First official ICC ODI Rankings launched!

ICC One-Day International Championship Table
as at 31 October 2002 ]

Team Matches Points Rating
1 Australia 27 3465 128
2 South Africa 38 4571 120
3 Sri Lanka 35 4092 117
4 Pakistan 32 3675 115
5 India 31 3301 106
6 England 21 2014 96
7 West Indies 22 2074 94
8 New Zealand 31 2832 91
9 Zimbabwe 28 1886 67
10 Kenya 12 263 22
11 Bangladesh 13 145 11

Next Series to be Played:

India v West Indies
7 ODIs, November 2002

Zimbabwe v Pakistan
5 ODIs, November-December 2002

South Africa v Sri Lanka
5 ODIs, November-December 2002

Bangladesh v West Indies
3 ODIs, November-December 2002

Zimbabwe v Kenya
3 ODIs, December 2002

South Africa v Pakistan
5 ODIs, December 2002

VB Series in Australia (Australia, England, Sri Lanka)
14-15 ODIs, December 2002-January 2003

New Zealand v India
7 ODIs, December 2002-January 2003

Summary of the Ratings Method:
A rating is worked out by dividing the points scored by the matches played, with the answer given to the nearest whole number.
After every ODI, the two teams each receive a certain number of points, based on a mathematical formula. Each team’s new points total is then divided by its new matches total to give their updated rating.
Matches abandoned with no result are always ignored. Also, only ODIs between full members are rated, so matches involving the Netherlands, Canada or Namibia at the ICC Champions Trophy, World Cup or other such tournaments will not be included.
The amount by which your rating improves after winning an ODI depends on the rating of your opponent. A win over a much stronger team (ie. one with a much higher rating than your own) boosts your rating far more than beating a much weaker opponent. Conversely, losing to a much stronger team will not cause your rating to drop too far but losing to a weaker side would.
The country with the highest rating is officially regarded as the best ODI team in world cricket, and will hold a specially commissioned ICC ODI Trophy, while it tops the table.

Period Covered:
The ratings will be based on up to three years of results.
The inaugural table reflects all ODIs played since 1st August 2000.
All ODIs played until the start of next August will be added on to this table.
In every subsequent August, the first year of results will be dropped from the table, so it will then cover the most recent two years of results. Thus once a year, the rankings will change overnight without any new ODIs being played.

Weighting of Results:
All matches included within the rankings will always fall into one of three time periods. Weightings are applied to these three groups of matches so that the rankings more fully reflect recent form. These weightings are:
Period One covers the first year of matches (weighting: one-third)
Period Two covers the second year of matches (weighting: two-thirds)
Period Three covers the remaining more recent matches (weighting: one)
The number of matches played and the number of points earned in each period is multiplied by the weighting factor. Example: if a team played 33 ODIs in Period One, the weighting of one third means this counts as 11 matches towards their rating. Similarly, 21 ODIs played in Period Two count as 14. Add to that 10 played in Period Three to bring it to a total of 35. A small technical adjustment ensures that, for all teams, the total number of matches and rating points is always a whole number.

Ratings Formula:
After each match, the two teams each score a certain number of rating points. These points are then added to their existing total and used to generate their updated ratings. The number of points a team scores is based on two factors:
the result of the match and

the gap between the ratings of the two teams going into the match.
There are two different formulas. One applies if the gap between the two teams’ ratings is less than 40 points, the other if the gap is 40 points or more. The rating points you score from a particular ODI is as follows:

Case 1 - gap between the two teams’ ratings is less than 40 points:
if you win, you score 50 points more than your opponent’s rating
if you lose, you score 50 points less than your opponent’s rating
if you tie, you score your opponent’s rating

Case 2 - gap between the two teams’ ratings is 40 points or more:
If the stronger team wins, it scores 10 points more than its own rating while the weaker team scores 10 points less than its own rating
If the weaker team wins, it scores 90 points more than its own rating while the stronger team scores 90 points less than its own rating
If the match is tied, the stronger team scores 40 points less than its own rating and the weaker team scores 40 points more than its own rating
Link

ODIs now have official ICC ranking mechanism


One-Day Internationals have today been given a ranking structure by the International Cricket Council along similar lines to Test cricket.

Not surprisingly, Australia sits in No 1 position, giving it the double as the best all-round team in world cricket.

The full list of rankings among the 11 nations is: Australia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, India, England, West Indies, New Zealand, Zimbabwe, Kenya and Bangladesh.

International Cricket Counci (ICC) chief executive Malcolm Speed today said a ranking system was long overdue for ODIs.

The system has been designed to do away with the dead rubbers that occurred when sides could not be beaten in a series.

“Now, the result of every one of the 120 or so matches that will be played between the 11 ODI countries over the next 12 months will count towards a country’s rating. This will add a new dimension to the playing side of the game and contribute towards greater spectator interest,” he said.

In order to make the rankings, all matches played between the participating countries since August 1, 2000 have been taken into account.

And the rankings will be the basis of future placements in tournaments.

Every match counts towards the rankings and all matches, whether in a World Cup or a dead series, will be treated with equal importance.

The formula devised takes into account: results from all ODI matches played over the previous two to three years; strength of opposition, with greater reward for beating higher-ranked opponents; greater importance is placed on more recent results, with older matches dropped every 12 months; all matches have equal status, with no account taken of venue or margin of victory.

In developing system, the ICC has consulted closely with international scorer and cricket statistician David Kendix.

The country with the highest rating is officially regarded as the best ODI team in world cricket, and will hold a specially commissioned ICC ODI Trophy, while it tops the table.

The ICC ODI rankings table will be updated and published on the ICC web site (www.icc.cricket.org) after each ODI match between the 11 major nations. Series previews and details of major movements on the rankings table will be circulated on a regular basis by ICC media release.

A feature of the web site interaction is a ‘Predictor’ that allows users to select future results and what effect they will have on the table.

A rating is worked out by dividing the points scored by the matches played, with the answer given to the nearest whole number. It can be compared with a batting average, but with points instead of total runs scored and matches instead of number of times dismissed.

After every ODI, the two teams each receive a certain number of points, based on a mathematical formula. Each team’s new points total is then divided by its new matches total to give their updated rating.

Matches abandoned with no result are always ignored. Also, only ODIs between full members are rated, so the Netherlands’ two matches in the recent ICC Champions Trophy were not included, nor will 2003 World Cup matches involving the Netherlands, Canada or Namibia.

Link

Losing Morroco & Nairobi Cup let Pakistan two spots down. I hope, team recovers soon.

its not a bad idea to have ODI rating too!!!

well the predictor on the cricket.org website shows how the positions will change, so Pakistan doesnt have any effect when it wins all its 5matches against Zimbabwe, just gets 1point, have to really work against the South Africa to come somewhere near Australia!!!

Considering where I thought Pakistan would be at this point, this ain’t bad at all. :k:

The rating looks fair, much better than ICC Test Championship, this table is getting a fair view, Pakistan could have been on top had they not performed so badly in Kenya and morroco and Champios Trophy.
Don't worry friends Pakistan will be on top after they get through South Africa.
It is bound to happen. Before every world cup, Pakistan plays badly and right around the time of WC they start playing excellent cricket.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by UMAIR316: *
The rating looks fair, much better than ICC Test Championship, this table is getting a fair view, Pakistan could have been on top had they not performed so badly in Kenya and morroco and Champios Trophy.
Don't worry friends Pakistan will be on top after they get through South Africa.
It is bound to happen. Before every world cup, Pakistan plays badly and right around the time of WC they start playing excellent cricket.
[/QUOTE]

Damn Right!!!!!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by UMAIR316: *
Before every world cup, Pakistan plays badly and right around the time of WC they start playing excellent cricket.
[/QUOTE]

If you go by 1992's example, we'll play badly almost upto the semis! :)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *

If you go by 1992's example, we'll play badly almost upto the semis! :)
[/QUOTE]

Pakistan was the only team who defeated NewZealand in 92 World Cup!

NZ - 166 all out!

Mere bhai, that was just before the semis.

In 1992 WC, at one point, due to our poor performance we were almost eliminated from the tournament. It was Australia (who had lost almost all their matches) who came to our rescue by defeating the Windies, and allowed Pakistan to go ahead to the semis.

From semis on, the team was in a completely different mind-set which won us the trophy.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *
Mere bhai, that was just before the semis.
[/quote]

So? We outclassed them. Didn't we? No team did it except Pakistan.

[quote]
In 1992 WC, at one point, due to our poor performance we were almost eliminated from the tournament. It was Australia (who had lost almost all their matches) who came to our rescue by defeating the Windies, and allowed Pakistan to go ahead to the semis.
[/quote]

And you believe that as a luck. Thank you.

Point being, the team didn't start clicking until they were facing elimination from the tournament. They played the first half of the tournament in an horrible manner and still managed to win the tournament.

As long as the Pakistan team keep its eyes on the ball and focus on performing their best in the matches that really matter, they should do ok.

I don't expect this Pakistan team to show any levels of consistency in their performance. That will be asking for almost the impossible. Please, just click in the important matches. Thank you.

Well said :hehe:
Pakistan will do well insha’allah! They didnt play in ealdup to the worldcup in 92 and were not favorites!
In 1987 they were Hot favorites on theri home soil as well as in 1996!
And in 1999 they were awesome in leadup to the worldcup and lost in finals.. This time around even if they do beat SA and ZIM (insha’allah) they will No be as hot favoriotes and it might be a blessing in disguise…
Insha’allah!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *
Point being, the team didn't start clicking until they were facing elimination from the tournament.
[/quote]

Not until we kicked Kiwis, Aussies butt!

Also reminds me, that if you look at 1999 WC, same thing happened to Australia. At one point, their position in the first round was quite precarious, and they had to win all their matches in the round and the Super Sixes to make it to the semis. From that point on, they clicked and then won all the way.

So, the key is to keep the eye on the ball. Focus on the ultimate prize.

I know many folks here, will just feel excited if Pakistan defeated India in WC. Or Australia. Nah! World Cup is much bigger than that. If they win all their early matches (as in 1987) they grow complacent in the big matches and the tournament ends in a severe disappointment. I'd rather Pakistan lose some early matches to get a kick in their butt and push them all the way to the final, and hopefully win it, then be holding a lame victory over one team or the other, as the only achievement from this prestiguous tournament.

Long shot, ofcourse, but umeed pe duniya qaim hai. :)

Personal opinion I think PAK ODI team looks much better I have a feeling PAK will win the WC if they play with their heads down on 2nd thought I have a feeling PAK will make to semi or final but will not win because some of the players in the team don't want to see Waqar coming home with the WC Trophy so they might not perform.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Question: *
Personal opinion I think PAK ODI team looks much better I have a feeling PAK will win the WC if they play with their heads down on 2nd thought I have a feeling PAK will make to semi or final but will not win because some of the players in the team don't want to see Waqar coming home with the WC Trophy so they might not perform.
[/QUOTE]

nah question!
I dont think they are THAT selfish! Wasim will surely want to anounce retirement after sharing worldcup trophy with his team-mates... They wont do this just to bring Waqar down! Nahhhhh....

If they won’t then my gut feelings says PAK will win the world cup :k: but you never know.

Insha’allah…

Everything seems Kosher in this rating…
Pak 4th...hummm… Challo Bhai aaj kaal tu yeh bhee bohaat hai…

…W/ all my saved up wishes…I think Pak can still win the WC…but we need to get rid of Waqar..ASAP!