Re: Disgraceful origins of pak army
Your motion that the army is proud of a disgraceful origin seems to stem from an article about operations during WW2; ignoring the statement from Jinnah at the start or the article that "Mr. Jinnah had even said that if Britain lost, the Muslims were likely to suffer" .
Jinnah was almost certainly proven right. The Axis were allied with staunchly nationalistic elements in India who would almost certainly never have agreed to partition should the Germans or Japanese taken control of India, leaving the entire Muslim population of the subcontinent under the heel of Hindu rule rather than merely one third.
At any rate, there is no Muslim armed force that has any right to be proud of its origins - they all have roots in organizations that engaged in wars on and subjugation of Muslims. The Mughal army waged unprovoked campaigns against many Muslim nations including Bijapur and Golcanda. The Saudi army waged war against and subjugated the Kingdom of Hijaz. The Turkish Army and Iranian armies are descended from the armies that slaughtered countless Muslims during the Ottoman-Persian wars.