Do not forget to google out and open and read the references mentioned at the bottom of the page, which are the “actual” research studies conducted.
The actual studies based on which 99% similarity claims were shamelessly made had only some again “some” proteins parts of both species’ dnas studied, which make up very very very little fraction of the entire dnas. And this information was never taken from harun yahya site. And this is the actual research paper that was distorted.
1975 paper by Mary-Claire King and A. C. Wilson. Article compared several proteins only proteins in chimpanzees to their equivalent proteins, in humans.
*** “Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.” (Romans 8:34)
*** One of the most glorious truths of the Christian life is that the Lord Jesus Christ, who died for our sins and rose for our justification, now lives to intercede for us before God.***
**please tell me you also believe in all this too then, since it was in your very authentic and credible link!
**if you believe their anti-evolution stance, you should also accept Lord Jesus died for our sins, it’s stated in this website that **YOU **posted..
You believe Jesus Christ died for our sins?After all, it was in your link, so must be true, right?
try again.
this time, just make sure the next page is not dedicated to Lord Jesus Christ.
I know that a chimpanzee has 48 chromosomes and we have 46 ... A reeves muntjac and sable antelope both have 46 as well ... Although the proteins may be similar between a chimp and a human the problem I have is understanding the leap from 46 and 48 ... What creature would be ancestral to both? How many chromosomes would it have?
and there does not seem to be a pattern between complexity of creature ...
a chicken has 78 and a Ophioglossaceae has 1260 chromosomes !!!
While a mosquito has 6 chromosomes
An indian muntjac has only 6 chromosomes and 7 for a male, while it's reeves version has the same number as humans. You can cross reference this from anywhere ...
That is a good passage. My beef is nit with you. It definitely is not against ANY religion. My beef is ONLY with those who are so arrogant wrt their faith. When they declare there religion is the ONLY one that is relevant, perfect and their book is the only one that matters.
Anyway, I will stop posting on this topic.
people this should not have happened!!
Very first disobedient was due to arrogance(remember ?), like Its mother of all evils. Putting your self first by any mean necessary.
Here we are peaching to bella thiorist and southie, and they feel our arrogance.
not a good job.
It is not about their choice. That is debatable and refutable. trust me.
It is about your choice to spread and support irreligious and anti-religious ideas.
You are not the only one who came for this agenda and many left some stayed.
Just admit you are are negating three large religions of the world.
I am not going to ask you to be honest since I feel you are not.
If you cannot admit you failed to acknowledge simple anatomical differences between men and women for a reason, you are being dishonest.
None of genetic book can tell you higher species came from lower species to an extent, earlier species were observed or can even be transformed to higher species.
All they talk about is mutation or adaptation etc.
Homosexuality is wrong on all counts. APA never gave any scientific reason or researched based reason for its decision which a whole lot of people on earth do not believe.
It was an absurd decision. It made difficult to rehab the sodomites and homosexuals who otherwise could save the world from a lot of complexities including psychologically abusing children who are adopted by them.
people this should not have happened!!
Very first disobedient was due to arrogance(remember ?), like Its mother of all evils. Putting your self first by any mean necessary.
Here we are peaching to bella thiorist and southie, and they feel our arrogance.
not a good job.
Disagree;
If someone feels it is arrogance then its that person's problem.
Simply stating the obvious is not arrogance.
No one supported ONE religion I hope.
Science and science lovers these days have been taken over by anti-religious and or irreligious thoughts.
Counter argument:
Look above,
Just because a link was cited from a Christian site, Bella showed arrogance and simply refuted it.
The last 3 posts are a classic example of a "religious" person exhibiting his bigotry and intolerance. He calls a poster a fool earlier. Then he calls her dishonest. Then he attacks an entire segment of the population simply because of their orientation.
every decent Individual shoulld shun succh behavior. For some mysterious reason, few people do around here. It ought to be obvious that treating fellow human brings with respect is paramount. If that is not done following ones religious rituals is meaningless. If there is God, He will frown upon such behavior.
how do you know its not a choice? did any homosexual person ever tell you this? ALL your ridiculous claims have been refuted int he other thread many times.
Being non religious and antireligious are different. understand the difference.
where have I been dishonest?
Huh? when did I say there is no difference? never would i say there is no difference. please stop lying atleast.
who said it’s wrong? Forget APA, tell me what do psychiatrists in US say about it? what are they taught in medical school and during residency? they are wrong too? Basically ALL European and US psychiatrists are wrong because they do not consider it a disease or even a choice.. All the biologists are wrong, all the scientists are wrong. but only Diwana is right… got it:D i wonder who the arrogant one is hmmmm
Again, more lies..
You cannot send homosexuals for therapy because it is not a disease. Give me one reason WHY it’s not considered a disease by ANY medical organization in the western world?? as far as abuse, STRAIGHT people abuse children just as much. this is a complete myth that gay parents are abusive. a lie spread by someone like you who cannot accept other peoples choice of lifestyle simply because it’s not the same as yours.
Btw, majority of the think tanks, whose researches go into the development of new products, medications, vaccines and technology equipment even the ones used at hospitals, employ christian scientists. Christian scientists and researchers are actively involved in new drugs’ discovery and development. Stop using those products because using them implies you are rejecting the evolutionary theories. if that forms basis of the rejection of researches.
Btw, majority of the think tanks, whose researches go into the development of new products, medications, vaccines and technology equipment even the ones used at hospitals, employ christian scientists. Christian scientists and researchers are actively involved in new drugs' discovery and development. Stop using those products because using them implies you are rejecting the evolutionary theories. if that forms basis of the rejection of researches.
So when I post a link, YOU call it 'unathentic' but I can't do the same for yours...why is that??
The last 3 posts are a classic example of a "religious" person exhibiting his bigotry and intolerance. He calls a poster a fool earlier. Then he calls her dishonest. Then he attacks an entire segment of the population simply because of their orientation.
every decent Individual shoulld shun succh behavior. For some mysterious reason, few people do around here. It ought to be obvious that treating fellow human brings with respect is paramount. If that is not done following ones religious rituals is meaningless. If there is God, He will frown upon such behavior.
i could care less about personal attacks on me, but this is where he is absolutely wrong, yet no one seems to really care about such offensive behavior. to call an entire population abusive and diseased is very shameful indeed.
you have posted a very interesting question.
regarding the difference in number of chromosomes in humans vs chimpanzee, human chromosome 2 is the result of a telomere-to-telomere fusion of two ancestral chromosomes.scientists have found that the center of human chromosome #2 had two connected telomeres, meaning that the ends of two chromosomes had fused.
found this interesting: Origin of human chromosome 2: an ancestral telomere-telomere fusion.
i could care less about personal attacks on me, but this is where he is absolutely wrong, yet no one seems to really care about such offensive behavior. to call an entire population abusive and diseased is very shameful indeed.
Re the first sentence, I am continually amazed at how restrained you have been wrt personal attacks against you. Your response to each attack has been to the point. Providing a nice counter argument. A model for hoe to debate.
Continue to deal with bullies this way. You cant control others behavior. The charge thrown against you - that by debating certain isseues - you are spreading anti religious message as part of an agenda - was quite shameful. Been at the receiving end of that charge from same poster. So understand that it is the other who has an agenda - to ruthlessly throw mud and hope some sticks- at those that dare to disagree.
Not having a choice is not a good argument at all.
I did say irreligious too.
yes, you are negating not only three large religions, you are negating majority of the world opinions.
No one in right mind should support sodomy.
There is a reason why male and female anatomy are made compatible with each other.
Gad to see you want to forget APA now. Good start.
There are homosexuals who changed their lifestyle. Giving them the message it is not abnormal, blocks their chance for rehabilitation.
I never said gay people ‘abuse’ their children. I said placing children in homosexual environment is (a form of) psychological abuse. Please learn to read.
