Re: Do philosophical theories
lol diwana you have way too much time on your hands.
Re: Do philosophical theories
yes i know how crazy of me, please pardon me for being so ignorant to bring science to my defense. what else should i bring?
:halo: i should be following theories made by diwana.
I love how you think all the scientists are stupid and you are above all of them.
oh Lord, 
no evidence for evolution? lol okay.
so you don’t believe in in science? btw, science is either accepted or rejected, not’ believed’. FYI, it was science and scientists who invented thing wonderful thing called computer and internet where you sit and type all these amazing theories invented by yourself. 
Re: Do philosophical theories
I cant imagine a worse torture than making someone read all of your posts Diwana.
I am sorry, did not want to indirectly torture you. :(
Re: Do philosophical theories
What if I told you I make money in between posting online?
There has NEVER been any scientific evidence of evolution.
All trickled down to assumptions, guess work, far fetched ideas,… lumped sump together in the name of theory.
Read thread on this topic over or close to 20 pages…as a reference.
Re: Do philosophical theories
please visit a museum of natural history in your spare time.
yes, scientists are dumb, they just make stuff up. and creationists don’t make anything up, they have evidence for everything :halo:
Re: Do philosophical theories
Forget about creationists. Worry about evolutionists. They make no real sense. All they talk about is possible, maybe, perhaps, probable etc. since there has never been any prove that living organisms changed their genome ENOUGH to become something different.
Anyhow, read the thread on it in the past. I am not sure if you have as of yet.
Re: Do philosophical theories
Forget about creationists. Worry about evolutionists. They make no real sense. All they talk about is possible, maybe, perhaps, probable etc. since there has never been any prove that living organisms changed their genome ENOUGH to become something different.
Anyhow, read the thread on it in the past. I am not sure if you have as of yet.
There is plenty of evidence for those who are willing to read it and accept it. Ofcourse you can have your beliefs but that doesn't mean there is no evidence. overwhelming majority of scientists accept evolution. please read origin of species by Darwin to understand what evolution by natural selection is.
Re: Do philosophical theories
There is plenty of evidence for those who are willing to read it and accept it. Ofcourse you can have your beliefs but that doesn't mean there is no evidence. overwhelming majority of scientists accept evolution. ** please read origin of species by Darwin to understand what evolution by natural selection is**.
Sorry, you are living in past about 200 years now..and I have mentioned that in the context of homosexuality which you did not get.
You do need to stop clinging on to Darwin and his ideas. it is 2014.
Re: Do philosophical theories
Sorry, you are living in past about 200 years now..and I have mentioned that in the context of homosexuality which you did not get.
You do need to stop clinging on to Darwin and his ideas. it is 2014.
but its okay to cling on to scriptures from 2000 years ago?
Re: Do philosophical theories
but its okay to cling on to scriptures from 2000 years ago?
I know you are desperate to somehow find a way to bash religion particularly Islam and/or Christianity,....
..., but I have not brought religion or scriptures in any of my arguments, evolution or homosexuality.
Like I said: I do not need religion..... to refute any of these issues.
Re: Do philosophical theories
I know you are desperate to somehow find a way to bash religion particularly Islam and/or Christianity,....
..., but I have not brought religion or scriptures in any of my arguments, evolution or homosexuality.
Like I said: I do not need religion..... to refute any of these issues.
can you possibly be more hypocritical?
i have not bashed any religion. according to your logic, something written 200 years ago shouldn't be paid attention to. those were your words not mine! YOU said Darwin should be ignored because he wrote his book 200 years ago, yet when I mention the same about scripture being 2000 years old, that becomes bashing ?? You were the one who said, its 2014 and something written long time ago shouldn't be important. So, you just indirectly bashed religion!
And yes you dont need religion, you actually make up your own theories all by yourself it seems that have no religious or scientific basis.
Re: Do philosophical theories
can you possibly be more hypocritical? i have not bashed any religion. according to your logic, something written 200 years ago shouldn't be paid attention to. those were your words not mine! YOU said Darwin should be ignored because he wrote his book 200 years ago, yet when I mention the same about scripture being 2000 years old, that becomes bashing ?? You were the one who said, its 2014 and something written long time ago shouldn't be important. So, you just indirectly bashed religion! And yes you dont need religion, you actually make up your own theories all by yourself it seems that have no religious or scientific basis.
Peace bella88
200 year old human ideas will change, but from the Divine forget about 2000 years even 20,000 to the nth order should not change ... For that would set a precedent that God can change. Rather one may say human interpretations of scripture can change ... And they have ...
The basis of Darwin's theory was flawed ... Outward changes never change the inner ... Modern evolutionists try to use cross breeding to demonstrate evolution, but that only produces extrapolative genes not interpolative ones. The resultant creature of cross breeding will be genetically between two existing animals and appear that way too, it will never become a third species that is genetically not encased but the other two parents.
Re: Do philosophical theories
Peace bella88
200 year old human ideas will change, but from the Divine forget about 2000 years even 20,000 to the nth order should not change ... For that would set a precedent that God can change. Rather one may say human interpretations of scripture can change ... And they have ...
The basis of Darwin's theory was flawed ... Outward changes never change the inner ... Modern evolutionists try to use cross breeding to demonstrate evolution, but that only produces extrapolative genes not interpolative ones. The resultant creature of cross breeding will be genetically between two existing animals and appear that way too, it will never become a third species that is genetically not encased but the other two parents.
peace psyah,
its your belief that something is Divine, I donot believe in the Divinity of any scripture. But my post was directed at diwana, as he thinks anything that was written 200 years ago should be discarded. i just wanted to expose his double standards and hypocrisy here.
you can stick to your faith and reject anything which goes against it. i am not here to argue with you on evolution ( as I have the evidence I need to accept it, and I have no problem in anyone rejecting or accepting it) my post was simply to point out diwanas double standards and bigotry.
Re: Do philosophical theories
peace psyah, its your belief that something is Divine, I donot believe in the Divinity of any scripture. But my post was directed at diwana, as he thinks anything that was written 200 years ago should be discarded. i just wanted to expose his double standards and hypocrisy here. you can stick to your faith and reject anything which goes against it. i am not here to argue with you on evolution ( as I have the evidence I need to accept it, and I have no problem in anyone rejecting or accepting it) my post was simply to point out diwanas double standards and bigotry.
Never said ANYTHING which is written 200 years ago should be discarded. I only talked about Darwin's theory.
If my post got you confused then it was because I deliberately did not want to talk about anything other than Darwin's theory and did not expect you will bring 'scriptures' when I have consistently been avoiding any talk about religion since I have a feeling you want to promote irreligious ideas on this forum and bash religion(s).**
I CAN refute both evolution and homosexuality without using religion or any scripture. Just to remind you.**
Do not bring scriptures or religion(s), again when discussing with me those two issues. Understood? :)
Re: Do philosophical theories
Never said ANYTHING which is written 200 years ago should be discarded. I only talked about Darwin's theory.
If my post got you confused then it was because I deliberately did not want to talk about anything other than Darwin's theory and did not expect you will bring 'scriptures' when I have consistently been avoiding any talk about religion since I have a feeling you want to promote irreligious ideas on this forum and bash religion(s).**
I CAN refute both evolution and homosexuality without using religion or any scripture. Just to remind you.**
Do not bring scriptures or religion(s), again when discussing with me those two issues. Understood? :)
oh please stop with the lies. you stated he wrote the book 200 years ago and this is 2014. so it's you whos disregarding things written in the past. *so you basically are disregarding scriptures using your very own logic *:)
you cannot refute evolution or homosexuality since you don't even understand either of them. its hilarious to read what you even post regarding those subjects.
if anyone disagrees with you they are always accused of bashing religion. hilarious. keep it coming.
your doublestandards are so obvious and almost all other members have pointed it out as well many times. it seems like you have an agenda here to only promote hatred and intolerance. There are other members here too who believe in religion and peace, however you have a very different agenda here which is obvious to everyone.
*stop telling me what to post here, understood? *;)
Re: Do philosophical theories
oh please stop with the lies. you stated he wrote the book 200 years ago and this is 2014. so it's you whos disregarding things written in the past. *so you basically are disregarding scriptures using your very own logic *:)
you cannot refute evolution or homosexuality since you don't even understand either of them. its hilarious to read what you even post regarding those subjects. if anyone disagrees with you they are always accused of bashing religion. hilarious. keep it coming. your doublestandards are so obvious and almost all other members have pointed it out as well many times. it seems like you have an agenda here to only promote hatred and intolerance. There are other members here to who believe in religion and peace, however you have a very different agenda here.
:D
I am not sure but you have a consistent tendency to not read and keep writing same thing despite given answer.
Even so called evolutionists could not prove 'evoluton' and even homosexuals cannot prove they are normal. And bella can. ;)
Please get a consent from the animal,...... before eating meat,.... then come back and discuss with me.
I am still waiting for your video getting consent from the animal before it is brought to you dinner table.
Re: Do philosophical theories
:D
I am not sure but you have a consistent tendency to not read and keep writing same thing despite given answer.
Even so called evolutionists could not prove 'evoluton' and even homosexuals cannot prove they are normal. And bella can. ;)
another lie by diwana. everything has been proven yet diwana must continue to lie :)
[quote]
Please get a consent from the animal,...... before eating meat,.... then come back and discuss with me.
[/quote]
please tell me why rape and eating the animal are the same thing according to you then come back and discuss.
[quote]
I am still waiting for your video getting consent from the animal before it is brought to you dinner table.
[/quote]
im still waiting for you to explain why rape and eating the animal is the same thing? please explain.
thanks
i love how you're still suck on animal consent issue.
But first, please learn what consent means, it seems like you're very confused on that.:D
Re: Do philosophical theories
another lie by diwana. everything has been proven yet diwana must continue to lie :)
please tell me why rape and eating the animal are the same thing according to you then come back and discuss.
im still waiting for you to explain why rape and eating the animal is the same thing? please explain. thanks
i love how you're still suck on animal consent issue. But first, please learn what consent means, it seems like you're very confused on that.:D
There is no such thing as rape of animal. Like always you did not read my posts before....at least those which I wrote in other thread.
I never compared rape with eating animal. You made it up in your head.
How thick are you, is very obvious from your hilarious posts after posts.
Sorry can't help mentioning...but thanks for giving me laughter after laugh. It is my pleasure to read your posts and get refreshed again and again after a long tiring day. :)
Re: Do philosophical theories
There is no such thing as rape of animal. Like always you did not read my posts before....at least those which I wrote in other thread.
I never compared rape with eating animal. You made it up in your head.
yes you did and not just once but many times. please be honest at least.
hopefully you have learned the meaning of consent by now ;)
Re: Do philosophical theories
When there is no concept of consent in animals then there is no such thing as rape of animals.
There, I again spelled it out since I know your level of understanding is below a five year old child… if there is any. 
Keep amusing me.