Do philosophical theories

[psyah]

Re: Do philosophical theories

@bella88

peace psyah,
if you’re comparing homosexuality to bestiality then you must know the differences. regardless of whether the dog wants to hump a persons leg, it still cannot give informed consent as it doesn’t have the mental capacity of a human, just like a child cannot give informed consent either even if the child is not forced at all. lets say a mentally retarded person gives consent, will that be valid? no, it will be rape. for these reasons, you cannot compare 2 adult homosexuals who have the mental capacity to know what they are doing meanwhile children and animals dont.
And yes there are still people that view bestiality as something not harmful but i strongly view it as abuse due to the nature of animal and lack of mental capability compared humans. im unable to view homosexuality as harmful however as i have yet to see any harmful outcome due to this sexual orientation.this is my stance on homosexuality vs pedophilia vs bestiality.

No I wasn’t actually … I was showing that animals don’t need to be subdued or groomed into sex - they are capable of doing it all themselves … yet if it is recognised animals do not have the mental capacity of humans why is animal homosexuality used as an argument to support homosexuality?

You got it right this time … they are animals … we should not have sex with them and we should not take their example for homosexuality either - why?

Because they don’t have the mental capacity that we have … we know what we are doing … they operate on urges … as I was saying earlier.