do about that? Maybe it is the mass conversion to Christianity that is pissing the Arabs off in Sudan...perhaps that is why there have been 300,000 killed in three years. Interesting now, recently I read a new article about Muslims crying foul about black Africans enmass converting to Christianity. The writer seemd to think they were being forced....I believe differently. Atleast Christians are not coming along and calling themselves "idol smashers".

Here is a word "duplicity"!

@Sadiyah

I was referring to the so-called Muslim countries having an Islamic government when I mentioned how Muslims would prefer to live under Islamic rule than in other nations.

Don't forget what your own people have done to Muslims isn't exactly very nice and peaceful either. Remember the Gujrat massacre? Remember how the railway eventually fessed up that it was a technical fault and not a doing of Muslims?

If you aren't a scholar on Islam then you might want to be careful. Yes, express your views all you want, but make sure it's based on facts rather than the ignorance of Muslims.

I'd like to leave it at that, as I'm on a tight schedule.

You don't have to refer to the "so-called Muslim countries". How about looking at France? There are Muslims there and in Canada that want to be governed by Islamic law. Imagine that, a Christisan trying to even practice his religion in Saudi Arabia. More duplicity.

I remember the Gujrat riots very well. Are you aware of what is happening in Sudan? Fifteen times more people killed.(300,000).

I keep telling you. I'm no scholar on Islam, nor do I pretend to be, nor do I want to be. I just think that selective outrage is very unbecoming. The preception Muslims has of Islam being is a religion of peace is contra-indicated by non-believers. Perhaps to you forced conversions and destruction is a sign of piety, but to everyone else it is intolerance...be it Kerala or anywhere else.