Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

I like here way of thinking. If more people were thinking like her Pakistan would be a different story today. :slight_smile:

‘Real’ Bhutto heir denounces family business
Fatima Bhutto
Jeremy Page in Karachi

When Fatima Bhutto heard that her estranged aunt had been assassinated she put aside decades of family feuding to mourn with her relatives at the ancestral home in Pakistan.

Three days later, when Benazir Bhutto’s 19-year-old son, Bilawal, was anointed head of the Pakistan People’s Party, Fatima maintained a respectful silence, despite whispers that she was the real Bhutto heir.

But now, two weeks on, she has broken that silence to launch a blistering attack on her cousin’s appointment, accusing those around him of perpetuating dynastic politics and trying to cash in on his mother’s blood.

In an interview with The Times – her first with the Western media since Benazir’s death – the 25-year-old newspaper columnist also rejected her own claim to the Bhutto legacy, calling for a new era of politics based on platforms rather than personalities.

“That’s the problem – it’s a field that’s held hostage by so few and it’s become in a sense the family business, like an antique shop, where it’s just ‘So and So and Sons’ and then grandsons and great grandsons. It just gets handed down,” she said.

“The idea that it has to be a Bhutto, I think, is a dangerous one. It doesn’t benefit Pakistan. It doesn’t benefit a party that’s supposed to be run on democratic lines and it doesn’t benefit us as citizens if we think only about personalities and not about platforms.” At a news conference in London this week, Bilawal denied that the party had been handed to him “like some piece of family furniture”.

Fatima’s remarks are unlikely to dent his support, but they reflect the concerns of many about his party’s democratic credentials ahead of parliamentary elections on February 18. And while she says her doors are “always open” to Bilawal and his sisters, her criticism is almost certain to dash hopes of a family reunion and carry the epic feud into the next generation.

“We were there for those three days of mourning,” she said. “So it’s up to them now.” Fatima’s father was Murtaza Bhutto, Benazir’s younger brother and the eldest son of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who was Pakistan’s first populist Prime Minister until he was deposed in a coup in 1977 and executed.

Murtaza led a resistance movement from Afghanistan, returning to Pakistan to challenge Benazir’s leadership of the PPP. He was killed in a police shootout in Karachi in 1996, while she was Prime Minister. Murtaza’s Lebanese-Syrian wife, Ghinwa, has always blamed Benazir and has run a splinter faction of the PPP ever since. Benazir, meanwhile, derided Ghinwa as a “belly dancer” and disputed her inheritance of the family homes in Karachi and Larkana. “It was not a pleasant relationship we had at all,” Fatima said.

The PPP says that Benazir left a will appointing her husband, Asif Ali Zardari, as party chief and that he stepped down in favour of Bilawal, a history student at Oxford. Bilawal added “Bhutto” to his surname and said his father would run the party until he completed his studies. Mumtaz Bhutto, leader of the 700,000-strong Bhutto tribe, has disputed that, saying Bilawal’s name change did not make him a “real Bhutto”.

Fatima said that neither she nor her 17-year-old brother were the rightful heirs – even though they are the offspring of the male line. The issue, she said, was whether Bilawal was a suitable choice, given that by law he must wait another 6 years to run for Parliament – and 16 years to stand for Prime Minister. “Ultimately the party workers believe that nobody can head the party but a Bhutto, but I don’t think the workers believe that on whomever you put the Bhutto name can lead,” she said.

“They seem to be a party in a hurry and they seem to be desperate to cash in on her blood. There was a certain coterie around her that benefited richly from her Government and they plan, it seems, to benefit richly from her death as well.”

Fatima, like Mr Zardari, rejected the Government’s claim that Islamist militants were behind Benazir’s assassination, but she also questioned Mr Zardari’s motives. “I think at some point the will should be made public, if indeed there was one,” she said.

The parallels between Fatima and her aunt are striking: Benazir studied at Harvard and Oxford before returning to Pakistan and taking over the PPP aged 24. Fatima returned to Pakistan two years ago after completing a BA in Middle Eastern studies at Columbia University and an MA in South Asian government and politics at SOAS in London.

Fatima has also published a book of poetry aged 15 and another on the 2005 earthquake in Kashmir.

So far, she has resisted the urge to run for Parliament, confining herself to campaigning for her mother and writing her weekly columns. She admits, though, that politics is in her blood. “If there was an opportunity for new faces to come up and new voices to be heard and if I could be of service in some way, I wouldn’t say no,” she said. “But I’m not interested in being a symbol for anyone.”

Voice of dissent

“[Benazir] Bhutto’s political posturing is sheer pantomime . . . By supporting Ms Bhutto, who talks of democracy while asking to be brought to power by a military dictator, the only thing that will be accomplished is the death of the nascent secular democratic movement in my country
Opinion piece in the Los Angeles Times November 14, 2007

I never agreed with her politics. I never did. I never agreed with those she kept around her, the political opportunists, hangers-on, them. They repulsed me. I never agreed with her version of events. Never. But in death perhaps, there is a moment to call for calm. To say enough. We have had enough. We cannot, and will not, take any more madness

2 Likes

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

:k:

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=90651

PPP’s flawed succession
Legal eye

Saturday, January 12, 2008
Babar Sattar

The writer is a lawyer based in Islamabad. He is a Rhodes Scholar and has an LL.M from Harvard Law School

Within minutes of PPP naming Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari as its new Chairman, I got an email from William Polkinghorn (an American friend who was a fellow Rhodes Scholar at Oxford) that read: “How did this go down? In a democracy you don’t name political successors in a will? And he is only 19 years old!” True in a democracy you cannot hand down the leadership of a mainstream political party as a ‘family heirloom’. But unfortunately in Pakistan the succession debate is focused largely on whether Bilawal is the legitimate recipient of the Bhutto bequest or if Zulfi Junior or Fatima Bhutto has a better proprietary claim over PPP, and also if it is at all appropriate that Bilawal has taken on his mother’s surname.

Bilawal conducted his maiden press conference this past week after assuming the role of PPP’s chair and he did an impressive job – especially as a 19 year old who just lost a parent. But the succession debate is not really about Bilawal. It is about Benazir Bhutto, the state of democracy within all our political parties, and our social value system that enables political elite to perpetuate itself in power and prevent challengers from entering the political fray. Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and Asif Zardari were not forced to step-up during a crisis and nominate themselves co-chairs because there was no succession planning within PPP, but actually in giving effect to the succession plan left behind by PPP’s erstwhile chairperson-for-life.

Benazir Bhutto headed the party for over two and a half decades, accepted and justified the title of chairperson-for-life and did not allow leaders to evolve from within who could possibly replace her or even question her word. Her not-so-secret disaffection for Aitzaz Ahsan – since he rose to greater national prominence as a leader of the lawyers’ movement fighting to uphold rule of law and justice – underscores the deliberateness of such policy. However, PPP does not stand out as a political fief wherein the party head monopolized and jealously guarded her unquestioned authority. The despotic tendency of our leaders is evident across the political spectrum: from the other mainstream party PML-N to smaller parties such as MQM, ANP and Tehreek-e-Insaaf.

It is amazing that the prophets of democracy heading Pakistan’s political parties never utter a word about internal party democracy and consequently (i) politics in Pakistan remains personality-driven as opposed to issue-based and (ii) the distinction between democracy and dictatorship become fudged as the style of governance under both remains autocratic. In Pakistan little attention has been paid to the organizational structure through which much of the politics takes place. The process of balloting doesn’t automatically result into a representative democracy if people have little control over which names get on to the ballot.

The nature of a democracy is affected by specific institutional structures and legal rules, because popular will translates into electoral mandate through the medium of these structures and rules. The entrenched ground rules of political competition in Pakistan are such that they squeeze out challengers and thus the forces of change. There seems to be a covenant among our political elites that they will work together to prevent easy penetration by outsiders. The fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan (introduced by the Nawaz Sharif government and supported by the PPP) that gave party heads excessive control over the freedom of speech, legislative choice and association of their elected party representatives was a manifestation of such covenant.

In Pakistan the barriers to entry into the political arena are sky-high. There is simply no institutional mechanism to groom leaders and it is either the incidence of birth or historical events that account for the emergence of a leader. But due to the lack of a process for finding and cultivating political talent and fresh ideas, we are stuck with the recycled ones we have. A popular bumper sticker these days reads, “Join Pakistan Army, Become President”. This is as much a satire on the military’s intervention in politics as it is on the failure of political parties to function as democratic institutions. For another one saying “Join PPP, Become Prime Minster” would be equally hysterical.

How do you become a meaningful part of the political process if you don’t belong to a political family and don’t have excessive wealth to gatecrash a party? Can you become a party worker and expect to rise to the top by virtue of your talent? Yet there are no signs of any plans or even a desire being harbored by our existing political parties to reform themselves along democratic lines. The only way to force reform upon existing parties is by establishing competing political structures that are democratic. But for that to happen we would need prominent political leaders to join hands and resolve to create a party that is not only larger than individuals but is actually designed to render individuals dispensable.

We have before us the example of Nelson Mandela who stepped aside as president of South Africa as well the African National Congress to enable alternative leadership to evolve. Such voluntary rejection of unbridled power and authority goes against the grain of most mortals and that is what makes Mandela a legend. For the rest of us we need to create structures that distribute power widely and require that political office be abdicated to make room for new faces and fresh ideas. The US model is a useful one in this regard. By virtue of a constitutional norm and convention an elected president is required to step aside after two terms. But more importantly party candidates, to be nominated for the top office, are elected through a competitive democratic process which throws up new leaders. And we see that candidates who take a turn and lose – like Vice President Al Gore and Senator John Kerry – end up making room for new faces.

Pakistan could use enhanced competitiveness within the political arena and one way to accomplish that is for hope-inspiring politicians such as Aitzaz Ahsan, Imran Khan and their like to create a political party that disallows individuals from holding either political party office or public office for more than two terms. We need a new political force that encourages equality, integrity and competence to flourish and also provide room for internal change as opposed to chasing out the dissenting voices.

It is not warped political parties alone that enable individual politicians to monopolize authority but a larger social value structure that supports the barriers to entry into politics. We continue to behave as a society that places higher emphasis on pedigree, clan and wealth in choosing political leaders as opposed to the integrity and facility of the individual. The Bhutto succession debate has highlighted the insidious prejudice and chauvinism still prevailing in Pakistan. Why are we even discussing that Fatima Bhutto or Zulfi Junior are more legitimate successors than Bilawal Zardari, unless there is an underlying assumption that blood flowing through the paternal side of the family is purer? Why should Bilawal feel the need to adopt the Bhutto surname to embellish his political credentials and why should such a cosmetic change actually make him more acceptable?

The debate regarding the succession of leadership within PPP is likely to prove largely irrelevant for the future of politics in Pakistan. Benazir Bhutto inherited the PPP mantle in a different era and toward the beginning of the reign of a dictator. As political processes remained suspended in the country for a while, her age and physical absence from Pakistan didn’t matter all that much. In contrast by the time Bilawal finishes his studies and comes of age, much water would have flown under the bridge. While he will have an edge over the next twenty five year old political enthusiast, he will need to prove his mettle and create room for himself to lead the party and play a meaningful role in the politics of Pakistan.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

Utter crap! If she would have the chance to get into PPP (and PPP lift naih kara ti usse) she would be there in seconds. She is paid for all what she utters. Such only intend to split societies.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

Good read... Been really impressed by Fatimah since she started writing... She seems to realize that Party isnt her fiefdom. She could prove to be the differnce.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

Mr. 10% would probably get her assassinated too!!!

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

So you think that PPP should be run as a jaagir where the chairmanship is handed from bhutto to bhutto, rather than as a political party where the chairman is elected purely on merit?

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

Well, I think we have to wait and see. I, for one, think she is a very talented, educated and smart women who can succeed in any filed, including politics even w/o the Bhutto name. So, let us give her benefit of doubt....

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

So you think she would not have different views regarding her Aunty If she would have been THE major part of BBs will? Politics is a very dirty game. This government proves It.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

I hardly think that she would be even taken serious, If she wouldnt have the name Bhutto. No one is interested in some Fatima who writes articles against BB and PPP.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

Fatima has always kept herself away from politics. She knows the game and she knows that its a dirty game too and for that reason she stays away from it. She's been in the scene for quite some time now you know, didnt just pop up overnight.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

As soon as you write on politics you are part of It and since her Aunty was a political figure there is no escape for her anymore. Yes she there for quite a while, but had little influence with her saying. To be honest no one cares about her much. Not the average Pakistani.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

Ali you failed to answer what Cheegum asked you. How can you trust a party to bring democracy in the country, when it does not believe in using democracy to elect its parties chairman? Benazir definitely did not believe in democracy, if she is the one that wrote that will. She was just using the word democracy to win votes. What if Bilawal turns out like his father? Will we just let him be the leader of the country because he has Bhitto in his name??

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

its strange she doesnt raise similar objections to Ghinwa Bhutto heading Shaheed Bhutto Group :confused:, instead is a worker of said party?

or is unqualified, uncharismatic Bahu of Bhutto different from unqualified, uncharismatic Nawasa of Bhutto?

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

she finally uncrossed her fingers.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

I do believe Bilawal and the other Bhutto youths will be better at patching things up within the families and making sensible decisions compared to their elders. Or so we hope!!

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

I have discussed this a couple of time. Let the search function on this site be your best buddy to assist you on reading my views about the will.

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

every thing aside, she is beautiful, i will vote for her... :)

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

[quote]
So far, she has resisted the urge to run for Parliament, confining herself to campaigning for her mother and writing her weekly columns. She admits, though, that politics is in her blood. “If there was an opportunity for new faces to come up and new voices to be heard and if I could be of service in some way, I wouldn’t say no,” she said. “But I’m not interested in being a symbol for anyone.”
[/quote]

What contradictions.
But I like her too hanibal. Maybe It can become a reason to vote for her :D

Re: Fatima Bhutto Condemns Dynastic Politics

I like the way you dodge so that you dont have to answer the question.