English Cricket Crises : Pietersen resigns, Moores sacked, Strauss named captain

Pieterson was trying to do Smith or Dhoni, looks like it backfired. IF he is removed who should be the captain of England? (btw, I think he should go). I think it should be one of Andrew Strauss, Flintoff or Collingwood.


Cricinfo - Emergency meeting undermines Pietersen

In a surprise development, the ECB have called an emergency board meeting to discuss the rift between Kevin Pietersen and Peter Moores.
Cricinfo understands that the 12-man board met by teleconference on Tuesday night, raising the possibility that Pietersen, who had not been due back from his holiday in Africa until Thursday, may pay the price for his outspoken views on the future direction of the England team.

Research conducted by the ECB in the last few days suggests that Pietersen does not have the steadfast support of his team-mates or the back-room staff. The majority of the England support staff are understood to be supportive of Moores while most of the players are underwhelmed by Pietersen’s dramatic intervention, as Steve Harmison demonstrated with his ambivalent comments on Tuesday.

There is also some sympathy towards Moores who, it is understood, was given the authority to select the England captain when Paul Collingwood and Michael Vaughan resigned, and there are those within the set-up who feel that Pietersen has betrayed the coach’s trust.

Attitudes towards Pietersen also appear to be hardening at board level. While few are completely convinced by Moores, they do not like the manner in which the captain has attempted to dictate events. As one board member told Cricinfo: “People who want to keep their jobs don’t issue ultimatums. At this stage any outcome is possible.”

Whether Moores’ position is salvageable remains highly debatable, however. There has been little evidence of progress under his tenure and his credibility may now be damaged beyond repair. A double departure - Pietersen and Moores - is a growing possibility.

Meanwhile, the identity of Moores’ immediate successor as coach has been shrouded in further confusion, after Warwickshire warned they may not necessarily keep Ashley Giles’s job as the county’s director of cricket open, should he be asked to fulfil a role as “stop-gap” coach in the Caribbean.

Though Warwickshire will not stand in GIles’s way if he is offered the job, his involvement in the West Indies would rule him out of any involvement in Warwickshire’s pre-season plans and the club want to minimise disruption in the dressing-room. Furthermore, it is feared that Giles could recruit Allan Donald - currently Warwickshire’s first-team coach - to help him in the Caribbean.

And emergency it is. Ever since Pieterson learnt that Vaughan was not included in the squad based upon his recommendation and how the coach got his way, it has all become public.

If they both are let go, this would be an unfortunate end, because they cannot find anyone else as aggressive in a captain's role as Pieterson, who also should not have made the mountain out of it and let the role and position of a coach come into the picture without devaluing his authority. They both have stepped in each other's shoes, in a few days we will find out who is let go.

Pietersen and Moores resign

ECB in turmoil

So who is going to be the next English cricket coach and captain?

Cricinfo - Pietersen and Moores resign

Kevin Pietersen and Peter Moores have resigned as England’s captain and coach respectively, leaving the ECB in complete turmoil following the emergency board meeting that took place on Tuesday evening to discuss the rift in the leadership of the team.
The 12-man board met by teleconference on Tuesday night, raising the possibility that Pietersen, who had not been due back from his holiday in Africa until Thursday, would pay the price for his outspoken views on the future direction of the England team.
Now, however, it appears that Pietersen has taken his future into his own hands, and handed back the role he took on from Michael Vaughan barely five months ago. According to Sky News, Pietersen has given as his reasoning the fact that the ECB did not act quickly enough in responding to his demands over Moores’ future.
Andrew Strauss, who captained England in 2006 when Vaughan was out of the team with injury, is the hot favourite to lead them on the tour of West Indies, which begins in exactly a fortnight’s time.
Meanwhile, Moores’ departure comes as less of a surprise. His position became untenable following the revelations of the rift, and there had been little evidence of progress under his tenure and his credibility had been damaged beyond repair.
Cricinfo understands that Andy Flower, Moores’ assistant coach, will be offered the interim role for the West Indies tour, although it remains highly debatable whether he will accept the role in the current circumstances.
Speaking to the News of the World earlier in the week, Pietersen said: “This situation is not healthy, we have to make sure it is settled as soon as possible and certainly before we fly off to the West Indies. Everybody has to have the same aims and pull in the same direction for the good of the England team.”
Research conducted by the ECB’s director of England cricket, Hugh Morris, however, suggested that Pietersen did not have the steadfast support of his team-mates or the back-room staff. The majority of the England support staff are understood to be supportive of Moores while most of the players are underwhelmed by Pietersen’s dramatic intervention, as Steve Harmison demonstrated with his ambivalent comments on Tuesday.
There was also some sympathy towards Moores who, it is understood, was given the authority to select the England captain when Paul Collingwood and Vaughan resigned, and there are those within the set-up who feel that Pietersen had betrayed the coach’s trust.
Attitudes towards Pietersen appeared to have hardened at board level. While few are completely convinced by Moores, they did not like the manner in which the captain has attempted to dictate events. As one board member told Cricinfo: “People who want to keep their jobs don’t issue ultimatums.”
The news brings to an end a tumultuous five-month reign. When Pietersen took on the role in August 2008 following Vaughan’s resignation, he immediately declared that he intended to do the job “his way”. With a maiden Test triumph over South Africa, followed by a 4-0 victory in the ODIs, his way was the high way during a heady honeymoon period.
But all throughout his tenure, rumours of his dissatisfaction with Moores’ methods were never far from the surface. Pietersen did not accept the job until he had had “clear the air” talks with Moores in the aftermath of Vaughan’s resignation, and he later voiced his disapproval of Moores’ dogmatic training methods that sapped the team’s energy on their tour of New Zealand in March.
Although Kent’s coach, Graham Ford, had been touted as Moores’ probable successor, his candidature had been raised with a view to finding a man who could work alongside Pietersen. Ashley Giles is another option, although Warwickshire have warned they may not necessarily keep his job as the county’s director of cricket open, should he be asked to fulfil a role as “stop-gap” coach in the Caribbean.

re: English Cricket Crises : ECB have called an emergency / Pietersen and Moores resign

This is major news. ECB have "no knowledge" of dual resignations although it is believed that they have resigned, which, if both of them came to a mutual conclusion (highly unlikely other than resignation), is a result of today's news. With such a new captaincy in his hands, the way Pieterson played it was not appropriate, not the way to go about things with demands from the captain which obviously made the coach looked like he stepped on captain's shoes. This was an unfortunate thing to happen for ECB and Michael Vaughan was the center of it all.

Pietersen out as England captain

Kevin Pietersen has left his position as England captain in the wake of his rift with coach Peter Moores.

BBC Sport understands Moores will also leave his post but it is unclear if the duo have resigned or been sacked.

The England and Wales Cricket Board held an emergency meeting on Tuesday evening where it is believed an initial decision to sack the pair was approved. But further meetings have since been taking place on Wednesday with a view to resolving the escalating crisis.
BBC cricket correspondent Jonathan Agnew said he had been told by an ECB spokesman that Pietersen and Moores had not tendered their resignations.

He told Radio 5 Live: "The ECB confirmed to me that no resignations have been offered or accepted.

There is no suggestion Pietersen will stop playing for the England team following the bust-up.

BBC sports editor Mihir Bose told 5 Live: "Pietersen gave an ultimatum to the ECB saying ‘sack the coach or I go’.
"The ECB has said ‘we value you as captain but we don’t take dictation from you’. So they accepted his ultimatum and he has suffered.

SOURCE: BBC SPORT | Cricket | England | Pietersen out as England captain

Re: English Cricket Crises : ECB have called an emergency / Pietersen and Moores resi

Looks like Pieterson has to go unless some last minute deal is brokered b/w ECB and him. So Shoaib Malik stay and Pieterson has to go :slight_smile:

as the say “my way or highway” never always work!


Cricinfo - Strauss stands by in England crisis

The England & Wales Cricket Board are expected to clarify the situations of both their captain, Kevin Pietersen, and the coach Peter Moores, after a dramatic day in which both men are believed to have tendered their resignation.** Andrew Strauss, who was seen leaving Lord’s along with the national selector, Geoff Miller, is now widely expected to step into the breach.**

The ECB were left in complete turmoil on a day of rumours, denials and high drama, following the emergency board meeting that took place on Tuesday evening to discuss the rift in the leadership of the team.

In a brief statement, however, the ECB insisted they have “no knowledge” of the departure of either Pietersen or Moores, although they have admitted that Pietersen was not prepared to tour West Indies under the current management structure. A full statement is expected later on Wednesday afternoon, although for the moment, it is understood that the ECB’s lawyers are working behind closed doors on the finer details of Pietersen’s contract.

The 12-man board met by teleconference on Tuesday night, raising the possibility that Pietersen, who had not been due back from his holiday in Africa until Thursday, would pay the price for his outspoken views on the future direction of the England team.

Instead, it appeared that Pietersen had taken his future into his own hands, and handed back the role he took on from Michael Vaughan barely five months ago. According to Sky News, Pietersen gave as his reasoning the fact that the ECB did not act quickly enough in responding to his demands over Moores’ future. Speaking briefly on the phone, Pietersen told the programme: “I am not in a fit state to talk.”

Strauss, who captained England in 2006 when Vaughan was out of the team with injury, is the hot favourite to lead them on the tour of West Indies, which begins in exactly a fortnight’s time. His reappointment, two-and-a-half years after he was overlooked for the Ashes tour in favour of Andrew Flintoff, would represent a remarkable turnaround for a player who, this time last year, was dropped from the Test side following a prolonged run of poor form.

Meanwhile, Moores’ departure would come as less of a surprise. His position became untenable following the revelations of the rift, and there had been little evidence of progress under his tenure and his credibility had been damaged beyond repair.

Cricinfo understands that Andy Flower, Moores’ assistant coach, was offered the interim role for the West Indies tour, although it remains highly debatable whether he could accept the role in the current circumstances.

Speaking to the News of the World earlier in the week, Pietersen said: “This situation is not healthy, we have to make sure it is settled as soon as possible and certainly before we fly off to the West Indies. Everybody has to have the same aims and pull in the same direction for the good of the England team.”

Research conducted by the ECB’s director of England cricket, Hugh Morris, however, suggested that Pietersen did not have the steadfast support of his team-mates or the back-room staff. The majority of the England support staff are understood to be supportive of Moores while most of the players are underwhelmed by Pietersen’s dramatic intervention, as Steve Harmison demonstrated with his ambivalent comments on Tuesday.

There was also some sympathy towards Moores who, it is understood, was given the authority to select the England captain when Paul Collingwood and Vaughan resigned, and there are those within the set-up who feel that Pietersen had betrayed the coach’s trust.

Attitudes towards Pietersen appeared to have hardened at board level. While few are completely convinced by Moores, they did not like the manner in which the captain has attempted to dictate events. As one board member told Cricinfo: “People who want to keep their jobs don’t issue ultimatums.”

The news brings to an end a tumultuous five-month reign. When Pietersen took on the role in August 2008 following Vaughan’s resignation, he immediately declared that he intended to do the job “his way”. With a maiden Test triumph over South Africa, followed by a 4-0 victory in the ODIs, his way was the high way during a heady honeymoon period.

But then came England’s disastrous showing in Allen Stanford’s 20/20 for 20 showdown in Antigua, in which England lost the chance to win US$1 million per man for a single evening’s work when they were bowled out by the Stanford Superstars for 99. Pietersen blamed the team’s performance on off-field “nonsense”, including floodlight issues and a high-profile faux pas involving the player’s wives, but there were no such ex cuses when England were subsequently thrashed 5-0 in their one-day series against India.

That tour was foreshortened after the Mumbai terrorist attacks in November, and though Pietersen earned huge credit for his role in persuading the team to rejoin the tour for the two-match Test series, and for his remarkable century at Mohali, his tactical nous came under scrutiny during their 1-0 defeat, especially after the team failed to defend 387 in the first match at Chennai.

But all throughout his tenure, rumours of his dissatisfaction with Moores’ methods were never far from the surface. Pietersen did not accept the job until he had had “clear the air” talks with Moores in the aftermath of Vaughan’s resignation, and he later voiced his disapproval of Moores’ dogmatic training methods that sapped the team’s energy on their tour of New Zealand in March.

Although Kent’s coach, Graham Ford, had been touted as Moores’ probable successor, his candidature had been raised with a view to finding a man who could work alongside Pietersen. Ashley Giles is another option, although Warwickshire have warned they may not necessarily keep his job as the county’s director of cricket open, should he be asked to fulfil a role as “stop-gap” coach in the Caribbean.

Re: English Cricket Crises : ECB have called an emergency / Pietersen and Moores resi

i hope Pietersen does’nt resign from being the England Captain, just when i thought we would get some continuity in our play. :hinna:

Sky Sports interview of Dominic Cork and Alec Stewart on the current crisis

I think the blame lies with ECB.

I know Pietersen is not an angel and has a big ego but if he wanted to have Vaughan in the side for the West Indies series the ECB should have honoured his wish. I have always been of the view that the captain and not the coach should have the FINAL say in team selection

Had Moores stayed it would have split the dressing room right down the middle.

Some of Pakistan's ex-captains and dressing room members would have been proud of this mess. There are obviously some factions in the dressing room, some with Pietersen and some not, and that's not the sort of harmony you want just six months before the Ashes.

Andrew Strauss will likely replace KP as test captain but since the former has not been a part of England's recent one-day teams, they might go for a separate one-day skipper. This farce could not have come at a worse time for England

Andy Flower is likely to be named as 'temporary' English coach

WHAT?

:smack:

Spockey tera gunda dimagh

Full statement issued by Kevin Pietersen

[quote]

Contrary to media speculation today, I wish to make it very clear that I did not resign as captain of the England cricket team this morning.

However, in light of recent communications with the ECB, and the unfortunate media stories and speculation that have subsequently appeared, I now consider that it would be extremely difficult for me to continue in my current position with the England cricket team. Accordingly, I have as of this afternoon decided to stand down as England captain with immediate effect.

Notwithstanding my resignation as England captain, I still fully intend to be a part of both England's Test and One Day International squad to tour the West Indies next month and to do all I can to recapture the Ashes during the summer.

I wish to add that I have principles in my professional and personal life as to how things are done and during my time as England captain I have always been both helpful and direct in my communications with the ECB. At no time, contrary to press speculation, have I released any unauthorised information to the media regarding my relationships with the players, coaches and the ECB itself.

I am extremely sad and disappointed to have to relinquish the captaincy at such an early stage, especially in a crucial year for English cricket, in such circumstances and particularly when I feel that I have much more to offer the England team as captain. However, this decision will not affect my determination to continue playing international cricket for England, doing all I can to win matches for the team and supporting whoever captains the team in the future.

[/quote]

**England captain Kevin Pietersen has quit in the wake of his rift with coach Peter Moores, who has also been sacked. **

**Andrew Strauss has been named as the interim captain for the tour of the West Indies, which begins 21 January. **

Hugh Morris, managing director of the England and Wales Cricket Board, said in a statement that the search for a new coach would begin “immediately”.

SOURCE: BBC SPORT | Cricket | England | England captain Pietersen resigns

SOURCE: BBC SPORT | Tom Fordyce blog

You are right about everything you mentioned. But a captain cannot have his own way within 5 months with a coach already present from Vaughan era. One cannot expect things to get handed to them right away, especially in light of the fact that Pieterson challenged the authority of a senior coach.

ewwwwwwwwwww

PS: u never know :)

You are right captain should have more say BUT thats something ECB has to outline. Currently, ECB has specified the roles of Coach and Captain where both have almost equal say and when KP accepted the job of Captain, he knew that. He should have asked ECB to have more say rather than running into moore; publically and that too without having credentials as Captain.

Re: English Cricket Crises : Pietersen resigns, Moores sacked, Strauss named captain

Hats off to ECB for standing up to Pieterson and "sacking" him. Look what overblown egos and players power has done to cricket in Pakistan and India. In Pakistan unfortunately this tradition was started by none other than Imran.

true...imran is such a schmuck...even now its not too late to sack him...mushy hota to uss ne to imran ko sack mein dalwa daina tha.

I don't entirely disagree with what most of you are saying here. True Imran has an inflated ego but since he always backed it up with good performances on the field people did not seem to mind it that much.

But you must also understand that the situation in Pakistan is very different from that in Australia. In Australia for instance the coach shares the blame for any abject performances with the captain. Ponting knows he cannot select the team on his own and vice versa. In Pakistan esp. in the eighties the captain was always the one who was put to the sword by the press and everyone. So Imran's view was if the captain was going to get hell after every loss from everyone then he should also be given a bigger role in selection matters.

Does anyone here for instance remember what Inti's role was in the 1992 World Cup in Australia? He was barely in the news. The whole world cup passed but I don't actually remember seeing a single statement from him in the papers. Whether Imran had gagged him or whether Inti himself was just too passive and felt that his role mainly was to supply chai and biscuits we don't know

It is only since the late 90s that coaches are being held equally responsible by the media in Pakistan. Believe you me that was not the case before. Imran was undoubtedly one of the 2 or 3 best players of his time so he could afford to get away with it (again I am not defending him here). Twice I remember in the eighties Miandad (not a bad captain himself) stepped down as captain voluntarily after Imran made himself available to play at the eleventh hour. The players and the management alike understood Imran's worth to the team. Miandad a great himself knew exactly what Imran's captaincy meant to the team and Pakistan. I respect him more for that.

In England traditionally the coach has always had more of an advisory or supporting role. Mickey Stewart always lived in the shadow of Gooch so what happened been Pietersen and Moores is really quite unprecedented.