Dr. Zakir Naik

Has anyone heard him speak on ETV-Urdu.

Here’s Zakir Naik, ‘Fundamentalist, not Fanatic’

Beirut to Jakarta, millions tune in to Mumbai-based ex-surgeon’s English sermons on Islam, Vedas, Bible

Mohammed Wajihuddin Javed Bakali, a leather goods manufacturer, takes his sehri—the pre-dawn light meal during Ramzan—with a sermon.

It doesn’t come in Arabic or Urdu or from a maulvi. Instead, Bakali, a commerce graduate from Mumbai University, tunes into ETV (Urdu) to listen to a former surgeon who quotes from the Vedas, the Bible and rounds it off with the ‘‘glory’’ of Islam—all in fluent English.

‘‘He is doing a service to Muslims by removing any wrong notions about Islam that may have crept into non-Muslim minds,’’ says Bakali, the 49-year-old father of three. ‘‘It lifts my mood, I get a sense of elation.’’

Bakali is just one of millions across the world who regularly tune in to hear Dr Zakir Naik, 39, a lanky, bearded, bespectacled scholar committed to ‘‘removing misconceptions about Islam.’’

Quoting from the Quran and a host of other scriptures, Naik is heard from Boston to Beirut, Paris to Port Blair, mainly through six channels of the Dubai-based Abdul Razzak Yaqoob (ARY) Digital Network.

‘‘He is acquiring cult status among our viewers,’’ Tariq Wasi, ARY’s vice-president (operations) told the The Sunday Express from Dubai. Besides the 24-hour Q-TV, which is immensely popular in Muslim homes in India and Pakistan, Naik is available for 30 minutes daily on ARY’s five other entertainment channels uplinked from Dubai.

‘‘At a recent studio lecture, Naik fielded dozens of questions, many from the Christian world,’’ says Wasi.

So is Naik an integrationist or a regular Islamic hardliner in modern garb?

Seated in his book-lined office of the Islamic Research Foundation, the centre he founded in 1991, off a dusty lane in Dongri in Central Mumbai’s teeming Muslim heart, Naik denies that he’s trying to prove Islam’s supremacy.

‘‘I am a fundamentalist,’’ he says, ‘‘not a fanatic.’’

A Maharashtrian Muslim from the Konkan, Maharashtra’s lush coastal edge, Naik insists he speaks of common ground between religions. ‘‘I plead that we leave the differences aside, and celebrate commonality,’’ he says.

One of Naik’s oft-quoted ‘‘commonalities’’ between Islam and Hinduism is a controversial one: a negation of idol worship. Though Islam’s rejection of idolatory is well-known, Naik says even Hinduism opposes idol worship.

‘‘Yajurveda, chapter 32, verse 3, says that God has no images,’’ he says. Naik also cites a relevant ‘‘admonition’’ from the Yajurveda, Chapter 40, Verse 9, about idol worship: ‘‘If you worship material things (assambhati), you’re entering darkness.’’

‘‘I back my arguments with logic and scriptural proofs,’’ says Naik, an MBBS and a surgeon who put down his scalpel to ‘‘defend Islam’’.

While doing the second year of his MBBS at Mumbai’s Nair Hospital in the late 1980s, Naik met Ahmed Deedar, a noted Islamic scholar from South Africa, and changed for ever.

‘‘After I met him, I told myself surgery was not my goal. Countering the lies and the half-truths about Islam became my mission,’’ he says.

Reading the scriptures widely—IRF’s library houses over 10,000 books, mostly religious texts from all religions—he has memorised dozens of verses.

After 9/11, Naik is frequently asked whether Islam supports terrorism. ‘‘Islam is clear about it. Killing an innocent is akin to killing the entire humanity,’’ he says, ‘‘still, Islam is demonised.’’

His fans certainly don’t regard him as a fanatic. ‘‘He doesn’t use rhetoric and always reiterates the good message. He keeps his cool even when someone asks a provocative question,’’ says Iqbal Masalawalla, a garment seller at Mumbai’s Mohammed Ali Road, who watches Naik regularly.

‘‘He has a lucid style of talking about Islam and other religions. I find him quite convincing,’’ says D S Chauhan, an Air Traffic Controller (ATC) at Mumbai’s Sahar Airport.

Once at a lecutre in Bhiwandi, some local Shiv Sena leaders verbally attacked Naik till many Hindus among the audience came to his rescue.

Naik insists that, like Islam, Hinduism too asks its followers to go for jihad. ‘‘In Bhagvad Gita (Chapter 2, Verse 37), Krishna tells Arjun that he should fight. If he gets killed he will enter swarg,’’ he says.

‘‘Krishna endorses war, but for a right cause. Similarly, in Islam, jihad means to strive, to struggle. Jihad against one’s own weaknesses is a bigger jihad.’’

Though Naik speaks in English, his speeches are dubbed in Hindi as well. He doesn’t charge for the lectures, nor are his VCDs sold—you can hire and copy them.

‘‘I have no copyright on anything that we produce. I will not mind if someone copies my cassettes and books and sells them,’’ says Naik, who’s published a dozen booklets, including Quran & Modern Science, Islam & Terrorism.

may Allah reward Dr. Zakir Naik for his efforts and may Allah give him a long healthy life so he may continue his struggle to guide manking to the religion of the One True God....

Anything good done by Dr. Naik is promptly nullified by the actions of Muslim fanatics around the world.

After 9/11, Naik is frequently asked whether Islam supports terrorism. ‘‘Islam is clear about it. Killing an innocent is akin to killing the entire humanity,’’ he says, ‘‘still, Islam is demonised*.’’ *

Dr Zakir Naik is very learned in Comparative Religion and does put the record straight on behalf of Islam. Wish we had many more role models like him.

Dr.Zakir is amazing! Apparently, hes coming to toronto at end of december! I am looking forward to it :slight_smile: If any other guppies from toronto want to carpool and go together then, just pm me.

His Website

I can sit and watch his lectures for hours on end. Very inspiring. Contradicts many beliefs some thick maluvis have made up over the years e.g wearing a tie is harram. I wish him the best of luck in his mission and would be thrilled if he was on BBC some day.

Well, I have personally met brother ahmed deedat when he was invited by birmingham islamic propagation centre in uk a very long time ago but not Dr naik.

Although, I have had exchange of ideas with dr naik on FFI and UKYM or some one who was pretending to be him.

One of our muslim brothers also invited brother harun yahya to exchange ideas with us at FFI but he too declined after promising to turn up.

Yes, brother naik is very good with words but like all my muslim brethren there is little or no substance in what they claim about islam. I have shown that quite clearly even on this forum. Unfortunately, we are a people living on dogmatic indoctrination of islam which is regretably very damaging and we do not even realise it eg see the follwoing links.

http://www.examinethetruth.com/craig_winn_exposed.htm

http://www.prophetofdoom.net/debate_nadir.html

http://www.libertyunites.tv/ftopict-3446.html&sid=fae1561d8547492df7c97014a96fa894

the man is a absolute genious and a living legend, i love his memorisation skills he knows quran by heart, vedic scriptures by heart, bhagavadgita and bible etc subhanallah may allah bless him for his efforts for the sake of islam + when he clamps up the non believers with proof from their books i just love it

:k:

hope it answers your question.....

MMughal

Muslims don't need substance to defend their position via words. The Qur'aan does it for us.

The reality is that Dr. Naik has no time for the likes of you. With all due respect, no-ones even heard of you.

What are your credentials? Please tell us.

Also enlighten us as to why you should be invited to a debate about any religion or vice versa, whereas you are not religious yourself as you have admitted yourself.

Memorising a number of Scriptures word for word with context is no easy feat. Have you memorised any guidance that you use for your Way of Life even if an Athiest, in it's totality with context?

The day I see MMughal on the world stage dealing with questions, misconceptions, views, stereotypes and assumptions about a Way of Life which he believes in and can produce factual evidence to justify his stance in an 'ad hoc' manner and responding factually with evidence like Dr. Naik, then maybe, just maybe you might be taken seriously.

Until then, your views are exactly as it states. Just views. Manmade views.

Peace

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by aysh: *
hope it answers your question.....
[/QUOTE]

lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Thats my msn nick - complete with Dr Naik photo - he is awesome!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by aysh: *
hope it answers your question.....
[/QUOTE]

:D

Dear sholay,

If the quran does it for you then the rest of scriptures do the same for others. So what is the point in discussions or debates? Please think about it.

Again it is not important in religious discussions as to who I am, how qualified I may be or how well I might be known in real life but what I say, because our only undisputable credentials in this regard are our brains, our senses and the information we obtain and process for making sense of things in the wider world. As for Dr Naik having no time for people like me, that is upto him I think to decide.

Well dear friend, we do not have to be relgious to debate about religions just as Dr Naik does not have to be a christian to say things about christianity, or a hindu to say anything about hinduism.

Dear sholay, again just because you do not memorise something does not disqualify you from speaking about things that you know about. You see the ulamaa that come out of daaral alooms, not all of them come out as huffaaz of the quran, hadith and fiqh. In a discussion you have to speak from what you know about something you are discussing. You do not have to know everything about everything else as well, do you?

Dear sholay, have you read any of my writings? If not please do.

http://www.libertyunites.tv/ftopic-3730-days0-orderasc-30.html&sid=4b57e271143b1d8020393222b41cd256

Many thanks for your kind response. My regards and best wishes.

He is Mashallah doing a lot of good for Muslims around the world by spreading knowledge about Islam among Muslims as well as Non-Muslims.

MMughal

Thanks for your offer of reading your posts. In all fairness to yourself and myself, I haven't got the time or desire to read and digest your posts from a Forum. I had a quick browse, but that's as far as it will go. If you have something constructive to say, then commission yourself a Book and become known. This way we can take you seriously and cross examine your views.

As far as credentials are concerened, they play a vital role in any form of dialogue. For instance, if you hadn't been taught by someone whether physically or via books who had knowledge of their subjects, you wouldn't be here putting two sentences together. How did you learn to read, write, walk, talk and run. You were taught by somebody who knew? I doubt very much that you were raised from birth on a desert island in total seclusion and learned the skills you currently have.

The Qur'aan actually also lays a challenge asking for the production of a verse similar to that of the Qur'aan. Just similar, not identical but similar. Now how hard is that over a period of 1400 years. If and when this challenge can be met, then I'd be the first in line to re-assess my beliefs and way of life. Up until then, the Qur'aan is the criterion and Dr Naik proves it time and time again to Muslims and Non Muslims alike.

Peace.

I had the oppurtunity to personally meet him in the airport while he was travelling.

Just for your info - ahmed deedat is banned here, for mocking the people who drive in their 4wDs & dont give a damn about the rest of the muslims.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by sholay: *

Thanks for your offer of reading your posts. In all fairness to yourself and myself, I haven't got the time or desire to read and digest your posts from a Forum. I had a quick browse, but that's as far as it will go. If you have something constructive to say, then commission yourself a Book and become known. This way we can take you seriously and cross examine your views.
[/quote]

Thank you for your kind suggestion for publishing a book dear sholay, I have been suggested to do so by various friends for quite some time now but I have not yet had the time to do so. It takes a lot of energy and concentration to go over the articles before I hand them over to friends for reviewing and proof reading etc. Hopefully, I will try. As for taking me seriously, that you should decide by reading what I have written. Nobody is born fully grown up or with knowledge of everything. Our credibility comes from many small steps in life. So it is our work that establishes our credibility not otherway round. In fact you could lose your credibility by making a mistake in what you do at any point in time. So it is good work that helps us establishe our credibility as well as it helps to hold on to it. A doctor can be struck off at once for making a serious error in his/her judgment.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by sholay: *

As far as credentials are concerened, they play a vital role in any form of dialogue. For instance, if you hadn't been taught by someone whether physically or via books who had knowledge of their subjects, you wouldn't be here putting two sentences together. How did you learn to read, write, walk, talk and run. You were taught by somebody who knew? I doubt very much that you were raised from birth on a desert island in total seclusion and learned the skills you currently have.
[/quote]

It is you yourself who learns things if you wish to do so and others can only be of assistance to you. Learning is natural instinct and I have explained that in the link I provided. However, each and every person or thing learns only what it deems necessary for itself. For example, you do not wish to read my posts but are happy to read dr naik's stuff. I can also assume why is that so, lol. As for drawing from bank of knowledge, that is a common heritage that is built bit by bit, generation after generation by humans themselves just like other animals. We observe things wherein we are and gain information and then try and put that information together in a ways that make sense to us and keep reflecting on what we have learned or discovered to keep corerecting our errors and be wiser.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by sholay: *

The Qur'aan actually also lays a challenge asking for the production of a verse similar to that of the Qur'aan. Just similar, not identical but similar. Now how hard is that over a period of 1400 years. If and when this challenge can be met, then I'd be the first in line to re-assess my beliefs and way of life. Up until then, the Qur'aan is the criterion and Dr Naik proves it time and time again to Muslims and Non Muslims alike.

Peace.
[/QUOTE]

Dear sholay, I have answered this question in my posts decisively. As for anyone proving the divinity of the quran, that is simply impossible. You see dear friend, when anyone tries to critically evaluate or if you like examine the islamic scriptures, muslims get very upset and therefore the actual point of discussion or debate is lost. I remember the debates we used to hold in mosques and halls in the uk between deobandi and brailvi or qadyaanies, shias etc ulamaa. We always ended up fighting. With lots of na'raz baazi and abuse. I do not know how old you are but some sites in 70s and 80s were not that good. This is because it was in seventies that we began inviting brailvi ulama and peer sahibaan from back home. That was because most people came from villages with brailvi beliefs of khatam droud and taweez tahaaga and deobandies and wahabies were against all that. The issue arose because we people brought over our families and birth and death rituals became important as we became settled in the uk.

I was part of muslim organisations right from the beginning in sixties. In 70s we used to arrange huge gathering of tablieghi jamaat in dewsbury as well used to hold huge urs gatherings in bradford and birmingham, besides we used to invite ulamaa of international repute from around the world for international muslim conferences like world islamic mission led by late allaama shah ahmed noorani. The seerat conferences led by allaama khaalid mahmood phd. Besides we used to hold khatame nabuwat conferences wherein we used to invite a lot of very capable religious personalities of various schools of thought. I knew great ulamaa of my time from various countries. I was involved in creation of uk muslim parliament as well with late dr kalim siddiqui. It is now presided by dr ghayas uddin siddiqui who also knows me. My great grandfather met queen victoria in what was then india. He witnessed the dethroning of king bahadar shah zafar, first in 1857 and then 1859.

Anyways, thanks again for your time and wish you success and happiness.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by mal1k: *
Just for your info - ahmed deedat is banned here, for mocking the people who drive in their 4wDs & dont give a damn about the rest of the muslims.
[/QUOTE]

are you serious?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by armughal: *
may Allah reward Dr. Zakir Naik for his efforts and may Allah give him a long healthy life so he may continue his struggle to guide manking to the religion of the One True God....
[/QUOTE]

Ameen summa Ameen. I have shook hands with him.

Dear Mmughal

Thanks for your brief history. At least I now know a little about you and your background.

It's a shame that you felt disorientated with Islam and decided to lose Faith and become an Athiest. May Allah have mercy on you and guide you to the right path.

The infighting you've mentoned between these brailvi, deobandi etc sects is also prevalent today. However, these manmade sects are predominantly from the Indo-Pak sub continent and have no basis in Islam. Some things never change.

If we could dig people up from their graves or gather the ashes of the incinerated, and ask them if there is a God and who their God is, making them speak. Everyone would revert to Islam. However, the Qur'aan tells us:

15:14. Even if We opened out to them a gate from heaven, and they were to continue (all day) ascending therein,

15:15. They would only say: "Our eyes have been intoxicated: Nay, we have been bewitched by sorcery."

I am willing to take the risk of believing in Allah and the Qur'aan without a shadow of a doubt, whereas you are willing to take the risk in NOT believing in Allah and the Qur'aan, despite your soul already giving it's convenant to the Creator.

It's a matter of Choice!