Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

[psyah]

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

@kchughtai

Before I say anything on what you have stated, could you give us a crash course on the use of ‘Kul’. Specifically, usage of ‘Kul’ when it always means ‘All’ under the given scope and when it means ‘some’ and not All. OR is it always upto the user to improvise this way or that way. You have stated positioning of ‘Kul’ is important. is this the only determining factor? How about the verse-fragment ‘INALLAh HA ALA KULI SHAIN QADEER’? Should we expect exceptions in this case as well?

Also, Why you always demand ‘Kul’ to mean ‘All’ when you yourself have tried to show that it could mean otherwise. For ‘All’, ‘Kul’ is not always necessary. You know that very well. For instance, ‘Rab un Naas’ (sustainer of ALL the people , ‘Rab ul Aalameen’ (sustainer of All the worlds). ‘All’ is implicit in these statements. There are other examples as well.

Now for 51:49,

seems like yusuali, pickthal and shakir are also lacking in their knowledge of Arabic and need a crash course from you.

Also to clarify

Kullu … Qul … and Kul are three different words …

Kullu means “all”

Kul means "Eat (imperative - instruction)

Qul means "Say (imperative - instruction)

Rab-u-Naas - Does not contain any further information than the translation “Lord of the People” … Rab-ul-'Alameen translates to “Lord of the Worlds” any further meaning that you want to give to these cannot be obtained from the Arabic text … they have to be obtained from tafsir … Wallahul’Alim