Feminine Charms

[uzair1]

Re: Feminine Charms

@chaibiskut

Makes sense. But you’ve addressed that which wasn’t raised. I quoted something that suggested women seduce because they cannot command, not that seduction is rocket science, or that it doesn’t occur organically, or that men won’t respond to it.

Men do employ charm with women (because they know it works), but they don’t have to. You could argue women rely on charm because there’s a lack of perceived alternative, or a lack of capability to engage as an equal. How we project influence over others reveals a power dynamic. Just like the answer to the question “Would you rather be loved/considered attractive vs respected” is telling.

the availability of an apparently easy and convenient choice/route/strategy ‘spoils’ them and kills the incentive to fight it out as equals in a harsh world. This is not to say that there are no hurdles for women (in a workplace context) and so there is lack of perceived alternative as well. But as the world becomes more equal and fair to the sexes, womens power would manifest in both ways. They could decide which route they want to take.

Men employ charm with women? i dont know. because i havent seen men who were giggly, agreeable, and dumb getting their way around with women, but they surely dont employ sexuality (barring exceptions)

btw, do you think women have the same ‘patronizing instinct’ towards men that can spoil them?