Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

[psyah]

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

@Mr.Popat

What mid sentence ?

According to you Isa a.s has ‘come and gone’ but you fail to explain to me what ‘come and gone’ mean to you? Does it mean they will come back again? if so, then you are really not getting the point. He a.s either ‘come and gone’ like other prophets have or other prophets have ‘come and gone’ like Isa a.s have ( bodily ascended )

You’re kidding now, right ?

You’re giving me Bible reference about something which is not the belief in Islam ? Is this your belief that Hz Idris a.s is alive ? If it’s not then your reference is wrong and is not credible. If this is your belief then you should also reject Isa a.s for the same reason that in Judaism a prophet was to descend from heaven before the coming of Messiah a.s. Fact of the matter is, no prophet has been saved from death once they were sent on Earth. Any belief against this is plain ignorance.

Strangely enough, there are stories of prophets goin to heavens, but we have never and will never ever see anyone physically descending from heavens alive.

Sorry. I dont understand what you’re asking.

Peace Mr.Popat

I said mid-sentence, because you stopped half way through the ayat. The rest of the ayat provides the conditions of the clause of the verse and contextualises why previous prophets have been invoked and on what manner they are “like” Isa (AS) … They are like him not because they “came and went” in the same manner … They are like him (AS) because they ate food.

Yes, the translations/assumptions of previous prophets has been known and accepted by Muslims. Certain things like mechanisms of returning people like Elijah is neither here nor there for us. The commentators of the Bible said that Elijah was John the Baptist., but this is neither explicitly stated by Jesus in the Bible nor is it something that we need to accept.

My point in stating this is that there are a few examples of prophets that have said to have “gone” in this manner in traditions. It deals with your complaint about Isa (AS) being unique, but in fact I have no problem with this being unique to Isa (AS) … That is your contention not mine.

And no … I am not kidding.