Re: Females - Polygamy. Their only choice?
Queer ka bacha :bash:
You are such a fitnati guy, I swear. You took the Quote out of context. Idiot.
This is what the quote is a part of. This Dr. Zakir had put forth what is essentially a philosophical thought-experiment. Those things are not to be taken literally. Its just merely a philosophical tool used often by philosophers. This is the entire excerpt:
**Even if every man got married to one woman, there would still be more than thirty million females in U.S.A who would not be able to get husbands (considering that America has twenty five million gays). There would be more than four million females in Great Britain, 5 million females in Germany and nine million females in Russia alone who would not be able to find a husband.
Suppose my sister happens to be one of the unmarried women living in USA, or suppose your sister happens to be one of the unmarried women in USA. The only two options remaining for her are that she either marries a man who already has a wife or becomes public property. There is no other option. All those who are modest will opt for the first.
In Western society, it is common for a man to have mistresses and/or multiple extra-marital affairs, in which case, the woman leads a disgraceful, unprotected life. The same society, however, cannot accept a man having more than one wife, in which women retain their honourable, dignified position in society and lead a protected life.
Thus the only two options before a woman who cannot find a husband is to marry a married man or to become public property. Islam prefers giving women the honourable position by permitting the first option and disallowing the second.
There are several other reasons, why Islam has permitted limited polygyny, but it is mainly to protect the modesty of women.**
Note, his example is merely theoretical. It in no way describes the real-world. Personally, I dislike these types of thought experiments - we used to get them ALL THE TIME in ethics classes and other philosophy classes. The trouble with them is that they don’t describe the real world exactly. Philosophers argue that for purposes of logic, they’re great tools. Also, philosophers argue that these examples can come close to the reality.
The reality in this situation is that there are many single women out there. But there are also many single men out there as well. And it doesn’t have as much to do with actual male: female ratios. You also have to look at age groups. Out of the 52% of females on Earth - how many of them are fertile? How many of them are children? How many elderly?
You really need to compare ratios of fertile men to fertile women. I bet that ratio is quite different.
Polygamy, like I’ve said before, is nothing more than a mere allowance to the natural state of man. Most men are not satisfied with one woman. Even guys who are in monogamous marriages get tired of one female. So if they don’t marry another, then guess what? They’ll cheat on their wife.
Same difference in the end. In countries wher you don’t have polygamy, you have polyamorous marraiges, or open marriages, or adultery, or swingers, etc.
Its part of man’s nature. I told you men are pigs.