Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

Some semi-literate politicians, servants-turned-dictators and the so-called intellectuals of Pakistan are continuously giving the impression in their rhetoric and writings that all the Ulema and only the Ulema opposed Pakistan movement and the political struggle of Quaid-e-Azam and Muslim League. The fact is quite the contrary. Many intelligent and mature people opposed the Pakistan movement, as many intelligent and mature people favored it. So like the Ulema, other Muslims were also divided into two factions: pro-Pakistan movement and anti-Pakistan movement. They also included secular, enlightened and moderates.
Decades of 1930 and 1940 presented a serious challenge for the Muslims of India. The question about their future arose: how their rights and interests are best secured in the future? Two solutions were proposed. First that India should be divided into two parts: Muslim India (later named Pakistan) and Hindu India. The other solution was that the Muslims should try to secure their rights and interests in united India. Adherents of both ideas had their own rationales. It is only a matter of academic interest to discuss whose point of view proved to be correct in the light of history. But people belonging to both the factions are our elders and we must respect them greatly, in spite of our political differences with them. Respecting those who have different political views than ours is the only way to propagate tolerance, open-mindedness, and patience. Rhetoric of dictators can never develop these values. Should our leaders themselves adopt these values, only then the masses will adopt them.
The notion that all the Ulema and only the Ulema, opposed Pakistan movement is actually put forward due to an intentional or unintentional conspiracy against Islam. The best way to produce distance between young generation and Islam is by propagating the idea that the Ulema are undependable, wrong and guilty. Once someone is successful in brain washing the youth with this idea, Islam will cease to have any effect in the lives of Muslims in a few years.
In the following part, I will show by giving a list of those Muslims of pre-partition India, who were not from amongst the Ulema but were still strong opponents of Pakistan movement. It will prove that the notion that only the Ulema opposed Pakistan movement is a myth. This myth was concocted by mischievous minds and is creating a wrong concept of our history in the minds of Pakistanis.

Dr. Saifuddin Kitchlew
A great patriot, freedom fighter and Muslim Indian Nationalist. He rose to the position of President of All India Congress’ Punjab unit. He also rose to the position of secretary general of All India Congress. He obtained a B.A. from Cambridge University, and a Ph.D. from a German university. Tragedy of Jallianwala Bagh is very important in the political history of subcontinent. Public meeting in Jallianwala Bagh was being held to protest against the arrest of Gandhi, Dr. Satyapal and Dr. Kitchlew.
He was a strong opponent of Pakistan movement. He opposed the acceptance of partition of India by Congress. He had the view that the acceptance of partition of India is a blatant surrender of nationalism for communalism.
In his later days he became closer to Indian Communist Party and worked for better relationships between India and Sovient Union. Lenin Award for International Peace was given to him. He died on October 9, 1963.

Dr. Mukhtar Ahmed Ansari
He was born in 1880. He served as Muslim League’s president in 1918 and 1920. He served as Secretary General of All India Congress many times. He also served as president of All India Congress. He played an important role in Lucknow Pact. He also played an important role in Khilafat Movement. Due to the separatist tendencies of Muslim League, he came closer to Congress and Mahatma Gandhi. In fact he enjoyed an intimate friendship with Gandhi.
He was a medical doctor by profession. He got M.D. and M.S. degrees. He worked in Lock Hospital and Charing Cross Hospital in London. He was a pioneer of surgery in India. Charing Cross Hospital has an Ansari Ward to honour his work. He died in 1936.

Asaf Ali
He was born in 1888. He was a great freedom fighter. He served as the deputy leader of Congress in Central Legislative Assembly. He strongly opposed Pakistan Movement. He defeated a Muslim League candidate in the elections. He worked as Minister of Railway and Transport in the interim Government of India. He worked as an ambassador to USA and minister to Switzerland, Austria and Vatican. He also worked as the Governor of Orissa.
He was much more “enlightened” than today’s self-righteous and self-claimed champions of enlightenment. In 1928 he married a Hindu girl, and faced the outrage of people. He died in 1953.

Dr. Zakir Hussain
He was the president of India from May 1967 until his death in May 1969. He also worked as Governor of Bihar and Vice President of India.
He was among those who founded national Muslim University: Jamia Millia Islamia. He got his degree of doctorate in economics from the University of Berlin. He got the highest Indian National honour, Bharat Ratna in 1963. He died in 1969 while he was the President of India.

Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed
He was born in 1905. he was a staunch opponent of Pakistan Movement. He served as the President of India from 1974 to 1977. He was the third Muslim President of India. After completing his education from Cambridge, he joined Congress and remained its active member. He died in 1977.

Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan
He was born in 1890. He was a great patriot, a great Pushtun leader and a brave freedom fighter. He was famous for his non-violent political doctrine. To achieve Gandhi’s goal of independent India, Ghaffar Khan founded “Khudai Khidmatgar” movement. He once stated his methodology of political struggle in these words, “I am going to give you such a weapon that the police and the army will not be able to stand against it. It is the weapon of the Prophet, but you are not aware of it. That weapon is patience and righteousness. No power on earth can stand against it.”.
He strongly opposed the partition of India. But in 1948 took oath of allegiance with Pakistan. The government of Pakistan kept him in house arrest without any charge from 1948 to 1954. when he came out, on the floor of constituent assembly he stated, “I had to go to prison many a time in the days of the Britishers. Although we were at loggerheads with them, yet their treatment was to some extent tolerant and polite. But the treatment which was meted out to me in this Islamic state of ours was such that I would not even like to mention it to you*.*”
He was awarded by the highest Indian National honour, Bharat Ratna in 1987. he died in 1988.

Khan Wali Khan
He was born in 1917. He was the son of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan. He was a prominent Pashtun leader and a confidante of Gandhi. He served as the provincial joint Secretary of Congress. Like his father he was a staunch opponent of Pakistan Movement. After the creation of Pakistan he struggled for Pashtun autonomy within Pakistan. He was imprisoned without charge from 1948 to 1953.
During the era of Gen. Yahya Khan, he tried much to keep Pakistan unite, but failed. He was against the military operation in East Pakistan. In 1973, Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s notorious FSF attacked a public meeting in Rawalpindi and killed many Pakhtun followers of Wali Khan.
In 1986, he published a book “Facts are Sacred”. In this book he explained why he and his father opposed Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Pakistan Movement. The book contains declassified British Imperial documents during the time of Pakistan Movement.
After his defeat in 1990 elections, he announced his retirement from politics. He died in 2006.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

That's democracy. Well written.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

[quote]
Some semi-literate politicians, servants-turned-dictators and the so-called intellectuals of Pakistan are continuously giving the impression in their rhetoric and writings that all the Ulema and only the Ulema opposed Pakistan movement and the political struggle of Quaid-e-Azam and Muslim League.
[/quote]

They were against the creation of Pakistan and they're doing everything now to destroy it. You can see from daily suicide bombings from terrorist mullahs

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

Mostar95! I thank you for your favourable comment.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

establishment of Pakistan was opposed by them because it was going to put a dent in their plans to keep giving teh public teh koolaid about khilafah, and fill there coffers with cash and toonds with halwa from the proceeds and support of the jahil masses..who were kept jahil by the mullahs by condemning scienctific education (or as they called it, western education)

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

This is just one sided picture. There were others who opposed that too, and then there were some who opposed the creators and against them after partition. What do you call them. I am posting a link from 1965 Times magazine. I hope that it survives.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,941860,00.html?iid=chix-sphere

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

those ppl were opportunistic pigs too, whether you look at folks like ghaffar khan and wali khan or gm syed.

or as the case of what you are showing..

it is quite interesting that you brought up this story, because it shows you the genesis of violence in karachi and the factors that led to the creation of MQM later.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

After reading this, I concluded the same thing of this being the begining of MQM (in spirit, at least), not that it gives MQM any justification now to do what they are doing.

Guys, I dont want to divert from the main topic of this thread. Please keep the linked story inside the context of thread. One should disregard Fraudia's comment and my reply so people can keep the focus on the main topic

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

Pashtuns fought hard to dislodge the British from their territory. Later they worked together with the Congress that their aim was similar, both wanted to get rid of the British raj. But unlike Congress, the politics of Bacha Khan was parochial to the Pushtun interests. Pashtuns had no fear of Hindu dominance and had no reson to join the ML in its struggle for a seperate muslim state. It would have been better if BK had strived for the reunification of NWFP and upper Balochestan with Afghanistan, but he perhaps knew that the British would never let it happen.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

hopefully bacha khan did not run into any bacchay baaz khans.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

Forget about ppl who died.
What are your thoughts on ppl who currently think that creation of pakistan "was the biggest blunder"?

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

you mean altaf? sheesh u know my thoughts on that nutter already

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

:blush:

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

Actually it reconfirms much of whats been written..Gohar Ayub Khans rally that is mentioned in that article consisted of people from Haripur and the surrounding areas. Contrary to what one assumed, it was the same Pashtun nationalists who went t karachi at that time to prevent the violence turning ethnic much the same way they did in the 1980’s with their agreement with the MQM and again this year when despite the may killings it did not degenerate into a tit for tat shoot out. Similarly the Baloch nationalists were mostly karachi educated, and in the 1970’s and 1980’s were very mcuh part of the mainstream despite the frequent army operations.

GM Syed is also not mentioned, he was a die hard Pakistan activist till 1947, and the first person to table a resolution in support of Pakistan in the Sind assembly.
Despite his falling out with Jinnah, Jinnah never ordered his arrest..similarly with Ghaffar Khan Jinnah wanted a compromise with his KK movement..unfortunately it was disrupted by some of the sudden “converts” to the pakistan movement. Wali Khan also served as fatima Jinnahs election agent in the presidential elections.

Other big names who were ambivalent about pakistan were the major Bengali eladers who felt the issues of provincial rights were not defined properly..Hussain Shaheed and Fazlul Haq are other examples. Sheikh Mujib was a student activist who after seeing what happened to his mentor and his mysterious death became increasingly radical..but even as late as 1969 he was still saying how he could not dream of a separate state.

The Ulemas role is more confusing while major groups like the JUH and Maudoodi did oppose Pakistan..Maudoodis comments were particularly nasty..the Muslim League was heavily involved in using Pirs and influential religious figures in their cause, and it was not averse to the occassional smear against people like Ghaffar Khan and Kalam Azad’s Muslim credentials.

If you want to really find out who opposed pakistans development after its creation you should read up on who sidelined people like Hussain Shaheed, who rigged the election against Fatima Jinnah and who kept people like Nishtar out of the cabinet and it wasn’t the ulema or GM syed

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

who?

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

zakk wise guy you are :k:

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

Important
I want to divert your attention on the main theme of the topic “Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan?” The main purpose of the topic was to show that the notion that only Ulema opposed Pakistan movement is wrong. I tried to show that it is a historical fact that a significant part of secular people and moderates also opposed Pakistan movement. Unfortunately history is twisted and it is told to the young generation that only Ulema opposed Pakistan movement.If someone disagrees with me, he should show that my data about Dr. Saifuddin Kitchlew, Dr. Mukhtar Ahmed Ansari, Asaf Ali, Dr. Zakir Hussain, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan and Khan Wali Khan is wrong in the sense that 1) they were not secular or moderate people, or 2) they were not against the creation of Pakistan. If those commenting on the topic could not prove that my data in this sense is wrong, it will demonstrate that my thesis is correct. So far my thesis looks to be correct as no one could prove with historical evidence that it is wrong.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

The ulema were not the only one to oppose the creation of Pakistan but they are the only one that hypocritically try to force their views and ways on entire Pakistan. They are the ones that want to control and define its laws and want to enforce a Khilafat system in Pakistan. They claim to be Thaikadars of everything in Pakistan and force people with violence and intimidation.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

As no one could oppose my claim, so as far Gupshup forums are concerned, it is proved that the propaganda of secular people that only Ulema opposed creation of Pakistan is a myth. Secular people concocted the history to mind wash innocent people of Pakistan. The discussion seems to be nearlt over.

Re: Did Only the Ulema Oppose the Creation of Pakistan

Dr. Allamah Muhammed Iqbal and Muhammed Ali Jinnah on Ulemas.

http://www.gupshup.org/gs/showthread.php?t=257754