Re: Female Prophets
Please provide evidence for the bold statement above. I will not leave this point, so get ready …
coming back to your initial point … You were very clearly asked to provide evidence that men made religions … You have failed to provide that evidence instead you are trying to play a cat and mouse game by setting your premise and conclusion to be causes of each other … So far it seems like circular argumentation.
Throughout time there have been many cases where men have loved women, like their wives or their mothers so much if men made religions could have made their own women to assume positions of power … And if religions were really made by men … It would not matter to create some female prophet in the past, while they still retain their masculine control … The other problem is that history contradicts you … There is evidence to show that men didn’t make religion, but were compelled to abide by it. Islam for example has more responsibility for men … There are clear verses that show the close companions and at times the Prophets themselves (AS) were corrected and told to do something other than what they desired.
This shows there is an authority above men … All religions will have some tradition of the obligation of men to protect their women … If men made religion then why would they oblige themselves of that?
It is our claim that men and women have different roles … as it states in the Qur’an … You are making the assumption that men and women should have the same role by asserting women should also have been prophets … Nature and the development of the human race would prevent that notion … Women would take care of children and at most forage for food, whereas men would hunt and gather. This is what your own atheism in evolution teaches you … That men and women had different roles.
It is natures signature that men and women do different things … Actually where men and women do the same things mostly that is man-made … Like jobs in the work place under gender equality … Man-made laws make us have the same roles not nature. So the evidence is against you.