So if it is that easy to refute arguments in religion, why is it that there are so many sects in a single religion. Leave people like me aside, I am talking about differences in the opinions of the so called ‘learned religious scholars’. It it is that straight forward to refute arguments, why don’t they agree on ‘one’ Islam and discard all the other versions based on the undeniably convincing arguments for or against certain beliefs? Why is it that nobody in the world disputes claims about Amir Khan’s height but ‘learned religious scholars’ do not agree on things like Milaad? When the instruments required for validating arguments are not there, why argue? Where will you end up, if not in getting BPs high?