Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

[Zapatista]

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

@psyah

Peace Zapatista

In this verse it talks about if RasoolAllah would be killed (kutila) or if he were to die (mawt) … but before this it states in Arabic … (qad khalat) - Notice how this phrase could have just stated (mawt) as well, but it didn’t here is why …

**“’Qad khalat’: means separation from their communities, either though death or ascension to the heavens. And what is meant by “they parted with them” (khalaw minhum) is that they were there sometimes in the past time (*fi b’adh al-zaman al-madhi).” (*Nazam al-Dorar fi Tanasib al-Ayat wal Saur vol.5 p.82 Da’ira al-Ma’rif al-Uthmania, Hyderabad, 1973)

****Meaning of “qad khalat” and Qur’an 3: 144 (part-2)

How come that when the phrase “Qad Khalat” appears in other verses of the Quran in connection with a person it means “passed away” i.e. died, but here it means ascended to Heaven also? How come that when you look up the term “Khala” in an Arabic Lexicon, it means to pass away or die i.e. “Mawt”? How come in all translations, it’s translated as passed away or died? What did Hazrat Abu Bakr RA say after the Prophet’s (PBUH) death again?