Fitna-e-Qadriya

[Damras]

Re: Fitna-e-Qadriya

@obaid1982

Typical … resorting to Qadiani-bashing. Care to elaborate on some “proper” and “non deviant” sects of muslims?
Ahmadis have a proven record of non-violence not just in Pakistan, but all over world. By the grace of Allah, Ahmadis are doing very well in serving Islam and Humanity. But its a shame that a typical state-certified muslim is only busy in blackening Islam’s face by their actions … (and then they ask WHY THERE IS NEED OF ANOTHER PROPHET … just look around the society and you’ll know why).

Ahmadiyya are forced to live peacefully in Pakistan or else they would have roasted us and thrown us at dogs and other creatures had they been in majority and in power. **Don’t you know how more peaceful people than Qadiyanis, the Buddhists killed, raped and tortured the ‘Islamic radicals’ in Burma?

**When these Buddhists can go crazy nutters, we may expect worse from Ahmadiyya. You should be grateful to Allah, that He never supported your people. Power and strength is evil for you!

Let me show you a non-Ahmadiyya mirror to you, perhaps you may see the real face of your leaders.

1. Your zealots live ‘peacefully’ in Israel and when Modi arrives there, your head in Israel goes to welcome him. In other words, your sect is united with Hindu extremists and Zionists against us.

2. Your prophet was born and bred in the British India, and when he claimed he was the promised messiah and the prophet of God, he made peace with the British Christians who had been exploiting Indian people by stealing their wealth and resources. In other words, your prophet collaborated with the evil criminals, and gave them his support by saying that British were good people and Muslims of India were supposed to be loyal to them. And hence Jihad and Qital is haram!

Now you’re going to do the same thing which your ‘kinds’ do usually. Posting references of Sunnis, Deobandis, Barelvis that they also supported the British masters. But when you do it, it will prove that your prophet did the same dirty work that these scholars of Muslims did. **Actually the Hindus who offered resistance to the evil British rule, the likes of Bhagat Singh were better than your prophet and his devotees!

**3. Your sect was born in the lap of British masters, sought refuge in the lap of the British Queen (in England, where the khalifah resides). We know that England is the land which gives asylum to people like Salman Rushdie and Altaf Hussain. Doesn’t it ring a bell in your head?

4. Quran says that Allah’s prophets will be dominant. And it proves when we see that your prophet died without completing his mission and his followers are condemned in the Muslim world by the mainstream majority of Muslims. Your prophet failed in his mission. You claim your prophet was the saviour for all people, but he didn’t serve humanity, instead he caused violence in Pakistan where Muslims and Ahmadiyya both died in anti-Ahmadi riots. Doesn’t it prove that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s teachings are based on mischief and are aimed at dividing and weakening Muslims?