Adaptation is different than evolution. Skin color changing (adaptation) is because of sun ray's its not an evolution to become a better spicy (because in evolution Fittest Survives)
Can you please show me more creatures that are hybrid?
I don't think whale is the right example, yes it has characteristics of mamals and non-sea animals but it just a unique creature of its own.
Since its evolutions you have to show at least three animals that are in synch with each other. For example, there is a "fish" charactristic whale ... that turned into mammal whale (as we know now) .... that turned into a "land" whale or something. It shows evolution that one thing transformed to another.
We always find two animals that have some similar charactristics - and they are seperated by thousands of years apart. Yes, it is possible they have evolved from one to another - but we must be able to find at least 1 example where we can see this path clearly and not just two thousands of years apart creatures that have some similarties.
Again, let me clarify my original statement:
Evolutions make sense to (limited) human logic, but we have as much proof of it as God putting Adam / Eve on earth. Just because we lack a concrete proof of evolution, should we abondon it? Absolutely not. We need to do more research and explore more because that will increase our understanding of Quran and Science. We just need to keep in mind , that it is not concrete.
Adaptation is a mechanism by which evolution works. Race differences are an adapatation to differnt environments. That is why skin color is genetic variation, along with other features.
The problem is that even if we were to find animals that demonstrate the conversion of the whale from a land animal to a sea creature, they could all be dismissed as unique unto themselves.
Still, we do have such lineages... The human evoutionary tree is pretty well populated, and you can see the various adapatation and changes over thousands of years. And even today we can seee that creatures closely realted to us like the great apes have a very high correlation to our genome. The farther we go down the evolutionary tree the more similarity we see.
We dont assume two animals thousands of years apart are related, unless we can prove it.
Diference between science and religion is that science demands evidence. Religion neither demands nor presents it, you have to take it on faith.
Nothing is concrete, but I bellieve there is more evidence to support evolution at this point.
But I dont think evoltution is a challenge to religion. I think they can both compliment each other. Its up to the faithful to to come to their own reconciliation.