Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

Do you think ppl really have a good reason to be appallled at this move, or is it just biased thinking?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/local/story/393032p-333282c.html

BY MICHAEL McAULIFF
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration gave control of six crucial ports to a 9/11-linked Arab nation after a flimsy investigation and with weak guarantees the company in charge can stop Osama Bin Laden from infiltrating, the House homeland security chairman said.

“There are conditions, which shows they had concerns, but it’s all procedural and relies entirely on good faith,” Rep. Peter King (R-L.I.) told the Daily News. “There’s nothing those conditions … nothing that assures us they’re not hiring someone with Bin Laden.”

The firm, Dubai Ports World, owned by the United Arab Emirate of Dubai, cut a $6.8 billion deal last week to buy control of the ports — including Manhattan’s cruise ship terminal and Newark’s giant container port — from a British firm.
A source with knowledge of the purchase echoed the chairman, telling The News that while Department of Homeland Security administrators rubber-stamped it, senior analysts at the agency were never told, and they don’t like it now. News of the sale, approved by a secretive multiagency panel headed by the Treasury Department, has sparked a growing outcry from both political parties.

“It’s unbelievably tone-deaf politically at this point in our history, four years after 9/11, to entertain the idea of turning port security over to a company based in the UAE, [which] vows to destroy Israel,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told “Fox News Sunday.”

Hearings on the deal have been called for this week in Congress, and Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y) and Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) have proposed a law to ban such takeovers.

Schumer demanded that President Bush personally intervene.
“The President must act,” he said at a news conference with New York Harbor as a backdrop. “Outsourcing the operations of our largest ports to a country with long involvement in terrorism is a homeland security accident waiting to happen.”

But the administration is defending the port transfer, pointing out that even though Dubai was an important base for the 9/11 plot, the emirate is now an American ally.

“You can be assured that before a deal is approved, we put safeguards in place, assurances in place, that make everybody comfortable that we are where we need to be from a national security viewpoint,” Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told ABC’s “This Week.”
But King, who was briefed on the deal by top officials last week, disagreed.

Our investigation was very superficial," he said. “We’re talking 20 to 25 days of work, and that includes all the financial aspects and everything else.”

King said a huge blind spot was the identity of the firm’s employees.
“All we know are principals and people at the top level,” he said. “We don’t even know the midlevel guys, who are the ones who will be doing the work, really running things.”

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

they were saying on the news a few days ago how none of the alleged 9/11 guys even came from UAE :D Another scare tactic by our government and people of course will fall for it again. Let's all run and hide under our beds the bad guys are coming!!!

y?

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

its really not a big deal - i mean if all the airports involved in 911 can be serviced by an israeli company then why cant UAE get some action aswell

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ICTS.html

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

Slowly but surely the middle east take over of US has begun. hehe

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

The knew-jerk reaction by American lawmakers just shows their hypocrisy and stupidity. They're so against an arab owned company, so they shouldn't mind Arabs being against American companies.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

UAE taking over these ports at the very least will be delayed until further review of the transaction can be completed. Turning port control over to a country that hosted planners of 9/11 without a detailed and open look was asinine of the Bush administration.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

^ rubbish...when did UAE as a country supported 9/11 attacks??

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

Perhapes the U.S. should give a Saudi firm control of our nations airports as well.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

Well...dey iz Ayyy-rahbs....and 9/11 'tacckers be Ayyy-rahbs too...

The logic is quite stunning...

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

^Racist ehh!!

Well we have no place for "racists" in USA being a "free country" ....

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

What's being called for it more review and scrutiny of this transfer which is very understandable under the current political climate. After everything Bush has said and done this is an excellent political opportunity to weaken him. Knowing Dubai they would actually class the joints up and make them mega tourist attractions.

Fact is as of now there are many questions unanswered. I’ve read that the workers aren’t screened currently and this is unacceptable. Time for Bush to step up to the plate and lay down what exactly is going on.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

How did this guy get reelected? :konfused:

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

This is looking to be a major political punch in Bush's face. His approval ratings have been hovering around 40% for the last few months expect that to erode as even his hardcore base is turning against him. I think the public outcry is a sign that Americans do not trust Bush's credibility nor his decision making.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

Dubai company set to run U.S. ports has ties to administration

**WASHINGTON - **The Dubai firm that won Bush administration backing to run six U.S. ports has at least two ties to the White House.

One is Treasury Secretary John Snow, whose department heads the federal panel that signed off on the $6.8 billion sale of an English company to government-owned Dubai Ports World - giving it control of Manhattan’s cruise ship terminal and Newark’s container port.

Snow was chairman of the CSX rail firm that sold its own international port operations to DP World for $1.15 billion in 2004, the year after Snow left for President Bush’s cabinet.

The other connection is David Sanborn, who runs DP World’s European and Latin American operations and who was tapped by Bush last month to head the U.S. Maritime Administration.

The ties raised more concerns about the decision to give port control to a company owned by a nation linked to the Sept. 11 hijackers.
“The more you look at this deal, the more the deal is called into question,” said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who said the deal was rubber-stamped in advance - even before DP World formally agreed to buy London’s P&O port company.

Besides operations in New York and Jersey, Dubai would also run port facilities in Philadelphia, New Orleans, Baltimore and Miami.

The political fallout over the deal only grows.
“It’s particularly troubling that the United States would turn over its port security not only to a foreign company, but a state-owned one,” said western New York’s Rep. Tom Reynolds, chairman of the National Republican Campaign Committee. Reynolds is responsible for helping Republicans keep their majority in the House.

Snow’s Treasury Department runs the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., which includes 11 other agencies.
“It always raises flags” when administration officials have ties to a firm, Rep. Vito Fossella, R-N.Y., said, but insisted that stopping the deal was more important.

The New York Daily News has learned that lawmakers also want to know if a detailed 45-day investigation should have been conducted instead of one that lasted no more than 25 days.
According to a 1993 congressional measure, the longer review is mandated when the company is owned by a foreign government and the purchase “could result in control of a person engaged in interstate commerce in the U.S. that could affect the national security of the U.S.”

Congressional sources said the president has until March 2 to trigger that closer look.
“The most important thing is for someone to explain how this is consistent with our national security,” Fossella said.

http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/politics/13922695.htm

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

Neither do they trust arabs/muslims running those ports.

I support the public in this matter.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

In a bizzare way I like this transaction. Any attack or illicit material coming though one of these ports would create a major embarrasment for the UAE. No one will work harder and more effectively to assure safety. Every Arab is not our enemy. The closer our linkages in business the more our fates are intertwined. This is not a bad deal, and the news media is frothing over the mouth on this one....

They will put this under a 90 day review, talk some sense to people and it will go through.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

^I agree it's not a bad deal...

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

Yes The Saudi Govt. sure was red in the face after 9/11. How embarassing for them! And the media is just reporting the reaction in Washington.

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

All through the years you have singing praises of Bush's behavior. I hope this deal goes through with only the arabic language to be spoken at the ports, (no english) then you will know how good your Bush was...lol

Re: Dubai secures control of six crucial ports

So, unh...why is there an outcry? Are Americans really that ignorant of their own port system?

You do relaize that there is NO security risk involved in this. The security of the ports always was, and always will be, in the hands of the US government.

So, if there's no security concern...what's the problem with an Arab-owned multinational taking over from a British one?

Bringing up the 9/11 link is retardation. Seriously...what's the concern?

The best I've heard so far is that the company is a government-owned one.

Handing over control of ports to a forien government is scary. I can understand that.

Further, the British company was a publically traded one, and so Americans were free to purchacse stock in that company and so hold influence in it if they so desire. Not so with this new company.

SO many valid reasons, yet morons decide to pick on the Arab factor. Sheesh...