Since we got pakistani Point of view from Jang.Lets see what times of india says.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?artid=38498653
KUALA LUMPUR: India and Pakistan on Monday came out more sharply against each other than than they have in the last three decades. This was after Gen Pervez Musharraf raised the Kashmir issue twice during his speech at the 13th NAM summit and offered to host a “conflict resolution mechanism” under the aegis of NAM.
Taking the floor shortly after Musharraf’s speech, Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee ridiculed the reference to Kashmir. He first finished his speech to the forum and then read out four paragraphs that were circulated separately.
Vajpayee asked Pakistan to ponder over the fact that the “oppressed people of Kashmir” had actually been victims of terrorist violence and had voted in “an election that had been universally recognised as free and fair”, defying “bullets of terrorists, aided and abetted by Pakistan”. It was a staccato speech.
While the reference to Kashmir was on expected lines, India was miffed at Musharraf’s proposal for a conflict resolution mechanism — that an official described as “the cheek” — which had been considered at the official and ministerial levels, but for which New Delhi says there have been no takers.
**
As a result of this spat, any prospect of an early dialogue was angrily ruled out by both sides. While Musharraf said he was “least interested” in a dialogue if India did not want it, * (Now dont go to intrenational community like a crybaby and say everone that India is not talking) *external affairs minister Yashwant Sinha sarcastically thanked him for it, saying: “Bahut bahut shukriya (Thanks a lot).” :rotfl: :rotfl: **
**
Foreign secretary Kapil Sibal countered the talk of a handshake with a scathing query: “Shake hands with a terrorist?” He added for good measure: “There is a Pakistani footprint on every act of terrorism.” **
:rotfl:
Taking exception to the raising of the Kashmir issue, albeit not for the first time, India held that this was meant to vitiate the NAM ethos. Yashwant Sinha said conflict resolution was not part of the NAM charter, just as groupings like ASEAN or OIC did not cater to this. On Musharraf’s references to “oppression” in Kashmir during his 10-minute address, linking it with Palestine and Rwanda,** Sibal said the reference was “short on wisdom, and long on venom”.** 
Sinha said Musharraf ought not to talk of a dialogue since “jab bhi Bharat ki baat aati hai to unke moonh se gaali nikalti hai (whenever there is talk of India, he turns abusive)”. Sibal summed up by saying: “In history as in mythology, the vicious have become virtuous. If he (Musharraf) has a change of heart, and he is ready to atone for his sins (of sabotaging the Lahore Process and staging Kargil), he can not only shake hands but also have a dialogue with the Prime Minister.”
Earlier, even as Pakistani diplomats termed the Indian reaction “childish”, Vajpayee, on way to a meeting with Iranian president Seyyed Mohammed Khatami, ruled out any dialogue with Pakistan, saying: “Koi surat nahin dikhai deti (It seems impossible).”
Vajpayee also did not react to a Pak TV correspondent’s provocative question why he had “turned his face away from peace and dialogue”.
Cornered by the media on the sidelines of the summit about a dialogue with India, Musharraf said he “cannot clap with one hand…My hand is there. But I am tired of this…If they are not interested, I am least interested”.
He justified his references to Kashmir, arguing it was “an important issue”.
On his part, Sinha said Musharraf ought not to talk of a dialogue since “jab bhi Bharat ki baat aati hai to unke moonh se gaali nikalti hai (whenever there is talk of India, he turns abusive)”.
By raising the Kashmir issue again, Pakistan had done “nothing new”. Since 1947, Pakistan had been infiltrating outsiders and then talking of self-determination. Why not have self-determination in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir?" he asked.
Sibal summed up the Indian mood by saying: “In history as in mythology, vicious have become virtuous. If he (Musharraf) has a change of heart, and he is ready to atone for his sins (of sabotaging the Lahore Process and staging Kargil), he can not only shake hands but also have a dialogue with the Prime Minister.”
