If Imam Ali did not oppose the methods of Abu Bakr and Umar then why did he reufse to follow Sunnat of these 2 when he was offered the khilafat by the Shura comittee that was set up by Umar?
Pagluu yara, why we are all so biased and prejudiced that we find tiny bit of evidence to prove Ali rah was somehow dying to kill Abu Bakr rah or Umer rah (nauzbillah).
So what! they had tiny bits of disputes, and some times big disputes. Theirs was a different society, different time.
Man those guys lived in a time (and galaxy) far far away. Try to take examples of love if you want, from that time, and not this every bit of animosity.
They were all hum-nawala and all companions of our Messenger pbuh. Why we are hell bent on creating hatred among each other 1400 years later. Is that Ali rah or Abu bakr would have wanted from us. Just think if they come alive today and see us involved in these lengthy debates as to who was superior among Abu bakr or Ali?
In your quest to create hatred, you even go the lengths of quoteing Quran for the "chosen" people.
How many times Quran says it, and it can be applied to the current time as:
**
No kala, no gora, no Arab, no Irani, no Pakistani, and no Indian is better unless his aamal / actions are better. If someone says he is Quraishi so he is chosen, then the most one can do is "laugh" at him. **
So what if someone is Makki, Madini, or Qurasishi. The guy now lives in Pakistan, or lives in USA on an Pakistani passport. The only thing matter now is how nice he is with other Americans, how truthful he is, how honest he is. And that's all.
His namaza roza is between him and Allah. His genes and jeans are his business and his business alone.
It is time to use our own heads to spread humanity and love.
It is time to cut the 1000's old history cr-ap and move on.