Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

[psyah]

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

@Mr.Popat

peace psyah,
That is not necessary. You are forgetting about a hadith in which holy prophet said if imaan was to go up to skies (no, not literally), someone from the progeny of Hz sulemam farsi r.a will surely bring it back.
Also, i am just as same of a progeny of Muhammad pbub as you or any Muslim is and same goes for Hz Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as).
You do not find an english person always teaching english language. Any one can have a better grip on english language then any of the english man.
Someone can revert to islam and be a better muslim than someone who is born a muslim.
No arab has superiorty over non arab or non arab having superiority over arab except on thr basis of Taqwa.
Allah chooses whomsoever he pleases. Theres no asking him about why him, why at this time, which location etc. Prophethood is a blessing. It is Allah’s ways..
I dont think that question was important anyway. Why dont you comment on the verses i explained to you? That would be a better idea.

Mr. Popat you said “Imam mahdi is obviously going to be from the progeny (ummah) of Muhammad pbuh” - You have conveniently reinterpreted this to mean “ummah” … This is not true - had the word been “ummah” the hadith would have used that word … Imam Mahdi will be from the “house” (Bait) of RasoolAllah (SAW) … To avoid it you have included this ummah interpretation and yet your own beliefs are that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is from the progeny of Sayyiduna Muhammad (SAW).

I’ve done my job, you can’t possibly demonstrate that … Now, here is my real point …

You believe the Second Coming of Isa (AS) should be taken as a metaphor for the Messiah status to be given to another person … You also believe this other person is al-Mahdi and you believe he is from the Ummah of RasoolAllah (SAW) … You believe he was born to an Indian family, in and Indian tribe … You also argue that the original Isa (AS) went to Kashmir to teach the “lost tribes of Israel” - which cannot be ratified by significant data on Jewish diaspora anyway … May be those lost tribes are metaphorically part of the progeny of Israel too …

The return of the Messiah you say would be unfair if he came to the Ummat of RasoolAllah (SAW) rather than the Ummat of Israeel (AS) … but that is exacly what you claim happened albeit in the form of another person, who himself is neither from the Arabs nor the Jews … Is that not even greater in unfairness?