Re: Distinction between Medicine and Governance/Banking in Muslim societies
Wah. So your allegation is that I read this christian website and then reworked it using my own experiences with the same purposes as those of this anti-christian site. Paranoid much?
This is the overuse of persecution and the world is out to get me talk that dilutes genuine victimization. Trust me, IF I am even inspired by any other source, I would cite it. Thats part of my deen, and I have many more years of posting history than you on this very website to back that up.
So this is the substantive part of your post. You are asserting positively that comprehensive means comprehensive, and say that its possible to follow that way of life even if it may disadvantage you in certain professions. Fair enough. That is not an unusual opinion IMO, The Amish, the Luddites all took similar positions even on the christian side (suggesting that one answer to the christian article you posted is to tell them that this rhetoric exists on their side as well).
But whats interesting to me are the implications of what you’re saying above and in the text you posted. You say comprehensive means comprehensive and people who seek any other ‘deen’ are going to hell. Does that mean that otherwise devout Muslims who follow the ‘deen’ of any particular profession, ‘deen’ (codes of conduct) derived secularly i.e. through consensus on disparate origins and religious/areligious/athiest formulators, for instance doctors/lawyers/auditors etc, are going to Hell because they choose to do follow it?