Do philosophical theories

[psyah]

Re: Do philosophical theories

@bella88

humans also act on their urges, and sex is for pleasure in humans as well. religiously, you need to justify the the act of sex by using ‘reproduction’ as the excuse but we all know thats not why most of us have sex. the example of homosexuality in animals is not so we should copy them but that this behavior exists in other species, and exists in nature.
despite of whether it exists in animals or not, thats not the reason why humans should consider it normal or abnormal. i view it as normal act since it doesn’t harm anyone and no one chooses to be that way. as far as i know, there are genetic, biological causes for ones homosexual orientation, something that you donot have any control over.

Peace bella88

I can agree with that … But the whole point is just because it happens in nature is not a basis for concluding it is morally or philosophically right. Religion is a barrier here … The fact is religion and ethics coincide on this matter. And my belief is that a true religion will always coincide with the greatest ethics … Problem is these days we can’t decide what is ethically right either because our norms are clouding our judgement.

As Monk rightly states religion has gone in to the matter deeper and sexual interaction does bring love into a relationship it can solve many problems too … But the basis for sex is always procreation … Also when people are most at ease they enjoy it more and optimise fertilisation too.