Re: Do philosophical theories
So why bringing consent as argument for animals if they cannot consent?
You just keep repeating the same mistake here.
What part did you not get the consent is not always required to mak =e something right or wrong? Do you even read what is said to you or keep saying same thing again and again?
That is why I told you before a long time ago, you have no ability to engage in delicate discussions. Just wanted to prove it.
I know more about informed content than you would even know by the way.
Please go ahead and inform animals about being killed and then eat them next time. Please do make a video of that and post it. ![]()
There you go, now you came up with lying to spouse argument. ha ha!
What happened to “two consenting adult” argument now??? Didn’t think of that did you?
I never said birth control is not allowed. ** Admit that you were accusing me for something I never said.
**
You made that point of birth control but I am all for birth control with some conditions. Obviously the birth control only applies between male and female, so it is fine for me to have male and female (husband and wife) be engaged in sexual activity.
What I said is that homosexuality and bestiality are purely out of sexual pleasure acts and hence wrong and it the act between two males or two females etc. etc. so the act is wrong in many many ways.
I did not approve anything related to homosexuality and acting out of lust ONLY, is what is wrong there.
It is a very difficult topic for you to handle anyhow. Sorry.